Activity
From 12/16/2019 to 01/14/2020
01/14/2020
- 04:32 PM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- I agree, let's pause work on this.
- 04:24 PM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- The root of the problem is clearly at a lower level than anticipated. After some code analysis, the parser is the one...
01/13/2020
- 01:32 PM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Finally, I've got to the responsible area in the conversion. Mainly it looks like a new @BUFFER-SCORE@ Progress Ast s...
- 05:55 AM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Didn't you previously find that some abbreviations were treated as the same buffer as @dummy@ but... - 08:58 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- 4335a
- 08:52 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Which branch should I use for this task?
Thank you. - 08:21 AM Feature #3813 (WIP): misc DB features part deux
- From Eric:
> Pending Ovidiu's review, I believe the rest of #3813-2 is now pretty accurate, though I don't know ho... - 04:40 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- After addressing the items in #4011-61 through #4011-65, please consider and propose a design for a caching/optimizat...
- 04:29 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, currently, we determine which implementation of @DirtyShareContext@ we use for a particular buffer by the typ...
01/12/2020
- 10:13 AM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Didn't you previously find that some abbreviations were treated as the same buffer as @dummy@ but @dum@ was somehow s...
01/11/2020
- 09:56 AM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Issue #4492-1 is implying multiple changes regarding conversion:
# If the buffer used has the same name as the sch...
01/10/2020
- 10:46 AM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Issue #4492-5 fixed. @RecordBuffer.create()@ should have called the trigger before updating the @dirtyContext@, other...
- 08:52 AM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- There seems to be a sub-issue in #4492-1. The @find last@ statement will find the newly created record. In 4GL, an er...
- 09:22 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The trick is to write the @hashCode@ and @equals@ methods generically, to operate only on those properties that are c...
- 09:15 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> For the moment, I have one question, from 1st phrase, related to the key for the hash map/s... - 09:07 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- For the moment, I have one question, from 1st phrase, related to the key for the hash map/set: wouldn't it be a bit o...
- 08:21 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, please implement a feature which uses @BitSet@ and @HashSet@ (or @HashMap@) to implement a tracker for record...
01/09/2020
01/08/2020
- 04:22 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Tasks from note 59 are implemented and were pushed to branch 4011 as r11370.
- 03:37 PM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> These testcases are broken:
>
> ./uast/browse/shared_query_browse_frame.p
> ./uast/brows... - 02:08 PM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- These testcases are broken:
./uast/browse/shared_query_browse_frame.p
./uast/browse/shared_query_browse_frame-run... - 05:13 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- > The 4GL probably provides the ability to use a shared browse in more than one non-shared frame.
As far as I test...
01/07/2020
- 06:57 PM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> 4450a was merged into 4207a as rev 11371.
I updated my 4207a to that rev, and customer ... - 06:05 PM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- 4450a was merged into 4207a as rev 11371.
- 09:34 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 4450a Revision 11342
>
> I'm good with the changes. Please merge them... - 09:27 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Code Review Task Branch 4450a Revision 11342
I'm good with the changes. Please merge them into 4207a and then dea... - 09:20 AM Bug #4450 (WIP): implement shared query and shared browse
- Iterator issue and javadocs are fixed in 4450a rev 11342. (please note that I'll be unavailable for the next couple o...
- 08:11 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Please check in your changes and I will review. I'd like to have them merged into 4207a ASAP, if there is no issue.
... - 08:02 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Heh, I forgot to define a local iterator and and the one from the outer cycle was used.
The files in the customer's ... - 06:10 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- > 1. Why aren't shared browse instances registered with/imported from the SVM?
Browse widget is a part of a frame,...
01/06/2020
- 05:54 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Please go ahead and implement the conversion changes for the DMO interface simplification (i.e., moving the bulk meth...
- 03:20 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> It seems we could rationalize the DMO interface and implementation class hierarchy a bit. Cu... - 02:09 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Another issue I want to discuss for when I get back to the bulk getters and setter for extent fields in @DmoClass@......
- 01:49 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The usage of @BitSet@ should be blazing fast.
I think it should be much better, though n... - 07:29 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, welcome back! I am reworking the @RecordBuffer$Handler@ inner class pretty drastical... - 01:21 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, welcome back! I am reworking the @RecordBuffer$Handler@ inner class pretty drastically, pushing much of the p...
- 11:18 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Code Review Task Branch 4450a Revision 11341
1. Why aren't shared browse instances registered with/imported from t... - 09:19 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > 4450a rev 11341 fixes the testcase, not sure about the customer... - 09:13 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> 4450a rev 11341 fixes the testcase, not sure about the customer's app. Please review.
I... - 06:25 AM Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- A database trigger defined in the following manner behaves differently on FWD:...
- 06:17 AM Bug #4492 (WIP): database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
01/04/2020
- 03:35 PM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- 4450a rev 11341 fixes the testcase, not sure about the customer's app. Please review.
01/02/2020
- 06:59 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Please summarize the status of the task, what is left to do and the estimated time needed.
- 05:09 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- > Let me know if you'd like me to run the customer code through this branch for testing purposes.
Sure, as soon as...
