FWD » Core Development » Base Language

07/10/2024

04:53 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Found an interesting scenario when testing #8947 to expand another usage of @recordOrShowDatabaseError()@, the follow... Dănuț Filimon

07/09/2024

08:40 AM Bug #8944: FINALLY block transaction processing

In #8912-61, (and others), it was found that at least in this test FWD does not process the FINALLY blocks transactio... Constantin Asofiei

08:34 AM Bug #8944 (Review): FINALLY block transaction processing

Constantin Asofiei

07/05/2024

04:32 AM Bug #8929: Constructors with EXTENT parameters fails

We have this issue with JsonArray that takes extent parameters as input in constructor, instantiation fails for any o... Marian Edu

03:33 AM Bug #8929 (New): Constructors with EXTENT parameters fails

Marian Edu

07/01/2024

05:07 PM Feature #6431: implement support to allow CPINTERNAL set to UTF-8 and CP936

I'm not asure where to bring this up. I ran into some new issues with our latest p2j library. We use functions key F1... Robert Jensen

09:07 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

OK, then lets avoid the temp-table implementation. Greg Shah

08:04 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Is this implicit temp-table access heavily used in the application code or is this so... Constantin Asofiei

07:48 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

Constantin: Is this implicit temp-table access heavily used in the application code or is this something that can be ... Greg Shah

07:44 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * shows an implicit temp-table is created
Yes, default constructor is probably using th... Marian Edu

08:54 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> 6667g is based on trunk rev/15271, so it includes both revisions.
I understand now, I'll... Dănuț Filimon

08:53 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> ... can you take a look at #8643-12 and let me know if this patch is ok for 7156b?
The patch... Constantin Asofiei

08:52 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

6667g is based on trunk rev/15271, so it includes both revisions. Alexandru Lungu

08:50 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Danut, please pend effort until I can get some logs from 6667g to cross-check.
This issu... Dănuț Filimon

08:46 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've tried using @BlockManager@ and @TransactionManager@ from trunk (not just revs 14998... Dănuț Filimon

08:45 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Danut, please pend effort until I can get some logs from 6667g to cross-check. Alexandru Lungu

08:44 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I've tried using @BlockManager@ and @TransactionManager@ from trunk (not just revs 14998/15244, so other changes, too... Constantin Asofiei

04:22 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Danut, trunk/14998 was especially created to handle rollbacks, as there were unit tests (on... Dănuț Filimon

04:19 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Danut, trunk/14998 was especially created to handle rollbacks, as there were unit tests (on another customer applicat... Alexandru Lungu

04:15 AM Bug #8643 (WIP): ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I've been investigating the double validation and was using 7156b with the changes from 8643a for testing. For a set ... Dănuț Filimon

06/29/2024

06:20 AM Bug #8910: 'VIEW frame IN WINDOW' converts to invalid Java

Workaround:... Vladimir Tsichevski

04:19 AM Bug #8910: 'VIEW frame IN WINDOW' converts to invalid Java

Probably, the correct output shall look like this?... Vladimir Tsichevski

06/28/2024

04:38 PM Bug #8910: 'VIEW frame IN WINDOW' converts to invalid Java

The @VIEW outerFrame IN WINDOW wnd.@ statement in the following code:... Vladimir Tsichevski

04:33 PM Bug #8910 (New): 'VIEW frame IN WINDOW' converts to invalid Java

Vladimir Tsichevski

10:40 AM Feature #4347 (Closed): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Greg Shah

10:33 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Greg Shah wrote:
> Are all of your testcases meeting the following criteria?
>
> * Checked into xfer [[p2j:Testca... Eduard Soltan

04:32 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

Marian, regarding the @OpenEdge.Core.Collections.List@ question. There are these two cases in #8880:
* shows an imp... Constantin Asofiei

06/26/2024

08:43 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

The change mentioned in #8643-15 is not ok, the method called is @RecordBuffer.validate()@ which calls @flush(true)@ ... Dănuț Filimon

05:51 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

It's caused by the revalidation of the record in @BlockManager.processForBody()@:... Dănuț Filimon

05:38 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

*8643a* changes fail this test where the error is shown into a modal instead of being caught by the catch block:
<pr... Dănuț Filimon

04:57 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I've posted my results in #8308-403 where I compared the previously made changes from 8308e with the new changes from... Dănuț Filimon

03:52 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I'll be testing with the attached patch, let me know if it's not correct.
*EDIT*: the patch does not contain the *... Dănuț Filimon

03:47 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Constantin, patching ErrorManager for 7156b is a bit hard to understand as there are no @ServerErrorDataAccessor@ and... Dănuț Filimon

07:57 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

The documentation for the original implementation in FWD is at [[p2j:Appserver_Support]] and [[p2j:Setup_and_Configur... Constantin Asofiei

07:44 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Are all of your testcases meeting the following criteria?
* Checked into xfer [[p2j:Testcases]] project.
* Implem... Greg Shah

04:36 AM Feature #4347 (Test): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Alexandru Lungu

04:34 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

4347a was merged into trunk revision 15310, and archived. Eduard Soltan

02:33 AM Feature #4347 (Merge Pending): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

ChUI regression passed. One test failed (time-out) when running all tests automatically, but I re-run it manually and... Alexandru Lungu

07:41 AM Feature #8904: implement -catchStop and the integration/conversion of STOP conditions into except...

