FWD » Core Development » Runtime Infrastructure

05/24/2024

03:04 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

6692a rev 15242 - GenericWebServer now exposes all @jetty-@ jars to the .war launched app (fixes the JNDI problem). Constantin Asofiei

05/22/2024

03:22 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Greg Shah wrote:
> Please commit the change. Let's restart testing.
Committed to 6692a rev 15241. Constantin Asofiei

02:58 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Please commit the change. Let's restart testing. Greg Shah

01:58 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

This change removes mime4j benchmark, which required jmh:... Constantin Asofiei

05/21/2024

04:57 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Greg Shah wrote:
> The converted code javac times (and heap requirements) as seen in #8773 and #8771, are something ... Tomasz Domin

05/20/2024

10:16 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

The converted code javac times (and heap requirements) as seen in #8773 and #8771, are something for which we need to... Greg Shah

05/14/2024

04:45 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

In each of these testing processes, please use the details in [[p2j:Switching_Between_Java_8_and_Java_17]] to migrate... Greg Shah

04:40 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

The final phase of testing for 6692a is starting now. When each of the following are resolved, we will merge to trun... Greg Shah

09:08 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

I've pushed @6692a/15240@ based on current @trunk/15205@ I guess which is ready for testing.
Please review commits 1... Tomasz Domin

08:24 AM Bug #8624: Stream should detect whether it is being used from the client or the server

Greg, what do I need to do in order to do server side stream operations? I noticed some setup steps from #4065, besid... Șerban Bursuc

05/13/2024

01:43 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Roger Borrello wrote:
> > > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > > I guess t... Tijs Wickardt

01:13 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > I guess that was already planned to be c... Roger Borrello

01:03 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I guess that was already planned to be changed as @hotel_gui@ has a... Tomasz Domin

12:29 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I guess that was already planned to be changed as @hotel_gui@ has already that change implemen... Roger Borrello

11:56 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

I had some issues with FWD @build.gradle@ as it is using @javascript@ which is no longer available in JVM since JDK15... Tomasz Domin

05/09/2024

07:58 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I have just pushed @6692a/15188@ with following updates:
>
> Next steps:
> - updating docu... Tomasz Domin

05/08/2024

06:04 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

I have just pushed @6692a/15188@ with following updates:
* Support for versioned JS dependencies in @ReportWebServ... Tomasz Domin

05/06/2024

01:52 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Greg Shah wrote:
> > A remark - I don't think any of customer application would be ready for Java 17 right away - th... Eric Faulhaber

02:52 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues

Otherwise I'm ok with the changes. Galya B

02:52 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> This is the response on the #8206-11 finding and needs to be tested. I am not sure it w... Galya B

05/03/2024

05:41 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

> > Are you saying code changes are needed? I don't think we expose @com.goldencode.p2j.persist.Record@ in converted... Greg Shah

05:12 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Are you saying code changes are needed? I don't think we expose @com.go... Eugenie Lyzenko

04:00 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Greg Shah wrote:
> Are you saying code changes are needed? I don't think we expose @com.goldencode.p2j.persist.Reco... Tomasz Domin

07:58 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > * test customer applications for regression - the most important appl... Eugenie Lyzenko

06:03 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

> A remark - I don't think any of customer application would be ready for Java 17 right away - they most probably nee... Greg Shah

04:52 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> * test customer applications for regression - the most important applications - I guess we nee... Tomasz Domin

10:55 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues

Galya B wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Log manager initialization fixed in 8206a rev. 15197. Please, revie... Vladimir Tsichevski

09:44 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Log manager initialization fixed in 8206a rev. 15197. Please, review.
I'm not sure i... Galya B

09:21 AM Bug #8206 (Review): Logging manager issues

Log manager initialization fixed in 8206a rev. 15197. Please, review. Vladimir Tsichevski

06:29 AM Bug #8206 (WIP): Logging manager issues

OK, I'll rebase the branch and add the missing change. Vladimir Tsichevski

01:21 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues

Actually Vladimir is better familiar with these issues and has more insight on what needs to be achieved.
Vladimir... Galya B

05/02/2024

02:33 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Also I've found Java doc issue:... Eugenie Lyzenko

