FWD » Core Development » Database

04/16/2020

04:21 PM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

4231b rev 11462 contains some performance fixes related to the memory usage.
The idea here was:
* 'unpin' the AST... Constantin Asofiei

04:03 PM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Additional notes which may be useful:
The core idea is that the FWD ConversionDriver has an incremental conversion... Greg Shah

12:05 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Igor: Can you please commit your import fixes so that the build is working again? I need to push... Igor Skornyakov

11:24 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor: Can you please commit your import fixes so that the build is working again? I need to push this to our customers. Greg Shah

04/15/2020

07:15 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, there is an issue in @BufferFieldImpl@ - this import "import org.aspectj.org.eclip... Igor Skornyakov

06:29 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor, there is an issue in @BufferFieldImpl@ - this import "import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.*;" is not OK... Constantin Asofiei

07:11 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> However, I have another question on this topic: aren't the values in each row of the @.d@ fi... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

07:05 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> [...] I think we can either:
> * drop the method, I think the association property-index c... Eric Faulhaber

06:52 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The other issue is that I had removed the deprecated @BaseRecord.indexOf@ method in my worki... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

06:01 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I found out that @PropertyMapper@ tries to delegate the setting of a field if @delegate@ ... Eric Faulhaber

05:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric,
I started rewriting some parts of the @import.xml@, @ImportWorker@ and related classes to take advantage of th... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09:46 AM Bug #3471 (Closed): incremental conversion is regressed

Greg Shah

09:15 PM Feature #4613: add missing support for database user defined functions (UDF) if they are supporte...

FWD supports many built-in functions for use in WHERE clauses, such that they are executed at the database server usi... Eric Faulhaber

04/14/2020

07:03 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor, I will open a new task for this. We will need to put together a process for identifyin... Igor Skornyakov

06:54 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> The only remaining thing in this task is @Built-In Function Usage in WHERE Clauses@.
> Whe... Eric Faulhaber

03:33 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

The only remaining thing in this task is @Built-In Function Usage in WHERE Clauses@.
Where can I take a look at the ... Igor Skornyakov

03:30 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Implemented runtime support for the @BUFFER:BUFFER-VALIDATE@.
4231b revision 11447. Igor Skornyakov

06:58 PM Feature #4613 (New): add missing support for database user defined functions (UDF) if they are su...

Eric Faulhaber

06:06 PM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Branch 3471a was merged to trunk rev 11346 and archived. This adds support for incremental conversion. Not mandator... Constantin Asofiei

05:43 PM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Phase 2 planning:
* move the h2-related code as a service in goldencode.ast
* tmpTabNodes usage - find a better way... Constantin Asofiei

11:58 AM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Code Review Task Branch 3471a Revision 11376
I'm fine with the changes. You can merge to trunk when your testing ... Greg Shah

11:27 AM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

The lambda issues were addressed in 3471a 11375.
I think this can be merged to trunk, after I finish another conve... Constantin Asofiei

11:15 AM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

3471a rev 11376 contains a fix for #4384-187 issue related to converting references for builtin classes with no FWD i... Constantin Asofiei

04:57 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor, you can query the meta tables from a 4GL environment as a standard stable. For exampl... Igor Skornyakov

04:35 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata

Igor, you can query the meta tables from a 4GL environment as a standard stable. For example:... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04:13 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata

Where can I find the description of the schema metadata? So far I've found only this article: https://knowledgebase.p... Igor Skornyakov

04/13/2020

07:02 PM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Greg Shah wrote:
> 5. The design is quite elegant. The fact that the maps and sets in conversion have been replaced... Constantin Asofiei

06:54 PM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Code Review Task Branch 3471a Revision 11373
+Part 2+
5. The design is quite elegant. The fact that the maps a... Greg Shah

06:33 PM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. In the calling locations of @helper.persistCollection()@ it would be better if the types of t... Constantin Asofiei

04:34 PM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Code Review Task Branch 3471a Revision 11373
So far, I've very impressed.
+Part 1+
I'm posting the review in... Greg Shah

07:27 AM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed

Greg, 3471a rev 11373 is ready for review Constantin Asofiei

09:11 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Implemented changes suggested by Eric (see #3813-157) and fixed dependency of the DMO instantiation on @SESSION:DATE... Igor Skornyakov

