FWD » Core Development » Base Language

01/17/2020

12:01 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello wrote:
> We are only iterating through wlist once, because we no longer add the don't add @ as a ... Roger Borrello

11:57 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

We are only iterating through wlist once, because we no longer add the don't add @ as a widget, presumably when i... Roger Borrello

11:45 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Given the failed regression testing, I'm revisiting with this testcase:... Roger Borrello

01/16/2020

04:46 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin: please review. Greg Shah

04:45 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for a code review?
I think so. Igor Skornyakov

04:40 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Is this ready for a code review? Greg Shah

05:36 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

@VALIDATE-SEAL@ is fixed in 4335a revision 11475. Igor Skornyakov

02:50 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Hi Constantin... fyi my regression testing was successful wit... Roger Borrello

01:42 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Hi Constantin... fyi my regression testing was successful with that code removed. What was t... Constantin Asofiei

01:17 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The conversion fixes are in 4207a rev 11360. It also moves the @ExtentExpr@ to anon cla... Roger Borrello

01:00 PM Bug #4123 (Test): conversion generates incorrect java code for Extent statement

This is basically a duplicate of the issue #4160 and the fix is the same. Greg Shah

12:45 PM Bug #4123: conversion generates incorrect java code for Extent statement

Greg Shah wrote:
> In what branch and revision can you recreate this problem (i.e. is this in trunk 11319)?
I jus... Roger Borrello

09:46 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

> Throw a few test samples in here and we can see.
That is your task. Greg Shah

09:36 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah wrote:
> Hmm, this is worse than what we already knew (which was really bad).
>
> Questions:
>
> * D... Roger Borrello

09:33 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Hmm, this is worse than what we already knew (which was really bad).
Questions:
* Does this happen for any @@@ ... Greg Shah

09:27 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Roger, please change @mymess... Roger Borrello

09:25 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some si... Constantin Asofiei

09:24 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some similar @Missing value@ - I w... Roger Borrello

09:19 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some similar @Missing value@ - I wonder if @@@ option just form... Constantin Asofiei

09:10 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

I just wanted to make a note that the 4GL behavior when including conflicting formatting between the variable definit... Roger Borrello

01/15/2020

05:45 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

*Updated convert/frame_generator.xml in 4207a-11378*
We need to look at our parent node for @ base-field, instead ... Roger Borrello

04:13 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah wrote:
> This is an expected consequence of the change. We are now creating the widget from the child of ... Roger Borrello

03:56 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

This is an expected consequence of the change. We are now creating the widget from the child of @AT@ instead of at t... Greg Shah

03:40 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trun... Roger Borrello

01:31 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trunk, and this revision.
>
... Roger Borrello

11:02 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trunk, and this revision.
I modified the testcase @at... Roger Borrello

05:42 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

@VALIDATE-SEAL@ is almost fixed, but it appears the @LOAD-DOMAINS@ is broken. Will fix it tomorrow. Igor Skornyakov

01:50 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ ... Roger Borrello

11:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

Greg Shah wrote:
> I looked into this case. I think you are talking about @ladder-safety-gen.p@ where it references... Hynek Cihlar

10:13 AM Feature #3867 (Test): direct java class access from 4GL code

Greg Shah

10:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Constantin/Hynek: Do you know of any other critical bugs or missing feat... Greg Shah

01/14/2020

03:57 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ downpath:
>
> [...]
>
... Roger Borrello

02:17 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ downpath:... Roger Borrello

02:12 PM Bug #4484 (WIP): Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello

09:15 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Manually merged updates into 4335a revision 11469. Igor Skornyakov

09:13 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I will first merge into 4335a and continue in it. Is it OK?
Yes.
Constantin Asofiei

08:58 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Yes, please do. And please go through https://documentation.progress.com/output/ua/Open... Igor Skornyakov

08:56 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Oops. It seems that I've overlooked this, sorry. I have to add a corresponding test and upd... Constantin Asofiei

08:53 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Maybe it is better to just manually merge the changes as the... Igor Skornyakov

08:42 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Maybe it is better to just manually merge the changes as they affect only two classes?
Yes... Constantin Asofiei

