Activity
From 06/21/2019 to 07/20/2019
07/20/2019
- 08:44 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- After fixing #3860-63, to allow runtime-specification of default databases per a project, I get a validation exceptio...
- 08:38 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- I've placed some notes to #3816-34, #3816-35, #3816-36, as that task handles @BY-REFERENCE@ (only for tables). But t...
- 08:44 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> To continue with previous notes, as it may be related to @TABLE-HANDLE@, too: I think a ... - 05:57 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- To continue with previous notes, as it may be related to @TABLE-HANDLE@, too: I think a @DELETE@ for a @DATASET-HANDL...
- 08:36 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- The static dataset delete was just a minor issue. Even if I'm assuming that INPUT-OUTPUT behaves the same as BY-REFE...
07/19/2019
- 07:56 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Looks like this states that the 'delete will not happen if the DATASET is not owned by the procedure attempting the d...
- 07:20 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- I found in a project code like this:...
- 01:13 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Guys, I'm interested, how technically we can pass a table parameter by reference? In this ... - 08:55 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Guys, I'm interested, how technically we can pass a table parameter by reference? In this case 4GL passes the default...
- 05:58 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Ovidiu, as we discussed, I need NEXT-ROWID, BATCH-SIZE and R... - 02:46 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- The other part which I need is dynamic construction of a DATA-SET from a DataSetContainer received from a remote side...
- 09:53 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, as we discussed, I need NEXT-ROWID, BATCH-SIZE and RESTART-ROWID to work.
I s... - 09:05 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, as we discussed, I need NEXT-ROWID, BATCH-SIZE and RESTART-ROWID to work.
07/17/2019
- 08:24 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- > Temp-tables declared as REFERENCE-ONLY are initialized in FWD as usual buffers (i.e. StaticTempTable is created and...
07/16/2019
- 05:28 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Some thoughts about BIND:
# Temp-tables declared as @REFERENCE-ONLY@ are initialized in FWD as usual buffers (i.e. @... - 10:00 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Running the instrumentation added in trunk rev 11323 (#4056) has indicated that common persistence scenarios spend a ...
- 09:59 PM Feature #4016: replace portions of Hibernate which are non-performant
- Based on further analysis, including using the persistence instrumentation (#4056), we have decided to remove as much...
07/15/2019
- 04:13 PM Bug #4035 (Closed): newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- 4035a/11327 passed main regression testing and ETF. I rebased to trunk rev 11325, merged to trunk, and committed as t...
- 11:00 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- To summarize the idea:
* Any FOR BLOCK or FOR LOOP causes a special aggressive flushing mode to occur when all the... - 10:44 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Code Review Task Branch 4035a Revision 11327
I'm OK with the changes. I think they accurately implement the behav... - 10:11 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Greg, aggressive buffer flush mode support was added in 4035a/11327. It fixes the @buf1.p@/@buf2.p@ test case and fix...
- 10:22 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- After I've rebased to the latest trunk, the errors of the following type occur:...
07/14/2019
- 07:44 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, please look at 4124a rev 11336 - it fixes the DatasetContainer so that it works with appserver calls.
- 04:19 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Rebased task branch 3816a from P2J trunk revision 11325.
07/13/2019
- 06:27 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- 4124a rev 11333 fixes a naming issue with DATASET or TABLE parameters, when the source is in a super-class: for DATAS...
07/12/2019
- 04:42 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- 3809d was merged to 4124a rev 11329 and dead-archived.
- 02:42 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Branch 3809c passed MAJIC testing and was merged to trunk rev 11325, and archived. It contains changes:
* OM: many ... - 02:21 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Please merge 3809c to trunk.
- 02:02 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Runtime testing (main part) passed with 3809c rev 11382.
- 02:24 AM Feature #4056: instrument FWD and supporting libraries to measure database performance
- Branch 4056a was merged to trunk revision 11323. It passed ChUI conversion and runtime regression testing (the latter...
07/11/2019
- 03:53 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Yes, it works if ALL indexed fields are updated after the second create book.
Even if you e... - 03:45 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Yes, it works if ALL indexed fields are updated after the second @create book@.
However, I'm not sure that forcing... - 03:20 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Eric, some thoughts: for indexed fields, maybe we should assu... - 03:17 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, some thoughts: for indexed fields, maybe we should assume that when a (sub)tx bloc... - 03:10 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Eric, some thoughts: for indexed fields, maybe we should assume that when a (sub)tx block iterates, its indexed field...
- 03:05 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are the buffer scopes the same as the converted code? Based on what you told me previously, the ... - 02:56 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Are the buffer scopes the same as the converted code? Based on what you told me previously, the transaction scoping ...
- 02:53 PM Bug #4035: newly created record is not flushed at the right time
- Here are the compile listings for the test cases above (note: I have renamed them to @flush-buf1.p@ and @flush-buf2.p...
- 02:51 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > The problem is time and the fact that the mapping are to PPTT constants, which started to be ve... - 02:44 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- If the branch passes ChUI regression testing, I am good with it being merged to trunk.
