Activity
From 04/28/2016 to 05/27/2016
05/27/2016
- 12:15 AM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Code review 2421a/11039:
The code looks good to me. Please regression test.
05/26/2016
- 02:22 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Please review task branch 2421a revision 11039.
- 02:07 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Rebased task branch 2421a from P2J trunk revision 11035.
05/24/2016
- 03:53 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Should I fix this as the part of this task?
Yes, please do. - 03:41 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Eric, there is the conversion issue for validation messages. Testcase:...
- 09:30 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Eric, for the case: am I right that @DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY@ and @{FIRST|LAST}[-OF]@ can... - 02:08 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- The task branch 2275a was committed to trunk as revision 11034 and then archived. Notification was sent to team.
The... - 10:36 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Code review 2275a/11038:
The changes look fine. None of this code is used in the normal regression test environmen...
05/23/2016
- 02:40 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Eric, for the case: am I right that @DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY@ and @{FIRST|LAST}[-OF]@ cannot be used on the same que...
- 10:02 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Thanks, Eric.
The golden idea was to save the (default) parameters, too, in with 1st level cache, so we could 'rehyd... - 09:56 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- The key to my suggested approach working is that the second scenario above cannot be appreciably slower than the curr...
- 09:34 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- I've been thinking about the same problem with the 2-level cache, but I came to a different conclusion. The first lev...
- 08:49 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Eric,
I am working on double cache solution. I encountered the following issue which I sensed but was not able to de... - 08:15 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Ovidiu, please note that one of the changes in task branch 3109a (now P2J trunk 11032) was to increase the DQH cache ...
05/20/2016
- 02:16 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > I am not happy with the 'manufactured' variable names. Maybe we ... - 02:03 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- [ECF: moved this entry to #3081-3]
- 01:42 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I am not happy with the 'manufactured' variable names. Maybe we should discuss about this t...
05/19/2016
- 03:26 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- I don't foresee an issue from the proposed change.
- 02:43 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Yes, it is.
- 02:34 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Let me know if you foresee any problems with that.
@PreselectQuery@ was not originally me... - 01:36 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Eric, please consider the case when an inner record of a compound query is updated AND corresponding inner sub-query ...
- 11:34 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I need to check the operator and the opposite operand and convert the variable type/value. ... - 11:01 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > To fix this we could add casting or automatically convert the in... - 10:54 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> To fix this we could add casting or automatically convert the injected variable to required... - 10:38 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Eric,
I found the errors logged in @/var/log/postgresql/postgresql-9.2-p2j_enUS.log@. I don't think hibernate is abl...
05/18/2016
- 02:39 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- After more research on testcase from note 16 that causes some failures:
* I tried to isolate the testcase with TEMP-...
05/17/2016
- 03:55 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Created task branch 2421a from P2J trunk revision 11031.
- 03:29 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Encountered an issue with new processing. The queries like ...
- 02:26 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, can you please help me understand how the @variable_definitions.rules@ changes (both... - 01:03 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Ovidiu, can you please help me understand how the @variable_definitions.rules@ changes (both annotations and conversi...
05/16/2016
- 02:08 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Created task branch 2275a from trunk 11030. Last revision is 11031. The update is based on the algorithm described in...
05/14/2016
- 01:26 PM Bug #3026 (Closed): BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- 12:54 PM Bug #3026 (Review): BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Сommitted into the trunk as bzr revision 11029.
- 12:04 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Rebased task branch 3026a from P2J trunk revision 11028.
05/13/2016
- 11:43 AM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- The ETF testing had some trouble for other reasons, but enough of the testing did well that I'm comfortable with this...
- 10:05 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- The summary/statistics can be found at #2488-34 and 35. I don't recall the exact target. I can reactivate the log and...
- 09:33 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > How do we deal with the buffer(s) in this new cache? It is possi... - 04:41 AM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> How do we deal with the buffer(s) in this new cache? It is possible to specify various buffe...
05/12/2016
- 02:24 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- This looks good so far.
How do we deal with the buffer(s) in this new cache? It is possible to specify various buf... - 12:54 PM Feature #2275: cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
- We are using now the dynamic conversion mostly for the HQL that are hardcoded at conversion time.
