Activity
From 08/15/2013 to 09/13/2013
09/13/2013
- 04:26 AM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- Yesterday my work was focused on fixing the queries for failing tests. Because of the large amounts of sql queries ne...
09/12/2013
- 04:35 PM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- I have added item 7 about sequences to note 9 and question.
- 03:22 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- The initial tests had some unimportant fails in CTRL+C and quite a lot of fails in the main part:
* 7 in gso_tests ...
09/11/2013
- 03:33 PM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- *XXXXP2JDialect implementation (will be extended)*
1. extractColumnName(String expr) , needsComputedColumns() and i...
09/09/2013
- 01:21 AM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> One more question concerning mapping varchar to TEXT in PostgreSQL.
Progress @character@ f...
09/07/2013
- 05:21 PM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> I have noticed in import_util.rules that PostgreSQL connection string is configured only fo... - 03:39 AM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- One more question concerning mapping varchar to TEXT in PostgreSQL.
09/06/2013
- 04:46 PM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- I have noticed in import_util.rules that PostgreSQL connection string is configured only for default port (5432). Is ...
- 12:23 PM Bug #2178: Asymmetric sequence behavior
- Sequences in Progress are somewhat asymmetric relatively to their increment:
- An ascending sequence will allow any ... - 12:02 PM Bug #2178 (New): Asymmetric sequence behavior
09/05/2013
- 05:14 PM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- I have checked in SQL Server 2005 (I think the same for SQL Server 2008 and 2012): the following column names are cor...
- 09:28 AM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- Your understanding is correct (assuming that prefix generates a legal name in SQL Server).
- 03:15 AM Feature #2141: generate SQL Server schema
- Could the same prefix @CC_PREFIX = "__"@ be used for any database supporting computed columns? As far as I understood...
- 02:32 PM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- The runtime test failed.
Some CTRL+C test failed and 3 reports show results different than expected.
I started disc... - 10:53 PM Feature #2116 (WIP): add runtime support for _user metadata table
- See #2177, which describes some background research to be done in preparation for this task.
The P2J implementatio...
09/04/2013
- 10:53 AM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- Update merged with latest bzr sources and changes from review. I already re-tested it with my sample tests.
I am run... - 07:57 AM Bug #2176: exceptions to rereadnolock
- This looks like an optimization of some kind that Progress uses to reduce accesses to db.
When the search for a re... - 07:53 AM Bug #2176 (New): exceptions to rereadnolock
- 03:23 AM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- The code changes look good, though please remove the left margin space that was inserted on every line after the firs...
09/03/2013
- 06:15 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- Also, the code changes don't include automated tests. Should tests be part of the solution for this particular issue?
- 06:13 PM Bug #2164 (Review): Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- Please review the changes. The submitted files are based to bzr revision number 10379.
- 05:27 PM Feature #2141 (WIP): generate SQL Server schema
- This will require the addition of a @P2JSQLServerDialect@ which extends Hibernate's @SQLServer2008Dialect@. If I reca...
- 05:06 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Update vmn_upd20130903a.zip committed to bzr revision 10379.
- 04:13 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Please don't commit MetaSchemaImpl and comment out its usage for now, adding a TODO to fix it later.
- 04:11 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric, should I commit also MetaSchemaImpl?
Or simply comment current MetaSchemaImpl method call and write P2JIndex ... - 12:29 PM Feature #2126 (WIP): add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime intern...
- 11:48 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Since my requested changes do not affect the code itself, no need for another round of testing. Assuming it still com...
- 11:37 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- The changes look good. Please add a header entry to @LockManagerMultiplexer.java@. As @MetaSchemaImpl@ is a temporary...
- 01:54 PM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- <sigh> I can't make any sense of the "logic" that must be behind these results. Looks like a quirk/bug of their parse...
- 01:20 PM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- I found another issue. When the search for a record is done using the ROWID or RECID, the record is not re-fetched fr...
- 12:13 PM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> @rereadNoLock()@ to @getRereadNoLock()@.
Sorry, for consistency, I guess that should be @is... - 11:23 AM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- One more thing: please use proper logging in your @RecordBuffer@ changes instead of @System.err.println@.
- 11:06 AM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- OK, thanks for the explanation. The implementation looks good to me, just minor change requests:
* For consistency o... - 09:48 AM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- From my researches on 4GL and docs, there is nothing to indicate that Progress looks into other user's buffers to see...
- 01:42 AM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- I haven't finished a detailed review yet, but I have a basic question on your approach: are you trying to determine ...
- 12:30 PM Feature #2043 (WIP): add runtime support for some embedded SQL features
- 12:27 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Interesting temp-table result for DBNAME, too. Suggests that internally, Progress uses a distinct database for temp-t...
