Activity
From 04/27/2026 to 05/26/2026
05/26/2026
- 07:04 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- I have some problems figuring out what is wrong with the changes from the last commit, the only difference I can find...
05/25/2026
- 04:49 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Danut, please create a standalone test for the 16577 commit.
>
> The resolvers must n...
05/22/2026
- 10:08 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Danut, please create a standalone test for the 16577 commit.
The resolvers must not have dependencies on each othe... - 10:04 AM Feature #6407 (WIP): name_map.xml improvements
- 3 tests remain to be investigated and fixed.
- 09:07 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Committed *6407b/16577*. Added 2767 error handling and fixed the remaining scenario where the function declaration is...
05/21/2026
- 07:28 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> * @hpUtils = this-procedure.@ to @hpUtils = ?.@
This needs to be fixed in FWD.
> * removed ... - 07:26 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Looks good. Please also test what happens if @hpUtils@ in test2.p or in start.p is unkn... - 07:04 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Looks good. Please also test what happens if @hpUtils@ in test2.p or in start.p is unknown.
- 06:40 AM Feature #6407 (Review): name_map.xml improvements
- I committed *6407b/16576* to fix how the IN-HANDLE/local implementation are resolved.
Constantin, please take a lo... - 04:14 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * @InternalEntryKey@ needs to have also as part of the key the @IN handle@ flag (only th... - 04:11 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Danut, this is part of a bug which exists already in trunk:
* test1.p... - 03:30 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please post a standalone test.
This is the test case....
05/20/2026
- 09:21 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Please post a standalone test.
- 08:12 AM Feature #6407 (WIP): name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin, I found a scenario where we need the @jname@ in the LegacySignature. The following stack trace creates an...
05/19/2026
- 04:44 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- I got news from Serban that the runtime testing failed for a customer, I am currently investigating.
https://proj.g...
05/15/2026
- 09:16 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> > @is-legacy-oo@ and @legacy-res-support-type@ are actually brok... - 01:57 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> @is-legacy-oo@ and @legacy-res-support-type@ are actually broken, I got lots of errors while ...
05/14/2026
- 08:26 AM Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- > For @VAR@, I am wondering where the expression should be evaluated? I thought of the following:
> * Using a lambda... - 08:24 AM Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- Before we move ahead, please create ABLUnit testcases that:
* Explore the different syntax options.
* Prove (or d... - 04:23 AM Feature #9767 (WIP): Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- There's more to the @VAR@ statement than just the syntax from #9767:...
- 07:36 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I do not plan to commit the 9488a changes to trunk *at this time*. Any changes made to ...
05/13/2026
- 01:40 PM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Actually, for generics there is #9868 and for the var statement there is #9767 - lets work them in those tasks, please.
- 01:36 PM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Committed *9488c/16551* containing conversion changes from 9488a + additional change to fix t... - 10:42 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Greg, about the VAR statement. Wouldn't the current structure of DEFINE VARIABLE be reasonabl... - 09:00 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Greg, about the VAR statement. Wouldn't the current structure of DEFINE VARIABLE be reasonable? During conversion, we...
- 08:35 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > var statement => def var
>
> We should just add a new rule to match this language statement.... - 01:09 PM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Danut, please add history entry to @WebUtil.java@. Otherwise,... - 09:30 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Danut, please add history entry to @WebUtil.java@. Otherwise, is there more testing nee... - 06:36 AM Feature #6407 (Internal Test): name_map.xml improvements
- Danut, please add history entry to @WebUtil.java@. Otherwise, is there more testing needed?
05/12/2026
- 05:49 PM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- > var statement => def var
We should just add a new rule to match this language statement. I don't think it is co... - 08:03 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- There are a few issues which I found that still give me issues during conversion, mostly related to generics.
#948...
05/07/2026
- 06:18 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- I've uploaded ade.src.9488c.7z to devsrv01:/tmp/ which contains the conversion for:...
05/06/2026
- 09:49 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Committed *9488c/16551* containing conversion changes from 9488a + additional change to fix the LegacyString conversi...
