Activity
From 04/06/2019 to 05/05/2019
05/02/2019
- 10:24 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, @dataset-handle@ parameters need to convert as @DatasetParameter@ (same as @table-handle@ does). Currently t...
05/01/2019
- 04:58 PM Feature #3761 (Closed): add DYNAMIC-FUNCTION() support to the dynamic database WHERE clause inter...
- As of trunk revision 11302, this functionality is complete.
- 02:14 PM Support #4063: linking looping FIND FIRST/NEXT and FIND LAST/PREV in a set oriented operation
- After speaking with Eric, some thoughts:
* The current approach is handled exclusively at runtime.
* The more adv... - 02:04 PM Support #4063: linking looping FIND FIRST/NEXT and FIND LAST/PREV in a set oriented operation
- From Eric:
> Yes. This has been implemented since 2006 as @AdaptiveFind@.
>
> It doesn't detect that it is in ... - 02:02 PM Support #4063: linking looping FIND FIRST/NEXT and FIND LAST/PREV in a set oriented operation
- From Constantin:
> An idea here is to add an UUID at conversion time, to a FIND. This way the runtime can uniquely... - 02:01 PM Support #4063: linking looping FIND FIRST/NEXT and FIND LAST/PREV in a set oriented operation
- Can @FIND FIRST@ and @FIND NEXT@ with same buffer and same @WHERE@ be matched together into a set oriented approach? ...
- 02:00 PM Support #4063 (New): linking looping FIND FIRST/NEXT and FIND LAST/PREV in a set oriented operation
- 01:58 PM Feature #4033: avoid query for FIND unique when the current record in the buffer would match the ...
- I think that in addition to @FIND unique@, there are other cases (@FIND FIRST/LAST@) where we can track enough state ...
- 01:17 PM Support #4060: investigate converting extent fields to array columns
- Note that this task is created in the context of investigating changes that may improve performance, but I don't know...
- 01:08 PM Support #4060: investigate converting extent fields to array columns
- We have found on occasion that our default approach of normalizing extent fields of like extent into a secondary tabl...
- 01:01 PM Support #4060 (WIP): investigate converting extent fields to array columns
- 01:00 PM Support #4058: consider denormalizing tables as the default approach
- I don't really want to make denormalization the default, as this can result in a huge number of columns in a table, h...
- 10:49 AM Support #4058: consider denormalizing tables as the default approach
- We know that denormalizing for all tables is not always a performance improvement, so there may need to be a better a...
- 10:48 AM Support #4058 (New): consider denormalizing tables as the default approach
- 10:46 AM Bug #4057: h2 performance degradation
- From Eric:
> I'd rather not. 197 has a lot of fixes for regressions in the last few point releases before it.
>
... - 10:46 AM Bug #4057: h2 performance degradation
- As an interim measure, can we go back to 1.4.196 (and add our customizations)?
- 10:45 AM Bug #4057: h2 performance degradation
- More from the mailing list:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [h2] Re: Recent drops in performance
D... - 10:44 AM Bug #4057: h2 performance degradation
- From Eric:
> We're on (a customized) 1.4.197 (not depicted, but probably somewhere between cyan and red). - 10:43 AM Bug #4057: h2 performance degradation
- From the H2 mailing list:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [h2] Re: Recent drops in performance
Dat... - 10:42 AM Bug #4057 (New): h2 performance degradation
- 02:21 AM Feature #4056: instrument FWD and supporting libraries to measure database performance
- In order to improve the performance of the persistence layer of FWD, we first need to measure the time spent at sever...
- 02:11 AM Feature #4056 (WIP): instrument FWD and supporting libraries to measure database performance
- 02:03 AM Feature #4055: optimize temp-table output parameter copying
- This idea warrants further investigation.
