Activity
From 06/24/2020 to 07/23/2020
07/17/2020
- 10:13 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- I'm looking at the table, dataset and buffer matching right now. In @SymbolResolver.translateType()@ we have this co...
07/16/2020
- 06:37 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> OK, an important point is @if caller hasn't specified a mode for an argument, use wildcard@.
>
... - 06:21 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- OK, an important point is @if caller hasn't specified a mode for an argument, use wildcard@.
Still, I don't unders... - 05:34 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> As far as I know the parameter modes are not actually part of the "fuzziness". In fact, we proba... - 05:29 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- No, I mean this code:...
- 05:24 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Constantin wrote:
> you mean the narrowing/widening match, based on the parameters mode? - 05:23 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- We have a step that comes at the end for matching parameter modes.
Constantin: Why does it need to come at the en... - 05:22 PM Feature #4350 (WIP): method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object ...
- > Do you have a simple example for this? Conversion rules should choose the @putBytes_1@ if the argument is @Memptr@....
- 02:35 PM Feature #3817: create resource bundles from string literals and implement optional support for se...
- This is very interesting. I wasn't familiar with gettext. Thank you for posting this!
I like that the results ar... - 10:10 AM Bug #4754 (Test): DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- I'm fine with the change.
- 09:56 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- @3821c-11399@ ready for review.
- 09:42 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- > Can I check it in?
Yes. - 09:25 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > It's not the same as a function call parameter.
>
> In what way?
Well, my ignorance was s...
07/15/2020
- 04:03 PM Feature #3817: create resource bundles from string literals and implement optional support for se...
- I have good experience with GNU gettext (for Java). The great advantage is the ability to use the original texts in t...
- 03:11 PM Feature #3753 (Closed): I18N additions
- The support from this task is already in trunk. The remaining items will be tracked in #4761.
- 02:53 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- > Ah, as a side note we've found a strange issue with conversion - the backslash escape in strings present in source ...
- 03:07 PM Feature #2135 (Closed): implement COPY-LOB language statement
- These changes are all in trunk. The remaining work will be tracked in #4768.
- 03:06 PM Feature #4761: I18N phase 3
- #4763 replace any hard coded dependencies on charset processing
#4762 localize system error messages
#4768 finish @... - 12:08 PM Feature #4761 (New): I18N phase 3
- 03:01 PM Feature #4768: finish copy-lob support
- The following need to be completed:
* TODOs in the code, primarily those where errors need to be handled with a mo... - 02:58 PM Feature #4768 (Closed): finish copy-lob support
- 02:56 PM Bug #4767: memptr set-size() issue
- From Marian:
> memptr, set-size - on Windows when passing a negative number the value apparently gets set as xor b... - 02:55 PM Bug #4767 (New): memptr set-size() issue
- 02:51 PM Feature #4763: replace any hard coded dependencies on charset processing
- Is this what you've reported in #3753-121 as "'iso8859-1' seems to be considered as the 4GL default"?
> Greg, alre... - 01:40 PM Feature #4763: replace any hard coded dependencies on charset processing
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We need to check the FWD runtime for hard coded references to specific charsets. For example the... - 01:27 PM Feature #4763: replace any hard coded dependencies on charset processing
- We need to check the FWD runtime for hard coded references to specific charsets. For example there is code like this...
- 01:25 PM Feature #4763 (New): replace any hard coded dependencies on charset processing
- 02:49 PM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- As noted during #4384 work, Marian's team found that CHR and ASC were not double byte enabled, they use the wrong def...
- 02:48 PM Bug #4766 (WIP): fix CHR and ASC
- 02:45 PM Feature #4765: MAP/NO-MAP support
- In #3753 we added conversion support for the @MAP@ and @NO-MAP@ stream options. As can be seen in #3753-57, we need ...
- 02:40 PM Feature #4765 (New): MAP/NO-MAP support
- 02:21 PM Feature #4764: make modifications to FWD so that all I18N testcases work properly
- In #3753, we implemented phase 2 of our I18N support. This was done before I18N testcases were available. This task...
- 02:14 PM Feature #4764 (New): make modifications to FWD so that all I18N testcases work properly
- 01:35 PM Feature #4762: localize system error messages
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We know that 4GL system error messages are localized. They have different message source files t... - 01:24 PM Feature #4762: localize system error messages
- We know that 4GL system error messages are localized. They have different message source files that are somehow sele...
- 12:48 PM Feature #4762 (New): localize system error messages
- 12:46 PM Feature #4378: properly handle clob/lonchar assignment, especially the implicit codepage conversion
- > FWD's implementation of BUFFER-COPY uses the @RecordBuffer@ invocation handler for its individual fields, so if we ...
