Activity

From 08/11/2024 to 09/09/2024

09/10/2024

08:10 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: First, the good news.
It seems that a tenant change cannot be performed while in a database transaction. In case thi... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09/09/2024

05:30 PM Bug #9133: Array subscript is out of range stops the evaluation of other expressions in the where...: This is actually happening in the case of one of our customer, so it needs to be fixed. See #7143-1204.
The (anony... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09/06/2024

07:13 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Short update on task status:
* I managed to get a stable revision of 9036a after the rebase. Committed revision 1543... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09/05/2024

07:20 AM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: > When writing 4GL code and the tenant is changed, this MUST happen outside any transaction. All buffers must be flus... Greg Shah
08:03 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: I fixed locking in tenant mode. The fields of @Tenant@ container which must be final are wrapped in a new class which... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
05:06 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur Școlnic wrote:
> The second issue is that the SysError @tt already exists@ is not caught in a catch block, the... Artur Școlnic

09/04/2024

04:50 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Go ahead and move fields from @Context@ to @Tenant@ as needed. Keep in mind that all fields in @Tenant@ must be immut... Eric Faulhaber
02:46 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: As part of my tests of the 9036a/15426 I used two concurrent users which execute basic CRUD operations on the databas... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
01:50 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: The changes in 9036a/15426 look good to me. What is left to implement for this task to be complete (not considering #... Eric Faulhaber
03:33 AM Bug #9133: Array subscript is out of range stops the evaluation of other expressions in the where...: ... Lorian Sandu
03:32 AM Bug #9133 (Internal Test): Array subscript is out of range stops the evaluation of other expressi...: Lorian Sandu

09/03/2024

07:44 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: No, you are right. That was just my brain being lazy.
I addressed the issue. Also, I fixed a problem with re-initial... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
05:53 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Actually, I used the database name, in lowercase. That was also to make sure there are no c... Eric Faulhaber
10:15 AM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > [...] The table-level annotation can help us with our implementation o... Greg Shah
09:58 AM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Actually, I used the database name, in lowercase. That was also to make sure there are no conflicts with the default ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
07:54 AM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The default tenant's @Tenant@ object would be created when the @Persistence@ object is in... Eric Faulhaber
08:54 AM Bug #9127: Decimal values with precision over 50 can't be inserted in the persistent databases.: Values like @4000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000@, with more than 40 digits, can be stored in OE persisten... Artur Școlnic
08:48 AM Bug #9127 (New): Decimal values with precision over 50 can't be inserted in the persistent databa...: Artur Școlnic
07:22 AM Feature #5219: implement native full-text search for word index and CONTAINS support: > The exploration and possible use of database native support to implement CONTAINS support is considered part of thi... Greg Shah

09/02/2024

05:16 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > But why do you mean by breaking the encapsulation? Pinning the @... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
03:56 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Greg Shah wrote:
> [...] The table-level annotation can help us with our implementation of shared vs multi-tenant ta... Eric Faulhaber
07:41 AM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: > 2. Switching to multi-tenant database mode requires reconversion
Please note that an important objective of our ... Greg Shah

08/30/2024

06:06 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> But why do you mean by breaking the encapsulation? Pinning the @Persistence@ object to a sp... Eric Faulhaber
02:40 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I've also been thinking more about the "need to reconvert for multi-tenancy mode" aspect we ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
02:27 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> We discussed this, but I don't think it is a settled point yet. If we revert the changes you... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
01:44 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: I've also been thinking more about the "need to reconvert for multi-tenancy mode" aspect we discussed. We noted that ... Eric Faulhaber
01:27 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>
> *1. A @Persistence@ object for a logical database is not enough*
>
> My commits in 9... Eric Faulhaber
11:58 AM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: The investigations for _meta database lead me to other issues. We discussed today and here is a summary of our meet.
... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
09:06 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: To summarize, there are 2 issues. The first one is that @no-error@ is not honored in FWD when a handle is deleted and... Artur Școlnic

08/29/2024

09:40 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Replacing @ErrorManager.recordOrThrowError@ with @ErrorManager.recordOrShowDatabaseError@ did not solve the issue. Artur Școlnic
08:28 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: For errors conditions being raised when database is accessed, we found quirks which we solved via calling @ErrorManag... Constantin Asofiei
08:02 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: ... Artur Școlnic
07:59 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: ... Artur Școlnic
06:18 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: start.p... Artur Școlnic
05:02 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur Școlnic wrote:
> Coming back to #9091-37, it looks like proc2 should not be executed at all, but it is execute... Artur Școlnic
04:50 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Coming back to #9091-37, it looks like proc2 should not be executed at all, but it is executed in FWD, which causes t... Artur Școlnic
03:32 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: In @ProcedureManager.delete()@... Artur Școlnic
02:54 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: start.p... Artur Școlnic
07:11 AM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: > But the information is pretty much similar (like @_File@ and related tables).
These databases share the same ex... Greg Shah

