Activity
From 01/04/2016 to 02/02/2016
02/02/2016
- 12:30 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I think we'll want to parameterize the expression class hierarchy at some point, since there... - 12:12 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The updated was committed to task branch 2794a as revision 10970.
The changes are good, than... - 10:56 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The updated was committed to task branch 2794a as revision 10970.
- 10:15 AM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- To disable the server-side join optimization, change the implementation of @CompoundQuery.canOptimize@.
- 09:03 AM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- Can you please tell me how to turn it off? But the issues isn't about optimization, it presents in the bzr versions b...
- 08:51 AM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> There are more issues with compound adaptive queries than I've expected.
When you write,... - 08:02 AM Bug #2955 (WIP): Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- There are more issues with compound adaptive queries than I've expected. When a backing buffer is updated, the follow...
02/01/2016
- 02:45 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric, I reverted 2975a back to rev 10968 = 10970. Sorry, I misread your note 100.
- 02:27 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Support for interpreting remaining datatypes @__Expressions@ in @RuntimeJastInterpreter@ wa... - 12:48 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Support for interpreting remaining datatypes @__Expressions@ in @RuntimeJastInterpreter@ was added as rev. 10969 in t...
- 09:34 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > > The @RuntimeJastInterpreter@ still... - 09:10 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The @RuntimeJastInterpreter@ still lacks the support for some cl...
01/30/2016
- 04:06 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Is there any work left to do on the initial implementation, or a...
01/19/2016
- 08:00 AM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- Please go ahead with your proposed approach.
01/15/2016
- 07:55 PM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- > That sounds OK. Your first example suggests that this would have to be a deep copy of the original record (slower) ...
01/13/2016
- 04:23 PM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- That sounds OK. Your first example suggests that this would have to be a deep copy of the original record (slower) to...
- 03:22 PM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- > Do you mean @RecordBuffer.snapshot@?
Yes.
> > I think we should persist the original image of the last record in ... - 01:32 PM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> There are @RecordBuffer.referenceRecord@
Do you mean @RecordBuffer.snapshot@?
> ...and @... - 06:01 AM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- This task was created as the old issue - P2J is sensitive to the content of a buffer participating in the adaptive qu...
- 04:59 AM Bug #2955 (WIP): Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
01/06/2016
- 01:48 PM Bug #2946: SESSION:FIRST-BUFFER buffer order is wrong
- From #2795-47
> 2795a rev 10981 looks like is working OK with the permanent buffers, too - see @testcases/uast/pro... - 10:45 AM Bug #2946: SESSION:FIRST-BUFFER buffer order is wrong
- The following problem was found by Constantin in #2795-46.
There is an issue related to the buffer order reported ... - 10:43 AM Bug #2946 (New): SESSION:FIRST-BUFFER buffer order is wrong
Also available in: Atom