See #4347-19 and following for a discussion about how @STOP@ conditions can be converted into @Progress.Lang.Stop@ ex... Greg Shah

07:38 AM Feature #8904 (Closed): implement -catchStop and the integration/conversion of STOP conditions in...

Greg Shah

06/25/2024

10:28 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I've rebased 7643a from trunk rev 15308.
The changes are in rev 15311. With this, the tests in #8308-397, #8308-3... Constantin Asofiei

03:12 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> > Committed *8643a/rev.15307* which contains the 15272 and 15273... Dănuț Filimon

08:46 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Just a quick note to inform you the tests for consuming WS from 4GL (FWD) client were converted to ABLUnit - availabl... Marian Edu

08:15 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think I should implement it and wait for the review to discuss it further, as per usual.
>
... Galya B

08:14 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> I think I should implement it and wait for the review to discuss it further, as per usual.
Does this really have... Greg Shah

07:45 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Marian, thanks for the references.
I've read the Progress documentation, so my question was if we do Progress-like... Galya B

07:39 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Aren't we simulating the nameserver lookup with our services configuration in... Marian Edu

06:58 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> If I understand correctly, we are just trying to bypass the nameserver nonsense and use the servi... Galya B

06:48 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin: Please provide some details about how this is supposed to work and why we have it.
Consider that appli... Greg Shah

06:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Aren't we simulating the nameserver lookup with our services configuration in the directory?
We ... Galya B

06:23 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Aren't we simulating the nameserver lookup with our services configuration in the directory? Greg Shah

03:33 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > We have no need for the nameserver. We don't plan to implement a replacement... Galya B

01:58 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> We have no need for the nameserver. We don't plan to implement a replacement for it. Any functi... Galya B

06/24/2024

09:55 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

We have no need for the nameserver. We don't plan to implement a replacement for it. Any functionality choices shou... Greg Shah

09:44 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

What's different in FWD is that appserver connect works without nameserver and without @-DirectConnect@. In Progress ... Galya B

08:47 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Constantin, I don't understand what is the function of the appserver config @... Galya B

08:43 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin, I don't understand what is the function of the appserver config @services@ in the conte... Greg Shah

08:40 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> > Where to find the 'TCP/IP services file' in Progress, where the IP <-> service name is configured for appserver c... Greg Shah

06:21 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Another question: How to configure a default appserver for Progress nameserver? There is no such config in the web ma... Galya B

05:49 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin, I don't understand what is the function of the appserver config @services@ in the context of the finding ... Galya B

05:28 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Where to find the 'TCP/IP services file' in Progress, where the IP <-> service name is configured f... Galya B

04:03 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Where to find the 'TCP/IP services file' in Progress, where the IP <-> service name is configured for appserver connect? Galya B

02:03 AM Feature #6417 (WIP): cleanup some known items in appserver support

6417d was merged to trunk as rev. 15307 and archived. Galya B

01:55 AM Feature #6417 (Merge Pending): cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya, please merge 6417d Constantin Asofiei

06/21/2024

02:30 PM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Committed *8643a/rev.15307* which contains the 15272 and 15273 revisions from *8308e*. (see #... Constantin Asofiei

10:29 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Committed *8643a/rev.15307* which contains the 15272 and 15273 revisions from *8308e*. (see #8308-397) Dănuț Filimon

10:12 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Created *8643a*. Dănuț Filimon

02:28 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > ETF or some other appserver application testing to confirm that we haven't affected anyth... Constantin Asofiei

10:24 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Smoke tests for a customer GUI application passed. Șerban Bursuc

10:13 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Rebased 4347a to latest trunk. It is now at rev. 15315. Alexandru Lungu

09:59 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

I am rebasing this now. Alexandru Lungu

09:58 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

> ChUI regression testing. It uses virtual sessions and more than one FWD server which is definitely affected by thes... Alexandru Lungu

09:42 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Additional testing:
* ChUI regression testing. It uses virtual sessions and more than one FWD server which is def... Greg Shah

09:08 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Committed on 4347a, revision 15212. Eduard Soltan

09:02 AM Feature #4347 (Internal Test): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Eduard, please assess #4347-68 for 4347a.
This should be ready to be merged, right? Greg, other testing you sugges... Alexandru Lungu