08/28/2024

06:42 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Earlier today I committed my latest changes to 9036a and rebased the branch to latest trunk. The current revision is ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
08:28 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> ... and used @run checkNew.@ in @proc1@ and in the @finally@ block of @start.p@. In bot... Constantin Asofiei
07:51 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: As far as I know, errors like @tt already exists@ are not supposed to be caught with @catch e as Progress.Lang.Error@... Artur Școlnic
07:38 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: In FWD, tt is flushed 3 times, at the create, on the associate of the dataset (throws the error) and when exiting the... Artur Școlnic
07:23 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Adding @release tt@ in proc1 after the creates causes the error not to be caught in 4gl, this matches the behavior in... Artur Școlnic
06:53 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: I've added this in @parser.p@:... Constantin Asofiei
06:50 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Could running of a procedure with an output parameter cause a flush and expose the errors in the procedures ran previ... Artur Școlnic
06:49 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Another test: use a secondary buffer @def buffer buftt1 for tt1.@ in @proc1@ instead of ... Artur Școlnic
06:45 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, now test in OpenEdge with a @TABLE@ parameter instead of @DATASET@, add a @proc3@ wi... Artur Școlnic
06:43 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Another test: use a secondary buffer @def buffer buftt1 for tt1.@ in @proc1@ instead of the implicit buffer, and test... Constantin Asofiei
06:42 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: OK, now test in OpenEdge with a @TABLE@ parameter instead of @DATASET@, add a @proc3@ with a @def output parameter ta... Constantin Asofiei
06:42 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: proc2 does not seem to be executed, however, if the output parameter is not used, the error is no longer thrown at al... Artur Școlnic
06:34 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: ... Artur Școlnic
06:18 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Add a @MESSAGE@ statement in proc2, so we know if that proc2 body is executed or not. Also, test this with and witho... Constantin Asofiei
06:00 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: start.p... Artur Școlnic
05:52 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> No, the output of @ex:getMessage(1)@.
@tt already exists...@
Artur Școlnic
05:45 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur Școlnic wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Who exactly throws this error - @reader:sax-parse()@ or @run p... Constantin Asofiei
05:44 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur Școlnic wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > What is the error message being caught in OpenEdge?
> Caught... Constantin Asofiei
05:43 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Who exactly throws this error - @reader:sax-parse()@ or @run proc2@?
@run proc2@
Artur Școlnic
05:42 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What is the error message being caught in OpenEdge?
Caught exception! Artur Școlnic
05:42 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: What is the error message being caught in OpenEdge? Who exactly throws this error - @reader:sax-parse()@ or @run proc... Constantin Asofiei
05:31 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: The parser is a program designed to parse an XML file and insert the data in the temp tables defined in it. The error... Artur Școlnic
05:17 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: start.p... Artur Școlnic
05:15 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: It seems like the external procedure is deleted at the end of the main program and all of it's resources are closed, ... Artur Școlnic

08/26/2024

08:49 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: I've added MESSAGE statements like this:
* main.p... Constantin Asofiei
04:39 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: In @ProcedureManager@, for @External.execute()@, there are 3 finalizables objects added to the @finalizables@ set, on... Artur Școlnic
08:08 AM Feature #7960 (Test): Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa
08:08 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Branch 7960a merged to *trunk as rev. 15394* and archived. Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa
06:36 AM Feature #7960 (Merge Pending): Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: I am OK with the changes. Please go ahead and merge 7960a to trunk. Alexandru Lungu

08/24/2024

09:03 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: 9036a branch was updated. Latest revision is 15388.
Changes:
* Improve database awareness of tenant information;
... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

08/23/2024

08:52 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur Școlnic wrote:
> Considering that the proc1 is an internalProcedure, is persistent and the @staticResources@ i... Constantin Asofiei
08:48 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Considering that the proc1 is an internalProcedure, is persistent and the @staticResources@ is empty, could someone s... Artur Școlnic
07:58 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: In @scopeFinished@ for the proc1, the procedure gets deleted only if it is external and not persistent,
which in th... Artur Școlnic
07:18 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: On @popScope@ of the buffer, @finishedImpl@ is not executed, instead the @worldScope@ attribute is set to true. Artur Școlnic
04:32 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: @target.finished()@ for a @BufferManager@ does... Artur Școlnic
03:54 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: The buffer is in @PersistentProcScope@, but the problem is still persisting, @target.finished()@ is called to soon or... Artur Școlnic
03:27 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: The opening of the scope in the external procedure is correct. To propagate it, FWD is checking if the procedure was ... Alexandru Lungu
03:19 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: When using @run proc1 in external@, the conversion for @external.p@ is ... Artur Școlnic

