Activity
From 08/30/2017 to 09/28/2017
09/28/2017
- 03:12 PM Feature #3288: support > 1 browser tabs for a single FWD java client instance
- Please see #3287-2 through #3287-12 for details on this multiple web socket task.
- 01:47 PM Feature #3288: support > 1 browser tabs for a single FWD java client instance
- Greg, please explain what is the target of this task? The web client handles only one thin client that can be called ...
- 03:11 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- This task is designed for implementing the locally installed "listening client" mode (this must work for multiple use...
- 03:10 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- Yes, multiple web sockets can allow multiple browser/tabs. Another issue to think about: what happens when a tab (sa...
- 03:09 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- > By 'same origin' you mean same host and port, right? This could help so we will have a direct JS access between the...
- 03:09 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- From Constantin:
> By 'same origin' you mean same host and port, right? This could help so we will have a direct J... - 03:08 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- > A mode where one or more windows are active and each one assigned a dedicated iframe could work, but adding concurr...
- 03:08 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- From Constantin:
> The first thing that comes to mind is how we will handle the business logic: if a single client... - 03:07 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- > I think the 2nd option is the way to go; we will need a way to mark certain users that they will use an explicit cl...
- 03:05 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- > Did you consider a use case to update the P2J client from a server with new version?
No, I didn't consider this.... - 03:03 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- From Sergey:
> Did you consider a use case to update the P2J client from a server with new version? Please explain... - 03:02 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- From Constantin:
> I think the 2nd option is the way to go; we will need a way to mark certain users that they wil... - 03:02 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- Every 4GL GUI application we have ever seen contains some number of native platform dependencies. Since these applic...
- 01:39 PM Feature #3287: local web client installation
- Greg, please clarify the web client installation task. Does it include the spawn installation? What is an environment...
- 02:19 PM Feature #2368: allow widget output to stream in GUI mode
- A very high-level description of what needs to be done:
# GUI-ChUI driver switching; this is tricky, as we need to h... - 01:50 PM Feature #2368: allow widget output to stream in GUI mode
- > Do you know how many references of STREAM-IO are in the project?
5,514 :(
- 01:23 PM Feature #2368: allow widget output to stream in GUI mode
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > A question: can we defer the GUI behaviour for STREAM-IO, if is not in use (and all usage is to... - 12:58 PM Feature #2368: allow widget output to stream in GUI mode
- > A question: can we defer the GUI behaviour for STREAM-IO, if is not in use (and all usage is to stream)?
Yes, it... - 12:55 PM Feature #2368: allow widget output to stream in GUI mode
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Possibly. But I wonder if there are layout differences that can only be seen at runtime. For ex... - 08:22 AM Feature #2368: allow widget output to stream in GUI mode
- Possibly. But I wonder if there are layout differences that can only be seen at runtime. For example, I think the F...
- 12:36 PM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- 3260b rev 11175 and hotel_gui_3260b rev 147 has latest compatible changes.
There is a bug, don't know why, but t... - 09:03 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- I've created a temporary copy of Hotel GUI as @~/secure/code/p2j_repo/samples/hotel_gui_3260b@ Use that and when the...
- 11:57 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- I think he means the customer GUI app in which we had 10 documented scenarios that can be used for testing.
- 11:40 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Can you please do some tests with the large GUI app?
Yes, I am currently testing Hote... - 11:32 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Hynek, I'm OK with the change in 3284b revision 11184. Can you please do some tests with the large GUI app?
09/27/2017
- 07:37 PM Feature #2368: allow widget output to stream in GUI mode
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This work should include support for the frame option @STREAM-IO@ (runtime is needed).
Isn't @ST... - 07:31 PM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Greg, I have some Hotel GUI changes which are dependent on 3260b - where should I commit them for review?
- 06:12 PM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- 3284b revision 11184 resolves all the points from the last review, resolves the layout and draw of window small close...
- 10:28 AM Feature #1834 (Closed): implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- 08:48 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please merge to trunk.
Done.
Branch @1834b@ was merged to trunk as revno @11170@ then it wa... - 08:35 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Please merge to trunk.
- 07:51 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Testing completed. No regressions found. Had to run 3-way tests in standalone session. The results:
@1834b_11197_ee1... - 06:44 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The main regression cycle has passed. Waiting for @CTRL-C@ results.
09/26/2017
- 03:50 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been updated to revision is @11197@.
Ironically I have missed the round rectangle fix.... - 02:44 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been rebased with trunk @11169@. New revision is @11196@.
The regression testing is re... - 10:39 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been updated, rebased with trunk @11168@. New revision is @11195@.
