Activity
From 07/24/2015 to 08/22/2015
08/17/2015
- 07:57 AM Bug #2638 (Closed): improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
08/15/2015
- 03:22 AM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Branch 2638a rev 10925 was merged to trunk rev 10923 and archived. Notification email was sent.
- 03:19 AM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Rebased branch 2638 from trunk rev 10922 (new branch rev 10925).
08/14/2015
- 02:52 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- My testing of this update (i.e., branch rev. 10922) has gone well. I'm comfortable with you merging these changes int...
- 02:07 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Branch 2638 rev 10923 passed runtime testing.
Rebased branch 2638 from trunk rev 10921 (new branch rev 10924).
08/13/2015
- 06:08 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Eric: conversion passed, all changes are OK and expected.
Compilation fails because of hand-written java functions... - 04:59 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- I've added a small fix to rev 10922 - Added @BlockManager.markPendingDynCall@ to @ControlFlowOps.initializeExternalPr...
- 04:53 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Code review 2638a/10921:
Changes look good. I'll report results of use with server after overnight conversion and ... - 04:50 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> To be more specific:
> - if there is only generated code, @resolveClosestMethod@ will n... - 04:48 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > I've committed to rev 10921 the fix - it was pretty simple in... - 04:42 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've committed to rev 10921 the fix - it was pretty simple in the end, just bypass @Proc... - 04:37 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- Created task branch 2638a.
I've committed to rev 10921 the fix - it was pretty simple in the end, just bypass @Pro... - 04:28 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
Greg,
On another thought, this is need only for user-defined function calls; so adding new parameters to the exi...- 04:27 PM Bug #2638 (Closed): improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls
- 12:18 PM Bug #2637: batch client needs to detect if the client process has output redirected and change er...
- I don't think the @OutputManager.activateBatch(false);@ calls throughout @ThinClient@ and @Window@ are properly balan...
- 11:06 AM Bug #2637: batch client needs to detect if the client process has output redirected and change er...
- When a _progres executible launches, it can detect if its standard output is redirected. In batch mode, this changes...
- 11:04 AM Bug #2637 (New): batch client needs to detect if the client process has output redirected and cha...
08/06/2015
07/28/2015
- 08:03 AM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions
- The 2592a/10900 was merged to trunk as revision 10901 and the notification email was sent to team.
07/24/2015
- 12:27 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions
- The 2592a/10900 passed the regression testing. The harness results were saved as /opt/secure/clients/timco/majic_test...
Also available in: Atom