08/22/2024

06:34 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: 9036a branch was updated. Latest revision is 15387.
Changes:
* Made @Database@ objects tenant-friendly;
* Started ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
02:17 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: To summary (hopefully most or all of) our discussion today...
*@Database@ Object Use*
We agreed that we want to... Eric Faulhaber
01:30 PM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...: > I did not see that attribute in the @.df@ file I have. The table @test@ is defined as:[...]
I think that attribu... Greg Shah
01:05 PM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...: Radu,
I did not see that attribute in the @.df@ file I have. The table @test@ is defined as:... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
12:02 PM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...: Radu got to the schema answer before I could post. :)
> I do not think the tables from different tenants can be in... Greg Shah
11:48 AM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...: Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> But in order to generate that, the information must come from somewhere. How is this inform... Radu Apetrii
11:32 AM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...: Yep, I forgot about the DMO annotations.
But in order to generate that, the information must come from somewhere. H... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
10:37 AM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...: I don't think this is correct.
The default database and the tenant databases have the same exact schema. There is... Greg Shah
08:45 AM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...: If I understand it correctly, when a database is declared (generically speaking) we get the following information:
#... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
07:33 AM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...: When running import, the user should be able to optionally force the import to limit itself to one the following:
... Greg Shah
07:28 AM Feature #9093 (Closed): add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables ...: Greg Shah
09:28 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: In @TransactionManager.processFinalazables()@, the record buffer is missing from the @blk.finalizables@ when using @r... Artur Școlnic
09:16 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur Școlnic wrote:
> @run external.p@ is converted as an externalProcedure.
> [...] is converted as an internalPr... Artur Școlnic
09:11 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: I meant that the @proc1@ is @internalProcedure@.... Artur Școlnic
09:09 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: I converted the example in #9091-11 and I get:... Alexandru Lungu
08:45 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: @run external.p@ is converted as an externalProcedure.... Artur Școlnic
08:27 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Who is causing the release of @tt@ the second time? The first time it is clear.
I added ... Artur Școlnic
08:16 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Who is causing the release of @tt@ the second time? The first time it is clear. Alexandru Lungu
08:10 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Releasing tt after the second create does cause the error to be thrown. Artur Școlnic
08:03 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur, the first record that you created is flushed to the database because you re-use the buffer (causing an implici... Alexandru Lungu
07:57 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: @getUnvalidatedIndices@ returns null because the unique bit set is being checked against the Map of properties touche... Artur Școlnic
07:32 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: When using composite indices in this context, @getUnvalidatedIndices@ returns null instead of the bit set representin... Artur Școlnic
06:26 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: main.p... Artur Școlnic
06:18 AM Bug #9091 (WIP): Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur Școlnic
06:18 AM Bug #9091: Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: This ticket is derived from #8912-216. Artur Școlnic
06:17 AM Bug #9091 (WIP): Unique composite index is ignored when create is used in an external procedure: Artur Școlnic
03:44 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Committed on *7960a rev. 15355* formatting changes.
The testing plan has been successfully completed, please refer... Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa

08/20/2024

02:26 PM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Only small formatting issues:
* return javadoc doesn't need to have the type; only the description of the returned v... Alexandru Lungu
08:42 AM Feature #7960 (Internal Test): Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Eric Faulhaber
12:13 PM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables: There is another point here. When a Java method gets called 10k's of times, then the local-var FIND will be created ... Constantin Asofiei
11:13 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables: A @FIND@ statement can be executed 10k's or more just for simple API calls. This requires, for each execution:
* a ... Constantin Asofiei
11:00 AM Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables: Constantin Asofiei

08/19/2024

05:45 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: > I think the best solution is a runtime flag (in @directory.xml@)
Whether or not a table is shared or multi-tena... Greg Shah
05:04 PM Bug #9036 (WIP): Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: Multiple issue reported in my previous note are caused because some objects are cached locally, in different persiste... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
08:26 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa wrote:
> Made a small error in @CentralLoggerFile@ at @fileCount@ and @fileLimit@ condition... Galya B
07:48 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Made a small error in @CentralLoggerFile@ at @fileCount@ and @fileLimit@ conditions. Resolved it and committed the fi... Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa
05:47 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Addressed code review.
I retested the scenario where @filepath@ is null or empty, as I was concerned about potentia... Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa
03:47 AM Feature #9057: enable intermixed access to default tenant (shared) data and tenant-specific data: Greg Shah wrote:
> OE knows whether a table is shared (default tenant) or is multi-tenant. In OE, setting the tenan... Radu Apetrii

