Activity
From 05/15/2020 to 06/13/2020
06/13/2020
- 05:53 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > There's nowhere to descend, nor another sibling. When iter.hasNext() is called after the BOOL_TRUE was processed, i...
06/12/2020
- 07:03 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Yes, if we can evaluate static sub-expressions during conversion, we roll them up to their result and replace the sub...
- 07:00 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Is it possible that the WHERE node was dropped in this case?
- 06:57 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- AFAIK, we didn't change this in 4011a. I wonder why we are hitting this now.
- 06:42 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- There's a bug in @AnnotatedAst.iterator@ when trying to iterate starting from the @BOOL_TRUE@ child (of the @WHERE@ c...
- 06:20 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The not closed objects are most likely the reason for the me... - 05:37 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin, I am blocked by this as well. Please commit the fix as soon as it is ready.
See... - 05:25 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, I am blocked by this as well. Please commit the fix as soon as it is ready.
- 05:17 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- This was inspired by what I saw Hibernate was generating. The most signifiant 32 bit came naturally and will match th...
- 05:02 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Or better yet, why use a hashcode for the FK? Just as a convention? This name needs to... - 05:01 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There's something wrong in TempTableHelper when the constraint name is computed:
> [...... - 04:45 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- There's something wrong in TempTableHelper when the constraint name is computed:...
- 03:57 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- OK, I think this is what Hibernate did as well. We may come back to @PreparedStatement@ caching as a potential optimi...
- 03:49 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I think we know when we are done with the statement in all cases, but do we cache @PreparedS... - 03:47 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I think we know when we are done with the statement in all cases, but do we cache @PreparedS... - 03:43 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I think we know when we are done with the statement in all cases, but do we cache @PreparedStatement@ instances to pr...
- 03:42 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The not closed objects are most likely the reason for the memory issues. I tried to close s... - 03:20 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The not closed objects are most likely the reason for the memory issues. I tried to close some of them but it was rea...
- 03:18 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> How were we handling cleanup of the Hibernate query resources?
I think Hibernate was taking... - 03:09 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- @AbstractQuery@ has a @cleanup@ method, however, the use of @SQLQuery@ and even @Query@ is somewhat internal/hidden w...
- 03:04 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Another issue which I don't understand: the @SQLQuery@'s JDBC statement and ResultSet is never closed. Why? Who shou...
- 03:02 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > I've moved to another test as the current one is blocked ... - 09:05 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've moved to another test as the current one is blocked with the flush/mandatory issue.... - 08:25 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've moved to another test as the current one is blocked with the flush/mandatory issue. Now I've reached an extent ...
- 08:13 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Not exactly. I will add it, thanks.
06/11/2020
- 07:57 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, do you have this case in your current flush/validation work?...
- 06:37 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, the NO-UNDO issue is related to passing the temp-table as a parameter, where you e... - 06:06 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, the NO-UNDO issue is related to passing the temp-table as a parameter, where you end up with two records like ...
- 04:56 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> A test related to NO-UNDO temp-tables (not related to STOP, replace it with UNDO, LEAVE ... - 03:39 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- A test related to NO-UNDO temp-tables (not related to STOP, replace it with UNDO, LEAVE and there is the same behavio...
- 03:22 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, what's the difference between @FqlType.DECIMAL@ and @FqlType.DOUBLE@? How are th... - 03:07 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- 11467 contains the ScrollingResults fix, rollback of SqlQuery RSMD usage and another fix in FqlType.
- 03:06 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Should I call @Persistence$Context.useSession@ for @Scrol... - 02:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Should I call @Persistence$Context.useSession@ for @ScrollingResults@, too? I see that w... - 02:48 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've got an infinite loop because this code:...
- 12:28 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > That code already has a call for RSMD, @int columnCount =... - 12:26 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> That code already has a call for RSMD, @int columnCount = resultSet.getMetaData().getC... - 12:14 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The foreign table is mapped by @MetaFile.class@ and by defau... - 12:03 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin, we have biased as much as we can in this implementation toward speed, so we are ... - 11:45 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, we have biased as much as we can in this implementation toward speed, so we are avoiding things like @Res...
