Activity

From 09/28/2025 to 10/27/2025

06:35 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Rebased *9687c* to *trunk* revision *16246*.
Tested features - all works correctly:
* hotel_gui
** virtual deskt... Tomasz Domin

08:23 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production: @max_connection@ is per-cluster, so all databases in that cluster (including multi-tenant) will use this value. So, ... Constantin Asofiei
07:57 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production: When deploying to production, there is configuration which needs to be adjusted depending on the customer's load. Th... Constantin Asofiei
07:36 AM Bug #10733 (New): evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in pr...: Constantin Asofiei

10:02 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I mean the basepath - if that is /ws and the request URI is /wsa, then it will match. I... Tomasz Domin
05:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: I mean the basepath - if that is /ws and the request URI is /wsa, then it will match. I think basepath needs to be s... Constantin Asofiei
05:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, beside the @requestUri.startsWith(instance.getBasePath())@ check mentioned by Hy... Tomasz Domin
04:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz, beside the @requestUri.startsWith(instance.getBasePath())@ check mentioned by Hynek, I think we are OK. Constantin Asofiei
04:53 AM Feature #10685: Move name_map.xml to the cvt folder: The purpose of this task is to move the name_map.xml to the conversion folder, this is a breaking change which will r... Dănuț Filimon
04:52 AM Feature #10685 (Closed): Move name_map.xml to the cvt folder: Dănuț Filimon

09:29 AM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz Domin
09:29 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: I've just checked and the current trunk introduces a feature that may require a bit more work before merging - revis... Tomasz Domin
05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I agree that @StandardServer@ should not be aware of activated handlers. However, the handlers... Tomasz Domin
04:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > The solution for the potential context conflict isn't well structured... Hynek Cihlar

09:46 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 9687c.
Thank you
> Please fix the added javadoc of @SoapServiceFilterHandler.h... Tomasz Domin
05:25 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Instead of a filter, did you consider distinct context handlers? I.e. to have a context handle... Hynek Cihlar
05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek - please review revision 16214
Code review 9687c.
Please fix the added javadoc of ... Hynek Cihlar

05:36 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz Domin wrote:
> There is a bit unexpected (I didnt presume its possible to map Soap handler to root of the ser... Tomasz Domin
02:41 AM Feature #9687 (WIP): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: There is a bit unexpected (I didnt presume its possible to map Soap handler to root of the server) consequence of mig... Tomasz Domin
04:43 AM Bug #10574 (New): contextlocal cross-dependencies: Branch 10574a was merged to trunk rev 16207 and archived.
What's left is to improve/refactor the ContextLocal feat... Constantin Asofiei
03:07 AM Bug #10574 (Merge Pending): contextlocal cross-dependencies: I'll merge after 10483a. Constantin Asofiei

01:33 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've committed changes #10616-57, it is need to handle special case when SOAP services are pla... Hynek Cihlar
03:07 AM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: I've committed changes #10616-57, it is need to handle special case when SOAP services are places in a root context (... Tomasz Domin

10:08 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz Domin wrote:
> We dont. Our customers do.
> See: [[p2j:Jetty_12]]
I see. Still, they should be deduplicated. Hynek Cihlar
09:42 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > Tomasz, why do we need @CurrentRequestFilt... Tomasz Domin
04:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > The changes needed to make Spreadsheet backend compatible with Jetty ... Hynek Cihlar
04:01 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz, why do we need @CurrentRequestFilterEE10@ and @WebAuthFilterE... Hynek Cihlar
02:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> The changes needed to make Spreadsheet backend compatible with Jetty 12 are checked in to 9687... Tomasz Domin
01:06 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, why do we need @CurrentRequestFilterEE10@ and @WebAuthFilterEE10@? The implementations... Tomasz Domin

05:44 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: Tomasz, why do we need @CurrentRequestFilterEE10@ and @WebAuthFilterEE10@? The implementations duplicate @CurrentRequ... Hynek Cihlar
05:41 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11: The changes needed to make Spreadsheet backend compatible with Jetty 12 are checked in to 9687c. Tomasz, please review. Hynek Cihlar

Also available in: Atom

FWD » Core Development » Runtime Infrastructure