This is round recta... - 08:11 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- > Do you mean these?:
Yes. - 08:00 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I've noticed quite a few javadoc problems with the OracleJDK, even in trunk. If you can resolve ... - 07:53 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- > Should I include this fix into 1834b branch?
Yes.
> There are also 23 new javadoc errors introduced in yester... - 07:22 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- There are also 23 new javadoc errors introduced in yesterday trunk(@11166@) from branch @3222a@. I can also fix them ...
- 06:50 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > GUI standalone tests has no regressions. But I see the issue pr... - 06:20 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > GUI standalone tests has no regressions. But I see the issue pr... - 05:59 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> GUI standalone tests has no regressions. But I see the issue presented in trunk as well. Th... - 05:23 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Eugenie, committed revision 11191, 11192 added comments for these files WebClientProtocol... - 01:15 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > 3. Please change EVL to SBI for those files where the changes were wr... - 10:05 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- GUI standalone tests has no regressions. But I see the issue presented in trunk as well. The rounded rectangle has in...
09/25/2017
- 05:29 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been rebased with trunk @11166@. New revision is @11190@.
I'm going to start regressio...
09/22/2017
- 03:29 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been rebased with trunk @11165@. New revision is @11189@.
09/21/2017
- 05:51 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- As preparation step the task branch @1834b@ has been rebased with trunk @11164@. New revision is @11188@(I saw the br...
- 08:05 AM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Sorry, patch fixes the problem.
- 07:08 AM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Constantin, @frame.getName(this)@ cannot be replaced with @widgetName()@ for usages inside... - 05:36 AM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Constantin, @frame.getName(this)@ cannot be replaced with @widgetName()@ for usages inside @FrameWidget@, because the...
09/20/2017
- 05:37 PM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Looks like the @BROWSE:NAME@ attribute is reported properly. Stanislav, I think the issues are:
# as you mentioned ... - 05:24 PM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Constantin,...
- 05:18 PM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Actually, sorry, that was only for FRAME:NAME.
Stanislav/Ovidiu: is the converted code for the frame definition ... - 05:15 PM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: What do you think?
I have this code in 3260b which I think it should fix the issue:
... - 05:12 PM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- The current implementation of @GenericWidget.widgetName()@ is using @GenericFrame.getName(GenericWidget<?> widget)@ t...
- 04:05 PM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- > Also, the message should contain the legacy widget name (br_table), not the javaname (brTable).
Error message uses... - 06:12 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Created task branch 3275c from P2J trunk revision 11164.
09/19/2017
- 03:36 PM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Greg, @setNoValidate@ should behave differently depending if it is a frame construction st... - 03:23 PM Bug #3335 (WIP): buggy no-validate in browse widget
- Greg, @setNoValidate@ should behave differently depending if it is a frame construction stage (@NO-VALIDATE@ option) ...
- 10:10 AM Bug #3335: buggy no-validate in browse widget
- I was testing #3330 with a large customer GUI application and I got an message that was not expected according to doc...
- 10:08 AM Bug #3335 (Closed): buggy no-validate in browse widget
09/18/2017
- 06:56 PM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Greg, what I want to finish at this time is an improvement for the JS code, to allow unique JS files for each window ...
- 06:54 PM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > @beforeConfigValueSet@ or @afterApplyConfig@ should be called... - 05:21 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Hynek, review for 3284b rev 11174:
> # have you tested how @window-delayed-minimize@ an...
09/15/2017
- 04:24 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Greg,
You are right. I updated the code accordingly. Committed as r11241. - 03:10 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Why should have it been dropped?
I meant FWD previously dropped it, not that it should.
- 02:57 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Code Review Task branch 3330a Revision 11240
This is very close.
1. I think the unconditional use of @(String) ... - 02:40 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, while you are at it, there is another case where I think the condition is droppe... - 02:16 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Ovidiu, while you are at it, there is another case where I think the condition is dropped: if the @VALEXP "not CAN-FI...
- 02:05 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- I moved the code into Progress parser. In fact I used the already existing code from @resolveLvalueCoreType@.
Suppo... - 03:14 PM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Hynek, review for 3284b rev 11174:
# have you tested how @window-delayed-minimize@ and @ALWAYS-ON-TOP@ work with par... - 01:41 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Somehow I didn't notice that the failing step was now 41 not 40. I guess that came with your MAJIC update.
- 12:03 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin/Eugenie/Ovidiu: Please see #3275-100. Does anyone have a reason for why the tc_job_00... - 11:25 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin/Eugenie/Ovidiu: Please see #3275-100. Does anyone have a reason for why the tc_job_00... - 10:40 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- 3275b was merged into 3330a as revision 11238.