- 10:33 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The problem is the previous code assumed the SELECT was always retrieving full records. ... - 10:24 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > 4011a rev 11465 contains my FQL fixes plus misc. Please rev... - 09:38 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> 4011a rev 11465 contains my FQL fixes plus misc. Please review.
I have only a questi...
06/10/2020
- 06:23 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- 4011a rev 11465 contains my FQL fixes plus misc. Please review.
- 06:17 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The foreign table is mapped by @MetaFile.class@ and by default the 'foreign' field is also ... - 01:53 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Lots of regression after changing it... so no good.
- 01:49 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- There is a problem at the fql.g parser:...
- 01:43 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Found a broken feature I forgot about in 4011: sequences, see #3814-109.
> We need to add ... - 12:05 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Replacing Record with Persistable fixes the above.
> I am n... - 11:59 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin,
After running conversion with a newer metadata definition I have this:... - 11:16 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, I have a problem with the relation generated between the Field and File meta tab... - 10:48 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Replacing Record with Persistable fixes the above.
I am not sure is not correct. Which ... - 09:17 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Replacing Record with Persistable fixes the above.
- 09:02 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've fixed that manually (BTW, @name="id"@ should be @name="recid"@, depending on what you configured as the PK in p2...
- 08:51 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, I have a problem with the relation generated between the Field and File meta tables. In DMO index, I have th...
- 08:37 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- 11463 fixes the FqlType issue in #4011-517. But I think we need complete support for FqlType enum.
- 07:53 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, I need a mapping between FQLType enum values and java.sql.Types. Can you provide a complete list?
- 06:05 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Rev 11462 fixes @TB.readAllRows@. It also has some validation, flush, rollback fixes that are work in process. They d...
- 05:33 PM Feature #4155 (WIP): remove conversion dependency on metadata .df file
- Our ultimate objective with schema metadata is to eliminate the conversion of these DMOs and instead rely upon metada...
- 10:21 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> As you check in updates for this task, the @rules/gaps/database.rules@ (@addMetaschema@ section) ... - 10:19 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- As you check in updates for this task, the @rules/gaps/database.rules@ (@addMetaschema@ section) needs to be updated ...
06/09/2020
- 07:13 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There is this code in @TemporaryBuffer.readAllRows@:
> [...]
>
> I would expect @res... - 07:01 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- There is this code in @TemporaryBuffer.readAllRows@:...
- 03:32 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Actually, the code above will not work for PostgreSQL as the @getComputedColumnFormula@ will return @null@. It looks ...
- 03:19 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > That is interesting. It looks like I added a regression when... - 03:14 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> That is interesting. It looks like I added a regression when constructing validation messag... - 03:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- That is interesting. It looks like I added a regression when constructing validation message in my recent commit. Ple...
- 02:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, one more - I don't understand where the "__i?" is coming from....
- 02:44 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- If the query already has fetched the full records, we already would have used the session cache to gain this optimiza...
- 02:37 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin,
> I think the change you refer to was mine. The idea was to fetch the exact am... - 02:36 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> This part in @metaschema.xml@ is wrong:
> [...]
> We need to use the primary key as s... - 02:30 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin,
I think the change you refer to in #4011-504 was mine. The idea was to fetch the exact amount of informa... - 02:21 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- This part in @metaschema.xml@ is wrong:...
- 01:31 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, what part is wrong here? The @Presorter$SortedResults@ which expects full records,... - 01:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Found a broken feature I forgot about in 4011: sequences, see #3814-109.
We need to add back initialization support ... - 10:02 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- If you enable enhanced browse, and click the 'checkin' column in the Guests grid, you get a @ClassCastException@:
<p... - 09:46 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Attached are my changes in process for the rollback fix. It is not working yet, but I am pos... - 08:22 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Attached are my changes in process for the rollback fix. It is not working yet, but I am posting because I need to ta...