- 02:26 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- > The problem is time and the fact that the mapping are to PPTT constants, which started to be very cryptic. I will p...
- 02:19 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3809c Revisions 11325 through 11380
> I only reviewed the changes in @ut... - 01:57 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Code review task branch 3809c, rev 11326-11375 (part 4):
> @RecordBuffer@:
>
> * Please ... - 01:57 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code Review Task Branch 3809c Revisions 11325 through 11380
I only reviewed the changes in @util/@ and @uast/@. I... - 01:10 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, FYI, I have committed in rev 11380 some very minor format and typo cleanups that I made inline during my code...
- 10:39 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Code review task branch 3809c, rev 11326-11375 (part 3):
>
> @CallbackData@: Should @geTa... - 01:25 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Performance/Resource Concerns:
As noted earlier, these are things that stood out to me, but I obviously haven't do... - 01:15 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code review task branch 3809c, rev 11326-11375 (part 4):
@RecordBuffer@:
* Please use proper logging instead of... - 12:07 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code review task branch 3809c, rev 11326-11375 (part 3):
@CallbackData@: Should @geTarget@ be @getTarget@? It is c... - 01:59 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- FYI, branch 3809c has significant changes/improvements to table parameter processing (and dataset parameter processin...
- 10:47 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- The priority should be on the implementation of conversion and runtime support for the core features listed in #3816-...
- 09:45 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Created task branch 3816a from P2J trunk revision 11324.
- 09:11 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Okay, I fixed NPE and now I can get meaningful results for the testcases. It is about a hundred of testcases. I didn'...
07/10/2019
- 04:25 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Good, thank you! @convert/buffer_definitions.rules@ has this variable...
- 04:13 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- One has it and the other does not. I've attached my output (I changed the @.p@ names but the code is the same).
- 03:47 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Yes, convert both attached files in a single run and check if @TemporaryBuffer.createDynamicTable@ presents in both c...
- 03:45 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Do you have a standalone testcase I can use?
- 03:37 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Could someone please confirm the issue from the previous note? That it's not an issue with my RAM.
- 09:47 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Consider we have two procedures:...
- 09:31 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- There is a procedure @dataset/help/get_tt_num_rows.p@ which is used by pretty much all testcases (which now they are ...
- 03:28 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> @AbstractTempTable@: Why do we override/implement the @readXml@ methods in this abstract cla... - 02:37 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * Is it necessary for @buffer()@ to be @public@? I went through great pains to keep it @prot... - 02:09 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code review task branch 3809c, rev 11326-11375 (part 2 - I am not done with the runtime review yet, but I wanted to g...
- 10:26 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Constantin, could you review Hynek's changes?
> I'm OK with... - 09:00 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin, could you review Hynek's changes?
I'm OK with the OO changes.
Hynek, btw, I... - 07:42 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Code review task branch 3809c, rev 11326-11375 (part 1):
>
> Ovidiu, this is quite an imp... - 12:20 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Code review task branch 3809c, rev 11326-11375 (part 1):
Ovidiu, this is quite an impressive update! I am still re...
07/09/2019
- 07:23 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, please work with high priority on DATASET support for appserver - follow how @Ta... - 07:22 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, please work with high priority on DATASET support for appserver - follow how @TableResultSet@ and @TableWrapp...
- 04:25 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- I've started the rebase process to latest trunk. Thanks for notifying me. I was about to overwrite your revision.
- 04:23 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> BTW: Hynek, please review your changes in r11370. I encountered several conflicts with @Jso...
07/08/2019
- 04:32 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Task branch 3809c was updated with ORIGIN-ROWID & DATA-SOURCE-ROWID implementations. Latest revision is: 11371.
- 10:45 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, can 3809c be tested and merged to trunk in the near future? I need both Hynek's... - 07:47 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, can 3809c be tested and merged to trunk in the near future? I need both Hynek's JSON changes and dataset run...
- 06:13 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- The trunk revision number has increased by 2. I am starting the rebase op now.
07/07/2019
- 06:13 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Ovidiu, I have some code changes to @JsonExport@ I'd like to merge... - 04:44 PM Feature #4056: instrument FWD and supporting libraries to measure database performance
- Task branch 4056a has been rebased to trunk rev 11322.
07/05/2019
- 05:37 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- I updated the branch to r11365. Note that the temporary DMO will change a bit. (JSON not affected)
- 09:08 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Ovidiu, I have some code changes to @JsonExport@ I'd like to merge with your changes and deliv... - 05:05 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Ovidiu please check in the class @ThrowingConsumer@. Do you have o... - 05:04 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, I have some code changes to @JsonExport@ I'd like to merge with your changes and deliver to the branch. If yo...
07/04/2019
- 01:33 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Btw, I would like to merge JSON & XML export classes to use a single output code because both these classes write the...
- 01:27 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Ovidiu please check in the class @ThrowingConsumer@. Do you have other upcoming changes for @J... - 12:29 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu please check in the class @ThrowingConsumer@. Do you have other upcoming changes for @JsonExport@?
- 10:39 AM Support #3871: determine how to change codepages/locales during import
- In this task we are understanding and resolving issues related to reading a database dump (@.d@ files) which has data...