- 02:02 AM Feature #4055: optimize temp-table output parameter copying
- Eric wrote:
---
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > We could get past the first issue with ... - 02:01 AM Feature #4055: optimize temp-table output parameter copying
- Constantin wrote:
---
Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> We could get past the first issue with some clever insert statem... - 02:01 AM Feature #4055: optimize temp-table output parameter copying
- Eric wrote:
---
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, did you notice the time spent during temp-table output param... - 02:00 AM Feature #4055: optimize temp-table output parameter copying
- Constantin wrote:
---
Eric, did you notice the time spent during temp-table output parameter copying, during pr... - 01:59 AM Feature #4055: optimize temp-table output parameter copying
- The following discussion between Constantin and myself is copied from another task...
- 01:58 AM Feature #4055 (WIP): optimize temp-table output parameter copying
- 01:32 AM Feature #4054: only track specific tables in dirty database
- The idea is to improve performance of the persistence layer by only tracking certain tables within the dirty database...
- 01:28 AM Feature #4054 (New): only track specific tables in dirty database
04/23/2019
- 01:17 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- 3809a was merged to trunk as r11304. Fresh new 3809c was created for following changes on this task.
- 11:47 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> To be safe, please put this back through conversion regression testing. If it passes for the ChU... - 09:53 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric, what do you say?
Yes, I like this better. - 09:40 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, there is a regression in 3809a: you've added the @kw_cpy_ttbl@ to the top @load_... - 02:43 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, there is a regression in 3809a: you've added the @kw_cpy_ttbl@ to the top @load_descriptors@ function, and th...
04/22/2019
- 07:56 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Please document the specific questions we have that will require 4GL testcases. I don't know if we will be able to g...
- 07:51 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- 3809a contains some changes that implement dataset parameters. This will be merged to trunk shortly. As part of thi...
- 07:48 AM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- > BEFORE-TABLE
Isn't this going to be handled as part of the work for #3809? - 02:46 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, please rebase 3809a.
04/19/2019
- 04:55 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code Review Task Branch 3809a Revision 11316
I'm good with the changes. Constantin will include the @Preprocessor... - 04:44 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- The revision 11316 adds some new runtime support. It passed the DataSet Test Suite conversion test.
- 03:38 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3809a Revision 11315
> 2. I think the gap marking needs to be updated wi... - 03:34 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. Constantin: In regard to the @Preprocessor@ change:
>
> * Does this resolve #3846 (I assume... - 03:30 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code Review Task Branch 3809a Revision 11315
Generally, I'm good with this code. Some small items are below.
1... - 02:38 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Thanks, Ovidiu - 3809a rev 11315 fixes my case for the OO method calls.
- 01:32 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Sorry,
After my first reply I double checked the branch. I forgot to merge in the TRPL changes :(. Please update to... - 01:29 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, I assume the conversion rules for dataset as function call argument are still WI... - 01:26 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, I assume the conversion rules for dataset as function call argument are still WIP?
- 09:13 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- A bit later than expected I have the solution for @append@ and/or @by-reference@ datasets.
I tried to use the same c...
04/18/2019
- 05:19 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu: How long do you expect the parameter support changes to take? It may make sense to hold 3809a for those chan...
- 05:15 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Is it OK to deal with #3809-70 in another branch? Or will that cause us other issues... - 05:10 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- I'm inclined to get this merged to trunk.
Constantin: Is it OK to deal with #3809-70 in another branch? Or will t... - 02:56 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is there enough runtime change to make runtime regression testing useful?
I think not. I summary... - 02:36 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, I need support for @dataset@ references passed to i.e. function calls (and from this I will adapt for OO meth...
- 02:30 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Is there enough runtime change to make runtime regression testing useful?
- 01:44 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- The r11310 passed the conversion test on devsrv01, with no changes in generated code compared to latest trunk. I do n...
- 12:21 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- > And one more thing, I was not able to eliminate the ambiguity warning from progress grammar.
Resolved in revisio...
04/17/2019
- 03:04 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Fixed hierarchy and some annotation. Added runtime support. refid: #3809
Committed revision 11311.
04/16/2019
- 01:00 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> 3809a 11308 contains some required legacy classes .
and another legacy class in 11309 (... - 12:44 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- 3809a 11308 contains some required legacy classes .