- 07:06 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > The reason I ask is that I noticed in the debugger that the... - 07:01 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I guess all the changes for @LazyUndoable@ are just an optimization, but the core idea is st... - 06:55 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Now my problem is that @LightweightUndoable@ is nothing like I remember it. I guess all th... - 06:46 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, so the record doesn't need to remain in the database, as the flush is rolledback, ... - 06:38 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I don't understand this patch. I mean, I get the logic, but it doesn't look right to me conc... - 06:32 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I don't understand this patch. I mean, I get the logic, but it doesn't look right to me conceptually. The point of ma...
- 06:14 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, attached patch fixes this testcases:...
- 05:47 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Going back to this: I've tried saving the record in the database, in @ChangeSet.rollba... - 02:33 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> My worry here is that you are creating new things that will be hard to merge with 4011a. We plan... - 02:16 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- My worry here is that you are creating new things that will be hard to merge with 4011a. We plan to do that merge ve...
- 01:29 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Ovidiu: Doesn't @DMOIndex@ go away in 4011a?
> Yes, the @DMOIndex@ c... - 01:07 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Ovidiu: Doesn't @DMOIndex@ go away in 4011a?
Yes, the @DMOIndex@ class is already gone in 4011a.... - 12:24 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Ovidiu: Doesn't @DMOIndex@ go away in 4011a?
I already use @DMOIndex@ in the @MetadataManager@... - 12:12 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Ovidiu: Doesn't @DMOIndex@ go away in 4011a?
- 12:04 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Of course, please see the last lines in @ddl/schema_table_<db-name>_<sql-dialect>.sql@. Aft... - 11:23 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Of course, please see the last lines in @ddl/schema_table_<db-name>_<sql-dialect>.sql@. After a successuful conversio...
- 04:27 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Do we generate any artifacts for @SEQUENCE@? I cannot find any. The corresponding AST exists. Please advise.
Thank you.
06/08/2020
- 02:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > > Constantin, at this level in... - 02:00 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > I didn't think so. We should be fetching it from the database... - 01:54 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin,
in FWD runtime the primary key name is read from @persistence/primary-key-name@ and stored globally in @... - 01:36 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, in #4011-303, you note that in @p2j.cfg.xml@ you used this:...
- 11:13 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Constantin, at this level in the code, we are not dealing wit... - 11:04 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin, at this level in the code, we are not dealing with BDT instances.
You are corr... - 11:00 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, at this level in the code, we are not dealing with BDT instances. These are the lower level Java types wh...
- 10:51 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- This fix solves all deadlocks related to locking (even those which exist in trunk), in @BaseRecord.setDatum@:...
- 10:17 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- There is a deadlock when updating a Rate or a Guest by multiple clients, but this is an application logic problem.
... - 08:57 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I didn't think so. We should be fetching it from the database on next access.
The problem ... - 08:46 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The abend in Reservations/Check-in/Delete Guest/Cancel Check-in is related to this test:... - 08:41 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The abend in Reservations/Check-in/Delete Guest/Cancel Check-in is related to this test:...
- 07:52 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin, please commit your change to always use @NopDirtyShareContext@, with a TODO to r... - 07:04 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Rev 11455 fixes an NPE and some validation logic.
- 06:56 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, please commit your change to always use @NopDirtyShareContext@, with a TODO to re-enable it when the re-i...
- 06:48 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> So, the dirty share database should be used only for explicitly-configured tables/data... - 06:04 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> After another full @ant deploy.all@, this time with the data from Hotel GUI rev 212, I now g... - 05:57 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> And another issue with the dirty database - previously there were @Reversible@ instances... - 05:51 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Please coordinate with Ovidiu on this; he is actively making changes in this area. The dirty... - 05:46 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > BTW, also found these in the server log from the same work fl... - 05:20 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> BTW, also found these in the server log from the same work flow:
>
> [...]
