Project

General

Profile

Activity

From 11/06/2025 to 12/05/2025

12/05/2025

12:31 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek (Constantin ?)
> I'd like to standardize configurations used by @GenericWebServer.initi... Hynek Cihlar
11:01 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek (Constantin ?)
I'd like to standardize configurations used by @GenericWebServer.initializeWebApp@ and @Spreads... Tomasz Domin
11:12 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Greg Shah wrote:
> > and is not forbidden by rules.
>
> Actually, this is not the case, see [[internal-documentat... Vladimir Tsichevski
10:58 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
> and is not forbidden by rules.
Actually, this is not the case, see [[internal-documentation:Tools_and_Project_St... Greg Shah
10:39 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Thanks, Tomasz.
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Code review *8206b/16304*, the changes are good, I have just minor remarks.
... Vladimir Tsichevski
03:46 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Code review *8206b/16304*, the changes are good, I have just minor remarks.
* IntegerStartupParameter.java - Copyr... Tomasz Domin
08:36 AM Bug #10963: appserver resiliency and self healing
As Constantin stated in #10941-35, @MsaCancellableCallable.reserveSession@ gets stuck on completing the future:
<pre... Artur Școlnic
08:26 AM Bug #10963 (WIP): appserver resiliency and self healing
Artur Școlnic

12/04/2025

09:56 AM Bug #10963: appserver resiliency and self healing
With the recent fixes from #10941, the number of maximum concurrent requests FWD can handle is around 300 (with maxMs... Artur Școlnic
07:49 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Another difference spotted:
>
> If zero passed as the @number-of-users@ parameter va... Vladimir Tsichevski
07:15 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Greg Shah wrote:
> Tomasz: Please review.
+Tomasz Greg Shah
07:15 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Tomasz: Please review. Greg Shah
07:00 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Another difference spotted:
>
> If zero passed as the @input-characters@ parameter v... Vladimir Tsichevski
07:44 AM Bug #10971: Startup parameter validation: no error for zero value in -n (number-of-users)
This issue affects validation of the @-n@ (@number-of-users@) startup parameter when a zero value is provided. The pa... Vladimir Tsichevski
07:43 AM Bug #10971 (New): Startup parameter validation: no error for zero value in -n (number-of-users)
Vladimir Tsichevski
06:16 AM Feature #10968: making configuration less error prone
#10967-3 seems like another example of something we should calculate instead of requiring the customer to make the co... Greg Shah

12/03/2025

03:18 PM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Another difference spotted:
If zero passed as the @number-of-users@ parameter value:
# OE raises this error:
<... Vladimir Tsichevski
03:16 PM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Another difference spotted:
If zero passed as the @input-characters@ parameter value:
# OE raises this error:
... Vladimir Tsichevski
03:13 PM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
8206b rev. 16303: Fixed: FWD parameter names were used in error messages instead of OE names. Trivial @recordOrThrowE... Vladimir Tsichevski
01:56 PM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
New issue found: when formatting error messages, FWD uses the the FWD parameter names instead of original OE names, e... Vladimir Tsichevski
01:54 PM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
New 8206b revision is 16302. Vladimir Tsichevski
11:32 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
Unable to rebase branch 8206a onto the latest trunk, I created a new branch 8206b and applied the changes from 8206a,... Vladimir Tsichevski
02:45 PM Feature #10968: making configuration less error prone
There are critical parts of the system's configuration which, if gotten wrong, will cause the system to be fragile or... Greg Shah
02:39 PM Feature #10968 (New): making configuration less error prone
Greg Shah
08:52 AM Bug #10963: appserver resiliency and self healing
Tasks like #10941 and #10946 suggest that we need to improve our resiliency in our appserver (both classic and PASOE)... Greg Shah
08:47 AM Bug #10963 (WIP): appserver resiliency and self healing
Greg Shah

12/02/2025

07:35 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg - its hard to judge if its FWD problem. It was included in FWD distribution, now it is no... Hynek Cihlar
07:09 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
My point is that if there is a transitive dependency that is required at runtime because of a FWD feature being used,... Greg Shah
02:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > I've found an issue with one of customer application used for regressi... Sergey Ivanovskiy
07:10 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
Yes, 16 hours is a reasonable time to complete the full task. Go ahead with that. Greg Shah
03:27 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
Greg Shah wrote:
> >> As of trunk rev. 16279, there are 699 places which need refactoring for getAttr and 366 places... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

12/01/2025

05:33 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
If it is a feature in FWD that requires transitive dependencies to work at runtime, then those dependencies should be... Greg Shah
02:22 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> > I've found an issue with one of customer application used for regression testing - as @velocity... Tomasz Domin
10:23 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
> I've found an issue with one of customer application used for regression testing - as @velocity@ has been removed a... Greg Shah
10:34 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
>> As of trunk rev. 16279, there are 699 places which need refactoring for getAttr and 366 places for setAttr.
>
> ... Greg Shah