- 09:07 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > Should I check 3275b into trunk?
We are trying to get 3330a and 3222a into the trunk as priorities. However, th... - 09:05 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Constantin/Eugenie/Ovidiu: Please see #3275-100. Does anyone have a reason for why the tc_job_002 now gets past step...
- 04:20 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Regression testing for 3275b passed. The only thing is that IIRC @tc_job_002@ was failing with ...
09/14/2017
- 05:21 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- I understand. I will adjust the code as Greg suggested.
- 05:19 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3330a Revision 11237
>
> Eric: please review and comment.
Greg, I agr... - 05:18 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- To be clear about this, I am proposing that all the processing for this be removed from @SchemaDictionary@ (and @Symb...
- 05:02 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Code Review Task Branch 3330a Revision 11237
Eric: please review and comment.
1. My sense is that this is encod... - 04:42 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Committed as revision 11237.
- 04:33 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Yes, please do.
- 04:31 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Greg, I have a fix for this issue. It works fine for my testcases. Shall I commit it to 3330a for review?
- 02:18 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- > Doesn't such a match need to consider and handle abbreviations?
Yes. It should handle abbreviations and case-in... - 01:33 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like it is more complicated than that. Doesn't such a match need to conside...
- 12:30 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- I think the method could be something like @boolean SchemaDictionary.specificFieldMatch(String candidate, String sche...
- 12:18 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Greg Shah wrote:
> How about if the @SchemaDictionary@ provided a worker method to compare the candidate field name ... - 12:11 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Eric: Do you have any guidance here?
- 12:10 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- > use a ProgresParser member field to store the field when attaching schema validators. It should contain the name of...
- 11:56 AM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Ovidiu: Are you working this one?
Yes, I am using the testcase to go step-by-step and try to f... - 11:45 AM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- Ovidiu: Are you working this one?
- 11:44 AM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- > We need to introduce some exception when computing the parent table of an unqualified field in the case of the vali...
- 04:17 PM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> In Web GUI when overlay window is opened (combo box dropdown) and an action is performed that ... - 08:26 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- 3284b revision 11173 passed ChUI regression testing and GUI regression testing with one condition. In Web GUI when ov...
09/13/2017
- 04:03 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- I just realized that validation statements for browse are not properly converted when it comes to the validated varia...
- 06:22 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- There are multiple browse issues that has been found during testing:
# Scroll by mouse wheel doesn't work if the poi... - 11:00 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > @beforeConfigValueSet@ or @afterApplyConfig@ should be called, too. Otherwise @afterCo... - 10:53 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > Are the methods @beforeConfigValueSe... - 10:33 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Are the methods @beforeConfigValueSet()@ and @afterApplyConfig(... - 10:26 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Are the methods @beforeConfigValueSet()@ and @afterApplyConfig()@ in @SyncConfigChangesAspect@... - 10:14 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I was expecting that @ConfigManager.applyConfigUpdates@ called on server-side by @Logica... - 09:46 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Hynek, quick question: is it me or @afterConfigUpdate@ is never... - 09:36 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Hynek, quick question: is it me or @afterConfigUpdate@ is never called on server-side?
... - 09:22 AM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- Hynek, quick question: is it me or @afterConfigUpdate@ is never called on server-side?
09/12/2017
- 01:51 PM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- FYI, I had to revert the changes from trunk revision 11145 in Swing GUI driver related to window activation. The revi...
09/11/2017
- 02:34 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- For now we will leave combo-box support for #2628.
- 01:35 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > 5. What is your estimate of the effort needed to implement @COMBO-BOX@?
I think conversion + runtime will take a... - 02:32 PM Feature #2628: Non-fill-in column support in browse.
- @TOGGLE-BOX@ support has been implemented in #3275 (branch 3275b). Stanislav estimates 1 week to implement conversio...
- 02:16 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- I've done some investigations related to the issue from note 20. The decision where the unqualified field belongs to ...
- 12:19 PM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I assume you can match the behavior exactly in the web client virtual desktop mode. Correct? We... - 11:47 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- > This makes it impossible to fully support the runtime behavior of WINDOW:TOP-ONLY and WINDOW:ALWAYS-ON-TOP attribut...
- 10:03 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- With trunk revision 11145 (among the other benefits) we lost the flexibility of arbitrary stacking top-level windows ...
- 09:43 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Hynek,
OK. Please report this in 3284.
This branch will merge to trunk after 3330a and 3222a.
Thanks,
Gre...