The root caus... - 05:04 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- OK, I'll check with H2, too.
BTW, I still see the NPE for the 'delete guest' and 'Cancel', in the Reservations, C... - 05:00 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- BTW, also found these in the server log from the same work flow:...
- 04:59 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I am using the default H2 database in my testing. I'll try with PostgreSQL.
Indeed, the... - 04:42 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> 11454 does not compile for me:
> [...]
>
> I've bypassed this and I don't get your e... - 04:35 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- 11454 does not compile for me:...
- 04:24 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- After another full @ant deploy.all@, this time with the data from Hotel GUI rev 212, I now get the following error wi...
- 04:00 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- On a completely fresh run of Hotel GUI, first thing after running @ant deploy.all@ and server startup, I get some err...
- 08:50 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- > Regarding the undocumented fields of the _Field table, I think that it can be sufficient to set them to a "typical"...
- 08:30 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > This means that the _File._ianum is almost useless and has not any meaningful counterpart in FW... - 08:01 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- > This means that the _File._ianum is almost useless and has not any meaningful counterpart in FWD. I understand the ...
- 07:38 AM Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Considering that the WHERE clause work has been moved to #4613, is there any reason to keep this task open?
06/05/2020
- 07:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Unfortunately, I don't have the dirty share fully done yet.
To let my brain cool down I returned and fixed the uniqu... - 05:57 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Virtual desktop and embedded mode get through this flow fine,... - 05:42 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > The only issue I'm aware in Hotel GUI is the NPE related to C... - 05:41 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Virtual desktop and embedded mode get through this flow fine, so it may be a client problem ... - 05:36 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Another issue I hit was in Swing only:
* log in
* from "Available Rooms", click "Check-In..."
* delete guest
* ... - 05:32 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The only issue I'm aware in Hotel GUI is the NPE related to Cancel the Reservation, afte... - 05:15 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The only issue I'm aware in Hotel GUI is the NPE related to Cancel the Reservation, after deleting the guest.
- 05:13 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- This code in @RecordBuffer.delete@ doesn't set the @token@:...
- 04:56 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The deadlock described in #4011-385 can be duplicated like this in 11452:
* delete a room
* close and start another... - 02:56 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> My changes to fix the #4011-385, the @deleteAll@ problem because there was no notificati... - 05:35 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ok, that's what I'm doing. I wonder why I get different behavior. I'll run a full conversion... - 05:17 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ok, that's what I'm doing. I wonder why I get different behavior. I'll run a full conversion from scratch and try it ...
- 05:07 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Eric, the issue in #4011-412 is not solved by your changes.
... - 04:57 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, the issue in #4011-412 is not solved by your changes.
Constantin, I don't get a... - 04:38 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- # restored @_database-feature@ support previously implemented by Ovidiu
# added the following @_file@ fields:...
06/04/2020
- 05:20 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Added conversion support for the @_Field.CAN-*@ fields and population of @CAN_*@ and @*-SA@ fields for @_File@/@_Fiel...
- 04:08 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> In case of abends, I think FWD should release all locks, right?
Yes, it should. The... - 01:03 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- My changes to fix the #4011-385, the @deleteAll@ problem because there was no notification of a newly created record ...
- 12:39 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> If you know of any other issues in Hotel GUI which you suspect are related to this root caus... - 08:30 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, the issue in #4011-412 is no solved by your changes.
OK, thanks for testing. Th... - 08:22 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, the issue in #4011-412 is not solved by your changes.
- 07:21 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've committed rev 11450, which reworks the UNDO of DMOs to be primarily in memory on the FWD server, with less relia...
06/03/2020
- 06:35 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- More details:
At this moment the unique-indexes are validated on SQL-tier, the result in case of failure being a dia... - 05:26 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Please disable the new query-based validation check for now, but then get back to integratin... - 09:31 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> unique index validation: primarily a no 1 implementation (see entry 127), but also slight...
