Activity
From 11/18/2015 to 12/17/2015
12/17/2015
12/11/2015
- 02:14 PM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please merge to trunk.
2917a was merged to trunk rev 10958 and archived. - 01:28 PM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- Please merge to trunk.
12/08/2015
- 06:28 PM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2917a Revision 10960
>
> The changes are good. It is easier to read/u...
12/07/2015
- 03:49 PM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- Code Review Task Branch 2917a Revision 10960
The changes are good. It is easier to read/understand and I like the... - 12:47 PM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- 2917a rev 10960 fixes @EventList.remove@ - use intersection/difference to remove an event list.
- 09:55 AM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What standalone testcases have you checked?
I've tested with @uast/revert_trigger/revert_trigger...
12/04/2015
- 11:55 AM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- Code Review Task Branch 2917a Revision 10959
The code looks good.
What standalone testcases have you checked? - 11:08 AM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- I've rebased 2917a from trunk rev 10956.
See revision 10959 for the issues in note 2. - 10:54 AM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2917a Revision 10956
>
> 1. Is it intended that @EventList.remove()@ o... - 09:34 AM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- Code Review Task Branch 2917a Revision 10956
1. Is it intended that @EventList.remove()@ operate on multiple @Even... - 06:23 AM Bug #2917: fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
- This task finishes the ON ... REVERT trigger support. Also, it fixes and disambiguates the ANYWHERE option (for widge...
- 06:15 AM Bug #2917 (Closed): fix problems related to ON ... REVERT support in P2J
11/24/2015
- 04:41 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- > > > The only issue is choosing the cert location wisely because the normal secure socket connections are open from ...
- 03:21 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > The only issue is choosing the cert location wisely because the normal secure socket connection... - 03:16 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- > Are you sure?
Sadly, yes.
> I don't remember to encounter anything specified in docs. I must think of a solut... - 02:56 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Are you sure?
I don't remember to encounter anything specified in docs. I must think of a solution for detecting thi... - 02:44 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- > The only issue is choosing the cert location wisely because the normal secure socket connections are open from p2j ...
- 02:42 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- After further investigations, I found a solution to have the trusted certificates AND private keys exactly as P4GL. T...
- 03:21 AM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > So, unless we create a separate utility for importing certs, we are stuck with a minimal passwo...
11/23/2015
- 03:44 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- > As I understand, P2J server will run on a dedicated box and and the GUI clients will connect 'remote' using install...
- 03:12 PM Feature #2687: add SSL support for the 4GL web services implementation
- I believe I found a solution for the problem. It is possible to use a custom socket factory. I am already doing that...
- 02:11 AM Feature #2687: add SSL support for the 4GL web services implementation
- At this moment I was able to communicate with a WSDL web-service but for the moment only over HTTP.
The problem is...
11/20/2015
- 04:12 PM Bug #2872: IOException in Windows
- This task is dedicated to track encountered issues that prevent P2J to run on Windows OS, other than those related to...
- 03:44 PM Bug #2872 (New): IOException in Windows
- 09:16 AM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Both <OE-Install>/Certs and <OE-Install/keys> are fixed/global. This means their content is sha... - 08:25 AM Bug #2684: XML file processing needs to be implemented on the client side instead of on the P2J s...
- > You note the DOM. Is that to say there aren't implications for the SAX API?
It is a good question. Where there ...
11/19/2015
- 06:09 PM Bug #2684: XML file processing needs to be implemented on the client side instead of on the P2J s...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The key here is that we must:
>
> * handle any client-side file searching that may occur (the ... - 05:52 PM Bug #2684: XML file processing needs to be implemented on the client side instead of on the P2J s...
- > Is this meant to imply just that the architecture should be similar
Yes, but maybe not "just" that.
> is it ... - 05:39 PM Bug #2684 (WIP): XML file processing needs to be implemented on the client side instead of on the...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> As with how we redirect streams processing to the client, we must also implement remote/client-si... - 05:42 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- > Both <OE-Install>/Certs and <OE-Install/keys> are fixed/global. This means their content is shared by all users tha...
- 08:31 AM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2181a Revision 11059
>
> 1. We need to discuss the location and approa... - 07:08 AM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Very good work! Once again, Progress' developers have displayed a stunning lack of any understan...
11/18/2015
- 05:00 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Code Review Task Branch 2181a Revision 11059
1. We need to discuss the location and approach for the certificate/k... - 01:01 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Very good work! Once again, Progress' developers have displayed a stunning lack of any understanding about security....
- 12:49 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Some questions about the @SymmetricEncryption@ class:
>
> 1. Is it truly compatible with Progr... - 12:31 PM Feature #2181: implement SSL support for sockets
- Some questions about the @SymmetricEncryption@ class:
1. Is it truly compatible with Progress?
2. The "key" use...
Also available in: Atom