09/02/2013
- 05:43 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Regressions (note 24-25) were executed for vmn_upd20130831a.zip.
- 05:41 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- I have uploaded update vmn_upd20130831a.zip replacing vmn_upd20130814a.zip with fixes according to note 23.
- 04:54 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Regression 20130902_061345, 3 FAILED tests:
1. tc_job_002 FAILED failure in step 40: 'Unexpected EOF in actual at ... - 04:36 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- I have executed regression two times.
Regression 20130831_172455, 4 FAILED tests:
1. gso221_session1 FAILED f... - 05:31 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- The following test case for note 124:...
- 05:15 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- From docs: "For ... Buffer object handle, the ERROR attribute indicates whether an error occurred during a FILL or S...
- 11:37 AM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- Update pack for review. This update is built over the om_upd20130829a.zip of #1594.
The implementation looks into @B...
08/30/2013
- 03:07 PM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- My first instinct was to put this flag somewhere in the database branch which was a little cumbersome to extract. I f...
- 12:35 PM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> This is a command-line parameter for the client, it's proper location is not the @directory... - 11:57 AM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- This is a command-line parameter for the client, it's proper location is not the @directory.xml@.
In 4GL I can have ... - 02:22 PM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- I asked only to understand tables structures.
- 02:16 PM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- No reasons, I also think they could be hidden behind MetaSchema API.
- 02:11 PM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- Sorry I missed this earlier. Yes, these tables have a RECID field, generally of the form @{table_name}-recid@. But, I...
- 01:57 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> And what about index information - list of indexes with attributes: primary, word (if we n... - 01:46 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- And what about index information - list of indexes with attributes: primary, word (if we need it), unique?
> We wi... - 01:34 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- All of these will be available via the @MetaSchema@ API, though the actual metadata tables (e.g., _file, _field, etc....
- 01:26 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- > These names will available via an API. The code will look something like this:
>
> MetaSchema meta = persistence... - 11:58 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- For all the buffer-related attributes in note 113, please determine with test cases that these all work the same way ...
- 11:15 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Code review 20130814a:
I think the implementation of table locking in @InMemoryLockManager@ generally is OK, but s...
08/29/2013
- 05:59 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Update vmn_upd20130829a.zip/vmn_upd20130829b.zip is attached.
Test case corresponds to 4GL behavior for tablehand... - 02:37 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- Update for review.
We need to update the current-changed each time @P2JQuery.current()@ is called. Other first/next/... - 11:38 AM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- The @-rereadnolock@ is not activated and in 4GL this case is not taken into consideration.
In fact this is the sec... - 10:04 AM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- Testing environment. The article is not very explicit so I will explain the testcase.
Suppose we have a table @perso...
08/28/2013
- 03:46 PM Feature #2175: add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- The current persistence implementation does not support the feature provided by the @-rereadnolock@ startup parameter...
- 03:44 PM Feature #2175 (Closed): add support for -rereadnolock startup parameter
- 03:42 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- The @-rereadnolock@ parameter is indeed in use in the server project. We will need to support this as a configurable ...
- 03:29 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- Oops, I misread your test case. This is not a dirty share issue, as I was thinking. Session B actually commits its ch...
- 03:01 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- Just re-checked with @customer@ and @person@ tables.
There is definitely a bug, in P2J the A client displays the sa... - 02:35 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- How does this test case behave in the 4GL?
The @customer@ table is a bit unusual in our @p2j_test@ database in tha... - 02:19 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- I know.
The important issue is that if you have 2 clients on the same P2J server and
Client A:... - 02:11 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> There is no second level cache in Hibernate. The @directory.xml@ explicitly say: @hibernate... - 01:05 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- I am forced to do the implementation as you suggested.
I really do not understand why my session of hibernate cannot...
08/27/2013
- 06:51 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- I don't know if the caching behavior changed with the Hibernate upgrade. Regardless, I want to keep the calls to @Ses...
- 03:01 PM Feature #1594: add conversion and runtime support for CURRENT-CHANGED() built-in function
- You were right about the implementation. I changed a little, I'm doing the check for changed field in a bracket in @R...
08/26/2013
- 03:54 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- > Stas, could some conflict between ids happen with using shared buffers?
UniqueIdGenerator only hands out new ids... - 02:33 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Stas, could some conflict between ids happen with using shared buffers?
- 09:26 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Constantin, you can check com.goldencode.p2j.util.UniqueIdGenerator. Vadim, generator presumes that id's are unique a...
- 08:57 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> I understand for TEMP_TABLE, but why unique id for BUFFER is also ContextLocal?
I don't th... - 05:32 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- I understand for TEMP_TABLE, but why unique id for BUFFER is also ContextLocal?
08/25/2013
- 10:36 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Hibernate sources update.
