Activity
From 08/10/2025 to 09/08/2025
09/08/2025
- 07:38 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- I attached the patch. (reverted window manager, event manager, logs for show / hide are now handled by TitledWindow a...
- 07:16 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Paula Păstrăguș wrote:
> Hynek, if we add the logging directly in ThinClient, the web_gui log will quickly fill up w... - 04:28 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Hynek, if we add the logging directly in ThinClient, the web_gui log will quickly fill up with entries like:...
09/01/2025
- 12:22 PM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Paula Păstrăguș wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > For the key events logging I think it would make it more useful if... - 12:19 PM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Paula Păstrăguș wrote:
> Would it make more sense to handle this on show/hide and log based on the window’s visibili... - 08:19 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> For the key events logging I think it would make it more useful if more information is include... - 07:49 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> The "window closed" log output is a bit misleading. It is logged in the @remove@ method of @Wi... - 05:55 AM Feature #10451 (WIP): GUI interaction event logging
- Code review 10451a.
The "window closed" log output is a bit misleading. It is logged in the @remove@ method of @W... - 03:34 AM Feature #10451 (Review): GUI interaction event logging
- Committed finest-level logging for TAB and ENTER key events in rev *16136*. At this point, we have logging in place f...
08/28/2025
- 06:35 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Committed finest level logging for window open/close and mouse click events as rev *16135* / 10451a.
Next, I’ll re...
08/27/2025
- 06:02 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Paula, I like the idea. Two suggestions.
1. I think it would be even better to extend this to all widgets. I.e. p...
08/26/2025
- 06:17 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
- It worked! It is now able to execute the file fine.
- 06:04 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
- OK, comment out the code in FWD .java file to just use @p_relname@ to be what @SEARCH@ returns from PROPATH and see w...
- 06:03 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
- After that loop, the code does this...
- 05:55 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
- I'm thinking to just remove this code in FWD's .java converted file. What is @cLongestProPath@ used for, after this ...
- 05:53 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
- In relname, it first does @FILE-INFO:FILE-NAME = filename@, where filename is @test.r@. This triggers the initial se...
- 05:46 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
- What is relname 4GL code doing that it needs to look for the .r file on disk, and not rely just on SEARCH function to...
- 05:28 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
- Executing a file coming from a webspeed request involves a couple of additional steps rather than the classic method ...
- 05:11 AM Bug #10476 (New): Webspeed request for .r file fails
08/20/2025
- 09:58 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Let's use FINER or FINEST instead of INFO.
- 09:39 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- I’ve attached a patch that adds structured logging for key GUI events, specifically when windows are opened/closed an...
- 07:45 AM Feature #10451 (WIP): GUI interaction event logging
- 07:45 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- In that case, we can stick with the existing logger levels defined in @directory.xml@, no need to introduce any new v...
08/19/2025
- 10:36 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- A common log file is useful because then all logging has context about what was happening. To make that work, we wou...
- 08:50 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Hynek, I’d value your feedback on this and your approval. Thank you!
- 08:35 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- This task is meant to add logging for key GUI actions so we can reconstruct user flows and reproduce "one-off" issues...
- 08:24 AM Feature #10451 (Test): GUI interaction event logging
08/15/2025
- 02:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I finished the Keikai changes for Jetty 12. I tested them with isolated test cases and they pa...
08/14/2025
- 05:03 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> due to an unexpected exception during server start with 9687c.
See #9625-97.
- 04:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I finished the Keikai changes for Jetty 12. I tested them with isolated test cases and they passed. I haven't tested ...
- 07:11 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- I don't understand this @try@ block:...
- 04:00 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- It seems that the similar issue was discussed in some task but I did not find where it was.
- 03:51 AM Support #10389 (WIP): Ending Web application does not free port
- OK, please create the task branch 10389a.
- 03:09 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Sergey, the patch above isn't fully correct, but the idea stands, if we are in a pause caused by @END-ERROR@ another ...
08/13/2025
- 11:38 AM Support #10389 (Review): Ending Web application does not free port
- 06:52 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- The ESC issue is fixed by this change:...
- 06:30 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- -An easy example of a hanging application is #10087-19, this testcase on the web client hangs and there is no way to ...
- 06:27 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> > Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lo... - 09:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please rebase 9687c from trunk 16111. There was another regression in incremental conversion fro... - 08:38 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Please rebase 9687c from trunk 16111. There was another regression in incremental conversion from the 5586a changes,...
08/12/2025
- 03:27 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've pushed 9687c revision 16135 to xfer.
- 03:25 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm going to push this to xfer.
Please do. - 03:24 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I'm going to push this to xfer.
- 03:17 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased *9687c* to *trunk* revision *16110*.
Tested features - all works:
* hotel_gui
** virtual desktop
** emb... - 10:29 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lost message, same as holding ES... - 08:10 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lost message, same as holding ESC. This bug can be fixed...
08/11/2025
- 11:24 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- OK, the pushed branch looks OK now. I've pushed it to xfer.
- 10:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > In meantime on customer's request I've rebased branch 9687c to trunk revision 16089.
>
> 968... - 10:36 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > In meantime on customer's request I've rebased branch 9687c to trunk revision 16089.
9687c seems to be based on ... - 10:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
>
> Also: Hynek, I think w... - 09:55 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I don't want to squash changes in every rebase. We did that once to deal with some conflicting changes in trunk. Le...
- 09:52 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
I can run regression tests, ... - 09:29 AM Feature #9687 (Internal Test): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
Also: Hynek, I think we need your help with th... - 06:43 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Retesting now.
>
> Pushed up 9687b to revision 16011 post review f...
Also available in: Atom