Activity
From 02/23/2025 to 03/24/2025
03/24/2025
- 11:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> E.g. FWD API is making use of @javax.http.*@ classes in @SsoAuthenticator@, so it relies on lo... - 09:08 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Note there are due to migration there will FWD API changes, which I am not sure what to do with.
E.g. FWD API is mak... - 11:01 AM Support #9514: assess, recommend and document monitoring tools plan
- Some recent observations for using *jstack* in a container. Some settings have to be passed to docker upon building t...
- 10:51 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > > As for the real value of automation... I don't want... - 10:42 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > I think in FWD we have this notion that automation is not necessarily running... - 10:39 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> >> The API is defined at development time, not at runtime. You don't need to dynamically generate... - 10:32 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- >> The API is defined at development time, not at runtime. You don't need to dynamically generate it on a production ...
- 10:28 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
> >
> ... - 10:13 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Banks don't build platforms, they build applications. FWD is not an application, it is a platfor... - 10:06 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > > * JSON or Annotations
> > > ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then g... - 09:54 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
>
> I never said that. Th... - 09:53 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg: before committing to use Swagger and Jersey, I'd like to have a simple POC to chec... - 09:53 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
I never said that. This has nothing to do wit... - 09:52 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > > * JSON or Annotations
> > ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then generate Java stubs for... - 09:33 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The issue is that running extra code to dynamically generate and expose the API increases the att... - 09:20 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> * JSON or Annotations
> ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then generate ... - 09:05 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu: I like the way your work is moving. The design in #7080-80 is good.
Constantin: We should go ahead with a c... - 07:54 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg: before committing to use Swagger and Jersey, I'd like to have a simple POC to check how it integrates with FWD.
- 07:35 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- If the customers don't want to develop tools (API clients), they can have the auto-generated always up-to-date web cl...
- 07:32 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Galya B wrote:
> In any case it's a matter of configuration.
https://anirtek.github.io/java/jetty/swagger/openapi... - 07:13 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Here is a full list of the supported server stubs, client SDKs and doc types it can generate: "swagger-codegen":https...
- 07:02 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> How does Swagger generate the server stubs? With annotations?
The api is declared in ya... - 06:43 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Yes, we can consider Swagger.
>
> Constantin, does #7080-80 mean we're not... - 06:40 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, we can consider Swagger.
Constantin, does #7080-80 mean we're not considering Swagger for... - 03:57 AM Bug #9804 (Review): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 9804a rev 15813 has:
* Improvements for remote FWD OpenClient connections: ensure that the remote side uses a single...
03/21/2025
- 05:57 PM Feature #7080 (Review): expose all admin APIs via REST
- The changes in 8976a / 15810:
* created @BaseAdminRestHandler@ as base @abstract@ class for all REST handlers:
** w... - 05:22 PM Feature #7080 (WIP): expose all admin APIs via REST
- I committed the changes to 8976a / 15810.
- 04:04 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Otoh, I don't think we want to reserve dispatcher threads for all apps, even if they don't use remote openclient.
- 03:49 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Perhaps we should have a safer way to set the number of dispatcher threads. For example, doesn't... - 03:44 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg: why is BaseSession.listeners a LinkedList instead of a HashSet? Are the listeners depende... - 03:25 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * with its size limited to 80% of the number of Dispatcher threads
>
> I think we nee... - 03:22 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- > Greg: why is BaseSession.listeners a LinkedList instead of a HashSet? Are the listeners dependent on when their ord...
- 02:16 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Created task branch 9804a from trunk rev 15811.
In rev 15812, is the initial pass; it includes, on the remote FWD Op... - 06:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Hynek
> > > I have problems porting @Spre... - 05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Hynek
> > I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 ... - 04:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek
> I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 to Jetty 12, as some kind o... - 03:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek
I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 to Jetty 12, as some kind of internal API was used (...
03/20/2025
- 09:30 AM Bug #9804 (WIP): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 03:19 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The only difference is that I think we need to move away from basic auth and design a more approp...