08/23/2013
- 07:15 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached preliminary update vmn_upd20130824a including BUFFER-FIELD and GET-BUFFER-HANDLE support and MetaSche...
- 05:49 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Support of methods added in issue #1947:
@BUFFER-FIELD (KW_BUF_FLD)@
Implemented with MetaShemaImpl (stub with... - 12:59 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Update with new functionality for review.
08/22/2013
- 04:10 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- CompoundQuery.bufferHandle(int bufferSequenceNumber): could be based on recordBuffers() method returning iterator, bu...
- 03:22 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- I looked over the conversion test result and it has been generated as expected. Continuing with runtime-regression.
- 12:50 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- I double checked the index and sort clause generations for both H2 and PSQL dialects.
I am putting now this update t... - 01:48 AM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- Those examples I gave were theoretical cases which indeed may never happen. I'll put the check in the @BufferManager....
08/21/2013
- 05:55 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- I recommended @BufferManager.get()@ primarily because I was trying to keep it simple; this is the single point called...
- 03:09 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- Isn't the @BufferManager.get@ too low-level place for the check? Wouldn't be better to put it in the entry points (or...
- 06:56 AM Bug #2164 (WIP): Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- 05:24 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Buffer attributes status:
currentIteration – removed;
is/setError, get/setADMData, getNamespaceURI, getUnique... - 03:37 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- I encountered a small delay because of desc direction leaked into column names of .p2o files. That was because in @P2...
- 01:01 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- It is OK to leave "id" hard-coded in the dialect. We probably should use a constant instead of the string literal, th...
- 12:48 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- As I was implementing the solution I found some comments in both H2 and PSQL Dialects @getCreateIndexString()@ to mov...
08/20/2013
- 05:39 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- From note 113.
- 05:34 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Should be implemented only attributes from note 113, or all attributes from note 3?
- 05:06 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- I think only 2 methods are really needed from MetaSchema for attributes enumerated in note 113. ...
- 05:18 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have corrected methods signatures in note 205.
- 04:40 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Good findings. You are bringing back long forgotten memories :-)
The most important thing is that the queries (all... - 03:00 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- After further investigation I discovered that a similar code for detecting the index represented by a sort criteria i...
- 10:19 AM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- I investigated the reverse indexed @FIND@ s and, indeed there is a problem. At a given moment, in @SortCriterion.pars...
- 05:18 AM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- Will tables _File, _Field, _Index and so on have some unique fields like file_id, field_id, index_id, ... for joining...
08/19/2013
- 05:07 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> From my investigation it's enough to comment-out the line 399 from SortCriterion:
> [...]
... - 02:23 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The queries that used these indexes were probably unused on PSQL... - 02:09 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The queries that used these indexes were probably unused on PSQL.
How did you come to this... - 12:00 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- I have put to test my changes and here is the diff for it (ddl only):...
08/17/2013
- 04:47 PM Bug #2163: Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- OK, now I get it. I don't normally run non-database test cases (at least not without a data model present from some e...
- 04:23 PM Bug #2163: Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- Fixed the typo in my description above: off -> on.
- 04:14 PM Bug #2163: Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> When starting P2J server with converted code without data model (and no DMO index on the class... - 10:35 AM Bug #2163: Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- When starting P2J server with converted code without data model (and no DMO index on the classpath) and server persis...
- 10:13 AM Bug #2163 (New): Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- 04:22 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- Even so, you've identified a problem which has confused a number of people over the years. It's appropriate to open t...
- 04:16 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- Eric, you are right. I created the issue under false assumption that primes.p, which I used for testing, has no DB de...
- 04:01 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- The converted @primes.p@ sample program actually does have a persistence dependency; it uses a temp-table, which is w...
- 11:31 AM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- In regard to the NullPointerException - because persistence is off BufferManager is not listed in the context's (Tran...
- 11:19 AM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- When server persistence disabled (directory.xml:persistence/active == FALSE) an attempt to start a converted Progress...
- 11:07 AM Bug #2164 (Closed): Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
08/16/2013
- 12:20 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- I checked how this attribute is used in the project. There is only one use, and it is the widget version of the attri...
- 11:33 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- But according to documentation, integer CURRENT-ITERATION attribute is used only for using buffers related with ProD...
- 09:59 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- ProDataSet support is out of scope for the current project.
- 09:56 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Is @currentIteration@ attribute planned for @ProDataSet.FILL()@ support? In this case seems Buffer should refer to p...
- 06:57 AM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- CREATE DATABASE statement (not supported now) will be one more place for creating metadata tables.
08/15/2013
- 06:12 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I suggest to include the following methods to MetaSchema API...
- 02:21 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Please summarize what methods are left to be implemented in order to complete this task. If any of them require metad...
- 02:14 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Please review those attributes in this task which require metadata support in order to implement. This includes any s...
Also available in: Atom