05:26 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> No, please don't work on the conversion part. The @LegacyField@ annotation is precisely the ... Igor Skornyakov

05:05 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Igor: Can you implement the parts of the support except for the looku... Eric Faulhaber

05:03 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor, for @LegacyField@ look in @dmo_common.rules@, around line 1780, for code like this:... Constantin Asofiei

03:24 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Igor: Can you implement the parts of the support except for the lookup of the value? Then it can... Igor Skornyakov

09:20 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Eric: I assume you mean that just the backing value is there in the DMO in 4011a. The rest of th... Eric Faulhaber

04/12/2020

07:40 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
>
> > I'm supposed to work at least on @DECIMALS@ support right no... Greg Shah

05:05 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The other issue is that I had removed the deprecated @BaseRecord.indexOf@ method in my worki... Eric Faulhaber

05:03 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Thanks for fixing up the import.
I had two errors compiling with rev 11406. One was due to a change I have made in... Eric Faulhaber

04/11/2020

04:12 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Sorry, Igor, would not have been giving you implementation advice had I realized Ovidiu alre... Igor Skornyakov

04:08 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Sorry, Igor, would not have been giving you implementation advice had I realized Ovidiu already implemented this feat... Eric Faulhaber

04:01 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I'm supposed to work at least on @DECIMALS@ support right now.
If there is not a criti... Eric Faulhaber

03:58 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> [...]
> Both attributes and can be directly accessed via the new @DmoMetadataManager@ / @D... Eric Faulhaber

03:03 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor, I believe both of the above attributes are members fields in the new @Property@ DMO a... Igor Skornyakov

02:50 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor, I believe both of the above attributes are members fields in the new @Property@ DMO annotation of the new persi... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

08:08 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Can anybody help me to understand how the @LegacyField@ annotations are generated? We need at least two fixes for thi... Igor Skornyakov

04/10/2020

06:06 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
>
> > I need the get the @DECIMALS@ value from the @BufferFieldImp... Igor Skornyakov

06:00 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I need the get the @DECIMALS@ value from the @BufferFieldImpl@ method I do not see how ge... Eric Faulhaber

04:38 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The DMO field will always return a BDT value, never @null@, even if it is unknown value. The... Igor Skornyakov

03:58 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Fixed the issue with @INITIAL@ value parsing for date fields.
Committed with @SessionExport@ support to 4231b revis... Igor Skornyakov

03:06 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

I've removed my changes regarding @LogicalTerminal@. Apart from extracting @SessionExports@ operations to a separate ... Igor Skornyakov

01:57 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> > I understand that EnvironmentDaemon is not a suitable pattern for the situation with SESSION:DA... Igor Skornyakov

01:46 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

> I understand that EnvironmentDaemon is not a suitable pattern for the situation with SESSION:DATE-FORMAT and the ot... Greg Shah

01:11 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

I understand that @EnvironmentDaemon@ is not a suitable pattern for the situation with @SESSION:DATE-FORMAT@ and the ... Igor Skornyakov

04:26 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

The first revision of import process was committed to 4011a. I have successfully imported the hotel_gui database in b... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04/09/2020

03:32 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, it will certinly make it better, even if it is not the full solution.
>
> You can patte... Igor Skornyakov

03:30 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> BTW: maybe the problem is not with the @SessionUtils@ _per se_, but in the way @SessionExpo... Greg Shah

03:29 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Yes, it will certinly make it better, even if it is not the full solution.
You can pattern it using the @Environ... Greg Shah

03:29 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

BTW: maybe the problem is not with the @SessionUtils@ _per se_, but in the way @SessionExports@ is instantiated in th... Igor Skornyakov

02:55 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes. This is what I meant by my comment:
>
> > I don't know why we are using SessionUtils on ... Igor Skornyakov

02:47 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> A @SESSION:TIMEZONE = 3.@ (@SessionUtils.setTimezone@) causes the same exception as in #381... Greg Shah

02:45 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

A @SESSION:TIMEZONE = 3.@ (@SessionUtils.setTimezone@) causes the same exception as in #3813-123 (@No export or no ac... Igor Skornyakov

