Activity
From 10/29/2015 to 11/27/2015
11/25/2015
- 05:18 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Runtime main and ctrl-c regression testing passed. Server unit testing (full search, common search, system maintenanc...
- 10:49 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- > This is actually a useful side effect, as it provides a record of invalid validation expressions which have managed...
- 10:39 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- I'm going to call conversion regression testing passed. There are some differences in some frames' widget method name...
- 07:18 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Please provide a status update on your conversion and runtime regression testing.
Also, please write up a summary ... - 07:17 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Code Review Task branch 2692b Revision 10964
The changes are good. - 07:16 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Eric rebased task branch 2692b from P2J trunk revision 10952. The latest revision is now 10964.
11/24/2015
- 06:56 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Please rebase to trunk 10952.
11/23/2015
- 03:29 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- > > 3. I'm surprised that in @record_spec@, you did not exclude the fields in @except_list@.
> This was a bit compli... - 01:58 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 3. I'm surprised that in @record_spec@, you did not exclude the fields in @except_list@.
This wa... - 01:56 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 2. Please check if the @VALMSG@ can be an complex expression instead of a literal. In business l... - 01:17 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Any database field or lvalue can be inserted instead of the temp-table fields. The point is that these statements ar...
- 01:10 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- ...
- 01:09 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 6. The @set_or_update_or_prompt_for_stm@ case supports a non-record case where explicit fields ar...
11/22/2015
- 10:08 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- I've committed branch 2692b rev 10962 with some minor comment and formatting cleanups.
- 10:07 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Code Review Task Branch 2692b Revision 10961
This is really good work. It is very close to complete.
1. The @f...
11/19/2015
- 02:46 PM Bug #2514 (Closed): incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
- Sorry, I just came across this issue and realized I never reviewed this update separately. However, it seems this fix...
- 02:24 PM Bug #2456 (Closed): BUFFER-HANDLE attribute doesn't always work
- Just re-tested this -- I'm not sure in which revision it was fixed, but it works now.
11/18/2015
- 11:12 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Improved support for ENABLE ALL is now in 2692b/10961. This is a release candidate which I am testing currently.
11/11/2015
- 02:17 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Developer tests were OK.
If normal regression testing goes well, please merge the changes to 2677a. - 12:00 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Sysmaint tests were OK.
- 11:19 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Common search and full search unit tests went OK with 2618a/10953. Running sysmaint and developer tests next...
- 08:29 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- There is no need to wait on testing. Get it done now and then merge into *2677a*. Do not merge to trunk.
11/10/2015
- 04:54 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- On second thought: Greg, would you prefer we hold off regression testing 2618a and 2692b until you've merged 2677a to...
- 04:49 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Code review 2618a/10953:
Changes look good. Due to the regression found in 10952, I separated my work for #2692 in... - 03:25 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- P2J branch 2692b, rev. 10956 (based on trunk revision 10951) contains the changes necessary to:
* parse schema valid...
11/06/2015
- 03:06 PM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- Eric, no need to apologise - I should have noticed this myself.
Thanks! - 02:27 PM Feature #2808 (Closed): allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceId...
- Paul, sorry, I should have seen this earlier; turns out this feature has been there all along, but it had long since ...
11/03/2015
- 09:30 AM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- Ok, thanks Eric.
- 09:27 AM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- I am in the middle of a fairly big, unrelated change. I can piggy-back this feature onto that change when it goes int...
- 08:00 AM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- The sooner this is done the higher it's value for us.
At the moment the postgres bug that the PK scan triggers is ...
11/02/2015
- 04:17 PM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- Add an optional setting to the directory that would be read in @SequenceIdentityManager.setIdentityPool@, to disable ...
- 04:14 PM Feature #2808 (Closed): allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceId...
10/31/2015
- 03:01 PM Bug #2807 (Test): LDBNAME can work with an unopen buffer
- 03:01 PM Bug #2807: LDBNAME can work with an unopen buffer
- A proposed fix is in 2677a/10996. It resolves the above test case, but has not been regression tested.
- 04:50 AM Bug #2807: LDBNAME can work with an unopen buffer
- The @ldbname@ function (and maybe others?) work in 4GL with an not-yet-opened buffer:...
- 04:47 AM Bug #2807 (Closed): LDBNAME can work with an unopen buffer
10/29/2015
- 04:36 PM Feature #2618 (Test): add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- 04:34 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Code review 2618a/10952:
Ovidiu, all looks good. To double-up on regression testing, I'm going to be making update... - 04:28 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Thanks, Guy.
- 12:15 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- I've updated the bzr repo on lincon01 with versions of adcdedi1.w and adcdedi2.w with the references to SKIP-DELETED-...
- 12:02 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Hi Ovidiu,
To be honest I didn't know about the existence of that attribute, nor what it did.
Looking at the code... - 11:19 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Guy,
From the initial list, the @SKIP-DELETED-RECORD@ is the only attribute that lacks support in p2j. I was not ... - 12:06 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Code review 2618a/10951:
This update looks good. Please clean up a few minor issues:
* either add a header entry ... - 04:28 PM Feature #2615 (New): implement CONNECT statement options -cache, -N and -1
- You are right. We created this task based on an older set of reports. It is not needed in the current code.
This... - 04:01 PM Feature #2615 (WIP): implement CONNECT statement options -cache, -N and -1
- I searched the project for CONNECT statements and I could not find any. I could find instead a call to DISCONNECT sta...
- 02:42 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- We already know SET, UPDATE, PROMPT-FOR, INSERT trigger schema-level validation. The following test results are inten...
Also available in: Atom