03/19/2025
- 04:23 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The point is: I see real usage in getting the full details 'up front', and not having to... - 02:23 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> #** the @/admin/tenants@ and @/admin/sessions@ should return only the list of resources, no... - 02:14 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I agree with these ideas.
The only difference is that I think we need to move away from basic auth and design a mo... - 01:59 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin and I have a discussion on meet and we reach the following conclusions (summarised):
# instead a having... - 01:14 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > A question I have is do we expect the framework to ever expose endpoints that are not @/admin@, because to me every...
- 01:13 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I'm not opposed to an explicit versioning in the URL, but this also would suggest that the older versions would be su...
- 09:46 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Versioning is introduced when the team is on the same page about the definition of backwards compatibility. Breaking ...
- 09:34 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Idea discussed in the daily meeting today:
* As this task is also about (re-)designing the REST API to expose the ...
03/18/2025
- 11:18 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- The remote OpenClient calls are managed in FWD via the @RemoteLegacyJavaAppserverClient@ class, created via @LegacyJa...
- 10:42 AM Bug #9804 (Test): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 05:39 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > See : https://javadoc.jetty.org/jetty-12/org/eclipse/jetty/serv... - 03:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> See : https://javadoc.jetty.org/jetty-12/org/eclipse/jetty/server/Request.Handler.html#handle(... - 05:19 AM Bug #9740 (Test): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- @9740a@ was merged into @trunk / rev 15787@
03/17/2025
- 06:13 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > In order to minimize changes I've stayed with @AbstractHandler@... - 08:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to minimize changes I've stayed with @AbstractHandler@ despite its deprecated, as mov... - 08:01 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin: Please comment on this plan. Do we need to shift to the asynch approach?
- 03:52 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've started work on porting services to Jetty 12 API. There are differences requiring attention, it will take me 2-3...
- 12:02 PM Bug #9740 (Merge Pending): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Please merge after 9543a.
- 11:08 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes. There are other "interactive" mechanisms that are the equivalent to @OS-COMMAND@: @DOS@ and... - 11:00 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Lorian Sandu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
> >
> > The change is go... - 10:27 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
>
> The change is good.
>
> Please confirm tha... - 10:25 AM Bug #9740 (Internal Test): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
The change is good.
Please confirm that Windows process launching,... - 09:46 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think there is a latent bug here: the @isSuspended = 0;@ that is done *after* the @generateExce... - 09:38 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15780
The change is good.
I think there is a latent bug here: the @isSus... - 09:25 AM Bug #9740 (Review): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Please review.
- 09:25 AM Bug #9740 (WIP): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Good point. OK, move ahead with the @if (isSuspended)@ addition on Windows.
Committed to @974... - 09:03 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Good point. OK, move ahead with the @if (isSuspended)@ addition on Windows.
- 08:54 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In the testcase from #9740-10, what happens if the 2nd command runs longer than the 3rd command?
... - 08:50 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- In the testcase from #9740-10, what happens if the 2nd command runs longer than the 3rd command?
- 07:35 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please check that the code @client.suspend(silent);@ on line 276 of @ProcessDaemon@ is executed m...
03/14/2025
- 10:44 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Please check that the code @client.suspend(silent);@ on line 276 of @ProcessDaemon@ is executed multuple times before...
- 09:43 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please see if you can test my concern in #9740-2 that there could be multiple suspended terminals... - 08:33 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Please see if you can test my concern in #9740-2 that there could be multiple suspended terminals simultaneously. If...
03/13/2025
- 12:05 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've started upgrading dependencies to get rid of old and vulnerable libraries and I've encountered a problem that ma...
- 10:59 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Reopening the discussion on this.
Is it ok to fix this by adding the @if (isSuspended)@ (#9740-1) that is in the l... - 08:53 AM Feature #4132: implement configurable user and session limits
- I've documented this configuration in [[p2j:Session Management]].
03/11/2025
- 04:44 PM Feature #9687 (WIP): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- 03:54 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- We need to move ahead with this ASAP. Having it ready by the end of March is important to at least one customer. Th...
03/07/2025
- 04:28 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Another note here: I think we need the REST admin APIs to have mandatory authentication...