09/08/2017
- 04:08 PM Feature #3281: implement some frame options
- While working on #3330 I identified a conversion issue: if normally in a CAN-FIND (or other query) an field without w...
- 08:57 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- > A potential issue may be Swing and its window positioning limitations - the native 4GL behavior cannot be expressed...
- 08:51 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please provide some details of the issues related to @ALWAYS-ON-TOP@.
There are not really any... - 08:43 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Please provide some details of the issues related to @ALWAYS-ON-TOP@.
09/06/2017
- 12:07 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Code Review Task Branch 3275b Revision 11169
The changes look good.
1. @Browse.getCellTextNoError()@ should be ... - 09:27 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 1834b Revision 11186
>
> I'm fine with the changes.
>
> We are tryi... - 08:07 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Code Review Task Branch 1834b Revision 11186
I'm fine with the changes.
We are trying to get 3330a and 3222a in... - 10:39 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been updated for review to revision @11186@.
This is the note 4 resolution. All intern... - 09:09 AM Feature #3332: Add support for load offset and load size parameters of LOAD-IMAGE* methods of BUT...
- I prefer having a single worker that is unfinished instead of multiple independent locations that are not done. I ag...
- 02:36 AM Feature #3332: Add support for load offset and load size parameters of LOAD-IMAGE* methods of BUT...
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Eugenie: Please review 3330a revision 11189 for the initial runtime s... - 08:33 PM Feature #3332: Add support for load offset and load size parameters of LOAD-IMAGE* methods of BUT...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie: Please review 3330a revision 11189 for the initial runtime stubs that were needed. Also...
09/05/2017
- 05:46 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 1834b Revision 11184
>
> I've checked in some fixes for typos and codi... - 12:38 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 3. Please change EVL to SBI for those files where the changes were written by Sergey. Otherwise ... - 12:25 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Code Review Task Branch 1834b Revision 11184
I've checked in some fixes for typos and coding standards.
1. The ... - 11:24 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Since the ESC behavior doesn't exist in the 4GL, we will avoid it for now.
OK.
> Please do... - 10:30 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Since the ESC behavior doesn't exist in the 4GL, we will avoid it for now.
Please do the cleanup. - 10:19 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think Sergey is done with his part of the work (the JS file upload)... - 10:03 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think Sergey is done with his part of the work (the JS file upload).
>
> Eugenie: is there a... - 09:42 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- I think Sergey is done with his part of the work (the JS file upload).
Eugenie: is there anything more to do on th... - 09:41 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- > Greg: do you want to do this in a different task? Because I would like to see how triggers and maybe other UI stuff...
- 09:38 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin,
>
> Look at @Editor@, line 954:
> [...]
>
> The method @Keyboard.isPrint... - 09:32 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Constantin,
Look at @Editor@, line 954:... - 08:50 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > The idea. Instead of looping through every char in substring... - 08:43 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > The idea. Instead of looping through every char in substring... - 07:52 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The idea. Instead of looping through every char in substring we can compute full substring ... - 09:05 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Please review committed revision 11182 that changed @p2j.socket.js@ to send a packet of p... - 12:36 PM Feature #3332: Add support for load offset and load size parameters of LOAD-IMAGE* methods of BUT...
- Eugenie: Please review 3330a revision 11189 for the initial runtime stubs that were needed. Also, please review 3332...
- 12:30 PM Feature #3332: Add support for load offset and load size parameters of LOAD-IMAGE* methods of BUT...
- 3332a revision 11164 implements full conversion support for the missing @LOAD-IMAGE*@ overloads. It also adds initial...
- 12:21 PM Feature #3332: Add support for load offset and load size parameters of LOAD-IMAGE* methods of BUT...
- FWD is missing conversion and runtime support for the following methods @IMAGE:LOAD-IMAGE()@, @BUTTON:LOAD-IMAGE()@, ...
- 11:15 AM Feature #3332 (Closed): Add support for load offset and load size parameters of LOAD-IMAGE* metho...
09/03/2017
- 06:40 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Eugenie, I don't understand, please explain why @sendDropFileNotify@ should arrive before... - 03:12 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie, I don't understand, please explain why @sendDropFileNotify@ should arrive before @uploadFileToJava@ message ...
- 12:14 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> The canvas image can be broken if its window is moved during the file uploading.
> !Msgs... - 11:25 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Please review committed revision 11182 that changed @p2j.socket.js@ to send a packet of partial messages without recu...
- 10:34 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The canvas image can be broken if its window is moved during the file uploading.
!MsgsInterleaving.png!
