Activity
From 02/10/2026 to 03/11/2026
03/10/2026
- 06:31 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- > Also, I have a question. For web clients to connect on UDS, you need to use revision 16459.
I used 11275a/rev. 1... - 02:23 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Also, I have a question. For web clients to connect on UDS, you need to use revision *16459*.
I think you are using ... - 02:17 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- I will also considering testing the scenario which you are trying, to see if there is something else.
- 02:15 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Server has this config; again, is the secure_prot, secure and insecure_port required?
@n...
03/09/2026
- 08:47 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Teodor, I did the trivial patch of #11275-6. I did not saw any performance improvement per se, but I want to ensure t...
03/06/2026
- 07:00 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Please also take in consideration the fact that for database UDS, we still use @junixsocket@.
This was introduced fo... - 06:52 AM Feature #11275 (Review): Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD clien...
- 06:52 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Committed revision *16461* on task branch *11275a*:
- Added *javadocs* and reverted @AppServerHelper@ changes.
Co... - 05:18 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> > Yes, the same file is used by all clients and appserver and al... - 05:12 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Yes, the same file is used by all clients and appserver and all data transfer is done in *mem... - 05:10 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Yes, the same file is used by all clients and appserver and all data transfer is done in *memory*.
UDS can simulat... - 05:07 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Also, I don't quite understand what do you mean by cleaning when the FWD client terminates, a... - 04:49 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> More, these files need to be cleaned (by the FWD server) when the client terminates, oth... - 04:42 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Next: is @p2j.net.SessionListener.terminate@ notification still working?
Yes, is stil... - 04:30 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Teodor, I think the path of the UDS file needs to be calculated automatically by FWD, using some random UUID and plac...
- 03:53 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Committed revision *16460* on task branch *11275a*:
- Added probing mechanism which guarantees that only one instanc... - 02:21 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Committed revision *16459* on task branch *11275a*:
- Allow only UDS clients to authenticate on the process account....
03/05/2026
- 10:08 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Created task branch *11275a*.
Committed revision *16458* on task branch *11275a*:
- Make Appservers and FWD client ... - 09:51 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- I will commit the changes soon, I need to fix the web clients real quick.
- 09:49 AM Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Teodor, feel free to commit any intermediary work on #11275. I intend to also make some tests on another customer for...
- 06:02 AM Feature #11275 (WIP): Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client a...
- There are two types of *Sockets* available on the major operating systems @Windows/Linux/MacOS@:
- Network Sockets ... - 05:44 AM Feature #11275 (Review): Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD clien...
03/04/2026
- 06:31 AM Bug #11271: server-side streams and files with frames/redirected terminal
- AH, it also requires a folder @images/@ with 100 generated bmps. Attached a script to generate them.
- 06:29 AM Bug #11271: server-side streams and files with frames/redirected terminal
- > Alexandru: do you have some standalone tests for the behavior in #11184?
Attached example run in Hotel.
* Pro... - 06:26 AM Bug #11271: server-side streams and files with frames/redirected terminal
- Currently, enabling server-side streams does not allow work with FRAMEs (i.e. redirected terminal). To make it work,...
- 06:22 AM Bug #11271 (Test): server-side streams and files with frames/redirected terminal
03/03/2026
- 02:11 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > In this discussion what do you mean with term "official"? Is there ... - 12:32 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > In this discussion what do you mean with term "official"? Is there the resource where the @MinG...
03/02/2026
- 09:11 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- > In this discussion what do you mean with term "official"? Is there the resource where the @MinGW@ can be taken as "...
- 08:52 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > The only note: it is a zip file for unzip and run approach. I have not found the GUI installer.... - 08:35 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- > The only note: it is a zip file for unzip and run approach. I have not found the GUI installer. Is it a critical po...
02/28/2026
- 10:45 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Greg,
I have just tested recent @MinGW@ binaries from here: https://winlibs.com/ the version is @15_2_0@.
The c...
02/27/2026
- 07:37 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We do need to be able to use newer versions of mingw. No one except you has ever succeeded in ma... - 07:23 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- We do need to be able to use newer versions of mingw. No one except you has ever succeeded in making mingw work. Th...
- 07:21 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> > I think we need to understand what is the difference between good working system and proble... - 06:57 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- > I think we need to understand what is the difference between good working system and problematic one.
The differ... - 06:11 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Eugenie is right that we need to figure out the cause of the problem (the difference between the two environments).
... - 07:09 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Yes this should be true. Moreover modern Windows also accept the...
02/26/2026
- 06:08 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Yes this should be true. Moreover modern Windows also accept the @"/"@ for patch names in c... - 04:53 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Last week I tested @4645a@ and trunk under Windows. In this proc... - 04:51 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- With just some minor updates to the @src/native/makefile.*@ and a change to @build.gradle@, I think the pathing issue...
- 03:35 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Last week I tested @4645a@ and trunk under Windows. In this process I got issues but never ... - 03:31 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> With the merge of #4645, the problem is still there:
> [...]
>
> I had tried updates to ... - 02:23 PM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- With the merge of #4645, the problem is still there:...
- 03:45 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- > although I don't see conflicting information related to the make and gcc, since they are both pointing to the 4.9.0...
- 01:01 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Just FYI. I did a full recent trunk(@16183@) build inside Windows...
02/24/2026
- 03:08 AM Feature #10685 (Test): Move name_map.xml to the cvt folder
- Branch 7180a was merged into trunk as rev. 16438 and archived.
02/23/2026
- 04:49 AM Bug #10858 (Test): Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Branch 10858a was merged into trunk as rev. 16437 and archived.
- 04:10 AM Bug #10858 (Merge Pending): Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Alright, 10858a can be merged now.
- 03:56 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Code review 10858a. The changes look good.
- 03:36 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- I won't put this in the merge queue yet. I would like to see if Hynek is ok with the change from #10858-26 + the test...
- 03:04 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Testing that passed:
* ChUI regression tests
* full UI suite from testcases project
* unit-tests from a customer
...
02/18/2026
- 08:22 AM Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- yes
- 08:22 AM Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- Is this jsch fork backwards compatible with Java 17 and Java 21?
- 05:18 AM Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- Created harness task branch *9686a*.
Committed revision *40* on harness task branch *9686a*:
- Updated jsch depen... - 04:37 AM Feature #9686 (Review): move FWD to Java 25
- 04:36 AM Feature #9686 (WIP): move FWD to Java 25
- I have done some more tests and I have noticed that there is an issue with the testcases harness. This also happens o...
02/17/2026
- 02:12 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Rebased 10858a to trunk rev. 16430 and commited rev. 16433 to fix new usages of the old @setAttr()@ method.
02/16/2026
- 08:41 AM Feature #9684: migrate from libffi (and C heap functions) to the built-in JDK FFM support
- I don't want to work on this until after we no longer support JDK 17. This is not a priority right now.
- 08:06 AM Feature #9684: migrate from libffi (and C heap functions) to the built-in JDK FFM support
- Created task branch *9684a*.
Committed revision *16430* on task branch *9684a*:
- Initial alternative implementat...
02/12/2026
- 09:39 AM Bug #10858 (Internal Test): Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Code review 10858a. The changes look good. This will require full-spectrum regression testing.
Also available in: Atom