06/02/2020
- 05:34 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Even if this particular issue is related to a regression in batch assign mode, I think the o... - 05:34 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> >
> > > We probably need to centra... - 04:36 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
>
> > We probably need to centralize the validation/flushing/notifi... - 04:24 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> We probably need to centralize the validation/flushing/notification into one method to mak...
06/01/2020
- 03:09 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Added conversion support for the tables/fields string attributes (@*-SA@ properties)
Committed to 4231b rev. 11577. - 12:14 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Debugging the conversion I've realized that I have to add support for the new table/field properties to the @p2o.xml@...
- 10:04 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Put debug @printf@ statements in the @dmo_common.rules@ section for @graft "column-label-sa" anno... - 09:55 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Put debug @printf@ statements in the @dmo_common.rules@ section for @graft "column-label-sa" annotation@. Either you...
- 09:38 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes.
Well, as you can see the new properties were not added. - 09:02 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Yes.
- 08:45 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think you have shown the 4GL AST. The code calling @declareProperty@ is building a Java AST. ... - 08:16 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I think you have shown the 4GL AST. The code calling @declareProperty@ is building a Java AST. Please show that Jav...
- 07:53 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please show the output jast for the example field.... - 07:48 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Please show the output jast for the example field.
- 07:32 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Post your @dmo_common.rules@.
>
> Are the annotations correct (as you would expect) in the AST... - 07:25 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Post your @dmo_common.rules@.
Are the annotations correct (as you would expect) in the AST? - 07:16 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I see some strange situation:
There are two similar annotations for the field AST in the @.schema@ file:... - 06:23 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Please note, that the TYPE for the LABEL property is KW_LABEL, but is VALEXP for VALEXP (not KW... - 06:21 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Feedback:
>
> 1. The artificial token definitions for @KW_COL_LAB@, @KW_HELP@ and @KW_LABEL@ s... - 02:07 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Indeed, the full scan will be required for both of @count(__)@ versions. However, the @limi... - 02:02 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> About the #4011-385 - the issue is that the @ttRoomTypeAgg.deleteAll()@ is seeing the ta... - 12:42 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Some thoughts: that article uses a pseudo randomized unindexed data set. They need the coun... - 12:41 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Some thoughts: that article uses a pseudo randomized unindexed data set. They need the count so the scan is mandatory...
- 12:31 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Indeed, the full scan will be required for both of @count(__)@ versions. However, the @limit 1@ will not help. The re...
- 12:30 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Anyway, looking at some benchmark articles, like https://www.citusdata.com/blog/2016/1... - 11:50 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I suppose you are talking about the unique index validation. These are queries using standa... - 11:42 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> A note: we shouldn't use @select count(*)@ - this should be replaced by something like @... - 08:12 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- About the #4011-385 - the issue is that the @ttRoomTypeAgg.deleteAll()@ is seeing the table as 'empty' (the @isTableD...
- 07:41 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- A note: we shouldn't use @select count(*)@ - this should be replaced by something like @select count(recid)@ or whate...
- 07:37 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Please continue to test Hotel GUI and work on fixes for any apparent regressions which do no... - 05:08 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, I am working on a solution, but it may take another day or so. The good news is that I think you may have...
05/31/2020
- 06:20 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- > Please note, that the TYPE for the LABEL property is KW_LABEL, but is VALEXP for VALEXP (not KW_VALEXP)
Yes, tha... - 06:13 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Feedback:
1. The artificial token definitions for @KW_COL_LAB@, @KW_HELP@ and @KW_LABEL@ should not be moved into ... - 09:12 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, is not just about inserts. See this test:...
- 06:35 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The key is to maintain enough information to differentiate between a savepoint rollback which legitimately undoes a c...
- 06:16 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, please see this test:
> [...]
>
> The flush is executed at the @find first@ st... - 05:19 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, please see this test:...
- 08:42 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, the main issue with the savepoints, the FWD (sub)-tx and the FWD flush is this: in...