To correctly handl...
05/11/2016
- 02:43 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Rebased task branch 3026a from P2J trunk revision 11025.
- 01:50 AM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Code review 3026a/11026:
Very nice! Please regression test. - 11:53 PM Feature #2275 (WIP): cache of runtime-converted, dynamic queries and temp-tables
05/10/2016
- 10:46 AM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- You are correct, with @-p@ key this message is in the message area in both ChUI and GUI.
Rebased task branch 3026a...
05/09/2016
- 04:48 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- > "Table <table name> is defined with schema delete validation..." error is displayed as a message box in GUI and in ...
05/05/2016
- 06:04 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Eric, the "Table <table name> is defined with schema delete validation..." error is displa... - 09:14 AM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Eric, the "Table <table name> is defined with schema delete validation..." error is displayed as a message box in GUI...
05/04/2016
- 12:23 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- I know of no way to define schema table-level validation for a temp-table. I would have guessed the only way would be...
- 09:04 AM Bug #2222: WRITE event triggered too early
- Paul Eames wrote:
> Thanks for the update Ovidiu.
>
> The thing here that interests me most is that you have thes... - 08:29 AM Bug #2222: WRITE event triggered too early
- Thanks for the update Ovidiu.
The thing here that interests me most is that you have these tests that you run agai... - 08:02 AM Bug #2222: WRITE event triggered too early
- Yes, the cause for this issue is fixed now. The WRITE triggers are fired at the right moment up to step 13 of the tes...
05/03/2016
- 06:09 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- I was wondering if delete validation can be applied to a temp-table. All I found is @VALIDATE@ option for @DEFINE TEM...
- 10:15 AM Bug #2222: WRITE event triggered too early
- Paul Eames wrote:
> > The original problems have long since been resolved
>
> Does this mean that the behavioural... - 05:17 AM Bug #2222: WRITE event triggered too early
- I'd appreciate an update on this if that's ok?
See note 26.
05/02/2016
- 07:15 AM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Created task branch 3026a from P2J trunk revision 11019.
04/29/2016
- 06:32 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- OK, this plan sounds good.
- 05:16 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- OK, for testing we can use queries with complex sorting:...
- 01:34 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- There are actually a few dozen instances of @PresortCompoundQuery@ in the statically converted code of the current pr...
- 11:23 AM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Eric, BREAK BY applies only to cycles. IIRC we can convert to presort compound queries some other rare types of queri...
- 10:19 PM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> @PresortCompoundQuery@ is a compound query with 1. support for break groups / accumulation... - 04:20 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> * I recall that validation expressions be copied in from the schema more than once (if there are ... - 03:57 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> There are some things I would like to clarify. Please correct anything I get wrong here.
>
> ... - 08:15 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Questions:
* I recall that validation expressions be copied in from the schema more than once (if there are multip... - 08:11 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- There are some things I would like to clarify. Please correct anything I get wrong here.
1. It is not just @ENABL... - 12:54 AM Feature #2692 (Closed): table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- The essence of adding this feature was to move all the table-level validation expression parsing from the @SchemaLoad...
- 01:17 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Agreed.
- 01:13 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- The button in 4GL Data Dictinonary interface which calls validation editor is called "Validation..." so let's call it...
- 12:44 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > I think the best place for this is in the corresponding DMO, as a Java annotation.
>
... - 10:38 AM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- > I think the best place for this is in the corresponding DMO, as a Java annotation.
Should we extend @LegacyTable... - 11:11 PM Bug #3026: BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Eric, could you please clear something for me?
>
> 1. How do I define a schema delete v... - 08:15 AM Feature #2619 (Closed): misc database features needed for a GUI app
04/28/2016
- 05:39 PM Bug #3026 (WIP): BUFFER-DELETE() method does not account for table-level delete validation
- Eric, could you please clear something for me?
1. How do I define a schema delete validation - is that a correct d... - 10:02 AM Feature #2421: Implement DELETE-RESULT-LIST-ENTRY for PresortCompoundQuery
- @PresortCompoundQuery@ is a compound query with 1. support for break groups / accumulation 2. presorted up front; so ...
Also available in: Atom