- 12:16 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Something else - wasn't at some point the idea to avoid the generic get/set method name ... - 12:12 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > I have some untracked chang... - 12:09 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > I have some untracked changes, some related to dataset conve... - 12:07 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I have some untracked changes, some related to dataset conversion, some to other, but sa... - 11:40 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- I have some untracked changes, some related to dataset conversion, some to other, but safe enough to commit here - pl...
- 10:59 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code Review Task Branch 3809b Revision 11327
It was easier to review the old branch than the new one since my last... - 07:19 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Ovidiu: Do you think it is stable/safe enough to merge to trunk or does it need additional work?
... - 07:00 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu: Do you think it is stable/safe enough to merge to trunk or does it need additional work?
If this has no re... - 05:40 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Branch 3750b was relased and merged into 3750a, then archived as 'dead'.
Branch 3750a was updated to r11304. DataSet...
04/15/2019
- 03:23 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, once you have the dataset conversion/parsing changes in 3809a stable enough, I think we need to merge this to...
04/13/2019
- 06:11 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, now that branch 3750b has been merged to trunk 11302, I have rebased branch 3809a (currently at revision 1130...
04/12/2019
- 06:15 PM Feature #1587: implement full support for word indexes
- It should be noted that error handling for the UDF version of CONTAINS support is not quite right. Any error in the s...
- 06:07 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm not suggesting to use variable types. The idea is to use the @tempIdx@ value in @SymbolResol... - 01:29 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > > Also, do you have tests for shared datasets? I see no cha... - 01:25 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, please add conversion and stub support for BUFFER:DATA-SOURCE attribute.
- 01:22 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Also, do you have tests for shared datasets? I see no changes in SharedVariableManager r... - 01:20 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Hmm... related to OO, we need tests at least for:
> * DATASET and DATASET-HANDLE as met... - 01:15 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Ovidiu, do your testcases cover DATASET and DATASET-HANDLE a... - 01:03 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, do your testcases cover DATASET and DATASET-HANDLE as OO method arguments?
I ... - 12:59 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, do your testcases cover DATASET and DATASET-HANDLE as OO method arguments?
- 12:31 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- I'm not suggesting to use variable types. The idea is to use the @tempIdx@ value in @SymbolResolver@ (see @addWrappe...
- 12:17 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3809b Revision 11605
>
> 1. @annotations/datasets.rules@ implements li...
04/11/2019
- 03:00 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- > Is it OK to add move within RESERVED boundaries?
That is still for keywords. Instead, please put them inside th... - 02:34 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3809b Revision 11605
Thank you for the review. It helps me fix some issu... - 11:26 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code Review Task Branch 3809b Revision 11605
1. @annotations/datasets.rules@ implements linking of dataset/datasou... - 10:31 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Branch 3809b was updated. Current revision is (LE) 11605 . It contains fixes for regression introduces the last two d...
04/10/2019
- 02:43 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Yes, there are two ambiguity issues.
I haven't added @options { generateAmbigWarnings = false; }@ to hide them yet...
04/09/2019
- 06:42 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, antlr reports a lot of errors when I build 3809b/11596. Is that expected?
04/08/2019
- 06:12 PM Feature #4036: catch database UDF support up to current built-in function support level
- We have added support for many 4GL built-in functions over the past years. We need to review which of these can be us...
- 06:09 PM Feature #4036 (New): catch database UDF support up to current built-in function support level
- 05:27 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- The following test case illustrates the problem.
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Good news, I have a recreate; I thin... - 05:09 PM Bug #4035 (Closed): newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- 12:24 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- ...
- 11:41 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg, yes, these makes sense, but I am trying to understand if a @dataset-handle@ parameter can receive a generic @ha...
- 11:33 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Please see #3751-492 for some interesting details about @TABLE@ and @TABLE-HANDLE@ parameters for methods. It is my ...
- 11:04 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> For the moment the @DATASET-HANDLE@ is not recognized as special data type. I am adding now... - 10:31 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Consider the following ABL code:...
- 06:03 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, please post a small snapshot of how DATASET and DATASET-HANDLE parameters will convert.
Also, I assume tha...
Also available in: Atom