08:22 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> And if is an unknown value?
An error 4065 is generated.
Igor Skornyakov

08:20 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
Constantin. 3810e wa... Igor Skornyakov

08:17 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin. In 4GL the @domainAccessCode@ parameter is mandatory for the @SEAL@ call.
And ... Constantin Asofiei

08:15 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
>
> On a side note, in... Igor Skornyakov

08:04 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
On a side note, in @validateSeal@ I left this comme... Constantin Asofiei

01/13/2020

07:17 AM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

Greg,
I think we should support the thread "JOIN" concept by using an additional option @AS-THREAD [SET handle] [ON-... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01/12/2020

02:05 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

The issue #3810-407 resolved in 3810e revision 11342.
BTW: it appears the @PRIMARY_PASSPHRASE@ attribute value is ig... Igor Skornyakov

12:00 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

@SET-DB-CLIENT@ for the principal in a @LOGIN@ state validates only @DOMAIN-NAME@ and @DOMAIN-ACCESS-CODE@ (using MAC... Igor Skornyakov

11:03 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

With 3810e revision 11341, the @SET-DB-CLIENT@ with the imported sealed principal works fine. So the issue described ... Igor Skornyakov

01/10/2020

05:32 PM Feature #3254 (WIP): add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

To create a new thread, I was planning to add an optional @AS-THREAD [SET handle]@ extension to the @RUN@ statement. ... Greg Shah

04:10 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

Greg Shah wrote:
> I believe that we are at a good "first pass" level of support here. A future improvement would b... Constantin Asofiei

01:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin/Hynek: Do you know of any other critical bugs or missing features before we can accept... Hynek Cihlar

01/09/2020

05:56 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

Understood. To implement "temp-tables" that are shared across threads we would have to implement a multi-user databa... Greg Shah

05:17 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

To clarify, you can access a persistent table across threads, but not over the same connection. A temp-table actually... Eric Faulhaber

05:16 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

Greg Shah wrote:
> Since JDBC connections cannot be shared across more than one thread, the current temp-table appro... Eric Faulhaber

05:09 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session

Some months ago, Eric noted to me that sharing temp-tables will be a problem since they are private to a single JDBC ... Greg Shah

04:28 PM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

I believe that we are at a good "first pass" level of support here. A future improvement would be to support inherit... Greg Shah

04:24 PM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code

I just committed revision 11467 to branch 4335a (which is derived from 3809e revision 11466). This revision provides... Greg Shah

01/06/2020

02:06 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Well, I understand what was wrong in my setup. I had @large_customer_application.jar@ in my project classpath. Now th... Igor Skornyakov

02:00 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exi... Igor Skornyakov

01:56 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exist in your application jar f... Igor Skornyakov

01:40 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exist in your application jar file? Eric Faulhaber

01:21 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Please note that I still have no solution for problem #3810-413.... Igor Skornyakov

12:46 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Please note that I still have no solution for problem #3810-413. Any help will be highly ap... Eric Faulhaber

05:37 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Roger Borrello wrote:
> That was not enough detail to get me going. I believe Greg thought it would be an exercise i... Constantin Asofiei

01/03/2020

01:49 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

The extended @uast/security/export-cp.p@ test produces the compatible results in 4GL and FWD branch 3810e rev. 11341.... Igor Skornyakov

01:52 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * What is the structure/size/layout of the BOM for file input/output?
There is no special... Marian Edu

01/02/2020

01:07 PM Bug #4476 (Test): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah

12:12 PM Bug #4476 (WIP): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Roger Borrello

12:11 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah wrote:
> > but doesn't myat have to be defined properly, too?
>
> In the working case, the variable is ... Roger Borrello

10:23 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

> but doesn't myat have to be defined properly, too?
In the working case, the variable is not defined as an inline... Greg Shah

10:15 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Greg Shah wrote:
> That is probably not related. The issue will be the tree structure under the @KW_FORM@. The @FO... Roger Borrello

10:07 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

That is probably not related. The issue will be the tree structure under the @KW_FORM@. The @FORM_ITEM@ related to ... Greg Shah