09/02/2017
- 08:09 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been updated for review to revision @11181@.
Fix for array invalid index issue in @Edi...
09/01/2017
- 06:18 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Committed revision 11180 changed(added new methods) DragDropHelper, ClientProtocolHooks to use file channels for file...
- 05:20 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Prepared the fix for Unicode chars.
The idea. Instead of looping through every char in substring we can compute fu... - 01:30 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- > I guess this issue is not one of our priority and adding Cyrillic support can be postponed.
Actually, I think th... - 01:18 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> What is about the issue in the note 214?
The investigation:
1. The font width array w... - 12:28 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ok, understand now. There is the design issue that @WebClientProtocol.AppendMessageTask@ saves the whole message into...
- 12:16 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Another question related to this implementation is that we have a message type MSG_FILE_U... - 12:11 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > The task branch @1834b@ has been updated for review to revisi... - 11:59 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Another question related to this implementation is that we have a message type MSG_FILE_UPLOADING with its 32-bit fie...
- 11:45 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The task branch @1834b@ has been updated for review to revision @11179@.
>
> This is min... - 10:48 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been updated for review to revision @11179@.
This is minor code cleanup(@DragDropHelpe... - 09:10 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- I will take this part to implement MSG_FILE_UPLOADING from file channels on the java client side too if there are no ...
- 08:19 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie, please review the changes in 11178, 11177. We need to implement uploading files from file channels, but now ...
- 08:04 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- May be this extra 16 bytes are related to the protocol format that must carry the payload data. https://tools.ietf.or...
- 07:31 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ok, don't understand this extra 16 bytes that was added to the wss message? Please update src/com/goldencode/p2j/ui/c...
- 06:51 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Eugenie, you added MSG_SET_UPLOAD_FILE_SIZE_LIMITS message type. It is useful if this lim... - 05:00 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie, you added MSG_SET_UPLOAD_FILE_SIZE_LIMITS message type. It is useful if this limit is changed during the app...
- 10:17 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been updated for review to revision @11175@.
This update adds ability to configure fil... - 03:19 PM Feature #3331: translate 4GL menu widget processing into a standardized embedded web client menu ...
- > Maybe we can let our driver inform the client of the current window's menu?
Yes, I think that makes good sense. - 03:10 PM Feature #3331: translate 4GL menu widget processing into a standardized embedded web client menu ...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: I don't see a need for anything at conversion. It seems like we can do it all at run... - 02:54 PM Feature #3331: translate 4GL menu widget processing into a standardized embedded web client menu ...
- This is an extension of the idea in #3260-3. The key here is that instead of doing this at conversion time, we shoul...
- 02:48 PM Feature #3331 (Closed): translate 4GL menu widget processing into a standardized embedded web cli...
- 01:37 PM Feature #3283: add 4GL extension to obtain the mouse pointer location
- > Do we have any place (a wiki page) where we document the 4GL language extensions?
There are entries in this loca... - 01:32 PM Feature #3282: create a 4GL language extension to control screen refresh
- Can this task be closed?
- 08:31 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- When you have time, please review task branch 3275b rev 11169.
- 03:21 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Rebased task branch 3275b from P2J trunk revision 11163.
08/31/2017
- 02:23 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- I think we should use streams here.
- 02:06 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ok, thank you. It seems that we need to do some changes in @WebClientProtocol.AppendMessageTask@ because the file con...
- 02:00 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Eugenie, please help what 4GL examples should I use for tests with large files? There are... - 01:56 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> It seems that the uploading files without slicing are done except these configurable para... - 01:48 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie, please help what 4GL examples should I use for tests with large files? There are uast/drag_n_drop?
- 01:41 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- It seems that the uploading files without slicing are done except these configurable parameters in the directory, cor...
- 01:34 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Eugenie, Greg, should I take this JS part to upload files that exceed 1Gb?
Yes. If th... - 01:12 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie, Greg, should I take this JS part to upload files that exceed 1Gb?
- 12:21 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- I just found that https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/length the a...
- 11:56 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Another argument can be that the available memory that can be used to allocate the binary array on the client to hold...
- 11:41 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> > What file size is a criteria to start splitting it into slices?
>
> I imagine it may va... - 10:51 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It may be best for Sergey to take the JS file uploading part. What do you think?
I have no ob... - 10:30 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- It may be best for Sergey to take the JS file uploading part. What do you think?
- 10:28 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- > Probably we need a way to override this defaults within directory.
Yes.
> The question about large file. Do w... - 10:26 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834b@ has been updated for review to revision @11174@.
The update implements file synchronizatio...
Also available in: Atom