Activity

From 09/05/2021 to 10/04/2021

06:21 PM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering: Another open source framework to consider is "MicroStream":https://www.infoq.com/news/2021/09/microstream-5-is-open-s... Greg Shah

04:24 PM Feature #5685: optimization: limit iteration of RecordBuffers in Commitable hooks by scope: Greg Shah wrote:
> I know we notify related buffers when something happens to a record that they may be holding. ... Eric Faulhaber
07:37 AM Feature #5685: optimization: limit iteration of RecordBuffers in Commitable hooks by scope: Anything passed as a named parameter must be kept in the list I think:
* @buffer@ parameters
* @table@ parameters... Greg Shah

05:20 PM Feature #5685: optimization: limit iteration of RecordBuffers in Commitable hooks by scope: From previous profiling, I recall we spend too much time iterating through the @BufferManager.openBuffers@ scoped lis... Eric Faulhaber
05:07 PM Feature #5685 (New): optimization: limit iteration of RecordBuffers in Commitable hooks by scope: Eric Faulhaber

04:05 PM Bug #5683: Consider using multiple .df files for a database: It may be useful to have multiple .df files for a database. For example, allow instead of (or in addition to) the @da... Igor Skornyakov
04:03 PM Bug #5683 (New): Consider using multiple .df files for a database: Igor Skornyakov

06:54 AM Bug #5673: Additional support for INDEXED REPOSITION open query attribute: The INDEXED REPOSITION 4GL optimization allows query reposition to records which were not initially in the database (... Alexandru Lungu
06:44 AM Bug #5673 (New): Additional support for INDEXED REPOSITION open query attribute: Alexandru Lungu

10:55 AM Bug #5625: changing a before-table reserved field does not flush the change in the after-table: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The original issue is fixed. But I can't tell for sure what happens with the fix in #56... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
06:14 AM Bug #5625: changing a before-table reserved field does not flush the change in the after-table: The original issue is fixed. But I can't tell for sure what happens with the fix in #5625-15 if the record is just l... Constantin Asofiei
05:41 AM Bug #5625: changing a before-table reserved field does not flush the change in the after-table: Can we close this? Greg Shah

09:04 AM Bug #5625: changing a before-table reserved field does not flush the change in the after-table: Is there any work remaining in this task? Greg Shah
09:00 AM Bug #5625: changing a before-table reserved field does not flush the change in the after-table: Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> This happened because there was no session / transaction open at that moment. I created a s... Constantin Asofiei
07:00 AM Bug #4071: FWD server stops allowing new web client logins after abend: > I think we need to consider if there is ever a scenario in which context cleanup is needed for reader/writer thread... Greg Shah

07:21 PM Bug #4071: FWD server stops allowing new web client logins after abend: I was closing the web client of a large application in virtual desktop mode, debugging the update of the @meta_connec... Eric Faulhaber
02:56 PM Bug #4564: unqualified field references can get the wrong buffer name if a FORM or DEF FRAME is p...: No. @com.goldencode.p2j.persist.*@ is a runtime package. It has nothing to do with conversion. Greg Shah
02:30 PM Bug #4564: unqualified field references can get the wrong buffer name if a FORM or DEF FRAME is p...: We are still patching some procedures to fully-qualify their field-references. They are willing to incorporate the up... Roger Borrello

07:50 PM Bug #5625: changing a before-table reserved field does not flush the change in the after-table: This happened because there was no session / transaction open at that moment. I created a short-lived micro-transacti... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
07:17 AM Bug #5625: changing a before-table reserved field does not flush the change in the after-table: Unfortunately this makes things worse - try the test without a full tx present and you will get a @"Attempting DML wh... Constantin Asofiei

04:13 PM Bug #5625: changing a before-table reserved field does not flush the change in the after-table: The above changes were committed in revision 12898/3821c, after testing them for a few days on my local environment.
... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

Also available in: Atom

FWD » Core Development » Database