FWD » Core Development » Base Language

01/16/2020

04:46 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin: please review. Greg Shah

04:45 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for a code review?
I think so. Igor Skornyakov

04:40 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Is this ready for a code review? Greg Shah

05:36 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

@VALIDATE-SEAL@ is fixed in 4335a revision 11475. Igor Skornyakov

02:50 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Hi Constantin... fyi my regression testing was successful wit... Roger Borrello

01:42 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Hi Constantin... fyi my regression testing was successful with that code removed. What was t... Constantin Asofiei

01:17 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The conversion fixes are in 4207a rev 11360. It also moves the @ExtentExpr@ to anon cla... Roger Borrello

01:00 PM Bug #4123 (Test): conversion generates incorrect java code for Extent statement

This is basically a duplicate of the issue #4160 and the fix is the same. Greg Shah

12:45 PM Bug #4123: conversion generates incorrect java code for Extent statement

Greg Shah wrote:
> In what branch and revision can you recreate this problem (i.e. is this in trunk 11319)?
I jus... Roger Borrello

09:46 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

> Throw a few test samples in here and we can see.
That is your task. Greg Shah

09:36 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah wrote:
> Hmm, this is worse than what we already knew (which was really bad).
>
> Questions:
>
> * D... Roger Borrello

09:33 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Hmm, this is worse than what we already knew (which was really bad).
Questions:
* Does this happen for any @@@ ... Greg Shah

09:27 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Roger, please change @mymess... Roger Borrello

09:25 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some si... Constantin Asofiei

09:24 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some similar @Missing value@ - I w... Roger Borrello

09:19 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some similar @Missing value@ - I wonder if @@@ option just form... Constantin Asofiei

09:10 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

I just wanted to make a note that the 4GL behavior when including conflicting formatting between the variable definit... Roger Borrello

01/15/2020

05:45 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

*Updated convert/frame_generator.xml in 4207a-11378*
We need to look at our parent node for @ base-field, instead ... Roger Borrello

04:13 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah wrote:
> This is an expected consequence of the change. We are now creating the widget from the child of ... Roger Borrello

03:56 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

This is an expected consequence of the change. We are now creating the widget from the child of @AT@ instead of at t... Greg Shah

03:40 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trun... Roger Borrello

01:31 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trunk, and this revision.
>
... Roger Borrello

11:02 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trunk, and this revision.
I modified the testcase @at... Roger Borrello

05:42 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

@VALIDATE-SEAL@ is almost fixed, but it appears the @LOAD-DOMAINS@ is broken. Will fix it tomorrow. Igor Skornyakov

01:50 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ ... Roger Borrello

11:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

Greg Shah wrote:
> I looked into this case. I think you are talking about @ladder-safety-gen.p@ where it references... Hynek Cihlar

10:13 AM Feature #3867 (Test): direct java class access from 4GL code

Greg Shah

10:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Constantin/Hynek: Do you know of any other critical bugs or missing feat... Greg Shah

01/14/2020

03:57 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ downpath:
>
> [...]
>
... Roger Borrello

02:17 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ downpath:... Roger Borrello

02:12 PM Bug #4484 (WIP): Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello

09:15 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Manually merged updates into 4335a revision 11469. Igor Skornyakov

09:13 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I will first merge into 4335a and continue in it. Is it OK?
Yes.
Constantin Asofiei

08:58 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Yes, please do. And please go through https://documentation.progress.com/output/ua/Open... Igor Skornyakov

08:56 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Oops. It seems that I've overlooked this, sorry. I have to add a corresponding test and upd... Constantin Asofiei

08:53 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Maybe it is better to just manually merge the changes as the... Igor Skornyakov

08:42 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Maybe it is better to just manually merge the changes as they affect only two classes?
Yes... Constantin Asofiei

08:22 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> And if is an unknown value?
An error 4065 is generated.
Igor Skornyakov

08:20 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
Constantin. 3810e wa... Igor Skornyakov

08:17 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin. In 4GL the @domainAccessCode@ parameter is mandatory for the @SEAL@ call.
And ... Constantin Asofiei

08:15 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
>
> On a side note, in... Igor Skornyakov

08:04 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
On a side note, in @validateSeal@ I left this comme... Constantin Asofiei

01/13/2020

07:17 AM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

Greg,
I think we should support the thread "JOIN" concept by using an additional option @AS-THREAD [SET handle] [ON-... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01/12/2020