08/18/2024

05:51 PM Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise: I have created task branch 9036a and committed the changes to problems I encountered. Latest revision is 15386. Below... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

08/15/2024

07:32 AM Feature #9057: enable intermixed access to default tenant (shared) data and tenant-specific data: OE knows whether a table is shared (default tenant) or is multi-tenant. In OE, setting the tenant using @SET-DB-CLIE... Greg Shah
07:31 AM Feature #9057 (Test): enable intermixed access to default tenant (shared) data and tenant-specifi...: Greg Shah

08/14/2024

03:39 AM Bug #9034: FindQuery unique fails in a self join context: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> * I am a bit confused with the state of this branch. I already reviewed 9034a/15373 in #903... Artur Școlnic
03:18 AM Bug #9034: FindQuery unique fails in a self join context: Review of 9034a:
* I am a bit confused with the state of this branch. I already reviewed 9034a/15373 in #9034-9. May... Alexandru Lungu
02:11 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa wrote:
> Committed changes to *7960a rev.15352*. Added a concrete version of @CentralLogger... Galya B

08/13/2024

11:17 AM Bug #9034: FindQuery unique fails in a self join context: Alexandru, please review. Eric Faulhaber
05:57 AM Bug #9034 (Review): FindQuery unique fails in a self join context: I committed 9034a/15373 and 9034a_h2/51, added support for identifying ambiguous unique find. Artur Școlnic
09:32 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Committed changes to *7960a rev.15352*. Added a concrete version of @CentralLogger@ that allows dynamic file path con... Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa
06:55 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: The existing code was using the @CentralLogger@ format and @WARNING@ log level, so I think it's would be great if the... Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa
05:24 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa wrote:
> I could add a server hook and if profiling was enable to close the file.
I think ... Galya B
04:27 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: I looked into the file closing issue. The problem is here:
In @P2JQueryStatisticsConfiguration@:... Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa
08:57 AM Bug #8593: H2 performance improvement for table 'truncate by multiplex': Branch 8593e was merged to trunk rev 15379 and archived. Constantin Asofiei
08:31 AM Bug #8593: H2 performance improvement for table 'truncate by multiplex': Greg Shah wrote:
> If this is ready to merge, it can go after 8233a. Constantin/Alexandru make the call.
Queued fo... Constantin Asofiei
08:16 AM Bug #8593: H2 performance improvement for table 'truncate by multiplex': If this is ready to merge, it can go after 8233a. Constantin/Alexandru make the call. Greg Shah
08:09 AM Bug #8593: H2 performance improvement for table 'truncate by multiplex': I agree, I reckon 7156c fails because a @StopConditionException@. The SQL is wrong as a column is not found.
*So*, I... Alexandru Lungu
08:06 AM Bug #8593: H2 performance improvement for table 'truncate by multiplex': This passed ETF and also solves #9048. We need to merge it, even if it does not address issues in 7156c. Constantin Asofiei
03:19 AM Bug #8593: H2 performance improvement for table 'truncate by multiplex': > Alexandru, I've backed out the 'cleanup' change in RecordBuffer.finishedImpl; I don't have a recreate yet, but I'll... Alexandru Lungu
08:43 PM Bug #8593: H2 performance improvement for table 'truncate by multiplex': Review of 8593e/15379 (I assume this is your 15354 after the rebase).
I think the code is OK. I like the direct ac... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

08/12/2024

11:21 AM Bug #8593: H2 performance improvement for table 'truncate by multiplex': Ovidiu, please see 8593e 15354 - this fixes better ACCEPT-CHANGES.
Alexandru, I've backed out the 'cleanup' change... Constantin Asofiei
07:12 AM Feature #7960: Allow query logs to be collected in a H2 database: h3. Test results
Tested with a small testcase in dataset. Below is an example output.
!7960a_results.png!
Ad... Ioana-Cristina Prioteasa

« Previous

Also available in: Atom

Project

General

Profile

FWD » Core Development » Database

Activity

Activity

09/10/2024

09/09/2024

09/06/2024

09/05/2024

09/04/2024

09/03/2024

09/02/2024

08/30/2024

08/29/2024

08/28/2024

08/26/2024

08/24/2024

08/23/2024

08/22/2024

08/20/2024

08/19/2024

08/18/2024

08/15/2024

08/14/2024

08/13/2024

08/12/2024