04/07/2020

05:19 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

While working with the @hotel_gui@ and in particular with embedded client I feel that FWD is non-deterministically un... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04:46 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

The runtime support for the @DEFAULT-STRING@ (modulo the issue with EXTENT fields (see #3813-99) is finished.
Commit... Igor Skornyakov

04:27 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Most likely, the initial value for these problem cases should be the unknown value. Please check... Igor Skornyakov

04:24 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

> I've implemented preventive pre-check in the getDefaultString and do not try to vet the values for the problematic ... Greg Shah

04:01 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> > Formally this issue is not related to #3813 and does not prevent tesing.
>
> We still should... Igor Skornyakov

03:59 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> > I've found that current INITIAL attribute support generates exceptions for other data types (su... Igor Skornyakov

03:48 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

> Formally this issue is not related to #3813 and does not prevent tesing.
We still should probably fix this now. ... Greg Shah

03:37 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > On the conversion of the field definition
> > [...]
> > the time pa... Igor Skornyakov

03:31 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Another issue:
The converted statement @SessionUtils.setDateFormat(new character("ydm"))@ causes runtime exception:
... Igor Skornyakov

03:30 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

> I've found that current INITIAL attribute support generates exceptions for other data types (such as raw or even ch... Greg Shah

03:27 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> On the conversion of the field definition
> [...]
> the time part is lost.
Please show... Greg Shah

03:23 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I don't think that was intentional. Please add it if you need it. My advice about @getPrecis... Igor Skornyakov

03:21 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

In addition to the #3813-95, I've found that current @INITIAL@ attribute support generates exceptions for other data ... Igor Skornyakov

03:09 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

On the conversion of the field definition... Igor Skornyakov

02:56 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Where @foo@ represents a DMO and @bar@ is a @decimal@ property, ... Eric Faulhaber

01:33 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

@DEFAULT-STRING@ uses only decimal separator when rendering @DECIMAL@ values. The value of the group separator is not... Igor Skornyakov

11:04 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> No. A format string is not the same thing as the @DATE-FORMAT@. A format string for @date@ migh... Igor Skornyakov

10:45 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

> DEFAULT-STRING renders its dates and numeric values in LOCAL format, subject to the DATE-FORMAT and NUMERIC-FORMAT ... Greg Shah

08:23 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> The @date@, @datetime@, @datetime-tz@, @integer@, @int64@ and @decimal@ classes all are designed ... Igor Skornyakov

08:14 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

The @date@, @datetime@, @datetime-tz@, @integer@, @int64@ and @decimal@ classes all are designed to format their stat... Greg Shah

07:51 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Do we have methods for rendering date/numeric data using @SESSION:DAT... Igor Skornyakov

07:46 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> > We need to correctly distinguish between datetime literal and valid expression as NOW. The firs... Igor Skornyakov

07:39 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

> We need to correctly distinguish between datetime literal and valid expression as NOW. The first question is what c... Greg Shah

07:36 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Do we have methods for rendering date/numeric data using @SESSION:DATE-FORMAT@ and @SESSION... Greg Shah

05:45 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Do we have methods for rendering date/numeric data using @SESSION:DATE-FORMAT@ and @SESSION:NUMERIC-FORMAT@ attribute... Igor Skornyakov

05:39 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Where @foo@ represents a DMO and @bar@ is a @decimal@ property, the following will return th... Igor Skornyakov

04:40 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

The issue described in the #3813-97 was a result of the following. I've compiled two tests. The TEMP-TABLE @source-da... Igor Skornyakov

03:35 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Where @foo@ represents a DMO and @bar@ is a @decimal@ property, the following will return th... Igor Skornyakov

04/06/2020

07:29 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Where @foo@ represents a DMO and @bar@ is a @decimal@ property, the following will return the value of DECIMAL from t... Eric Faulhaber

05:43 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I cannot find where the value of the DECIMAL option of the field definition is located in t... Igor Skornyakov

05:38 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

I cannot find where the value of the DECIMAL option of the field definition is located in the conversion artifacts.
... Igor Skornyakov

01:35 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I will schedule working on this issue. 4011a is not yet stable enough, but we'll see whethe... Igor Skornyakov