12/31/2019
- 10:00 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Created task branch 4450a from FWD trunk revision 11339.
Let me know if you'd like me t...
12/24/2019
- 11:16 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Created task branch 4450a from FWD trunk revision 11339.
12/23/2019
- 09:54 AM Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Queries declared with @DEF QUERY@, e.g....
12/20/2019
- 05:24 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I committed revision 11369. Most important changes:
* removed completely the temporary @populateFields()@ and @popul... - 04:19 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I had a question w.r.t. the FQL->SQL generation: I know you've been focused primarily on getting the functionality wo...
- 01:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Yes, the idea behind @PropertyMeta@ was to store any information needed to convert between t... - 01:53 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Yes, the idea behind @PropertyMeta@ was to store any information needed to convert between these lower level types an...
- 01:28 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Done, see r11368.
Related to the content of @data[]@: I was using BDT, with unknown values. Your approach uses @nu... - 01:08 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ah, makes sense. That's a remnant of how the old Hibernate @Transaction@ object worked. I did not really intend to ca...
- 11:22 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> However, after rolling back that code, it seems that there is a imbalance in @Persistence@ ...
12/19/2019
- 05:21 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- RB's flushing and Hibernate's transparent write-behind are not directly related. We implemented the flushing in RB to...
- 04:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Well, a bit of investigation and I remember that in RecordBuffer:5917 I replaced @if (!isTransient())@ with @if (curr...
- 04:47 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The message is just a WARNING at the moment it is first displayed, but something goes wrong after the active (convert...
- 04:41 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Oops, I have this too, but when closing the client window.
I am using the ChUI client.... - 04:38 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Hm, I still get the @Illegal attempt to register Finalizable@ crash. You're not seeing this?... - 04:34 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Hm, I still get the @Illegal attempt to register Finalizable@ crash. You're not seeing this? Do you have any changes ...
- 04:31 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- No, it is not. It works without the release, too, but I wanted t be sure it does this way, too.
- 04:29 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Your basic testcase works for me. Clean convert, launched server, client and got the follow... - 04:28 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Hm, I had intended the block at line 262 to avoid this. I'll look at it in a bit...
I chang... - 04:25 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Your basic testcase works for me. Clean convert, launched server, client and got the following output: @0x1 1@ after ...
- 04:25 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The @for@ a line 252 will create multiple setters and getters for same property because the... - 04:21 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Once that is working, I will implement the state changes to get an update test case going. Then expand into a more co...
- 04:08 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I see. I started form that point and gradually gain complexity. I'm going back to the basic testcase to have the same...
- 04:05 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I am working my way up to extent fields. I put in the basic getter/setter methods -- incorrectly, apparently ;-) -- b...
- 04:00 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Yes, sorry, I missed the file.
- 03:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I have the following compile issue in @src/com/goldencode/p2j/persist/orm/DmoClass.java@:
... - 03:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Sorry to bother. The generated classes are invalid when they contain extent fields. The @for@ a line 252 will create ...
- 03:47 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The @DmoClass@ does not have full support for EXTENT fields. For completeness, there are two more getter and three se...
- 03:41 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I have the following compile issue in @src/com/goldencode/p2j/persist/orm/DmoClass.java@:...
- 03:29 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- There is still work I need to do on the DMO class assembler, but I wanted to try to get a real, converted, test code ...
- 03:23 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Please move the line that registers the DMO class just before returning the @dmoIface@ (ie.... - 03:13 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Please move the line that registers the DMO class just before returning the @dmoIface@ (ie. after the last @if@). Thi...
- 03:06 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Thanks, that helped. Now I get:...
- 02:52 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I'm getting a @Failed to locate ALIAS for Tt_1_1__Impl__@ error on a select. Is there an imp... - 02:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I'm getting a @Failed to locate ALIAS for Tt_1_1__Impl__@ error on a select. Is there an implicit assumption somewher...
- 02:04 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> As the priority is to get real code running, please continue to work through the @AbstractM... - 01:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric, I am aware of this. In fact, I wrote in note 14 about BDT used temporarily in data (s... - 01:54 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Whew, ok good :)
I haven't gotten my head fully around your FQL stuff yet, and I was worried the dependency might ... - 01:52 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, I am aware of this. In fact, I wrote in note 14 about BDT used temporarily in data (search for "Note that the v...
- 01:48 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding in your implementation of @populateData@, and as I dig furthe...
- 12:06 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- FYI, I've gotten through the verifier errors and I'm trying a simpler test case than yours (to begin with):...
- 09:48 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- _And the answer from Eric (also by email):_
I think you are correct that the @Buf@ interface can be removed, but I... - 09:46 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- _Current state of the task (from email):_
I have just committed the revision 11365 of 4011a. I tested it, and the ...
12/17/2019
- 06:27 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Getting rid of @dmo_index.xml@ is a long-term goal, not a short term requirement. I thought you had begun to undertak...
- 05:20 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I am aware of the startup problem. There are a couple of issues which prevented me to completely drop it until now an...
- 05:22 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I have a very rough cut of a DMO implementation class assembler in 4011a/11363. It is not feature complete and it has...
Also available in: Atom