Activity
From 01/27/2026 to 02/25/2026
02/24/2026
- 03:08 AM Feature #10685 (Test): Move name_map.xml to the cvt folder
- Branch 7180a was merged into trunk as rev. 16438 and archived.
02/23/2026
- 04:49 AM Bug #10858 (Test): Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Branch 10858a was merged into trunk as rev. 16437 and archived.
- 04:10 AM Bug #10858 (Merge Pending): Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Alright, 10858a can be merged now.
- 03:56 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Code review 10858a. The changes look good.
- 03:36 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- I won't put this in the merge queue yet. I would like to see if Hynek is ok with the change from #10858-26 + the test...
- 03:04 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Testing that passed:
* ChUI regression tests
* full UI suite from testcases project
* unit-tests from a customer
...
02/18/2026
- 08:22 AM Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- yes
- 08:22 AM Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- Is this jsch fork backwards compatible with Java 17 and Java 21?
- 05:18 AM Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- Created harness task branch *9686a*.
Committed revision *40* on harness task branch *9686a*:
- Updated jsch depen... - 04:37 AM Feature #9686 (Review): move FWD to Java 25
- 04:36 AM Feature #9686 (WIP): move FWD to Java 25
- I have done some more tests and I have noticed that there is an issue with the testcases harness. This also happens o...
02/17/2026
- 02:12 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Rebased 10858a to trunk rev. 16430 and commited rev. 16433 to fix new usages of the old @setAttr()@ method.
02/16/2026
- 08:41 AM Feature #9684: migrate from libffi (and C heap functions) to the built-in JDK FFM support
- I don't want to work on this until after we no longer support JDK 17. This is not a priority right now.
- 08:06 AM Feature #9684: migrate from libffi (and C heap functions) to the built-in JDK FFM support
- Created task branch *9684a*.
Committed revision *16430* on task branch *9684a*:
- Initial alternative implementat...
02/12/2026
- 09:39 AM Bug #10858 (Internal Test): Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Code review 10858a. The changes look good. This will require full-spectrum regression testing.
02/07/2026
02/06/2026
- 08:43 AM Feature #11183: Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
- Sure, I will look into this as well.
- 08:42 AM Feature #11183: Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
- I think we do more on the Jetty side than I want. I'm looking for a lower level transfer of the request. Also, I wa...
- 08:27 AM Feature #11183: Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
- Greg Shah wrote:
> My idea was not to have a queue for getting a thread but a queue for the jobs. Also the idea is ... - 08:23 AM Feature #11183: Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
- My idea was not to have a queue for getting a thread but a queue for the jobs. Also the idea is to do almost nothing...
- 08:15 AM Feature #11183: Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
- I believe for classic this does not happen and on agent pool exhaustion, the requests are refused.
- 08:14 AM Feature #11183: Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
- Constantin, please correct me if I am not accurate here, but I think this already happens with PASOE.
@AppServerConn... - 08:06 AM Feature #11183: Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
- I have planned #6673 which I believe is the same idea. I would be happy for you to work on that task. My opinion is...
- 03:04 AM Feature #11183: Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
- Although PASOE significantly improved request throughput compared to the classic AppServer infrastructure, there is s...
- 03:02 AM Feature #11183 (WIP): Upgrade our PASOE implementation to a fully async paradigm
02/05/2026
- 04:16 AM Bug #11157: Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Can you test with Hotel ChUI, as well?
I tested now and it is also fine. If we want to ...
02/04/2026
- 11:32 AM Bug #11157: Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- In a perfect world, the same @server.sh@ would be used at all customers. I don't want it to be customized or be out ...
- 09:29 AM Bug #11157 (Internal Test): Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- Can you test with Hotel ChUI, as well? If testing is good, Greg, we should be able to merge to the Hotel projects. It...
- 09:09 AM Bug #11157: Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> The changes look very good. Have you tested @start_server.sh@, the a wrapper script that exp... - 08:53 AM Bug #11157: Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- The changes look very good. Have you tested @start_server.sh@, the a wrapper script that expects @server.sh@ to start...
- 03:03 AM Feature #11169: Running Ahead-of-time compilation (AOT) on FWD
- Java *Ahead-of-time compilation* was introduced in *JDK 25*, as an evolution of *AppCDS*, which optimizes the warmup ...
- 02:36 AM Feature #11169 (New): Running Ahead-of-time compilation (AOT) on FWD
02/03/2026
- 08:56 AM Bug #10071 (Closed): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- 03:38 AM Bug #10963: appserver resiliency and self healing
- Regardin ...
01/30/2026
- 05:43 AM Bug #11157 (Review): Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- 05:42 AM Bug #11157 (WIP): Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- This is the patch needed for @server.sh@ in hotel_gui project which allows redirecting the KILL signal to the java pr...
01/29/2026
- 10:22 AM Bug #11157: Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- While working on #4369, I discovered that the current way of starting the Java process in server.sh may not work well...
- 10:12 AM Bug #11157 (Internal Test): Improve FWD server startup mode in server.sh
- 07:05 AM Bug #10963: appserver resiliency and self healing
- I increased the heap to 16Gb and repeated the stress test 3 times, the OutOfMemoryError was solved, so it is somethin...
- 05:27 AM Bug #10963: appserver resiliency and self healing
- During the investigation for #10941-77 I tried to replicate a long running query by executing some apis on the client...
- 06:35 AM Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- Committed revision *16266* in task branch *9686a*:
- Additional fixes.
- Fix for database import when XML files exc...
01/27/2026
- 10:59 AM Feature #11152: improve broker session distribution to implement simple load balancing
- Our session distribution for the brokers is pretty naive. I recall it was a simple round robin but regardless, it do...
- 10:57 AM Feature #11152 (New): improve broker session distribution to implement simple load balancing
Also available in: Atom