03:10 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

From Tomasz via email:
You need to add -Djava.locale.providers=SPI,CLDR,COMPAT instead of and put fwdcpi.jar on a ... Constantin Asofiei

01:24 PM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues

Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 8206a Revisions 14987 through 14992
> Vladimir/Galya: I understand tha... Vladimir Tsichevski

10:54 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues

With Theodoros gone, this will need to be rebased, tested and merged by someone else. Greg Shah

10:53 AM Bug #8206 (Internal Test): Logging manager issues

Code Review Task Branch 8206a Revisions 14987 through 14992
I have no objections to the changes.
As far as I kn... Greg Shah

07:55 AM Bug #7589 (Closed): org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder when deploying p2j.jar in tomcat

Greg Shah

07:52 AM Bug #7589: org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder when deploying p2j.jar in tomcat

This can be closed. We've delivered a way to disable the FWD's slf4j impl what was the issue. Galya B

06:32 AM Feature #8708 (Closed): cleanup of SLF4J

All the reported issues are resolved. Nice! Greg Shah

03:20 AM Feature #8708 (Test): cleanup of SLF4J

8708a was merged to trunk as rev. 15185 and archived. Galya B

02:27 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Galya B wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tested, it looks OK.
>
> Did you find any slf4j message from tika in th... Hynek Cihlar

02:01 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tested, it looks OK.
Did you find any slf4j message from tika in the client log? Galya B

05/01/2024

06:55 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

The first results for using Java 17 with big GUI application.
1. Conversion was completed. Build compiled.
2. The... Eugenie Lyzenko

09:27 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Yes, Hotel GUI in SSO mode works in trunk. Embedded mode does have a bug (see #8253) but it is not related to SSO. Greg Shah

09:24 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Galya B wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Do you have worked @SSO@ enabled @Hotel GUI@ for *Web* client with curr... Eugenie Lyzenko

09:17 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

P.S.S. I use SSO with trunk and testcases every week. Galya B

09:16 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

P.S. SSO is working only for *Web*. And embedded doesn't work without SSO. Galya B

09:15 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Do you have worked @SSO@ enabled @Hotel GUI@ for *Web* client with current @FWD@ trunk?
I'... Galya B

09:13 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Galya B wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > This was due to not configured SSO for hotel GUI. I disabled SSO and it... Eugenie Lyzenko

09:05 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> This was due to not configured SSO for hotel GUI. I disabled SSO and it works now.
Intrigu... Galya B

06:07 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Roger Borrello wrote:
> > > > Eugenie ... Eugenie Lyzenko

03:43 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Roger Borrello wrote:
> > > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > > Ha... Greg Shah

10:11 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Have you tested @hotel_gui@ with w... Eugenie Lyzenko

08:46 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

OK. To start application with Java 8 we need to add at least the following into @build.gradle@:... Eugenie Lyzenko

08:45 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Have you tested @hotel_gui@ with web client and Java 8? In my ca... Eugenie Lyzenko

08:41 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Have you tested @hotel_gui@ with web client and Java 8? In my case the client session can n... Roger Borrello

03:44 PM Feature #8708 (Merge Pending): cleanup of SLF4J

It can merge to trunk. Greg Shah

03:37 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> There are vulnerabilities in all the previous versions. We should stick to 2.9.x. I'll test if... Hynek Cihlar

03:17 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > What do you mean? Jetty is working on those systems.
>
> The logging is b... Hynek Cihlar

02:28 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Greg Shah wrote:
> What do you mean? Jetty is working on those systems.
The logging is broken.
Another way to... Galya B

02:14 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

What do you mean? Jetty is working on those systems. Greg Shah

02:13 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Greg Shah wrote:
> If this breaks the tika code, then we can't merge it because we have a customer using it in real ... Galya B

02:12 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

If 6692a resolves this, then we may have to wait for it. We are literally trying to get Java 17 into trunk next week... Greg Shah

02:11 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

If this breaks the tika code, then we can't merge it because we have a customer using it in real life. Greg Shah

01:59 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Greg Shah wrote:
> We're sure that the tika parser code we are using doesn't require slf4j?
It uses a new version... Galya B

