Activity
From 05/21/2015 to 06/19/2015
06/19/2015
- 03:41 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions
- I continued by digging into procedure call mechanism. In @ControlFlowOps@, there is @InternalEntryCaller.validate()@ ...
- 03:39 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions
- On 06/19/2015 10:04 PM, Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric/Ovidiu,
>
> This is a new discovery. And it looks like i... - 03:38 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions
- I found the following external procedure @caller.p@:...
- 03:36 PM Bug #2592 (Closed): improve support for implicit type conversions
06/08/2015
- 10:53 AM Bug #2578 (Closed): incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Nice work, Ovidiu.
- 10:48 AM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- The update passed the regression testing, was committed to bzr as revno 10874 and it was distributed by mail.
06/06/2015
- 12:21 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Update 0605a did well with the full group of search unit tests.
06/05/2015
- 01:10 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Code Review om_upd20150605a.zip
I'm good with this approach. You can check it in if it passes testing. - 12:21 PM Bug #2578 (WIP): incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Thanks, Greg, this is exactly my idea. I was sure the @ui_statements@ is not the right place - it is also called too ...
06/04/2015
- 03:16 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- OK, I've dug into this code more deeply. I think I understand better what you are trying to do.
I still believe t...
05/29/2015
- 05:00 AM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review om_upd20150528a.zip
> 1. Are the form header changes are necessary to fix this bug? I...
05/28/2015
- 03:45 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Code Review om_upd20150528a.zip
1. Are the form header changes are necessary to fix this bug? If I understand cor... - 02:08 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The changes look correct to me, but I am not expert in this area of the code. Greg will be r... - 01:08 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Code review 0527b:
The changes look correct to me, but I am not expert in this area of the code. Greg will be revi...
05/27/2015
- 03:27 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- This update is not the ideal solution I wanted but it fixes both last issues.
It passed my testcases, as well as the... - 10:55 AM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- My candidate has the following flaw I am trying to fix: when a @FORM HEADER@ is defined locally in an internal proced...
05/26/2015
- 01:10 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Do you have a new version that I should use for the code review?
05/22/2015
- 02:01 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Please ignore my om_upd20150522a.zip. It brings nothing new, I zipped the wrong files. Sorry.
- 11:28 AM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- I moved the @HandleExprN@ instance variable definitions to same scope as their class. The Majic conversion testing pa...
- 11:48 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- I tested @om_upd20150521a.zip@ with the current project. After conversion, there were a number of compile errors (act...
05/21/2015
- 01:02 PM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- Code review 0521a:
Looks good to me in terms of the persistence-related changes, though I did notice a typo in the... - 11:32 AM Bug #2578: incorrect promotion of local defined variables
- I have tested this update with majic conversion and it looks fine to me.
There are a lot of changes in the code: asi...
Also available in: Atom