- 09:39 AM Bug #11443 (Test): Analytics is broken in trunk/16548
- Branch 11443a was merged into trunk as rev. 16551 and archived.
(I also fixed the javadoc) - 09:33 AM Bug #11443 (Merge Pending): Analytics is broken in trunk/16548
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 11443a Revision 16551
>
> The changes are good. These are quite low r... - 08:54 AM Bug #11443: Analytics is broken in trunk/16548
- Please fix this javadoc issue:...
- 08:26 AM Bug #11443 (Internal Test): Analytics is broken in trunk/16548
- Code Review Task Branch 11443a Revision 16551
The changes are good. These are quite low risk. If reports work no... - 05:52 AM Bug #11443 (Review): Analytics is broken in trunk/16548
- Committed *11443a/16551*. Fixed analytics, found usage of 'file' through ReportDefinition#multiplexExpr.
Greg, ple... - 04:02 AM Bug #11443 (WIP): Analytics is broken in trunk/16548
- From #7143-1927:
---
Analytics is broken in trunk rev 16548 (or earlier) based on testing Hotel GUI rev 451 usi... - 04:01 AM Bug #11443 (Test): Analytics is broken in trunk/16548
05/04/2026
- 07:44 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Danut, changes in 6407b look good. Please commit the tool to compare the annotations/na... - 03:12 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Danut, changes in 6407b look good. Please commit the tool to compare the annotations/name_map.xml to @~/secure/code/...
04/30/2026
- 11:05 AM Bug #11421: Some dates mismatch after being persisted in a table
- It prints @yes@ for me in both cases (with and without the extra @setTimeInMillis()@).
But there is something that... - 07:45 AM Bug #11421: Some dates mismatch after being persisted in a table
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> In @date.java@:4579: the line seems useless. The assignment of @time@ field (@setTimeInMill... - 07:59 AM Feature #6407 (Review): name_map.xml improvements
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> If that's the case, MethodKey can be expanded to store an enum with the type.
Committed *64...
04/29/2026
- 07:08 PM Bug #11421: Some dates mismatch after being persisted in a table
- In @date.java@:4579: the line seems useless. The assignment of @time@ field (@setTimeInMillis()@) is overwritten a fe...
- 07:43 AM Bug #11421: Some dates mismatch after being persisted in a table
- Ovidiu, I committed the first round of fixes to 11421a. I still have to address the @getIsoDate@ issue. If you have a...
- 09:34 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- I committed *6407b/16537*. I committed the LegacySignatures converted for the webspeed code, modified the rules to ad...
- 03:22 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> > Constantin, should FORWARD functions be added to the LegacySig... - 08:01 AM Bug #11432: full compatibility for SECURITY-POLICY:ENCODE-DOMAIN-ACCESS-CODE
- In #11097, we've implemented the return value for @SECURITY-POLICY:ENCODE-DOMAIN-ACCESS-CODE@ to be the same as @AUDI...
- 07:59 AM Bug #11432 (New): full compatibility for SECURITY-POLICY:ENCODE-DOMAIN-ACCESS-CODE
04/28/2026
- 09:53 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Constantin, should FORWARD functions be added to the LegacySignatures? I have a scenario with... - 09:52 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin, should FORWARD functions be added to the LegacySignatures? I have a scenario with a FORWARD function that...
- 07:36 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- I've had to replace the String key used for storing the methods in ProgramInfo, the problem was that name collection ...
- 07:41 AM Bug #11421: Some dates mismatch after being persisted in a table
- There are three issues to be handled here:
* the 1-day difference for 'more recent dates' is, +in my current opinion... - 06:38 AM Bug #11421 (WIP): Some dates mismatch after being persisted in a table
- 04:37 AM Bug #11421: Some dates mismatch after being persisted in a table
- The issue comes from inconsistent calendar handling during date conversions, not from any specific date. Different pa...
- 04:26 AM Bug #11421 (WIP): Some dates mismatch after being persisted in a table
Also available in: Atom