- 04:15 AM Support #3871: determine how to change codepages/locales during import
- Greg, what exactly do you need us to do on this one?
Albeit related the code page character encoding and the colla...
07/03/2019
- 04:14 PM Feature #4128: defer transaction start until the time when real edits begin
- It is my understanding that starting in OpenEdge 11.x, the default behavior is to defer transaction start until the t...
- 04:13 PM Feature #4128 (New): defer transaction start until the time when real edits begin
- 02:27 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- > Place it in 3855b.
Committed rev 11329. - 08:27 AM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Where I can put the fix?
Place it in 3855b.
07/02/2019
- 04:46 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- > One thing that you MUST do is to include the @oo/Printme.cls@ in the conversion list. I suspect that is your issue...
- 04:44 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- > For now, I would just drop any code related to a temp-table definition in an interface
I couldn't do it at this ...
07/01/2019
- 02:59 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Do you, guys, know, if a code page of a temp-table field defined in an interface have an a... - 02:58 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Do you, guys, know, if a code page of a temp-table field defined in an interface have an actual effect? Temp-table de...
- 11:43 AM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- From Constantin: conversion fails because of a TEMP-TABLE with a COLUMN-CODEPAGE field defined in an interface.
<p... - 10:42 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Apparently the revision 11359 added some changes, but the @JsonBackend@ file is missing. Hy... - 06:43 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Apparently the revision 11359 added some changes, but the @JsonBackend@ file is missing. Hynek, please add it.
LE: T... - 06:34 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For JSON serialization, I need the legacy table and field names - but these are lowercas... - 06:27 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> 3809c build fails with:
>
> [...]
You are correct. On Friday I commit my changes then I ...
06/30/2019
- 05:09 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- 3809c build fails with:...
- 05:07 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- For JSON serialization, I need the legacy table and field names - but these are lowercased in FWD, I can't find a way...
06/29/2019
- 01:33 AM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Please post both the test driver and the @Printme.cls@ or commit them to @testcases/uast/@.
One thing that you MUS...
06/28/2019
- 07:12 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- The branch 3809c was rebased to latest trunk and updated to r11358 (includes XMLSCHEMA serialization for DATASETs).
- 06:18 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- > Most of the code in @testcases/uast/oo/@ converts OK (not all, but most). Please post your sample here for review.
... - 08:34 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- > Stanislav, what information do you need from the NEW SHARED TEMP-TABLE definition which is not in the SHARED TEMP-T...
06/27/2019
- 06:19 PM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- The branch 3809c was updated to r11355 (XML serialization for DATASETs). Note that it is not yet rebased to latest tr...
- 09:24 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- I have dumped the schema for some TEMP-TABLE and the list of fields looks like this:...
- 08:50 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- I'll attach some testcases here. Note that at this point they do not work "out of the box" because of #3815-41. You h...
- 08:40 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- 3815a has been merged into the trunk as bzr revision 11320.
06/26/2019
- 07:26 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Rebased task branch 3815a from P2J trunk revision 11319.
- 05:36 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > I can live with the @Text.assign(clob)@ issue temporarily if the runtime conversion chan... - 05:19 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- > I can live with the @Text.assign(clob)@ issue temporarily if the runtime conversion changes you have in mind are ti...
- 05:10 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Stanislav, what information do you need from the NEW SHARED TEMP-TABLE definition which is not in the SHARED TEMP-TAB...
- 11:41 AM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- The NEW (SHARED) TEMP-TABLES are tracked by @SharedVariableManager@. See @addTempTable()@ and @lookupTempTable()@ met...
- 10:12 AM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> I need help with an idea for the fix. @getStaticTempTableDepth(String name)@ searches for ... - 10:00 AM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > I'm not crazy about the addition of @Text.assign(clob)@, since this is an ancestor class... - 04:09 AM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- > @TempTableBuilder@: what is special about @ParmType.CLOB@ that we use @toLowerCase@ on this type and not on any of ...
06/25/2019
- 04:17 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- I need help with an idea for the fix. @getStaticTempTableDepth(String name)@ searches for the table using @(table-nam...
- 03:42 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> I found an issue: @add-fields-from@ and @add-like-field@ cannot find the source LIKE table... - 03:40 PM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- I found an issue: @add-fields-from@ and @add-like-field@ cannot find the source LIKE table if it is a shared table. T...
06/24/2019
- 06:13 AM Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- > I'm not crazy about the addition of @Text.assign(clob)@, since this is an ancestor class that is now aware of its d...
- 05:56 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, is 3809c in a state that is read for code review?
I added some unfinished code at t... - 12:46 AM Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- Ovidiu, is 3809c in a state that is read for code review?
I'm sorry I do not have an idea for your previous post ATM.
06/23/2019
- 04:56 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Most of the code in @testcases/uast/oo/@ converts OK (not all, but most). Please post your sample here for review.
06/21/2019
- 03:58 PM Feature #3816: table and table handle parameter options
- Adding skeleton helped to pass the errors above. However I cannot convert a file referencing a class. I suppose it ma...
Also available in: Atom