02:05 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

The issue #3810-407 resolved in 3810e revision 11342.
BTW: it appears the @PRIMARY_PASSPHRASE@ attribute value is ig... Igor Skornyakov

12:00 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

@SET-DB-CLIENT@ for the principal in a @LOGIN@ state validates only @DOMAIN-NAME@ and @DOMAIN-ACCESS-CODE@ (using MAC... Igor Skornyakov

11:03 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

With 3810e revision 11341, the @SET-DB-CLIENT@ with the imported sealed principal works fine. So the issue described ... Igor Skornyakov

01/10/2020

05:32 PM Feature #3254 (WIP): add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

To create a new thread, I was planning to add an optional @AS-THREAD [SET handle]@ extension to the @RUN@ statement. ... Greg Shah

04:10 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

Greg Shah wrote:
> I believe that we are at a good "first pass" level of support here. A future improvement would b... Constantin Asofiei

01:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin/Hynek: Do you know of any other critical bugs or missing features before we can accept... Hynek Cihlar

01/09/2020

05:56 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

Understood. To implement "temp-tables" that are shared across threads we would have to implement a multi-user databa... Greg Shah

05:17 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

To clarify, you can access a persistent table across threads, but not over the same connection. A temp-table actually... Eric Faulhaber

05:16 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

Greg Shah wrote:
> Since JDBC connections cannot be shared across more than one thread, the current temp-table appro... Eric Faulhaber

05:09 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

Some months ago, Eric noted to me that sharing temp-tables will be a problem since they are private to a single JDBC ... Greg Shah

04:28 PM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

I believe that we are at a good "first pass" level of support here. A future improvement would be to support inherit... Greg Shah

04:24 PM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

I just committed revision 11467 to branch 4335a (which is derived from 3809e revision 11466). This revision provides... Greg Shah

01/06/2020

02:06 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Well, I understand what was wrong in my setup. I had @large_customer_application.jar@ in my project classpath. Now th... Igor Skornyakov

02:00 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exi... Igor Skornyakov

01:56 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exist in your application jar f... Igor Skornyakov

01:40 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exist in your application jar file? Eric Faulhaber

01:21 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Please note that I still have no solution for problem #3810-413.... Igor Skornyakov

12:46 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Please note that I still have no solution for problem #3810-413. Any help will be highly ap... Eric Faulhaber

05:37 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Roger Borrello wrote:
> That was not enough detail to get me going. I believe Greg thought it would be an exercise i... Constantin Asofiei

01/03/2020

01:49 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

The extended @uast/security/export-cp.p@ test produces the compatible results in 4GL and FWD branch 3810e rev. 11341.... Igor Skornyakov

01:52 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * What is the structure/size/layout of the BOM for file input/output?
There is no special... Marian Edu

01/02/2020

01:07 PM Bug #4476 (Test): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah

12:12 PM Bug #4476 (WIP): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello

12:11 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah wrote:
> > but doesn't myat have to be defined properly, too?
>
> In the working case, the variable is ... Roger Borrello

10:23 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

> but doesn't myat have to be defined properly, too?
In the working case, the variable is not defined as an inline... Greg Shah

10:15 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah wrote:
> That is probably not related. The issue will be the tree structure under the @KW_FORM@. The @FO... Roger Borrello

10:07 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

That is probably not related. The issue will be the tree structure under the @KW_FORM@. The @FORM_ITEM@ related to ... Greg Shah

10:02 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Comparing the AST generated for the broken case (@shared_frame_at_label.p@) against the correct case (@shared_frame_a... Roger Borrello

12/31/2019

03:04 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

This is data from a correctly built testcase, which does *not* create the fields in the from on-the-fly.
@sharedfr... Roger Borrello

02:14 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Let me recap what is generated by the pair of testcases in #note-1 :
@sharedframes/SharedFrameAtLabel.java@... Roger Borrello

12:00 PM Bug #4484 (Test): Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Greg Shah

12:00 PM Bug #4483 (Test): Unable to use logical variable check in underline statement

Greg Shah

12:00 PM Bug #4482 (Test): Enable/Disable with empty EXCEPT causes issues

Greg Shah

11:59 AM Bug #4480 (Test): Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

Greg Shah

11:58 AM Bug #4455 (Test): Extent field on unsubscripted next-prompt not converted properly

Greg Shah

11:57 AM Bug #4423 (Test): Incorrect buffer scoping when same buffer name used as a parameter to internal ...