03/06/2025
- 11:13 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Another note here: I think we need the REST admin APIs to have mandatory authentication/authorization.
Ovidiu: pl...
03/05/2025
- 12:56 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Almost certainly yes.
- 10:18 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. Do we have thread safety issues in managing this @isSuspended@ flag? The @suspend()@ and @res... - 08:56 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- I have some converns with how we are managing the suspend/resume here. These concerns are not just related to the ch...
- 08:37 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- After a client that runs in batch mode finishes its execution it stops with a crash :...
- 08:30 AM Bug #9740 (Closed): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- 10:07 AM Support #9730: Run hotel_gui in Windows 11
- Thank you for noting these, Lorian. This is a task of mine, which hasn't been given enough attention. I ran into trou...
03/04/2025
- 10:11 AM Support #9730: Run hotel_gui in Windows 11
- Good news!
I was able to run the hotel app on Windows 11 ✅✅
Since the @prepare_hotel.cmd@ was *not working* p... - 04:23 AM Support #9730: Run hotel_gui in Windows 11
- I am trying to run the hotel_gui in Windows 11.
The revision of @hotel_gui@ i am using is @375@ (latest).
When ... - 04:09 AM Support #9730 (New): Run hotel_gui in Windows 11
- 08:25 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Yes, we need to also update other dependencies (for example, see the list in #9674). The Jetty issue is the biggest ...
- 02:11 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Tomasz: Please estimate the size of the work needed to migrate to the latest Jetty and other depe...
03/03/2025
- 04:12 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz: Please estimate the size of the work needed to migrate to the latest Jetty and other dependencies.
02/28/2025
- 09:47 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Yes, I agree. Those tables are security-related, not tenant-related.
- 09:05 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg, currently the @_sec-authentication-system@ and @_sec-authentication-domain@ are 'written' via @TenantManager@, ...
02/27/2025
- 02:38 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- The @domain@ table has references to @domain_type@ and @tenant_name@. Therefore a @domain@ cannot be defined without ...
- 11:47 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > Ovidiu, the @domain@ and @domain-type@, are these *only* related to multi-tenancy? Because as I recall these can a...
- 11:34 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, there is currently a single handler for @/admin/tenant@, @/admin/domain@ and @/admin/doma... - 09:31 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > Greg, there is currently a single handler for @/admin/tenant@, @/admin/domain@ and @/admin/domain-type@. The last ...
- 07:02 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg, there is currently a single handler for @/admin/tenant@, @/admin/domain@ and @/admin/domain-type@. The last 2 ...
- 06:21 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > > > I was not, but @/admin/meta/<meta-tables>/@ and @MetaHandler@ will fit for me as a glove (or two of them? :)).
... - 11:23 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > I would suggest one more small change for setup script:
> No...... - 10:49 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I would suggest one more small change for setup script:
No... there may be spaces in the p... - 10:32 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- I would suggest one more small change for setup script:...
- 08:54 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Thank you. I'll get this possibili... - 07:19 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Thank you. I'll get this possibility not early than tomorrow I t... - 07:11 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Thank you. I'll get this possibility not early than tomorrow I think.
I had success inst...
02/26/2025
- 05:06 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > I was not, but @/admin/meta/<meta-tables>/@ and @MetaHandler@ will fi... - 04:10 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > You mean @/admin/meta/tenant/@? Then I'm OK to group these ... - 04:02 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > Greg, do we want to enable/disable certain rest ADMIN features? If not, then is enough to have a @server/default/re...
- 02:57 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> You mean @/admin/meta/tenant/@? Then I'm OK to group these together, and use the @META:... - 01:49 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * 8976b renames the ACL prefix from @TENANT@ to @REST-ADMIN@, while leaving @SESSION@ int... - 01:21 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * a better way to handle each REST feature being enabled/disabled and the token timeout (... - 12:47 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > As a separate idea, the @domain@, @domain_type@, and @tenant@ could use a different initial prefix, like @/meta/@, ...
