FWD » Core Development » Base Language

07/17/2024

08:41 AM Bug #8978: ErrorConditionException in not being propagated correctly

This ticket is derived from #8912-105. Artur Școlnic

08:40 AM Bug #8978: ErrorConditionException in not being propagated correctly

... Artur Școlnic

08:38 AM Bug #8978: ErrorConditionException in not being propagated correctly

myClass file... Artur Școlnic

08:35 AM Bug #8978 (Closed): ErrorConditionException in not being propagated correctly

Artur Școlnic

08:15 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

6410b rev 14873 built on trunk 14856 was rebased from trunk rev 15338 - new rev 15355.
rev 15356/15357 contains re... Constantin Asofiei

07/10/2024

04:53 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Found an interesting scenario when testing #8947 to expand another usage of @recordOrShowDatabaseError()@, the follow... Dănuț Filimon

07/09/2024

08:40 AM Bug #8944: FINALLY block transaction processing

In #8912-61, (and others), it was found that at least in this test FWD does not process the FINALLY blocks transactio... Constantin Asofiei

08:34 AM Bug #8944 (Review): FINALLY block transaction processing

Constantin Asofiei

07/05/2024

04:32 AM Bug #8929: Constructors with EXTENT parameters fails

We have this issue with JsonArray that takes extent parameters as input in constructor, instantiation fails for any o... Marian Edu

03:33 AM Bug #8929 (New): Constructors with EXTENT parameters fails

Marian Edu

07/01/2024

05:07 PM Feature #6431: implement support to allow CPINTERNAL set to UTF-8 and CP936

I'm not asure where to bring this up. I ran into some new issues with our latest p2j library. We use functions key F1... Robert Jensen

09:07 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

OK, then lets avoid the temp-table implementation. Greg Shah

08:04 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Is this implicit temp-table access heavily used in the application code or is this so... Constantin Asofiei

07:48 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

Constantin: Is this implicit temp-table access heavily used in the application code or is this something that can be ... Greg Shah

07:44 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * shows an implicit temp-table is created
Yes, default constructor is probably using th... Marian Edu

08:54 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> 6667g is based on trunk rev/15271, so it includes both revisions.
I understand now, I'll... Dănuț Filimon

08:53 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> ... can you take a look at #8643-12 and let me know if this patch is ok for 7156b?
The patch... Constantin Asofiei

08:52 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

6667g is based on trunk rev/15271, so it includes both revisions. Alexandru Lungu

08:50 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Danut, please pend effort until I can get some logs from 6667g to cross-check.
This issu... Dănuț Filimon

08:46 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've tried using @BlockManager@ and @TransactionManager@ from trunk (not just revs 14998... Dănuț Filimon

08:45 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Danut, please pend effort until I can get some logs from 6667g to cross-check. Alexandru Lungu

08:44 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I've tried using @BlockManager@ and @TransactionManager@ from trunk (not just revs 14998/15244, so other changes, too... Constantin Asofiei

04:22 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Danut, trunk/14998 was especially created to handle rollbacks, as there were unit tests (on... Dănuț Filimon

04:19 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Danut, trunk/14998 was especially created to handle rollbacks, as there were unit tests (on another customer applicat... Alexandru Lungu

04:15 AM Bug #8643 (WIP): ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I've been investigating the double validation and was using 7156b with the changes from 8643a for testing. For a set ... Dănuț Filimon

06/29/2024

06:20 AM Bug #8910: 'VIEW frame IN WINDOW' converts to invalid Java

Workaround:... Vladimir Tsichevski

04:19 AM Bug #8910: 'VIEW frame IN WINDOW' converts to invalid Java

Probably, the correct output shall look like this?... Vladimir Tsichevski

06/28/2024

04:38 PM Bug #8910: 'VIEW frame IN WINDOW' converts to invalid Java

The @VIEW outerFrame IN WINDOW wnd.@ statement in the following code:... Vladimir Tsichevski

04:33 PM Bug #8910 (New): 'VIEW frame IN WINDOW' converts to invalid Java

Vladimir Tsichevski

10:40 AM Feature #4347 (Closed): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Greg Shah

10:33 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Greg Shah wrote:
> Are all of your testcases meeting the following criteria?
>
> * Checked into xfer [[p2j:Testca... Eduard Soltan

