Activity

From 11/11/2015 to 12/10/2015

09:03 AM Feature #2618 (Closed): add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes: Greg Shah
08:35 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes: The update was merged into task branch 2677a as revision 11046. 2677a is already in trunk.
I believe we can close th... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

06:16 PM Bug #2896: Close dynamically defined query when an underlying buffer is closed: The discussion has started in #2819.
Last letter from Eric:
My understanding of your work so far is that you've f... Stanislav Lomany
06:13 PM Bug #2896 (New): Close dynamically defined query when an underlying buffer is closed: Stanislav Lomany
10:19 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Greg Shah wrote:
> Can we close this?
All the work with the code is done and merged to trunk. I just left this open... Eric Faulhaber
08:17 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Can we close this? Greg Shah
08:17 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes: Can we close this? Greg Shah

05:18 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Runtime main and ctrl-c regression testing passed. Server unit testing (full search, common search, system maintenanc... Eric Faulhaber
10:49 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: > This is actually a useful side effect, as it provides a record of invalid validation expressions which have managed... Greg Shah
10:39 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: I'm going to call conversion regression testing passed. There are some differences in some frames' widget method name... Eric Faulhaber
07:18 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Please provide a status update on your conversion and runtime regression testing.
Also, please write up a summary ... Greg Shah
07:17 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Code Review Task branch 2692b Revision 10964
The changes are good. Greg Shah
07:16 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Eric rebased task branch 2692b from P2J trunk revision 10952. The latest revision is now 10964.
Greg Shah

06:56 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Please rebase to trunk 10952. Greg Shah

03:29 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: > > 3. I'm surprised that in @record_spec@, you did not exclude the fields in @except_list@.
> This was a bit compli... Greg Shah
01:58 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Greg Shah wrote:
> 3. I'm surprised that in @record_spec@, you did not exclude the fields in @except_list@.
This wa... Eric Faulhaber
01:56 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Greg Shah wrote:
> 2. Please check if the @VALMSG@ can be an complex expression instead of a literal. In business l... Eric Faulhaber
01:17 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Any database field or lvalue can be inserted instead of the temp-table fields. The point is that these statements ar... Greg Shah
01:10 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: ... Greg Shah
01:09 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Greg Shah wrote:
> 6. The @set_or_update_or_prompt_for_stm@ case supports a non-record case where explicit fields ar... Eric Faulhaber

10:08 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: I've committed branch 2692b rev 10962 with some minor comment and formatting cleanups. Greg Shah
10:07 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Code Review Task Branch 2692b Revision 10961
This is really good work. It is very close to complete.
1. The @f... Greg Shah

02:46 PM Bug #2514 (Closed): incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods: Sorry, I just came across this issue and realized I never reviewed this update separately. However, it seems this fix... Eric Faulhaber
02:24 PM Bug #2456 (Closed): BUFFER-HANDLE attribute doesn't always work: Just re-tested this -- I'm not sure in which revision it was fixed, but it works now. Eric Faulhaber

11:12 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support: Improved support for ENABLE ALL is now in 2692b/10961. This is a release candidate which I am testing currently. Eric Faulhaber

02:17 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes: Developer tests were OK.
If normal regression testing goes well, please merge the changes to 2677a. Eric Faulhaber
12:00 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes: Sysmaint tests were OK. Eric Faulhaber
11:19 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes: Common search and full search unit tests went OK with 2618a/10953. Running sysmaint and developer tests next... Eric Faulhaber
08:29 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes: There is no need to wait on testing. Get it done now and then merge into *2677a*. Do not merge to trunk. Greg Shah

Also available in: Atom

FWD » Core Development » Database