10:02 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Comparing the AST generated for the broken case (@shared_frame_at_label.p@) against the correct case (@shared_frame_a... Roger Borrello

12/31/2019

03:04 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

This is data from a correctly built testcase, which does *not* create the fields in the from on-the-fly.
@sharedfr... Roger Borrello

02:14 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated

Let me recap what is generated by the pair of testcases in #note-1 :
@sharedframes/SharedFrameAtLabel.java@... Roger Borrello

12:00 PM Bug #4484 (Test): Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Greg Shah

12:00 PM Bug #4483 (Test): Unable to use logical variable check in underline statement

Greg Shah

12:00 PM Bug #4482 (Test): Enable/Disable with empty EXCEPT causes issues

Greg Shah

11:59 AM Bug #4480 (Test): Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

Greg Shah

11:58 AM Bug #4455 (Test): Extent field on unsubscripted next-prompt not converted properly

Greg Shah

11:57 AM Bug #4423 (Test): Incorrect buffer scoping when same buffer name used as a parameter to internal ...

Greg Shah

10:42 AM Bug #4427 (Test): Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Greg Shah

10:39 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Committed @rules/annotations/input_builtin_prep.rules@ to *4207a-11367*. Roger Borrello

10:19 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, I think I found the root cause. Try replacing the @walk-rules@ with @ascent-rule... Roger Borrello

12/28/2019

03:05 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

I still have two issues with @CLIENT-PRINCIPAL@ EXPORT/IMPORT support.
1. The quirk which is described in #4108 also... Igor Skornyakov

03:54 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Greg Shah wrote:
> 3809e is frozen at this time. Please create a new 3810e branch.
Thank you, Greg.
Created tas... Igor Skornyakov

08:58 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

3809e is frozen at this time. Please create a new 3810e branch. Greg Shah

12/27/2019

02:17 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

It seems that multiple changes are required. Which branch should I use to commit? At this moment I'm working with 380... Igor Skornyakov

02:33 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

Contrary to what is was said in #3810-174, the value of the @PRIMARY-PASSPHRASE@ attribute is *not* always hidden (re... Igor Skornyakov

12/26/2019

05:27 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

With with 3809e revision 11456 @uast/security/export-cp.p@ reveals multiple incompatibilities in @CLIENT-PRINCIPAL@ ... Igor Skornyakov

12/25/2019

02:47 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features

I'm trying to converted run @uast/security/export-cp.p@ with 3809e revision 11456 and two attached databases. The ser... Igor Skornyakov

12/24/2019

02:22 PM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger, I think I found the root cause. Try replacing the @walk-rules@ with @ascent-rules@ in @input_builtin_prep.rul... Constantin Asofiei

12:19 PM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

I see that getScreenValue() is the method used in your testcase. The AST and Java look so much cleaner than in my tes... Roger Borrello

11:44 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Thanks for looking. I had a much more complicated testcase or... Roger Borrello

11:17 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Thanks for looking. I had a much more complicated testcase originally, which has been greatl... Constantin Asofiei

11:16 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

There's something else going on. This case parses/converts properly:... Constantin Asofiei

11:11 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Thanks for looking. I had a much more complicated testcase originally, which has been greatly reduced:... Roger Borrello

10:59 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I went to a basic @input mybuff[x]@ where x was just an integ... Constantin Asofiei

10:55 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I went to a basic @input mybuff[x]@ where x was just an integer. It generated:
I don't thin... Constantin Asofiei

10:22 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger Borrello wrote:
> What is @dynamicindex@ annotation used for? I'm trying to determine why the LBRACKET subtree... Roger Borrello

12/23/2019

11:53 AM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

What is @dynamicindex@ annotation used for? I'm trying to determine why the LBRACKET subtree is duplicated in @input_... Roger Borrello

12/20/2019

04:54 PM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I looked at a much simpler case of using @input mynum@ then @input mybuff[mynum]@ instead of... Roger Borrello

04:02 PM Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent

I looked at a much simpler case of using @input mynum@ then @input mybuff[mynum]@ instead of the more complicated, ne... Roger Borrello

