Activity
From 04/21/2020 to 05/20/2020
05/20/2020
- 07:00 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think 4231b is fine.
Committed to 4231b revision 11549. ... - 06:35 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I think 4231b is fine.
05/19/2020
- 04:19 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've finished the population of the @_File@, @_Field@, @_Index@, and @_Index-Field@ system ... - 02:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've just committed my latest changes to 4011 as r11437.
The most important thing here is the fix for the endless qu... - 10:00 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > but in 4011 this is automatically done by DmoMetadataManager. The 4011 uses the new syntax supp...
05/18/2020
- 06:53 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> OTOH, the @ProgressiveResults@ have @sessionClosing()@ method which will duplicate the un... - 06:27 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > but in 4011 this is automatically done by DmoMetadataManager. The 4011 uses the new syntax supp... - 06:04 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > but in 4011 this is automatically done by DmoMetadataManager. The 4011 uses the new syntax supported by H2 (and PSQ...
- 05:49 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> [..] when a query is associated with a browse, apparently we need some special treatment, be... - 04:00 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Separately, I committed rev 11436, which completes the fix to the server startup performance... - 05:02 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The @UniqueTracker@ empty scopes issue seems to be caused by the fact that we aren't registering the tracker for @Fin...
- 05:44 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I've finished the population of the @_File@, @_Field@, @_Index@, and @_Index-Field@ system tables base on DMO reflect...
05/16/2020
- 01:53 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Running a single ETF test results in some errors......
05/15/2020
- 07:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The long delay during ETF server startup while processing index metadata appears to be due to the fact that we swappe...
- 06:57 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > * Using the mouse wheel to scroll down in the "Available Rooms" ... - 06:32 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * Using the mouse wheel to scroll down in the "Available Rooms" tab browse results in an end... - 05:07 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- The @_File@ table population for a large customer application (both system and user tables) takes ~100 ms in my envir...
- 12:55 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > I'm a little bit confused with the discussion in #3145. At the ... - 12:07 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I'm a little bit confused with the discussion in #3145. At the bottom line - is it OK to se... - 06:18 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I'm a little bit confused with the discussion in #3145. At the bottom line - is it OK to set the value of the @_Templ...
- 02:55 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > I've noticed that the current data for the @_User... - 10:04 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> [...]
> I've noticed that the current data for the @_User@ table in the @xxx.meta.xml@ f...
05/14/2020
- 05:45 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > [...] and @_Template@ is always zero (not a negative number).
... - 05:15 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> [...] and @_Template@ is always zero (not a negative number).
I do not remember exactly, b... - 05:04 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Populating @_File@ system table based *only* on database metadata (provided by @Connection.getMetaData()@) looks to b...
- 03:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Hotel GUI r220 issues with 4011a:
* Adding a guest to the "Check-In" dialog replaces the existing guest instead of... - 03:26 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I noticed something else related to assigns, which will probably not be handled in this task: the way the ASSIGN trig...
- 03:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We've never seen this behavior before. I think it can only be seen in a @NO-ERROR@ case because ... - 07:24 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > Next, if we enable the two commented lines the program will print 0 ? because the values of k and f11 will be rolle...
- 09:44 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Indeed, to observe the null-mandatory-nonValidated field case the field initial value must be declared @?@, like:
<p...
05/13/2020
- 07:08 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Related to not-null/mandatory validation. There are some issues with current implementation... - 04:28 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Related to not-null/mandatory validation. There are some issues with current implementation.
* 1st: there is a two... - 03:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I will do a test on my HDD to give as a base for comparing future work. How many threads ... - 06:19 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Revision 11434 implements bulk insert (i.e., broader SQL batching) and a few other optimizat... - 04:05 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Revision 11434 implements bulk insert (i.e., broader SQL batching) and a few other optimizations for the database imp...
- 09:33 AM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- Some other parts which are required for incremental conversion:
* the @.wsdl@ generation for exported SOAP services...
05/12/2020
- 08:07 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > This can result in a performance drag on the system, in that the maintenance of the state of th... - 08:03 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- > do we already have an issue for this?
Not that I recall.
> I do not want to include all system tables support...
05/11/2020
- 07:28 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I do not see any potential conflicts between what I see in 4011a and my changes in 4231b. S... - 06:37 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I've made @MetadataManager.initialize()@ implementation as close to one in 4011a as possible. Both implementations a...
- 06:52 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I do not see any potential conflicts between what I see in 4011a and my changes in 4231b. Some changes will be requir...
- 02:01 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Thanks for the batch size fix, I hadn't noticed that. Yes, the import organizes the records into batches, but we don'...