Greg Shah

10:42 AM Bug #4427 (Test): Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Greg Shah

10:39 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Committed @rules/annotations/input_builtin_prep.rules@ to *4207a-11367*. Roger Borrello

10:19 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, I think I found the root cause. Try replacing the @walk-rules@ with @ascent-rule... Roger Borrello

12/28/2019

03:05 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

I still have two issues with @CLIENT-PRINCIPAL@ EXPORT/IMPORT support.
1. The quirk which is described in #4108 also... Igor Skornyakov

03:54 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Greg Shah wrote:
> 3809e is frozen at this time. Please create a new 3810e branch.
Thank you, Greg.
Created tas... Igor Skornyakov

08:58 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

3809e is frozen at this time. Please create a new 3810e branch. Greg Shah

12/27/2019

02:17 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

It seems that multiple changes are required. Which branch should I use to commit? At this moment I'm working with 380... Igor Skornyakov

02:33 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Contrary to what is was said in #3810-174, the value of the @PRIMARY-PASSPHRASE@ attribute is *not* always hidden (re... Igor Skornyakov

12/26/2019

05:27 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

With with 3809e revision 11456 @uast/security/export-cp.p@ reveals multiple incompatibilities in @CLIENT-PRINCIPAL@ ... Igor Skornyakov

12/25/2019

02:47 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

I'm trying to converted run @uast/security/export-cp.p@ with 3809e revision 11456 and two attached databases. The ser... Igor Skornyakov

12/24/2019

02:22 PM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger, I think I found the root cause. Try replacing the @walk-rules@ with @ascent-rules@ in @input_builtin_prep.rul... Constantin Asofiei

12:19 PM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

I see that getScreenValue() is the method used in your testcase. The AST and Java look so much cleaner than in my tes... Roger Borrello

11:44 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Thanks for looking. I had a much more complicated testcase or... Roger Borrello

11:17 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Thanks for looking. I had a much more complicated testcase originally, which has been greatl... Constantin Asofiei

11:16 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

There's something else going on. This case parses/converts properly:... Constantin Asofiei

11:11 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Thanks for looking. I had a much more complicated testcase originally, which has been greatly reduced:... Roger Borrello

10:59 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I went to a basic @input mybuff[x]@ where x was just an integ... Constantin Asofiei

10:55 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I went to a basic @input mybuff[x]@ where x was just an integer. It generated:
I don't thin... Constantin Asofiei

10:22 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger Borrello wrote:
> What is @dynamicindex@ annotation used for? I'm trying to determine why the LBRACKET subtree... Roger Borrello

12/23/2019

11:53 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

What is @dynamicindex@ annotation used for? I'm trying to determine why the LBRACKET subtree is duplicated in @input_... Roger Borrello

12/20/2019

04:54 PM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I looked at a much simpler case of using @input mynum@ then @input mybuff[mynum]@ instead of... Roger Borrello

04:02 PM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

I looked at a much simpler case of using @input mynum@ then @input mybuff[mynum]@ instead of the more complicated, ne... Roger Borrello

02:52 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > a bug in ArrayAssigner - when is defined, a dynamic extent var g... Roger Borrello

01:06 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Does this mean the testcase is invalid? Or is there a bug? I was using 4207a, not trunk.
I ... Constantin Asofiei

01:04 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The above is from trunk: @if false then accum "third" (count).@ is marked as unreachable... Roger Borrello

12:57 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Greg Shah wrote:
> > a bug in ArrayAssigner - when is defined, a dynamic extent var gets registered with the previou... Constantin Asofiei

12:07 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

The above is from trunk: @if false then accum "third" (count).@ is marked as unreachable, which is not correct. Any a... Constantin Asofiei

11:56 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Roger Borrello wrote:
> > > I think there is a regression. S... Roger Borrello

10:24 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I think there is a regression. See testcase below. In fact, I jus... Constantin Asofiei

09:58 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I think there is a regression. See testcase below. In fact, I just ran *4207a* against @uast... Roger Borrello

09:56 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

I think there is a regression. See testcase below. In fact, I just ran *4207a* against @uast/accum_scope*.p" and ther... Roger Borrello

09:36 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

> use a special wrapper (so that we can make even the dynamic extent vars 'mutable', maybe limited to shared cases)
... Greg Shah

09:33 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

> a bug in ArrayAssigner - when is defined, a dynamic extent var gets registered with the previous scope, and not the... Greg Shah

01:09 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Argh, there was another typo. fixed in 11366
Great... this update worked! We need to ... Roger Borrello

12:45 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Argh, there was another typo. fixed in 11366 Constantin Asofiei