02:52 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > a bug in ArrayAssigner - when is defined, a dynamic extent var g... Roger Borrello

01:06 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Does this mean the testcase is invalid? Or is there a bug? I was using 4207a, not trunk.
I ... Constantin Asofiei

01:04 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The above is from trunk: @if false then accum "third" (count).@ is marked as unreachable... Roger Borrello

12:57 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Greg Shah wrote:
> > a bug in ArrayAssigner - when is defined, a dynamic extent var gets registered with the previou... Constantin Asofiei

12:07 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

The above is from trunk: @if false then accum "third" (count).@ is marked as unreachable, which is not correct. Any a... Constantin Asofiei

11:56 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Roger Borrello wrote:
> > > I think there is a regression. S... Roger Borrello

10:24 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I think there is a regression. See testcase below. In fact, I jus... Constantin Asofiei

09:58 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Roger Borrello wrote:
> I think there is a regression. See testcase below. In fact, I just ran *4207a* against @uast... Roger Borrello

09:56 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

I think there is a regression. See testcase below. In fact, I just ran *4207a* against @uast/accum_scope*.p" and ther... Roger Borrello

09:36 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

> use a special wrapper (so that we can make even the dynamic extent vars 'mutable', maybe limited to shared cases)
... Greg Shah

09:33 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

> a bug in ArrayAssigner - when is defined, a dynamic extent var gets registered with the previous scope, and not the... Greg Shah

01:09 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Argh, there was another typo. fixed in 11366
Great... this update worked! We need to ... Roger Borrello

12:45 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Argh, there was another typo. fixed in 11366 Constantin Asofiei

12:12 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Just reporting that there is another scenario which creates a hidden FieldRef. I checked in @uast/accum/accum_count_h... Roger Borrello

10:02 AM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Roger, see 4207a rev 11362, it should fix the issue.
>
> I... Roger Borrello

10:00 AM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, see 4207a rev 11362, it should fix the issue.
I'll take a look Roger Borrello

09:31 AM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Roger, see 4207a rev 11362, it should fix the issue. Constantin Asofiei

07:12 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total

Found a subsequent error, when multiple accumulators are on the same statement.
Added a new testcase @uast/accum_s... Roger Borrello

12:34 PM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

Greg Shah wrote:
> > The updated ended up being in Variable.java, so updated to progress.g are unnecessary. However,... Roger Borrello

11:42 AM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

> The updated ended up being in Variable.java, so updated to progress.g are unnecessary. However, the changes could b... Greg Shah

12/19/2019

06:36 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ah, and I just realized something - for variables scoped to the external program, we sho... Constantin Asofiei

03:48 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

The conversion fixes are in 4207a rev 11360. It also moves the @ExtentExpr@ to anon classes, to get rid of the param... Constantin Asofiei

02:44 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

I have a conversion fix for the INPUT and normal variable, but I'm working also on getting rid of the promotion of th... Constantin Asofiei

12:53 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

And another side-note, in case of OE class properties, we are missing:
* getter which returns the extent var (withou... Constantin Asofiei

12:46 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Greg, as a side note: for shared variables, if there is a dynamic extent case, then this solution will not work (as t... Constantin Asofiei

12:06 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Greg Shah wrote:
> OK. Can you please add that change to 4207a?
OK, will do. Constantin Asofiei

12:04 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

OK. Can you please add that change to 4207a? Greg Shah

11:47 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Greg, the @ref[0]@ approach was added, but only for OUTPUT parameters (I really don't recall why I did it only for th... Constantin Asofiei

11:38 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue

Indeterminate arrays are profoundly broken in the current FWD trunk. This task and #4123 show two very simple cases ... Greg Shah

01:47 PM Bug #4480 (WIP): Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

Roger Borrello

01:47 PM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

*Code checked into 4207a-11359.* Roger Borrello

01:42 PM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

h2. Testcases Converted and Compiled.
@form_with_extent.p@... Roger Borrello

01:18 PM Bug #4480: Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > But: the same might apply to OO properties, table fields and procedu... Roger Borrello