Activity
From 01/02/2020 to 01/31/2020
02/01/2020
- 07:24 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Made an update to the testcase....
01/31/2020
- 06:21 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- While that testcase does not throw the exception in @trunk@, it still reports issues. I added some debug to my trunk ...
- 03:14 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Bug found when converting customer code.
Testcase:... - 01:03 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 4207a Revision 11386
>
> I'm OK with the changes. If it passes regres... - 01:01 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Code Review Task Branch 4207a Revision 11386
I'm OK with the changes. If it passes regression testing, while stil... - 12:49 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> @search_widget@ is used in many places so we must be especially sure that your change is safe. I... - 12:06 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- @search_widget@ is used in many places so we must be especially sure that your change is safe. I can't tell without ...
- 11:31 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Check my placement of the check:
Currently we call "search_widget":... - 10:45 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Optimally, we would see the @dumpTree()@ from the ancestor @STATEMENT@ node.
- 10:00 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I have changed the message to printfln("## WARNING: %s: Usingframe='%s' from Dictionary for ref... - 09:56 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > I have changed the message to printfln("## WARNING: %s: Usingframe='%s' from Dictionary for ref='%s', id=%d", file,...
- 09:54 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I did see a lot of "DANGER WILL ROBINSON!" messages on some regression tests yesterday from the @search_frame_phrase@...
- 09:13 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I have the following, but am trying to determine what type to make the ID, since we wanted to i... - 01:44 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. I think that we should introduce a new 4GL annotation @@ThreadSafe@ which can be used to m... - 01:30 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- > We may consider that this related thread shares with the parent and other related threads only its security data, p...
- 11:12 AM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Greg Shah wrote:
> My instinct is to disallow this (super-procedures). The new threads are related from the perspec... - 10:39 AM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- >> Should we exclude having super-procedures on the AssociatedThread instances? Lots of old code might require such a...
- 09:43 AM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > * Should we exclude having super-procedures on the @AssociatedThre... - 09:38 AM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Greg Shah wrote:
> * Should we exclude having super-procedures on the @AssociatedThread@ instances? Lots of old cod... - 09:03 AM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- I'm thinking through the @JOIN@ implementation. I agree it is a good idea.
I also am thinking about the following... - 12:21 PM Feature #3868: customer servlet integration/support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hyenk: We may need to you look at this. I don't want to derail your spreadsheet widget work righ... - 11:44 AM Feature #3868: customer servlet integration/support
- My understanding is that what remains open in this task is the conflict with @jasper@ and @castor@. Is that correct?...
01/30/2020
- 06:20 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > I have the following, but am trying to determine what type to make the ID, since we wanted to initialize it to -1.
... - 06:00 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I have the following, but am trying to determine what type to make the ID, since we wanted to initialize it to @-1@. ...
- 04:48 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > What about a ScopedSymbolDictionary, where I add a scope then add symbols in the walk-rules, then delete in the asc...
- 04:26 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> @convert/control_flow.rules@, search for @Dictionary@.
Thanks. That shows adding to the "switc... - 09:37 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Yes, test cases will be very useful. Thanks!
It seems that the 4GL implements a subset of the "Byte Order Mark":h... - 08:56 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: 2 followup questions:
>
> 1. What is the unicode BOM character that is used?
>
> 2....
01/29/2020
- 04:05 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- @convert/control_flow.rules@, search for @Dictionary@.
- 03:51 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Found that since we have reverted code, and the widget list for frame f2 now contains the variable that was before th...
01/27/2020
- 01:39 PM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Marian: 2 followup questions:
1. What is the unicode BOM character that is used?
2. Is it always the same unico...
01/24/2020
- 04:47 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- It is more correct now. The reason is probably simple: the widget before was being created from a string literal and...
- 01:45 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I wanted to check that this is a valid addition to the frame definition for this testcase:
... - 01:35 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > addrId.setFormat("999999");
>
> This one needs to be there. I'm very surprised it isn't the... - 12:44 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- >> addrId.setAt(true);
>> addrId.setAtFormatLength(6);
I'm not sure about these. You'll have to... - 12:13 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I wanted to check that this is a valid addition to the frame definition for this testcase:...
- 09:34 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Did you read the javadoc?
Got it. Thanks for the discussion.