- 12:13 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I've been running database import and I noticed something surprising in the import worker co... - 05:42 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I'm trying to run my standalone test with H2 database. It runs fine with 4231b, but with 4011a the server fails at st...
- 04:32 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've been running database import and I noticed something surprising in the import worker code:...
05/10/2020
- 03:31 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- To clarify, that last line refers to deleting DMOs one at a time using @Persistence.delete@, as is done in the persis...
- 03:27 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I think this region o...
05/09/2020
- 09:41 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > [...]
> > I think this region of the persistence was not altere... - 06:38 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> [...]
> I think this region of the persistence was not altered. I wonder how this was work...
05/08/2020
- 07:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Please find the TempTable DataSource management patch as r11432. I tested the web client and multiple clients connect...
- 07:09 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I was testing the new datasource/connection when I encounter the following issue: once a dynamic table (probably not ...
- 06:08 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, w.r.t. the ETF import taking almost 17 hours, is that normal for that machine? It se... - 05:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Agreed. That's what I was trying to suggest, but you summarized it better.
Also, looking back at how it ended up, ... - 05:54 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I think the framework might work with this idea: we just move the context from the @TempTableDataSourceProvider@, to ...
- 05:46 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The problem is in @JdbcDataSource@. For temp-tables, it is built from the @DataSourceImpl@ ... - 05:04 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The problem is in @JdbcDataSource@. For temp-tables, it is built from the @DataSourceImpl@ returned by the @TempTable...
- 04:25 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>
> > I investigated the connections and they seem to share the sa... - 12:37 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I investigated the connections and they seem to share the same connection. I will investi... - 06:18 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I tried connecting with two clients at once: the Swing client first (only connect, no other clicks) and then the embe...
- 04:32 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, w.r.t. the ETF import taking almost 17 hours, is that normal for that machine? It seems really long to me. Wi...
- 04:08 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Thanks for the fixes.
I rebuilt and converted Hotel GUI from scratch. The import worked, but unfortunately, I stil... - 09:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- New update, r11431.
There was an issue with _temp records fetched by loader. The hydration wasn't setting up the @_m... - 03:20 AM Feature #3757: add metadata support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor,
> I do not remember exactly why the @ _database-feature@ was removed. It seems to me...
05/07/2020
- 07:24 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
Please grab -r11429- LE:r11430. I have a separate directory for commits and I forgot to compare and merge in t... - 06:38 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, I'm getting this during the import step:...
- 04:40 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The standalone clients now can sequentially connect to server and the table/index cleanup... - 04:15 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I have just committed r11429. Changes include:
* moved DDL generation from @DmoMetadataManager@ to @TempTableHelper@... - 04:27 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I committed rev 11427, which adds the placeholder suffix at the end of temp-table index names. Note that this short t...
- 04:19 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> This must be done as some things changed: @id@/@recid@ as PK, @identifier@/@id@, datetime... - 10:43 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Please prioritize the temp-table name suffix fix. I'd like to see this go in as soon as poss... - 08:38 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Please prioritize the temp-table name suffix fix. I'd like to see this go in as soon as possible, even if nothing els...
- 07:17 PM Feature #3757: add metadata support
- Igor,
I do not remember exactly why the @ _database-feature@ was removed. It seems to me that, since work on @_ActLo... - 06:24 PM Feature #3757: add metadata support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I had not planned for you to make everything "live" yet. For this current task, it is OK to exte... - 06:16 PM Feature #3757: add metadata support
- I had not planned for you to make everything "live" yet. For this current task, it is OK to extend the current stati...
- 04:59 PM Feature #3757: add metadata support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The @_database-feature@ has the runtime support in @MetadataManager.populateDatabaseFeature...
05/06/2020
- 07:52 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The following is a short discussion from email, with my last replies:
Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> On 5/6/20 4:33 PM, Ov... - 05:56 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> ... the @TempTableHelper@ also keeps a static @cache@ in a form of a @HashMap@ which is nev... - 03:51 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- It doesn't matter much to me where we keep the cache... wherever you think it makes the most sense is fine.
As to... - 01:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
Your statements are correct. I added the code exactly as you described them an continued some investigations. ... - 08:25 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin, I am hitting a resource cleanup problem with a persistent procedure in Hotel GUI... - 07:33 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, I've committed rev 11427, which partially fixes persistence context cleanup. However, I found a problem with ...
- 04:22 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin, I am hitting a resource cleanup problem with a persistent procedure in Hotel GUI... - 04:12 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, I am hitting a resource cleanup problem with a persistent procedure in Hotel GUI. The procedure is the co...