01:29 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

> BTW: do I understand correctly that more complicated expressions cannot be used in the @INITIAL@ clause?
TBH, befo... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

12:40 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I am working on 4011a branch, where the field's attributes (including the default value) ar... Igor Skornyakov

12:29 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

The following field definition... Igor Skornyakov

12:26 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

I am working on 4011a branch, where the field's attributes (including the default value) are defined as DMO interface... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:40 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

At the moment FWD runtime support if the INITIAL attribute for fields like @FIELD s-datetime AS DATETIME INITIAL NOW@... Igor Skornyakov

09:57 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Greg Shah wrote:
> Doesn't the @DEFAULT-VALUE@ of the DMO map more closely to @BUFFER-FIELD:DEFAULT-VALUE@ instead o... Igor Skornyakov

09:50 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Doesn't the @DEFAULT-VALUE@ of the DMO map more closely to @BUFFER-FIELD:DEFAULT-VALUE@ instead of using the @DEFAULT... Greg Shah

09:42 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

We have no support for the BUFFER-FIELD:DEFAULT-VALUE (even conversion is not supported). This can be a little bit tr... Igor Skornyakov

07:34 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Which revision of hotel_gui are you using with 4011a/11404?
I found r202 of hotel_gui is wh... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04/05/2020

06:08 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I have committed my latest changes to 4011a as r11404.
> The standalone hotel_gui is start... Eric Faulhaber

07:52 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

I have committed my latest changes to 4011a as r11404.
The standalone hotel_gui is starting up and tabs can be navig... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

07:37 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

> This is a non-orthodox workaround.
You're being kind. Let us call it what it is: an ugly solution. Unfortunate... Greg Shah

04/04/2020

06:24 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg, thanks for suggestion. This is a non-orthodox workaround. Here is what I've done.
I altered @NUM_LITERAL@ in l... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04/03/2020

06:33 PM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

By the end of the weekend, please report the list of open items remaining in this task. We can push the #3813-81 it... Greg Shah

06:31 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Is the column name version of @order@ always "qualified" (e.g. @tt1.order@)? If so, then you can easily differentiat... Greg Shah

05:29 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

In fact, @by@ does not suffer from this inconvenient as it is already a Progress reserved keyword and cannot be the n... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

I encountered the following issue and I see no easy trick to work around. It is a antlr issue I think. Suppose we hav... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04/02/2020

08:22 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Contrary to what is said in the Progress documentation the @DEFAULT-STRING@ attribute is read-only. This is logical a... Igor Skornyakov

04/01/2020

11:47 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg Shah wrote:
> > There is another issue which I have in mind: when creating a savepoint, shouldn't we also sav... Eric Faulhaber

11:36 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg Shah wrote:
> What happens if in the meantime between the roll-forward and the original execution of a statem... Eric Faulhaber

07:39 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

> maybe, instead of trying to track NO-UNDO DMOs as POJOs, I need to track the SQL statements that were rolled back a... Greg Shah

07:21 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric, this FFD replay is the same though I had in mind. I don't think we can keep the database in good condition and ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03/31/2020

06:25 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

I've been struggling with how to fit a bulk delete (i.e., @delete from <table> [ where <condition> ]@) which operates... Eric Faulhaber

10:14 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux

Working on @BUFFER-FIELD:DEFAULT-STRING@ and @BUFFER-DECIMALS@ attributes support. Igor Skornyakov

03/30/2020

03:51 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> OTOH, in case of the TEMP-TABLEs, there is the case when two independent tables are defin... Eric Faulhaber

11:38 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

My concerns on different @extent@ fields were related to @shared@ tables. However, re-reading #2942 notes I see that ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09:53 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

I really like your proposal as well. It seems "more correct" and it reads better.
In regard to the question "whic... Greg Shah

09:47 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, I like the chaining approach. This is an approach I have adopted with other new APIs... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09:42 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I think your solution can limit the legacy annotations to only schema-related informatio... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03/28/2020

04:54 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu, I like the chaining approach. This is an approach I have adopted with other new APIs which have lots of possi... Eric Faulhaber

09:57 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu, your idea of setting these non-schema settings for a temp-table at the program where it is defined is interes... Constantin Asofiei