04:32 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces

Marian, regarding the @OpenEdge.Core.Collections.List@ question. There are these two cases in #8880:
* shows an imp... Constantin Asofiei

06/26/2024

08:43 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

The change mentioned in #8643-15 is not ok, the method called is @RecordBuffer.validate()@ which calls @flush(true)@ ... Dănuț Filimon

05:51 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

It's caused by the revalidation of the record in @BlockManager.processForBody()@:... Dănuț Filimon

05:38 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

*8643a* changes fail this test where the error is shown into a modal instead of being caught by the catch block:
<pr... Dănuț Filimon

04:57 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I've posted my results in #8308-403 where I compared the previously made changes from 8308e with the new changes from... Dănuț Filimon

03:52 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I'll be testing with the attached patch, let me know if it's not correct.
*EDIT*: the patch does not contain the *... Dănuț Filimon

03:47 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Constantin, patching ErrorManager for 7156b is a bit hard to understand as there are no @ServerErrorDataAccessor@ and... Dănuț Filimon

07:57 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

The documentation for the original implementation in FWD is at [[p2j:Appserver_Support]] and [[p2j:Setup_and_Configur... Constantin Asofiei

07:44 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Are all of your testcases meeting the following criteria?
* Checked into xfer [[p2j:Testcases]] project.
* Implem... Greg Shah

04:36 AM Feature #4347 (Test): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Alexandru Lungu

04:34 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

4347a was merged into trunk revision 15310, and archived. Eduard Soltan

02:33 AM Feature #4347 (Merge Pending): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

ChUI regression passed. One test failed (time-out) when running all tests automatically, but I re-run it manually and... Alexandru Lungu

07:41 AM Feature #8904: implement -catchStop and the integration/conversion of STOP conditions into except...

See #4347-19 and following for a discussion about how @STOP@ conditions can be converted into @Progress.Lang.Stop@ ex... Greg Shah

07:38 AM Feature #8904 (Closed): implement -catchStop and the integration/conversion of STOP conditions in...

Greg Shah

06/25/2024

10:28 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

I've rebased 7643a from trunk rev 15308.
The changes are in rev 15311. With this, the tests in #8308-397, #8308-3... Constantin Asofiei

03:12 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> > Committed *8643a/rev.15307* which contains the 15272 and 15273... Dănuț Filimon

08:46 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Just a quick note to inform you the tests for consuming WS from 4GL (FWD) client were converted to ABLUnit - availabl... Marian Edu

08:15 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think I should implement it and wait for the review to discuss it further, as per usual.
>
... Galya B

08:14 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> I think I should implement it and wait for the review to discuss it further, as per usual.
Does this really have... Greg Shah

07:45 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Marian, thanks for the references.
I've read the Progress documentation, so my question was if we do Progress-like... Galya B

07:39 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Aren't we simulating the nameserver lookup with our services configuration in... Marian Edu

06:58 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> If I understand correctly, we are just trying to bypass the nameserver nonsense and use the servi... Galya B

06:48 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin: Please provide some details about how this is supposed to work and why we have it.
Consider that appli... Greg Shah

06:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Aren't we simulating the nameserver lookup with our services configuration in the directory?
We ... Galya B

06:23 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Aren't we simulating the nameserver lookup with our services configuration in the directory? Greg Shah

03:33 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > We have no need for the nameserver. We don't plan to implement a replacement... Galya B

01:58 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> We have no need for the nameserver. We don't plan to implement a replacement for it. Any functi... Galya B

06/24/2024

09:55 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

We have no need for the nameserver. We don't plan to implement a replacement for it. Any functionality choices shou... Greg Shah

09:44 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

What's different in FWD is that appserver connect works without nameserver and without @-DirectConnect@. In Progress ... Galya B

08:47 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Constantin, I don't understand what is the function of the appserver config @... Galya B

08:43 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin, I don't understand what is the function of the appserver config @services@ in the conte... Greg Shah

08:40 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> > Where to find the 'TCP/IP services file' in Progress, where the IP <-> service name is configured for appserver c... Greg Shah

06:21 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Another question: How to configure a default appserver for Progress nameserver? There is no such config in the web ma... Galya B