01:48 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

We're sure that the tika parser code we are using doesn't require slf4j? Greg Shah

01:38 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Can we merge this soon, because it's too annoying? Galya B

10:07 AM Feature #8708 (Review): cleanup of SLF4J

Galya B

10:07 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

8708a r15183 based on trunk r15182: remove the transitive dependency of @slf4j-api:2.0.10@ from @tika-core@.
Diff ... Galya B

09:48 AM Feature #8708 (WIP): cleanup of SLF4J

... Galya B

08:52 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

Someone did something... wasn't me and this should have never appeared.
This warnings @Class path contains SLF4J b... Galya B

07:56 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J

As of trunk rev 15182, you can see the following.
1. During FWD build, there is this:... Greg Shah

07:43 AM Feature #8708 (Closed): cleanup of SLF4J

Greg Shah

10:42 AM Bug #8656 (Test): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

8656a was merged to trunk as rev. 15183 and archived. Galya B

10:29 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

You can merge to trunk now. Greg Shah

10:11 AM Bug #8656 (Merge Pending): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pd...

Hynek Cihlar

09:53 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

I did a comparison of the original behavior and output and the new one and shared the results in #8656-8. I can do mo... Galya B

09:50 AM Bug #8656 (Internal Test): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pd...

Galya B wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > The code changes remove the zipping part for the split pdfs. Was this part... Hynek Cihlar

08:44 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> The code changes remove the zipping part for the split pdfs. Was this part of the requirements... Galya B

06:25 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

Code review 8656a revisions 15156..15159.
The code changes remove the zipping part for the split pdfs. Was this pa... Hynek Cihlar

04:18 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

Sergey/Hynek: Please review. Greg Shah

01:24 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > A side observation is that the server struggles with such big data wh... Galya B

04/30/2024

07:29 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Branch @6692a@ has been tested with @hotel_gui@, @hotel_chui@ and standard regression testing ... Eugenie Lyzenko

04:56 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Seems like I have new issue:... Eugenie Lyzenko

03:03 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

I've tried ETF, but a suite gets into an infinite loop, while one passes. This was with Java 8 conversion and Java 1... Constantin Asofiei

01:43 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Branch @6692a@ has been tested with @hotel_gui@, @hotel_chui@ and standard regression testing suite. But it seems tha... Tomasz Domin

01:22 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
>
> > I'm going to check Java 17 now. Is the code converted with Jav... Eugenie Lyzenko

12:18 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I'm going to check Java 17 now. Is the code converted with Java 8 compatible with Java 17... Tomasz Domin

12:15 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Attempting to use @6692a@ with Java 8 causes exceptions:
> >
> ... Eugenie Lyzenko

12:12 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Attempting to use @6692a@ with Java 8 causes exceptions:
>
> [...]
>
> Is it expected... Tomasz Domin

12:01 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17

Attempting to use @6692a@ with Java 8 causes exceptions:... Eugenie Lyzenko

03:32 PM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

Galya B wrote:
> A side observation is that the server struggles with such big data when generating the report (@Rep... Sergey Ivanovskiy

02:29 PM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

A side observation is that the server struggles with such big data when generating the report (@ReportsManager.buildR... Galya B

02:24 PM Bug #8656 (Review): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pd...

8656a r15159 based on trunk r15156 ready for review.
@jPod@ was originally used only for merging big pdf documents... Galya B

02:15 PM Bug #8656 (WIP): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

Galya B

07:57 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

The @ant report_server@ is related to FWD Analytics and is not related to @ReportServlet@ from our admin console. Th... Greg Shah

07:50 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

@ant report_server@ gives a lot of errors and eventually fails. Ends up with:... Galya B

05:16 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

But ReportServlet is from FWD Admin console - for that try admin/test123. Constantin Asofiei

05:15 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

I assume you've ran the report tasks? The default user is admin and the default password is the app's name as config... Constantin Asofiei

05:04 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox

What is the user / pass for the reporting login in testcases? I tried admin/admin, but I get @socket closed (1011) - ... Galya B

04/29/2024

04:33 PM Bug #8206 (Review): Logging manager issues

Theodoros Theodorou