03/27/2020

07:44 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

We are talking about two different types of 'attributes' of the temp-tables:
* structural (actual data structure, m... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> If we were generating different DMO types for differences in certain [temp-]table attributes... Constantin Asofiei

01:34 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

I'm pretty sure we were never generating more than one DMO implementation class per DMO interface. These were designe... Eric Faulhaber

01:30 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin, you are right, one of the @xml-node-name@ s will be lost in this case.
This wa... Constantin Asofiei

01:22 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Constantin, you are right, one of the @xml-node-name@ s will be lost in this case.
However, this is a bug (I can say... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:06 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Eric/Ovidiu: maybe you've already considered, but please keep... Constantin Asofiei

01:01 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric/Ovidiu: maybe you've already considered, but please keep in mind also the 'resource... Eric Faulhaber

11:47 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric/Ovidiu: maybe you've already considered, but please keep in mind also the 'resource' behavior for temp-tables (w... Constantin Asofiei

11:23 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Less is more. I see no reason a customer would want the same structure duplicated just to get the affect of setting ... Greg Shah

11:20 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg Shah wrote:
> > I suppose an alternative is to include NO-UNDO among the criteria which differentiates DMO inte... Eric Faulhaber

11:12 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

> I suppose an alternative is to include NO-UNDO among the criteria which differentiates DMO interfaces during conver... Greg Shah

10:55 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

So, what I understand from your comment is that the NO-UNDO state is a property of the table the record belongs to (i... Eric Faulhaber

10:40 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

How can we test that? The only way is to use @buffer-copy@, but this will copy field by field, not the whole record.
... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:30 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

I guess the better question is whether it is possible for the same data record to be used by such temp-tables (i.e., ... Eric Faulhaber

09:09 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, if two temp-tables are defined identically, except that one is declared NO-UNDO and ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04:28 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu, if two temp-tables are defined identically, except that one is declared NO-UNDO and the other is not, do we g... Eric Faulhaber

03/26/2020

05:21 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

If the directory has a flag to force everything to be treated as @NO-UNDO@, then I don't see the need for a conversio... Greg Shah

05:04 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg Shah wrote:
> > The only value I see is that of pointing out which temp-tables are NOT marked NO-UNDO in the 4G... Eric Faulhaber

04:29 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

> The only value I see is that of pointing out which temp-tables are NOT marked NO-UNDO in the 4GL code, which might ... Greg Shah

04:04 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
>
> > He mentioned that he believes his team never knowingly uses UNDOab... Eric Faulhaber

03:43 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Eric,
IIRC, the @UndoStateProvider@ is used for two reasons:
* to allow the @undo@ property to be lazily set (in s... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:10 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu, I am implementing the forced NO-UNDO override idea Greg mentioned above, and I have come across @UndoStatePro... Eric Faulhaber

03/23/2020

03:01 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg Shah wrote:
> He mentioned that he believes his team never knowingly uses UNDOable temp-tables. In other wor... Eric Faulhaber

02:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg Shah wrote:
> [...]
> This would mean that the rollback for temp-tables would actually commit when this flag i... Eric Faulhaber

02:25 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

I have fixed the issue in entry 157, please disregard it.
The problem was in annotations' path: in the paths were in... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:40 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

I've was discussing (with a customer) the UNDO/transaction and sub-transaction rework that is happening in this task.... Greg Shah

12:52 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

While working on dynamic temp-tables I encountered the following issue: the @AsmClassLoader@ loads the dynamically ge... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03/19/2020

07:13 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg, never mind.
This seems to have something to do with my registration mechanism. It works with other test case... Eric Faulhaber

06:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Greg, could you please double-check the @entry@ hook logic for this test case?... Eric Faulhaber

03:51 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The actual cause of NPW was the fact that the @activeOffset@ was accessed for the @snapshot... Eric Faulhaber

03:26 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

The actual cause of NPW was the fact that the @activeOffset@ was accessed for the @snapshot@ of the @dmo@ of the @Rec... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:33 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements

Ovidiu, those places we are seeing the NPE on @BaseRecord.activeBuffer@ seem to be old code where we are calling a se... Eric Faulhaber