05:49 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin, I don't understand what is the function of the appserver config @services@ in the context of the finding ... Galya B

05:28 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Where to find the 'TCP/IP services file' in Progress, where the IP <-> service name is configured f... Galya B

04:03 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Where to find the 'TCP/IP services file' in Progress, where the IP <-> service name is configured for appserver connect? Galya B

02:03 AM Feature #6417 (WIP): cleanup some known items in appserver support

6417d was merged to trunk as rev. 15307 and archived. Galya B

01:55 AM Feature #6417 (Merge Pending): cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya, please merge 6417d Constantin Asofiei

06/21/2024

02:30 PM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Committed *8643a/rev.15307* which contains the 15272 and 15273 revisions from *8308e*. (see #... Constantin Asofiei

10:29 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Committed *8643a/rev.15307* which contains the 15272 and 15273 revisions from *8308e*. (see #8308-397) Dănuț Filimon

10:12 AM Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly

Created *8643a*. Dănuț Filimon

02:28 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > ETF or some other appserver application testing to confirm that we haven't affected anyth... Constantin Asofiei

10:24 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Smoke tests for a customer GUI application passed. Șerban Bursuc

10:13 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Rebased 4347a to latest trunk. It is now at rev. 15315. Alexandru Lungu

09:59 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

I am rebasing this now. Alexandru Lungu

09:58 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

> ChUI regression testing. It uses virtual sessions and more than one FWD server which is definitely affected by thes... Alexandru Lungu

09:42 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Additional testing:
* ChUI regression testing. It uses virtual sessions and more than one FWD server which is def... Greg Shah

09:08 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Committed on 4347a, revision 15212. Eduard Soltan

09:02 AM Feature #4347 (Internal Test): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Eduard, please assess #4347-68 for 4347a.
This should be ready to be merged, right? Greg, other testing you sugges... Alexandru Lungu

08:56 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

I tested Ctrl-C tests, with 4347a changes. And haven't got any regressions.
Also tested customer scenario, and it ... Eduard Soltan

12:09 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

No, no, I'm reverting, sorry, this is safer. Reverted in r15312. Galya B

12:08 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Or at least I need to add one @if (port == 0)@ before the filter. Galya B

12:04 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I think we should revert the @serviceName@ check. Less errors thrown, better. I think it's not correct now. What if i... Galya B

12:02 PM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > So you can have both port and serviceName. More, serviceName for UR... Constantin Asofiei

11:59 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> So you can have both port and serviceName. More, serviceName for URL connections is con... Galya B

11:46 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

See r15311. I'm committing the test without the if, it works well now. Galya B

11:40 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > @appsrv/test/connect_errors/service_name.p@ is successful. Is it not?
> It's a 'false... Galya B

11:38 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > > There is also an issue with @(s... Constantin Asofiei

11:37 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > There is also an issue with @(serviceName == null || ... Galya B

11:20 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Our @-S@ is both @serviceName@ and @port@. So the port can be declared @0@ in the connect string, w... Constantin Asofiei

10:56 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Note #6417-283 edited. Galya B

10:54 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Galya, please add back the @if (port != 0)@ test - this is required ... Galya B

10:33 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, please add back the @if (port != 0)@ test - this is required for connection strin... Galya B

10:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya, please add back the @if (port != 0)@ test - this is required for connection strings like @-AppService app_serv... Constantin Asofiei

10:01 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin: Please review. Greg Shah

09:32 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

The fix for #7143-1017 is on 6417d. Galya B

08:56 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

This is a list of all testcases/appsrv/test procedures. Before they were converting / compiling fine, now not.
Galya B

05:36 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There is also an issue with @(serviceName == null || data.services.contains(serviceName)... Galya B

05:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, please let me know when 6417d is available.
6417d is created from trunk r15306 a... Galya B

04:00 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

This is the async test:
* @appsrv/test/test_raise_quit2.p@... Constantin Asofiei

06/20/2024

05:19 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Code Review Task Branch 4347a Revision 15211
It looks good.
Minor issue: please remove the @import com.goldenco... Greg Shah

03:22 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option

Eduard reported in today's meeting that he was working to get Ctrl+C testing running. Greg, FYI, there is a 4347a/152... Eric Faulhaber

