Project

General

Profile

Bug #4173

BUFFER-COPY/BUFFER-COMPARE compares table fields by name rather than data type and order

Added by Eric Faulhaber over 4 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Adrian Lungu
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

billable:
No
vendor_id:
GCD
case_num:

History

#1 Updated by Eric Faulhaber over 4 years ago

  • Subject changed from BUFFER-COPY compares table fields by name rather than data type and order to BUFFER-COPY/BUFFER-COMPARE compares table fields by name rather than data type and order

Based on our findings of how tables are compared for parameter passing purposes and shared temp-table definitions (by field type and order rather than field name), we need to check whether the name-based comparison of tables currently implemented for BUFFER-{COPY|COMPARE} needs to be overhauled. I suspect so...

#2 Updated by Greg Shah over 3 years ago

  • Assignee set to Adrian Lungu

This seems related to your current work. It may make sense to implement any changes needed to resolve this task along with your other changes in 3821c.

#3 Updated by Greg Shah about 3 years ago

Is this still an open issue?

#4 Updated by Adrian Lungu about 3 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
  • Status changed from New to WIP

This can be closed; the premises in #4173 are not accurate as there is a difference in implementation between bufer-copy field mapping and copy-temp-table field mapping (#4055-79).

#5 Updated by Greg Shah about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from WIP to Closed

Also available in: Atom PDF