- 01:09 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- It's #4155.
I was looking for #3757 several days ago and for some reasons I could not reach it. Thanks for finding i... - 01:00 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I will answer this:
> there are a few versions of @standard.df@ in use. Depending on the v... - 12:46 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Igor,
> On a project, we had to include @_connect@ in the @metadata@. At that point, we rec... - 12:38 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor,
On a project, we had to include @_connect@ in the @metadata@. At that point, we received @java.lang.ClassNot...
05/05/2020
- 08:12 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin, can you please point me at some test cases which use buffers in persistent proce... - 05:45 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I committed rev 11426, which attempts to fix the session closing issue. However, there is still a problem, which I am...
- 05:42 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Tried an ETF run. Server startup reported these errors:...
- 03:44 AM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- Eric, I've noticed something while looking at #4633. The @SchemaWorker.joins@ does not survive for incremental conve...
05/01/2020
- 04:11 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, can you please point me at some test cases which use buffers in persistent procedures?
- 01:40 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Committed 11423. Changes:
* fixed regression in _meta tables;
* skip re-hydration of records if a non STALE copy is... - 07:31 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I do not know the exact H2 implementation, but it seems to me logical that once the table is LOCAL, its indexes will ...
- 06:44 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> At this moment we have some @Session@ -related events: SESSION_CLEANUP, SESSION_CLOSING_N... - 06:11 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> We have not changed the approach to "static" metadata tables in this branch, and we're makin... - 06:06 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> We have not changed the approach to "static" metadata tables in this branch, and we're makin... - 06:03 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, AFAICT, we do not do any explicit closing of resources associated with converted, le... - 06:01 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- We have not changed the approach to "static" metadata tables in this branch, and we're making only minimal changes to...
- 05:52 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Gentlemen,
I'm working on metatables support right now. Maybe it makes sense for me to use your branch?
Thank you. - 05:48 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- No worries. The patch I used to get past it is attached. If you're ok with it (I didn't test the case where the @Meta...
- 05:43 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The discussion of modifying the approach on the metadata DMOs notwithstanding, the current a... - 04:30 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Last night I committed r11422.
> This revision re-enables @LockTableUpdater@, @ConnectTab...
04/30/2020
- 06:56 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For persistent procedures, a buffer will live as long as that program lives.
Hm, ri... - 06:24 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Specifically, I provisionally have decided on the approach where we tie the database session... - 05:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, I need some guidance on my previous entry.
Specifically, I provisionally have decided on the approach ... - 03:50 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> If @Persistence.closeSession(false)@ is called only from @Persistence$Context.cleanup()@. T... - 10:08 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I agree that refactoring and using modules are both very good things. And we are definitely wanting to do some of th...
- 09:34 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> When we upgrade to Java9 we could make use of the new modules and compile them independentl... - 09:24 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In #4155 we are working to eliminate use of the @.df@. And converting as part of the build proce... - 09:10 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In #4155 we are working to eliminate use of the @.df@. And converting as part of the build proce... - 08:58 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- In #4155 we are working to eliminate use of the @.df@. And converting as part of the build process leads to a bootst...
- 08:50 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > taking in consideration that we do not have the class at the moment FWD is compiled
>
> In m... - 08:44 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > taking in consideration that we do not have the class at the moment FWD is compiled
In my opinion, it makes no s...
04/29/2020
- 05:29 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Last night I committed r11422.
This revision re-enables @LockTableUpdater@, @ConnectTableUpdater@ and @TransactionT... - 04:09 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- If @Persistence.closeSession(false)@ is called only from @Persistence$Context.cleanup()@. This is the end of session,...
- 02:33 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Just committed r11421.
> There are two changes:
> # in @Persistence.closeSession(boolean)... - 06:32 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- For now, don't change what the queries fetch. If a query fetches all columns, leave it that way, but ensure the prima...
- 08:47 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I observed the following usecase:
* some records are created fresh in a loop and get saved. They are successfully in...
04/28/2020
- 04:20 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Just committed r11421.
There are two changes:
# in @Persistence.closeSession(boolean)@, the @closeSessionImpl(error... - 01:36 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Briefly speaking, the problem is caused because the static temp-tables are 'permanent', a... - 11:50 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> One more issue to fix is that it seems we are not properly dropping indexes on temporary tab... - 08:18 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > At each nested block within that application transaction, the SavepointManager sets a database savepoint. If that b...
- 05:51 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- One more issue to fix is that it seems we are not properly dropping indexes on temporary tables upon exiting Hotel GU...