08:56 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

I tested Ctrl-C tests, with 4347a changes. And haven't got any regressions.
Also tested customer scenario, and it ... Eduard Soltan

12:09 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

No, no, I'm reverting, sorry, this is safer. Reverted in r15312. Galya B

12:08 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Or at least I need to add one @if (port == 0)@ before the filter. Galya B

12:04 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I think we should revert the @serviceName@ check. Less errors thrown, better. I think it's not correct now. What if i... Galya B

12:02 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > So you can have both port and serviceName. More, serviceName for UR... Constantin Asofiei

11:59 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> So you can have both port and serviceName. More, serviceName for URL connections is con... Galya B

11:46 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

See r15311. I'm committing the test without the if, it works well now. Galya B

11:40 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > @appsrv/test/connect_errors/service_name.p@ is successful. Is it not?
> It's a 'false... Galya B

11:38 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > > There is also an issue with @(s... Constantin Asofiei

11:37 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > There is also an issue with @(serviceName == null || ... Galya B

11:20 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Our @-S@ is both @serviceName@ and @port@. So the port can be declared @0@ in the connect string, w... Constantin Asofiei

10:56 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Note #6417-283 edited. Galya B

10:54 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Galya, please add back the @if (port != 0)@ test - this is required ... Galya B

10:33 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, please add back the @if (port != 0)@ test - this is required for connection strin... Galya B

10:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya, please add back the @if (port != 0)@ test - this is required for connection strings like @-AppService app_serv... Constantin Asofiei

10:01 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin: Please review. Greg Shah

09:32 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

The fix for #7143-1017 is on 6417d. Galya B

08:56 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

This is a list of all testcases/appsrv/test procedures. Before they were converting / compiling fine, now not.
Galya B

05:36 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There is also an issue with @(serviceName == null || data.services.contains(serviceName)... Galya B

05:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, please let me know when 6417d is available.
6417d is created from trunk r15306 a... Galya B

04:00 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

This is the async test:
* @appsrv/test/test_raise_quit2.p@... Constantin Asofiei

06/20/2024

05:19 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Code Review Task Branch 4347a Revision 15211
It looks good.
Minor issue: please remove the @import com.goldenco... Greg Shah

03:22 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Eduard reported in today's meeting that he was working to get Ctrl+C testing running. Greg, FYI, there is a 4347a/152... Eric Faulhaber

10:17 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Branch 6417c was merged to trunk rev 15305 and archived.
Constantin Asofiei

10:11 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

There is also an issue with the socket connection and 'nohostverify' - I've found when trying to run some reports in ... Constantin Asofiei

08:59 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * the test does not match the comment, I assume it was meant to be 'not equal':
> [...]... Galya B

08:56 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Go ahead and merge 6417c. Greg Shah

08:54 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I've checked @test_raise_stop.p@, @test_raise_quit.p@, @test_return_value.p@ and these work with 6417c and a change i... Constantin Asofiei

08:41 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> > 'Time' doesn't close old tasks by itself. My assessment is that this functionality should not b... Galya B

08:40 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> 'Time' doesn't close old tasks by itself. My assessment is that this functionality should not be reverted.
That... Greg Shah

08:38 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> > > No one is saying everything is your fault. And who really cares about blame when we simply n... Galya B

08:36 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> > No one is saying everything is your fault. And who really cares about blame when we simply need to help a custom... Greg Shah

08:33 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin found the issue early today. If he spoke with me, we might have had already found the proper solution. If ... Galya B

08:31 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> No one is saying everything is your fault. And who really cares about blame when we simply need ... Galya B

08:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> runtime issue in converison issue with @FileSystemOps.initFileInfo@ fixed in 15299
This is not i... Galya B

08:28 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

No one is saying everything is your fault. And who really cares about blame when we simply need to help a customer w... Greg Shah

08:27 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

# runtime issue in @FileSystemOps.initFileInfo@ fixed in 15299
# conversion issue in @control_flow.rules@ fixed in 1... Greg Shah

08:25 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I wondered how I get so many black points in the register. Now I see. All issues in FWD are on my account. Galya B

08:22 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> This is the 3rd regression from 6417a and if the solution Constantin proposes is not obviously sa... Galya B

08:20 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> > Are you saying it is better to back out 6417a completely?
> I'm obviously saying that a hotfix takes some time a... Greg Shah

08:20 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Across all of our customers, SOAP is much less used than appserver. For this customer, it is clo... Galya B

08:19 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Across all of our customers, SOAP is much less used than appserver. For this customer, it is close to a production i... Greg Shah

08:17 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Are you saying it is better to back out 6417a completely?
I'm obviously saying that a hotfix tak... Galya B

08:15 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I mean when SOAP wasn't working for days after java 17 related changes merge it wasn't urgent. Galya B