07/14/2020
- 02:19 PM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- > It's not the same as a function call parameter.
In what way?
We know that the parameter must be an @expr@. T... - 11:57 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The first parameter can be an arbitrarily complex sub-expression like @something + func(handle:bl...
07/13/2020
- 10:21 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- The first parameter can be an arbitrarily complex sub-expression like @something + func(handle:blah:blah:method(), ob...
- 10:12 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- Why is the 1st parameter of @KW_DYN_FUNC@ handled the same as the other parameters, when it is the _function-name_, n...
- 09:12 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- If you are sure that this is procedure handle syntax instead of widget qualifier syntax, then we may need a different...
- 08:46 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- @hFunc:NAME@ is a character, which in the DYNAMIC-FUNCTION's syntax for the first argument (@function-name[ IN proc-h...
- 08:33 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- The 4GL in the ADM2 @panel.p@ is:...
- 03:16 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- What's the generated Java code for this call? The @dynamic_function_func@ rule checks for @func_call_parm[false] (in_...
- 12:07 AM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Because the 2nd case is not supposed to match an @in_procedure_clause@. The 2nd usage is an attr...
07/12/2020
- 06:10 PM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- Because the 2nd case is not supposed to match an @in_procedure_clause@. The 2nd usage is an attribute that is being ...
- 06:07 PM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- From Roger:
Why would @widget_qualifier@ be parsing, instead of @dynamic_function_func@... - 06:06 PM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> It is like the @IN@ is never parsed.
No, the @IN@ is seen but the following token is unre... - 05:37 PM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- Added testcase @uast/handle/handle_attr_dyn_func.p@
- 05:31 PM Bug #4754: DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
- The second @DYNAMIC-FUNCTION@ call fails to parse:...
- 05:24 PM Bug #4754 (Closed): DYNAMIC-FUNCTION parsing fails when first parameter is not an expression
07/08/2020
07/07/2020
- 09:26 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- > It can be a @.x@, @.k@, @.tt@
And 4GL doesn't care about the extension, @RUN@ will work - only @.r@ is assumed if... - 09:25 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> ... but if there is a ".w" and ".p", we may have to enforce a precedence determined by testc... - 09:02 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg, you are correct. We need more testcases to find every case.
>
> For now, can i... - 06:18 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Greg, you are correct. We need more testcases to find every case.
For now, can it be enough to check if the last ... - 05:57 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Relative paths @./@ and @../../something/else/../blah/@ are possible. It is also legal to include @.@ in random part...
- 08:27 PM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Checked in updates to @3821c-11389@ that don't have the @pname.indexOf('.') < 0)@ check. I am open to changing, just ...
07/06/2020
- 10:52 AM Bug #4734: Invalid string to date conversion for non-"mm/dd/yyyy" format
- > Which FWD branch/revision?
I've tested it against trunk rev 11347. - 10:04 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Is it possible to have @.@ in your path (or filename) that might fail that test?
- 09:51 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Change the test to this: @if (extProg == null && pname.indexOf('.') < 0)@.
- 09:49 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Instead, you need to do this:
> # if the exact match of @pname@ is found, use that.
> ... - 09:16 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> In the debugger I noticed that the procedure name came into the @convertName@ method first, ... - 09:06 AM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- In the debugger I noticed that the procedure name came into the @convertName@ method first, without a path in front o...
07/04/2020
- 01:00 PM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- I forgot to use this task for this...
I asked about the existing code making an assumption that it is rcode. Howev...
07/03/2020
- 05:54 PM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- He was talking about @SourceNameMapper.convertName@ at line 1395.
The usage needs to be added to @lookupDirectName... - 05:52 PM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- Constantin asked:
Roger, rename @run-noext-victim.p@ to @run-noext-victim.k.p@ and do a @RUN run-noext-victim.k@. ... - 05:49 PM Bug #4741: RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fails to be ...
- There is an issue about finding an external procedure that is not passed to @RUN@ with an extension. I added this tes...
- 05:45 PM Bug #4741 (Closed): RUN statement with a path to a procedure that does not have any extension fai...
- 12:56 PM Bug #4734: Invalid string to date conversion for non-"mm/dd/yyyy" format
- Which FWD branch/revision?
- 12:20 PM Bug #4734: Invalid string to date conversion for non-"mm/dd/yyyy" format
- Testcase:...
- 12:12 PM Bug #4734 (Closed): Invalid string to date conversion for non-"mm/dd/yyyy" format
06/30/2020
- 11:11 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, I think this is your change, right?...
06/25/2020
- 04:00 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- We have some issues with OO named events, one of the tests does not pass conversion: @oo/openedge/net/http/filter/aut...
Also available in: Atom