11/27/2025

05:34 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
> According to your statement, we should make TreeListConfig.triggerColumn private, make a public getter for it and p... Alexandru Lungu
05:10 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > Ooh, right. It implies that this should be the actual config, correct? I went through mos... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
04:47 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
> Ooh, right. It implies that this should be the actual config, correct? I went through most of the config classes an... Alexandru Lungu
01:51 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> The customer for which this issue was created may have a scenario in which 10/20 such sets/... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

11/26/2025

03:41 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I've found an issue with one of customer application used for regression testing - as @velocity@ has been removed as ... Tomasz Domin
05:11 AM Feature #9687 (Test): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Branch 9687c has been merged into trunk as revision 16293
 Tomasz Domin
04:56 AM Feature #9687 (Merge Pending): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz, you can merge 9687c to trunk now - you have the green light! Alexandru Lungu
11:07 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> It may have been used in the base. I am afraid of having a decisive answer as I am not the ... Hynek Cihlar
09:33 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
> Note the fact that I removed the first parameter, String fname, because I couldn't find any usages for it. Please c... Alexandru Lungu
08:39 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
Before starting the refactoring work, I'll like to lay out my plan and *receive feedback* in order to not waste time ... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

11/25/2025

02:08 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg
What about merging 9687c ? I guess we do have green light from the customer(s), dont we ?. Tomasz Domin
05:09 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
> Alex: Should we dedicate 10858a for getAttr and 10858b for setAttr, or merge both of them in 10858a?
I think it ... Alexandru Lungu
04:13 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
As of trunk rev. 16279, there are 699 places which need refactoring for @getAttr@ and 366 places for @setAttr@.
*A... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

11/18/2025

12:56 PM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
I've spent some time migrating *gradle* to version supporting Java 21 - I started with version 8.14.3, which is curre... Tomasz Domin

11/17/2025

01:39 PM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
There is a problem with building FWD on clean system with Java 21 only - gradle 7.6.4 does not support Java 21 fully ... Tomasz Domin

11/14/2025

03:11 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
> And the fact Java 8/11 will not be supported anymore in trunk.
We'll do a final check on customers early next we... Greg Shah
01:29 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
@SPREADSHEET@ tests passed with 9687c. Hynek Cihlar
01:03 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I am starting testing spreadheet widget now, it shouldn't take long. Hynek Cihlar
12:53 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
>
> I think the only documentation is related with addiding *EE10* classes and handlers. AFAIR... Tomasz Domin
12:48 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> Are we just needing the spreadsheet to be tested before we can merge?
And the fact Java 8/11 wil... Tomasz Domin
09:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Are we just needing the spreadsheet to be tested before we can merge?
Tomasz: Is there any documentation needed fo... Greg Shah
06:21 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
The difference is just for the error messages being reported. That is OK.
Greg, as web_apis work, then 9687c pass... Constantin Asofiei
05:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> > > * Multi session app server (@MultiSessionAppserver@)
> > Isnt this setup by the customer req... Tomasz Domin

11/13/2025

06:53 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
This is an easy win. It is functionally the same and faster. There is good discussion of capturing/non-capturing la... Greg Shah
02:07 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
The idea was presented by Alex in the last statement from #9972-107. The general concept is to switch away from captu... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
01:59 AM Bug #10858 (Test): Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
02:02 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> > > * Multi session app server (@MultiSessionAppserver@)
> > Isnt this setup by the customer req... Tomasz Domin

11/12/2025

04:23 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
> > * Multi session app server (@MultiSessionAppserver@)
> Isnt this setup by the customer requesting this change.
... Greg Shah
04:02 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Constantin/Hynek: What other testing do we need?
>
> Here is the unso... Tomasz Domin
08:55 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin/Hynek: What other testing do we need?
Here is the unsorted list of features, beside... Hynek Cihlar
08:18 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
While waiting for answer from Hynek/Constantin I am wondering if there are branches that modify Jetty 9 related handl... Tomasz Domin

11/10/2025

03:32 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Good, thanks. Greg Shah
03:31 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I've asked for retesting apps in #10616-91 Tomasz Domin
03:30 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Constantin/Hynek: What other testing do we need? Greg Shah
11:46 AM Feature #9687 (Internal Test): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Well, I think you've fixed it in 9687c? I haven't run the test program in FWD.
Yes, ... Tomasz Domin
09:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Only the last one:
> > > Error load... Constantin Asofiei
09:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Only the last one:
> > Error loading WSDL document WSDLExcept... Tomasz Domin
08:46 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Only the last one:
> Error loading WSDL document WSDLException: faultCode=PARSER_ERROR: Prob... Constantin Asofiei
08:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've ran the test with the FWD server and:
> * first @CONNECT@ shows this in OpenEdge:
... Tomasz Domin
06:11 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I've ran the test with the FWD server and:
* first @CONNECT@ shows this in OpenEdge:... Constantin Asofiei
 

Also available in: Atom