10:17 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Branch 6417c was merged to trunk rev 15305 and archived.
Constantin Asofiei

10:11 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

There is also an issue with the socket connection and 'nohostverify' - I've found when trying to run some reports in ... Constantin Asofiei

08:59 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * the test does not match the comment, I assume it was meant to be 'not equal':
> [...]... Galya B

08:56 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Go ahead and merge 6417c. Greg Shah

08:54 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I've checked @test_raise_stop.p@, @test_raise_quit.p@, @test_return_value.p@ and these work with 6417c and a change i... Constantin Asofiei

08:41 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> > 'Time' doesn't close old tasks by itself. My assessment is that this functionality should not b... Galya B

08:40 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> 'Time' doesn't close old tasks by itself. My assessment is that this functionality should not be reverted.
That... Greg Shah

08:38 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> > > No one is saying everything is your fault. And who really cares about blame when we simply n... Galya B

08:36 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> > No one is saying everything is your fault. And who really cares about blame when we simply need to help a custom... Greg Shah

08:33 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin found the issue early today. If he spoke with me, we might have had already found the proper solution. If ... Galya B

08:31 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> No one is saying everything is your fault. And who really cares about blame when we simply need ... Galya B

08:29 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> runtime issue in converison issue with @FileSystemOps.initFileInfo@ fixed in 15299
This is not i... Galya B

08:28 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

No one is saying everything is your fault. And who really cares about blame when we simply need to help a customer w... Greg Shah

08:27 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

# runtime issue in @FileSystemOps.initFileInfo@ fixed in 15299
# conversion issue in @control_flow.rules@ fixed in 1... Greg Shah

08:25 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I wondered how I get so many black points in the register. Now I see. All issues in FWD are on my account. Galya B

08:22 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> This is the 3rd regression from 6417a and if the solution Constantin proposes is not obviously sa... Galya B

08:20 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

> > Are you saying it is better to back out 6417a completely?
> I'm obviously saying that a hotfix takes some time a... Greg Shah

08:20 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Across all of our customers, SOAP is much less used than appserver. For this customer, it is clo... Galya B

08:19 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Across all of our customers, SOAP is much less used than appserver. For this customer, it is close to a production i... Greg Shah

08:17 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Are you saying it is better to back out 6417a completely?
I'm obviously saying that a hotfix tak... Galya B

08:15 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I mean when SOAP wasn't working for days after java 17 related changes merge it wasn't urgent. Galya B

08:15 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Are you saying it is better to back out 6417a completely? Greg Shah

08:15 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

I'm generally surprised by the urgency of an issue not on production. Even issues on production usually take a day or... Galya B

08:13 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya: Please split this discussion into 2 parts. The first, urgent part is to ensure that 6417c... Galya B

08:10 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Also don't expect me to remember just like that what a change done months ago involves. That's what automation is about. Galya B

08:07 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Greg Shah wrote:
> This regression is holding back a customer's testing. While it exists in trunk, they are blocked... Galya B

07:49 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

This regression is holding back a customer's testing. While it exists in trunk, they are blocked. It is urgent to g... Greg Shah

06:19 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Galya B wrote:
> > > > Can you exp... Galya B

06:17 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Galya B wrote:
> > > Can you explain why you back it out? What are ... Constantin Asofiei

06:10 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Can you explain why you back it out? What are the steps for reproduc... Galya B

06:07 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Galya B wrote:
> Can you explain why you back it out? What are the steps for reproducing an issue?
The root cause i... Constantin Asofiei

05:40 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Can you explain why you back it out? What are the steps for reproducing an issue? Galya B

05:39 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> 6417c rev 15304 backed out part of trunk rev 15287 in AppServerManager - the client need... Galya B

05:37 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> 6417c rev 15304 backed out part of trunk rev 15287 in AppServerManager - the client need... Galya B

05:34 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Created task branch 6417c from trunk rev 15303.
6417c rev 15304 backed out part of trunk rev 15287 in AppServerMan... Constantin Asofiei

03:12 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Also the revert in #6417-235 breaks a core functionality of SOAP, so we should address it somehow. Galya B

03:10 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support

Constantin, give me more information on #7143-1012. Galya B