- 05:32 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> For undoable DMOs marked stale, the next access forces a re-read of that DMO's data from t... - 05:25 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I think there is an issue with the nesting transactions. [...]
I debugged through this... - 04:20 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Thanks for clarifications, I will use these information (from both your last posts) to continue investigations on the...
- 03:37 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > I don't intentionally create nested transactions, in fact, the @... - 03:09 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Can you please share the reasoning behind your change?
> The ... - 09:10 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I don't intentionally create nested transactions, in fact, the @inTx@ flag in @Session@ is i... - 09:03 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Can you please share the reasoning behind your change?
The usecase is when same dmo is load... - 08:50 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, the change in 11418 to @Session.save@ seems dangerous to me. The reason for the check to test whether another...
- 12:16 PM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The runtime would be up to Eric/Ovidiu. After #4011, they have plenty of control all the way dow... - 10:08 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- 4231b rev 11493 :
* added BUFFER:LAST-BUFFER and QUERY's callback API support
* fixed EXCEPT/FIELDS option with a r... - 09:43 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- Looks like FIELDS and EXCEPT are already supported for this case:...
- 09:41 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- The runtime would be up to Eric/Ovidiu. After #4011, they have plenty of control all the way down to the JDBC driver.
- 09:24 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- I understand the reasoning behind it, to limit the amount of data retrieved by a query; but, my point is that to make...
- 09:15 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I recall way back that we had a talk about FIELDS/EXCEPT with a record phrase, and with ... - 08:16 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- Yes, it exists:...
- 08:12 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Where did you find from of the existence of the attribute for dataset objects? Custome... - 07:32 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Just a note, there is a @DATASET:FILL-MODE@ attribute which ... - 07:01 AM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Just a note, there is a @DATASET:FILL-MODE@ attribute which I stubbed in 4231b. FWD now... - 10:16 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Why not keep the metadata in the database as 4GL does?
>
> Just because the 4GL represents t... - 10:08 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- > Why not keep the metadata in the database as 4GL does?
Just because the 4GL represents these as tables, doesn't ... - 09:49 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> When you add a column or an index post-conversion, it must be represented in the metadata. Relyi... - 08:00 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- When you add a column or an index post-conversion, it must be represented in the metadata. Relying upon static defin...
04/27/2020
- 07:20 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> At least for tables such as @file_@ or @field_@, these must always represent the latest structu... - 06:47 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I can easily imagine the situation when we'll be able to provide compatibility with 4GL for the... - 06:35 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- > I can easily imagine the situation when we'll be able to provide compatibility with 4GL for the application if we w...
- 06:00 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I've not realized this. In any case, the content of the non-VST system tables should be really ... - 05:45 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- > I've not realized this. In any case, the content of the non-VST system tables should be really persistent and survi...
- 05:25 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, AFAIK the meta database in FWD is a separate H2 in-memory database, for each physi... - 05:20 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor, AFAIK the meta database in FWD is a separate H2 in-memory database, for each physical database. So even if the...
- 04:31 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Well, it seems that we need some changes in the conversion proce... - 04:20 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Well, it seems that we need some changes in the conversion process. The SCHEMA meta tables ... - 06:44 PM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- I recall way back that we had a talk about FIELDS/EXCEPT with a record phrase, and with our current FWD, it doesn't m...
- 06:39 PM Feature #4397: add database attrs, methods and options
- Just a note, there is a @DATASET:FILL-MODE@ attribute which I stubbed in 4231b. FWD now has runtime only for @BUFFER...
- 05:37 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I don't intentionally create nested transactions, in fact, the @inTx@ flag in @Session@ is intended specifically to a...
- 05:24 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
I committed a small update that will make the embedded client work. See r11418.
But I have the following is... - 03:45 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> [...]
> This was making sense when we let Hibernate do the flush as late as possible, bu... - 08:47 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
We need to discuss the ... - 06:05 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> This is fixed in rev 11417.
Super!
> Ovidiu, after the issues in #4011-241, could you al... - 06:00 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, after the issues in #4011-241, could you also please take a look at what is going wrong with embedded mode Ho...
- 05:48 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > What is the recreate for this? I can have a look.
> Available R... - 02:15 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, thanks for the fixes in rev 11416. Please look at these next, which occur when you try to manipulate the tree...
04/25/2020
- 02:48 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I've now come across a dynamic database problem in Hotel GUI (virtual desktop). On the "Room... - 02:37 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> What is the recreate for this? I can have a look.
Available Rooms > Check-In > (select a gu... - 02:34 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The issue I was after yesterday changes a bit. [...]