05/30/2020
- 05:10 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, the main issue with the savepoints, the FWD (sub)-tx and the FWD flush is this: in H2, a flush will associate t...
- 04:27 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin, we made a significant functional change in 4011a in terms of the timing of flushes to the database.
As... - 03:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For some reason, FWD does the rollback for the savepoint which has the @guest.create()... - 03:49 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, I have the H2 fixes for CREATE/DROP INDEX, DROP TABLE, ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT ... - 03:17 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Attached is the changed H2 jar and the patch.
- 03:05 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Do you have the 197 version of this patch? I can't apply it to ver 197.
Hm, I have... - 02:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For some reason, FWD does the rollback for the savepoint which has the @guest.create()@,... - 02:14 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, I have the H2 fixes for CREATE/DROP INDEX, DROP TABLE, ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT FOREIGN cases. I'll upload t...
- 12:46 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Eric, we still require the synchronization patch we have for ... - 10:16 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, we still require the synchronization patch we have for ver 192 (from here: https:/... - 10:04 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Also, the current version is 1.4.200 - should we build the changes on top of that? And a... - 09:25 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Also, the current version is 1.4.200 - should we build the changes on top of that? And also switch FWD to 1.4.200?
- 09:22 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric, we still require the synchronization patch we have for ver 192 (from here: https://proj.goldencode.com/download...
- 06:11 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > I can see how we could defer the drops until a safe time, aft... - 03:38 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I can see how we could defer the drops until a safe time, after a transaction. The creates a... - 09:59 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I committed r11447. Changes include:
* unique index validation: primarily a no 1 implementation (see entry 127), but... - 03:27 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I've implemented the changes from #3814-79. However, the desired annotation arguments are still not emitted. I've als...
- 08:16 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Some feedback:
>
> 1. Keyword token lengths are limited to KW_ + 8 characters. @KW_VALMSG_SA@... - 08:08 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Some feedback:
1. Keyword token lengths are limited to KW_ + 8 characters. @KW_VALMSG_SA@ would be too long. Thi... - 06:52 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please post your changed versions of both @schema.g@ and @progress.g@.
Please find them attach... - 06:49 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Please post your changed versions of both @schema.g@ and @progress.g@.
- 06:46 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I'm trying to add conversion support for string attributes for tables and fields (@*-SA@ properties).
I've added th...
05/29/2020
- 05:28 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Nice find. I wonder why we weren't hitting this before. I was not doing anything special to do the temp-table DDL out...
- 04:21 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> * @transactional@ - the H2 manual says that the @CREATE TABLE@ _command commits an open tra... - 03:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The root cause for the @Reservations/Check-in/Delete guest/Cancel reservation@ abend related to invalid savepoint is ...
- 01:22 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- OK, so it probably is an issue with the timing of the record flush.
- 01:16 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > OK, I'll switch to the savepoint problem when using the 'good... - 01:03 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, I'll switch to the savepoint problem when using the 'good data'.
Since you have t... - 01:00 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin,
> I am working on getting these messages parsed and the proper 4GL error issue... - 12:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- This is one of the open items. See #4011-127.
- 12:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin,
I am working on getting these messages parsed and the proper 4GL error issued. I estimate they will be c... - 12:55 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- OK, that makes sense. My problem is this: in the @validateUniqueCommitted@, we don't know which unique index failed v...
- 12:53 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- This is interesting:...
- 12:48 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Why is @records@ empty? Shouldn't this be loaded with all the unique records from the ... - 12:37 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric/Ovidiu, about the 'bad data' case; there is this class @orm.UniqueTracker@:...
- 12:26 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > There is another issue, and please let me know if either of ... - 12:08 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There is another issue, and please let me know if either of you tracks it. If you go to... - 12:04 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- There is another issue, and please let me know if either of you tracks it. If you go to @Reservations@, and click @C...
- 11:54 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, I can't duplicate this anymore - yesterday I saw this issue, but it seems to be fixed in 4011a r11446.