12:12 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Just reporting that there is another scenario which creates a hidden FieldRef. I checked in @uast/accum/accum_count_h... Roger Borrello

10:02 AM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Roger, see 4207a rev 11362, it should fix the issue.
>
> I... Roger Borrello

10:00 AM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, see 4207a rev 11362, it should fix the issue.
I'll take a look Roger Borrello

09:31 AM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger, see 4207a rev 11362, it should fix the issue. Constantin Asofiei

07:12 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Found a subsequent error, when multiple accumulators are on the same statement.
Added a new testcase @uast/accum_s... Roger Borrello

12:34 PM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

Greg Shah wrote:
> > The updated ended up being in Variable.java, so updated to progress.g are unnecessary. However,... Roger Borrello

11:42 AM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

> The updated ended up being in Variable.java, so updated to progress.g are unnecessary. However, the changes could b... Greg Shah

12/19/2019

06:36 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ah, and I just realized something - for variables scoped to the external program, we sho... Constantin Asofiei

03:48 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

The conversion fixes are in 4207a rev 11360. It also moves the @ExtentExpr@ to anon classes, to get rid of the param... Constantin Asofiei

02:44 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

I have a conversion fix for the INPUT and normal variable, but I'm working also on getting rid of the promotion of th... Constantin Asofiei

12:53 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

And another side-note, in case of OE class properties, we are missing:
* getter which returns the extent var (withou... Constantin Asofiei

12:46 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Greg, as a side note: for shared variables, if there is a dynamic extent case, then this solution will not work (as t... Constantin Asofiei

12:06 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Greg Shah wrote:
> OK. Can you please add that change to 4207a?
OK, will do. Constantin Asofiei

12:04 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

OK. Can you please add that change to 4207a? Greg Shah

11:47 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Greg, the @ref[0]@ approach was added, but only for OUTPUT parameters (I really don't recall why I did it only for th... Constantin Asofiei

11:38 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Indeterminate arrays are profoundly broken in the current FWD trunk. This task and #4123 show two very simple cases ... Greg Shah

01:47 PM Bug #4480 (WIP): Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

Roger Borrello

01:47 PM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

*Code checked into 4207a-11359.* Roger Borrello

01:42 PM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

h2. Testcases Converted and Compiled.
@form_with_extent.p@... Roger Borrello

01:18 PM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > But: the same might apply to OO properties, table fields and procedu... Roger Borrello

12/18/2019

04:52 PM Bug #4484 (WIP): Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello

04:51 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Update to @rules/annotations/accumulate.rules@ checked into @4207a-11358@. Roger Borrello

04:34 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, please check this patch:
> [...]
>
> The problem was that the check if the ex... Roger Borrello

04:24 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger, please check this patch:... Constantin Asofiei

04:08 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Check the other @KW_ACCUM/EXPRESSION@ nodes. Once COUNT is encountered, any @ STATEMENT... Roger Borrello

03:34 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Check the other @KW_ACCUM/EXPRESSION@ nodes. Once COUNT is encountered, any @ STATEMENT/KW_ACCUM/EXPRESSION@ will ha... Constantin Asofiei

03:25 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Roger, there's another different in the AST: look for the @hi... Roger Borrello

01:53 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, there's another different in the AST: look for the @hidden@ attribute at the AST ... Roger Borrello

01:47 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger, there's another different in the AST: look for the @hidden@ attribute at the AST node; this depends on the @su... Constantin Asofiei

01:37 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I tried that immediately above. It is an issue limited to fie... Roger Borrello

01:34 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I tried that immediately above. It is an issue limited to fields. Are we trying to be too _f... Constantin Asofiei

01:29 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, try this, too:
> [...]
>
> Is normal to declare @i@, as is an explicit var. I'm ... Roger Borrello

01:25 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

OK, try this, too:... Constantin Asofiei

01:24 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > This works fine in 4GL:
> > [...]
>
> I added count...
>... Roger Borrello

01:20 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> This works fine in 4GL:
> [...]
I added count...... Roger Borrello

01:09 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

This works fine in 4GL:... Constantin Asofiei

01:06 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, is this limited only for fields? Does FWD convert OK if you replace the field wit... Roger Borrello

01:02 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger, is this limited only for fields? Does FWD convert OK if you replace the field with some variable? Constantin Asofiei

01:01 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Doing some research related to what makes these aggregate functions _order-dependent_.
>
... Roger Borrello

11:04 AM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Doing some research related to what makes these aggregate functions _order-dependent_.
+Run 1+... Roger Borrello