FWD » Core Development » Database

10/23/2015

04:01 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes

The implementation of UNDO attribute is done for dynamic temp-tables.
However, I discovered that the same attribute... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

08:28 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes

Further investigations I realized in the second half of my previous note I was wrong. Please ignore that part. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10/22/2015

03:17 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes

I continued investigations on SKIP-DELETED-RECORD but without success. I checked the GUI sources and there are only t... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:57 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

Right now, we have the original, 4GL validation expression string for the table in the @_File@ metadata table (via th... Eric Faulhaber

08:40 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

I might have misread something: @the record is not deleted, because the validation expression, normally applied at co... Constantin Asofiei

08:37 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

Greg/Eric: the doc for the buffer handle's @BUFFER-DELETE()@ method states this:
> The BUFFER-DELETE method correspo... Constantin Asofiei

10/21/2015

06:42 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

Ouch. You make a good point, which I should have considered in my previous answer. Sorry about that.
Since resou... Greg Shah

05:23 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

Our current strategy of parsing validation expressions at schema load time is faulty. I have long ignored validation ... Eric Faulhaber

12:39 PM Feature #2616 (Closed): add some minor metadata support

Greg Shah

12:28 PM Feature #2616 (WIP): add some minor metadata support

Eric Faulhaber

12:28 PM Feature #2616 (Closed): add some minor metadata support

Greg Shah

10/20/2015

04:15 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

That suggests that we must emit a different instance in each business logic file that uses the @DELETE@ statement on ... Greg Shah

04:07 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Can they reference context that exists in the business logic code that is executing the @DELETE@?... Eric Faulhaber

10/09/2015

04:34 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Can they reference context that exists in the business logic code that is executing the @DELETE@?... Eric Faulhaber

03:33 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

> as I understand it, the expressions can be arbitrarily complex
Can they reference context that exists in the bus... Greg Shah

02:59 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

The problem with inlining validation expressions in the DMO implementation classes is that, as I understand it, the e... Eric Faulhaber

01:09 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

> Don't we handle all the field-level, schema-based validation expressions by emitting them into the business logic t... Greg Shah

12:50 PM Feature #2692 (WIP): table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Guy prefers these be made explicit in all locations where there is a @DELETE@ for the matching ta... Eric Faulhaber

12:10 PM Feature #2618 (WIP): add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes

Current status:
* BUFFER:NUM_FIELDS. Looking over the P2J code, it seems to be fully implemented.
* QUERY:SKIP-DELE... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10/08/2015

10:39 PM Feature #2616 (WIP): add some minor metadata support

Added support for:... Eric Faulhaber