Regarding "junk" before the &#... - 08:19 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Did you read the javadoc?
- 07:58 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I have been working with @frame_generator.xml@ and @common-progress.rules@ to correct some regressions. I have a test...
- 07:43 PM Bug #4476 (WIP): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- 08:12 AM Feature #4392 (WIP): add -pf support for appserver CONNECT() method
01/20/2020
- 06:14 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- My annotations are being put into the tree:...
- 02:15 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > @ [java] Condition : ref_fmt = ref_fmtp.getImmediateChild(prog.kw_format, null@
>
> Do... - 01:43 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > @ [java] Condition : ref_fmt = ref_fmtp.getImmediateChild(prog.kw_format, null@
Do you have a missing clos... - 01:42 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > This is OK.
>
> Good... moving onto adding the annotations in @fram... - 11:49 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This is OK.
Good... moving onto adding the annotations in @frame_scoping.rules@ to allow @setA... - 09:45 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- This is OK.
- 08:56 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I suspect that the format in trunk was wrong. I think the conversion of the frame def looks OK h... - 07:11 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I suspect that the format in trunk was wrong. I think the conversion of the frame def looks OK here in 4207a.
Wha... - 09:57 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I would expect the widget to have @character@ type. But the override specified by the @@@ is goi... - 07:19 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Review for 4335a rev 11346 - I'm OK with the changes.
01/19/2020
- 05:30 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I would expect the widget to have @character@ type. But the override specified by the @@@ is going to be "temporaril...
- 05:20 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I have a quiz for the experts... What data type should the @getTmess()@ getter for the widget on @frame1@ return?
...
01/17/2020
- 12:01 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> We are only iterating through wlist once, because we no longer add the don't add @ as a ... - 11:57 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- We are only iterating through wlist once, because we no longer add the don't add @ as a widget, presumably when i...
- 11:45 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Given the failed regression testing, I'm revisiting with this testcase:...
01/16/2020
- 04:46 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin: please review.
- 04:45 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for a code review?
I think so. - 04:40 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Is this ready for a code review?
- 05:36 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- @VALIDATE-SEAL@ is fixed in 4335a revision 11475.
- 02:50 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Hi Constantin... fyi my regression testing was successful wit... - 01:42 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Hi Constantin... fyi my regression testing was successful with that code removed. What was t... - 01:17 PM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The conversion fixes are in 4207a rev 11360. It also moves the @ExtentExpr@ to anon cla... - 01:00 PM Bug #4123 (Test): conversion generates incorrect java code for Extent statement
- This is basically a duplicate of the issue #4160 and the fix is the same.
- 12:45 PM Bug #4123: conversion generates incorrect java code for Extent statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In what branch and revision can you recreate this problem (i.e. is this in trunk 11319)?
I jus... - 09:46 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > Throw a few test samples in here and we can see.
That is your task. - 09:36 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hmm, this is worse than what we already knew (which was really bad).
>
> Questions:
>
> * D... - 09:33 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Hmm, this is worse than what we already knew (which was really bad).
Questions:
* Does this happen for any @@@ ... - 09:27 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Roger, please change @mymess... - 09:25 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some si... - 09:24 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some similar @Missing value@ - I w... - 09:19 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some similar @Missing value@ - I wonder if @@@ option just form...
- 09:10 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I just wanted to make a note that the 4GL behavior when including conflicting formatting between the variable definit...
01/15/2020
- 05:45 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- *Updated convert/frame_generator.xml in 4207a-11378*
We need to look at our parent node for @ base-field, instead ... - 04:13 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This is an expected consequence of the change. We are now creating the widget from the child of ... - 03:56 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- This is an expected consequence of the change. We are now creating the widget from the child of @AT@ instead of at t...
- 03:40 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trun... - 01:31 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trunk, and this revision.
>
... - 11:02 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trunk, and this revision.
I modified the testcase @at... - 05:42 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- @VALIDATE-SEAL@ is almost fixed, but it appears the @LOAD-DOMAINS@ is broken. Will fix it tomorrow.
- 01:50 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ ... - 11:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I looked into this case. I think you are talking about @ladder-safety-gen.p@ where it references... - 10:13 AM Feature #3867 (Test): direct java class access from 4GL code
- 10:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Constantin/Hynek: Do you know of any other critical bugs or missing feat...