- 11:51 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- From Ovidiu:
> I understand that you managed to get the hotel GUI application up and running (including the database... - 08:30 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Committed rev 11446, which fixes a flushing issue found in testing, adds stricter caching logic to the ORM session to...
05/28/2020
- 07:36 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The leaking of these malformed records seems less likely to be useful than the one ChUI applicati... - 05:37 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The leaking of these malformed records seems less likely to be useful than the one ChUI application case where the co...
- 04:50 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Do you have any unofficial/uncom... - 04:43 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Note regarding the check for null mandatory fields (@checkNotNull@/@failNotNull@) already c... - 04:33 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin,
I think the @AsmClassLoader@ is missing from the command line (see the @-Djava.system.class.loader@).
L... - 04:31 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Do you have any unofficial/uncommitted updates to Hotel GUI, ... - 04:28 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Do you have any unofficial/uncommitted updates to Hotel GUI, in respect to #4011? I can... - 04:21 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Do you have any unofficial/uncommitted updates to Hotel GUI, in respect to #4011? I can't import the data in H2, I g...
- 03:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Note regarding the check for null mandatory fields (@checkNotNull@/@failNotNull@) already committed in 4011.
Ther...
05/27/2020
- 03:52 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The revision 11445 contains the fix for conversion of FQL statements when denormalized extent fields are present.
- 10:55 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I've committed rev 11443.
> Ovidiu, please review, as these are largely in areas of the cod... - 04:29 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Something in r11440 caused the following regression in Hotel GUI (virtual desktop). Recreate is to check in a guest f...
05/26/2020
- 08:12 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've committed rev 11443.
* temp-table copying fixes;
* @ScrollableResults@ fix to not skip first record;
* @SQL... - 08:04 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, please revert the changes in rev 11441 and commit a new revision to bring the branch... - 08:03 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > the pdf is generated but my pdf application is not fast enough to display it. The file is delet... - 07:39 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, please revert the changes in rev 11441 and commit a new revision to bring the branch back to where it was. Do...
- 06:06 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > the pdf is generated but my pdf application is not fast enough to display it. The file is deleted too fast so a mis...
- 04:25 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Thanks, but this breaks things the same way as I described. Here's an example stack trace. There are many like this, ...
- 10:20 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
I just committed r11441 with some adjustments in @Sql/Query.uniqueResult()@ implementation. I do not know th... - 09:00 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, can you help me understand the idea behind the @Query.uniqueResult@ implementation? The object ignores @rowSt...
- 08:39 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> it seems to me that the @PropertyMeta@ and @Property@ like the @DmoMeta@ and @RecordMeta@...
05/25/2020
- 06:19 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
please find r11440 of 4011. Some additional notes:
* the broken SELECT from note 258 was easy to fix, there ... - 04:51 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin or Greg: is that invalid handle error in #4011-358 something to be concerned with... - 04:42 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Constantin or Greg: is that invalid handle error in #4011-358 something to be concerned with? I want to avoid chasing...
- 07:58 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
I finished reviewing your latest changes. They are sound. I added the constant and replaced the related empt... - 06:41 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I just realized I forgot to add a @NO_ALIAS@ constant to the FQL converter instead of using the empty string literal ...
- 06:03 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've committed rev. 11439, which fixes several issues:
* the previously reported @ClassCastException@, which was c... - 05:00 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Consider the @_lock@ table as an example. With the current implementation, the @meta_lock@ t... - 04:54 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Regarding enabling all metadata in all applications, I have no p... - 04:46 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Regarding enabling all metadata in all applications, I have no problem doing this eventually... - 04:32 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Regarding enabling all metadata in all applications, I have no problem doing this eventually, but we do not yet have ...
05/24/2020
- 04:32 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please post the detailed status of this task. I would like to know:
>
> * In regard to the li...
05/23/2020
- 07:51 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- In #4011-355, your references to @no-undo@ are probably meant to be @no-error@?