08:15 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Are you saying it is better to back out 6417a completely? Greg Shah

08:15 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I'm generally surprised by the urgency of an issue not on production. Even issues on production usually take a day or... Galya B

08:13 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya: Please split this discussion into 2 parts. The first, urgent part is to ensure that 6417c... Galya B

08:10 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Also don't expect me to remember just like that what a change done months ago involves. That's what automation is about. Galya B

08:07 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> This regression is holding back a customer's testing. While it exists in trunk, they are blocked... Galya B

07:49 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

This regression is holding back a customer's testing. While it exists in trunk, they are blocked. It is urgent to g... Greg Shah

06:19 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Galya B wrote:
> > > > Can you exp... Galya B

06:17 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Galya B wrote:
> > > Can you explain why you back it out? What are ... Constantin Asofiei

06:10 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Can you explain why you back it out? What are the steps for reproduc... Galya B

06:07 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Can you explain why you back it out? What are the steps for reproducing an issue?
The root cause i... Constantin Asofiei

05:40 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Can you explain why you back it out? What are the steps for reproducing an issue? Galya B

05:39 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> 6417c rev 15304 backed out part of trunk rev 15287 in AppServerManager - the client need... Galya B

05:37 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> 6417c rev 15304 backed out part of trunk rev 15287 in AppServerManager - the client need... Galya B

05:34 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Created task branch 6417c from trunk rev 15303.
6417c rev 15304 backed out part of trunk rev 15287 in AppServerMan... Constantin Asofiei

03:12 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Also the revert in #6417-235 breaks a core functionality of SOAP, so we should address it somehow. Galya B

03:10 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin, give me more information on #7143-1012. Galya B

06/19/2024

12:56 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

After making these changes, please work with Tomasz to run all the CTRL-C tests using this branch. Greg Shah

12:55 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Code Review Task Branch 4347a Revision 15210
This is good. It is very close.
1. I'm worried about the use of @... Greg Shah

11:00 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Committed on 4347a, revision 15210.
Changed implementation to insert Ctrl-C into TypeAhead queue.
Added as spec... Eduard Soltan

07:55 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Just a quick note to let you know the tests for calling appsrv from 4GL client (RPC style) were converted to AblUnit ... Marian Edu

04:46 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Created task branch 6417b from trunk rev 15298 to fix an existing bug exposed by the changes in 6417a.
The fix is ... Constantin Asofiei

06/18/2024

03:35 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

> > > Perhaps we need to down-call to cause this to occur. But I don't think it is as simple as making a downcall, s... Greg Shah

01:46 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Code Review Task Branch 4347a Revision 15209
1. The changes to rewrite the @Control@ synchronization are extensive... Greg Shah

01:29 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

> >I think we might have to insert @CTRL-C@ into the type ahead queue. Interestingly, that should even work when the... Greg Shah

11:01 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Committed on 4347a, revision 15209.
I implemented a mechanism to interrupt a Conversation thread and synchronize the... Eduard Soltan

06:40 AM Feature #6417 (WIP): cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah

05:31 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

6417a was merged to trunk as rev. 15287 and archived.
Galya B

03:04 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Let me know about 7994a and merge.
> Lets get 6417a to trunk first ... Galya B

03:01 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Let me know about 7994a and merge.
Lets get 6417a to trunk first and after that we'll check #7994 ... Constantin Asofiei

02:59 AM Feature #6417 (Merge Pending): cleanup some known items in appserver support

This can be merged after 8848a Constantin Asofiei

01:36 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> > Galya, this must be from the Jetty upgrade - we need a @baseRequest.setHandled(true);@ being call... Galya B

12:38 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Did 6417a pass its testing? If so, I'd like to get it merged.
It passed, but my concern is th... Galya B

06/17/2024

03:05 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Did 6417a pass its testing? If so, I'd like to get it merged. Greg Shah

02:39 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> Greg/Tomasz: is it worth it to integrate the #7994 work from 6667i into 6417a, so we can merge it to trunk?
Yes,... Greg Shah

02:30 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya, this must be from the Jetty upgrade - we need a @baseRequest.setHandled(true);@ being called always in @SoapHa... Constantin Asofiei

03:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

There is something wrong with SOAP on +trunk+. Jetty returns 404, although the @SoapHandler@ handles the requests suc... Galya B

06/14/2024

10:25 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Greg Shah wrote:
>I think we might have to insert @CTRL-C@ into the type ahead queue. Interestingly, that should ev... Eduard Soltan

06/13/2024

07:42 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Imagine an situation.
> If I am in timer thread and control is on the client side, I send a ... Greg Shah

04:02 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Imagine an situation.
If I am in timer thread and control is on the client side, I send a interrupt message to the c... Eduard Soltan

01:30 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Since the tests are up to date, how do I solve #6417-149?
> This is... Galya B