What is the recreate for this? I ... - 11:28 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
The issue I was after yesterday changes a bit. Now I am getting the following NPE when a record is deleted:
<... - 09:01 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > The problem with my last revision is that I was assuming Finalizable entry and finished calls were always paired, w...
- 04:19 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've committed rev 11415, which I believe fixes the @UniqueTracker@ scope imbalance problem. I think the logic is sou...
04/24/2020
- 04:11 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> the first part, @on commit drop@ means to drop the table on transaction commit. Now, I do... - 10:07 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Why do we create temp tables with the postfix @on commit drop transactional@? What does this... - 04:23 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Update on the unbalanced scopes in @UniqueTracker@...
I've reworked the scope mechanism in @UniqueTracker@ to rely... - 02:19 PM Feature #4375: add support for -pf <profile_filename> option for CONNECT statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It looks like rev 11369 of 4231b.
>
> As you develop changes for a task, please keep the @% Do... - 01:29 PM Feature #4375 (Test): add support for -pf <profile_filename> option for CONNECT statement
- It looks like rev 11369 of 4231b.
As you develop changes for a task, please keep the @% Done@ and @Status@ updated... - 01:13 PM Feature #4375: add support for -pf <profile_filename> option for CONNECT statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are the changes in 4231b?
I do not remember. I think that they are in the trunk already. - 01:12 PM Feature #4375: add support for -pf <profile_filename> option for CONNECT statement
- Are the changes in 4231b?
- 01:11 PM Feature #4375: add support for -pf <profile_filename> option for CONNECT statement
- This was done in the scope of #3813.
- 11:46 AM Feature #4375: add support for -pf <profile_filename> option for CONNECT statement
- I think I mistakenly assigned you #4392 previously, but meant for you to work this one.
- 01:06 PM Feature #4175: add support for -1 (single user) option for CONNECT statement
- I was not working in this task/ As far as I remember, I was reassigned to another one.
- 11:44 AM Feature #4175: add support for -1 (single user) option for CONNECT statement
- What is the status of this task?
04/23/2020
- 04:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Why do we create temp tables with the postfix @on commit drop transactional@? What does this do?
- 03:49 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I just committed r11414. Here are the changes:
* changed the initialization of @_metadata@ of @DmoClass@ generated c... - 02:33 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Do we need to be so eager to close the session in the attempt to salvage the normal execu... - 10:44 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I used r11413 and the hotel_gui has @deploy.all@-ed smoothly. I found some new hardcoded @id@ which were replaced wit...
- 08:15 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I was not thinking of database import when I put @PRIMARY_KEY_NAME@ into @DatabaseManager@. ... - 06:10 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The attached changes to @directory.xml@ are needed to adjust for the removal of Hibernate. Note that these are just t...
- 06:02 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I checked in rev 11413, which fixes a few bugs (hard-coded references to @id@ as primary key) and makes @Session.PK@ ...
- 04:44 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> * the @DatabaseManager.PRIMARY_KEY@ is used when initializing the @DmoMeta@ for each DMO ... - 09:33 AM Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- 4231b rev -11481- 11482 contains more performance fixes (again, related to the @tmpTabNodes@ and @AstKey@):
* collec...
04/22/2020
- 03:31 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Is @MultiClassLoader@ really needed for the import, or just @AsmClassLoader@?
Good point.... - 03:24 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Is @MultiClassLoader@ really needed for the import, or just @AsmClassLoader@?
- 03:21 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> BTW, for import and server to start the
> @-Djava.system.class.loader=com.goldencode.p2... - 03:20 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- BTW, for import and server to start the
@-Djava.system.class.loader=com.goldencode.p2j.classloader.MultiClassLoad... - 03:06 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
I committed r11412. The changes include:
* I fixed the reported issue. It was caused by the @key@ being dif... - 05:20 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, when I try to log into Hotel GUI embedded mode (or run any test case) with rev 14111, I get this:...
- 08:18 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
>> I noticed your TODO in DatabaseManager. I am going to address is immediately as this is use...
04/21/2020
- 08:07 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- At this moment I'm using the current approach based on @metadata@ in @p2j.cfg.xml@. I believe that it will be easy to...
- 08:02 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- We can leave behind a conversion artifact for this, since the dynamic queries are only processed at runtime this shou...
- 03:47 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg/Igor: a VST can be used from dynamic queries, too. And this will leave nothing for us to determine via the stan...
- 06:08 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I merged in my changes related to import and a few other fixes. Latest revision of 4011a is...
Also available in: Atom