01/14/2020
- 03:57 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ downpath:
>
> [...]
>
... - 02:17 PM Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ downpath:...
- 02:12 PM Bug #4484 (WIP): Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- 09:15 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Manually merged updates into 4335a revision 11469.
- 09:13 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I will first merge into 4335a and continue in it. Is it OK?
Yes.
- 08:58 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Yes, please do. And please go through https://documentation.progress.com/output/ua/Open... - 08:56 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Oops. It seems that I've overlooked this, sorry. I have to add a corresponding test and upd... - 08:53 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Maybe it is better to just manually merge the changes as the... - 08:42 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Maybe it is better to just manually merge the changes as they affect only two classes?
Yes... - 08:22 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> And if is an unknown value?
An error 4065 is generated.
- 08:20 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
Constantin. 3810e wa... - 08:17 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin. In 4GL the @domainAccessCode@ parameter is mandatory for the @SEAL@ call.
And ... - 08:15 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
>
> On a side note, in... - 08:04 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
On a side note, in @validateSeal@ I left this comme...
01/13/2020
- 07:17 AM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Greg,
I think we should support the thread "JOIN" concept by using an additional option @AS-THREAD [SET handle] [ON-...
01/12/2020
- 02:05 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The issue #3810-407 resolved in 3810e revision 11342.
BTW: it appears the @PRIMARY_PASSPHRASE@ attribute value is ig... - 12:00 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- @SET-DB-CLIENT@ for the principal in a @LOGIN@ state validates only @DOMAIN-NAME@ and @DOMAIN-ACCESS-CODE@ (using MAC...
- 11:03 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- With 3810e revision 11341, the @SET-DB-CLIENT@ with the imported sealed principal works fine. So the issue described ...
01/10/2020
- 05:32 PM Feature #3254 (WIP): add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- To create a new thread, I was planning to add an optional @AS-THREAD [SET handle]@ extension to the @RUN@ statement. ...
- 04:10 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I believe that we are at a good "first pass" level of support here. A future improvement would b... - 01:12 AM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin/Hynek: Do you know of any other critical bugs or missing features before we can accept...
01/09/2020
- 05:56 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Understood. To implement "temp-tables" that are shared across threads we would have to implement a multi-user databa...
- 05:17 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- To clarify, you can access a persistent table across threads, but not over the same connection. A temp-table actually...
- 05:16 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Since JDBC connections cannot be shared across more than one thread, the current temp-table appro... - 05:09 PM Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Some months ago, Eric noted to me that sharing temp-tables will be a problem since they are private to a single JDBC ...
- 04:28 PM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- I believe that we are at a good "first pass" level of support here. A future improvement would be to support inherit...
- 04:24 PM Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- I just committed revision 11467 to branch 4335a (which is derived from 3809e revision 11466). This revision provides...
01/06/2020
- 02:06 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Well, I understand what was wrong in my setup. I had @large_customer_application.jar@ in my project classpath. Now th...
- 02:00 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exi... - 01:56 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exist in your application jar f... - 01:40 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exist in your application jar file?
- 01:21 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Please note that I still have no solution for problem #3810-413.... - 12:46 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Please note that I still have no solution for problem #3810-413. Any help will be highly ap... - 05:37 AM Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> That was not enough detail to get me going. I believe Greg thought it would be an exercise i...
01/03/2020
- 01:49 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The extended @uast/security/export-cp.p@ test produces the compatible results in 4GL and FWD branch 3810e rev. 11341....
- 01:52 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * What is the structure/size/layout of the BOM for file input/output?
There is no special...
01/02/2020
- 01:07 PM Bug #4476 (Test): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- 12:12 PM Bug #4476 (WIP): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- 12:11 PM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > but doesn't myat have to be defined properly, too?
>
> In the working case, the variable is ... - 10:23 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > but doesn't myat have to be defined properly, too?
In the working case, the variable is not defined as an inline... - 10:15 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> That is probably not related. The issue will be the tree structure under the @KW_FORM@. The @FO... - 10:07 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- That is probably not related. The issue will be the tree structure under the @KW_FORM@. The @FORM_ITEM@ related to ...
- 10:02 AM Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Comparing the AST generated for the broken case (@shared_frame_at_label.p@) against the correct case (@shared_frame_a...
Also available in: Atom