> This is not the problem to solve... - 07:35 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Please post the detailed status of this task. I would like to know:
* In regard to the list of work in #3814-1 an...
05/22/2020
- 06:29 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've committed rev. 11438, which fixes both the @UniqueTracker@ empty scopes issue and the missing extent field metho...
- 06:22 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- There are a couple of days since I have started thinking of the following issue related to validation.
As I inform... - 05:33 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Do you have enough information in DMO annotations to generate them?
Yes, but I've had to... - 10:04 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > This can be done of course if you believe that it makes sens... - 09:57 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> This can be done of course if you believe that it makes sense to complicate the conversion/... - 09:55 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What about the @_lock@ meta-table? Currently FWD enables this only if @_lock@ is explici... - 09:32 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I totally agree with the idea to convert all system tables. After all, in 4GL they exist in... - 09:22 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> At this point I see no reason to continue with the configuration at all. Why are we not just con... - 09:07 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- > My idea was for the conversion rules to do some sanity checks: if you specified one or more table which is part of ...
- 09:05 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- We really only have one project where we made the effort to eliminate all metadata usage. That may not ever happen a...
- 09:03 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> The overhead with the creation/population of the "minimal" set of meta-tables is negligible... - 08:58 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I'm not OK with this. Meta-tables should be optional. It adds overhead to other projec... - 08:28 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- From an email discussion:
Constantin:
> BTW, leaving an empty metadata in p2j.cfg.xml works in FWD, so the meta t...
05/21/2020
- 06:02 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- My recent changes only involved the conversion. I do not have changes related to @DmoClass@. You can safely work in t...
- 02:57 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- We are not generating implementations for some methods declared in DMO interfaces, such as indexed getters and setter...
05/20/2020
- 07:00 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think 4231b is fine.
Committed to 4231b revision 11549. ... - 06:35 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I think 4231b is fine.
05/19/2020
- 04:19 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've finished the population of the @_File@, @_Field@, @_Index@, and @_Index-Field@ system ... - 02:58 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I've just committed my latest changes to 4011 as r11437.
The most important thing here is the fix for the endless qu... - 10:00 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > but in 4011 this is automatically done by DmoMetadataManager. The 4011 uses the new syntax supp...
05/18/2020
- 06:53 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> OTOH, the @ProgressiveResults@ have @sessionClosing()@ method which will duplicate the un... - 06:27 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > but in 4011 this is automatically done by DmoMetadataManager. The 4011 uses the new syntax supp... - 06:04 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > but in 4011 this is automatically done by DmoMetadataManager. The 4011 uses the new syntax supported by H2 (and PSQ...
- 05:49 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> [..] when a query is associated with a browse, apparently we need some special treatment, be... - 04:00 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Separately, I committed rev 11436, which completes the fix to the server startup performance... - 05:02 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The @UniqueTracker@ empty scopes issue seems to be caused by the fact that we aren't registering the tracker for @Fin...
- 05:44 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I've finished the population of the @_File@, @_Field@, @_Index@, and @_Index-Field@ system tables base on DMO reflect...
05/16/2020
- 01:53 AM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Running a single ETF test results in some errors......
05/15/2020
- 07:12 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The long delay during ETF server startup while processing index metadata appears to be due to the fact that we swappe...
- 06:57 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > * Using the mouse wheel to scroll down in the "Available Rooms" ... - 06:32 PM Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * Using the mouse wheel to scroll down in the "Available Rooms" tab browse results in an end... - 05:07 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- The @_File@ table population for a large customer application (both system and user tables) takes ~100 ms in my envir...
- 12:55 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > I'm a little bit confused with the discussion in #3145. At the ... - 12:07 PM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I'm a little bit confused with the discussion in #3145. At the bottom line - is it OK to se... - 06:18 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- I'm a little bit confused with the discussion in #3145. At the bottom line - is it OK to set the value of the @_Templ...
- 02:55 AM Feature #3814: more schema metadata
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > I've noticed that the current data for the @_User...
Also available in: Atom