- 12:44 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > /admin/login would enable a login for all REST features (like a 'super-admin')
Let's make this the only login fo... - 12:43 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> *Ovidiu* - please document here all the REST paths added to @AdminHandler@ in 8976b, in ... - 10:01 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- At this time, [[p2j:Administration_REST_API]] documents these REST APIs. I'm not including all the HTTP web methods,...
- 09:57 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please don't delete old versions of the script. Just add new ones. Redmine handles that just fi... - 09:56 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Please don't delete old versions of the script. Just add new ones. Redmine handles that just fine. If you delete t...
- 09:50 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- And the new file itself.
- 09:49 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > I expect this script to function across ... - 09:39 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > I expect this script to function across a range of recent Ubuntu rele... - 09:12 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- > We will *not* consider non @LTS@ reseases?
Correct. We should support 18.04, 20.04, 22.04 and 24.04. - 08:30 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I expect this script to function across a range of recent Ubuntu releases. Let's get this finish... - 05:48 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- I expect this script to function across a range of recent Ubuntu releases. Let's get this finished and only have to ...
02/25/2025
- 06:34 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie, did you have a chance to test on Ubuntu 24.04? I see errors when it comes to handli... - 04:57 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie, did you have a chance to test on Ubuntu 24.04? I see errors when it comes to handling the @/etc/apt/sources....
- 12:11 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I notice that @ant-native@ fails to build _unless_ you have "NCU... - 11:50 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I notice that @ant-native@ fails to build _unless_ you have "NCURSES_FWD_PTHREAD=true". Is t... - 11:28 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- I notice that @ant-native@ fails to build _unless_ you have "NCURSES_FWD_PTHREADS=true". Is that by design that we on...
- 08:35 AM Support #5568 (Test): implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- 08:25 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- *Merge notification for task branch 5568b.*
Branch 5568b was merged to trunk rev 15733 and archived.
* Updates fo... - 07:55 AM Support #5568 (Merge Pending): implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- You can merge 5568b to trunk now.
- 12:30 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> OK. Sorry, I missed the fact you already created new branch. So I'm late.
>
> The @5568b... - 07:36 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- OK. Sorry, I missed the fact you already created new branch. So I'm late.
The @5568b@ upadted to revision @15734@ ... - 12:41 PM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, renaming @TenantHandler@ to @AdminHandler@ and making this the authorative 'hand... - 11:00 AM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Ovidiu, renaming @TenantHandler@ to @AdminHandler@ and making this the authorative 'handler' for admin purposes is no...
02/24/2025
- 06:56 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I made some bug fixing and addition. Tested on @Ubuntu 22.04@. Please review new candidate.... - 06:26 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger,
I made some bug fixing and addition. Tested on @Ubuntu 22.04@. Please review new candidate.
I guess we c... - 06:22 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- I created branch 5568b and checked in the updated @setup_ncurses6x.sh@.
Greg Shah wrote:
> The container project ... - 04:29 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> It is not possible to have @NCURSES_FWD_PTHREADS@ defined without @NCURSES_FWD_STATIC@. The... - 04:25 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> There are some changes required to @setup_ncurses6x.sh@ to work in the Docker build. For one... - 04:11 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- I believe this update for the end of the @setup_ncurses6x.sh@ would work:...
- 03:51 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- There are some changes required to @setup_ncurses6x.sh@ to work in the Docker build. For one thing, the previous vers...
- 01:06 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The container project only exists for FWD, right? I'm not sure why it is even a separate thing.
... - 12:33 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The container project only exists for FWD, right? I'm not sure why it is even a separate thing.
As for gcd_system... - 10:59 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Currently the Docker image base ubuntu build has this step:...
- 09:20 AM Support #5568 (Test): implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- 09:08 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Branch @5568a@ was merged to trunk as revno @15728@ then it was archived.
- 09:00 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> FYI: #6433 was just merged to trunk.
I see, thanks.
The @5568a@ rebased with trunk re... - 08:52 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- FYI: #6433 was just merged to trunk.
- 12:30 PM Feature #6871 (Closed): add JMX instrumentation to monitor the appserver agents
- 12:26 PM Feature #6871: add JMX instrumentation to monitor the appserver agents
- Yes
- 12:22 PM Feature #6871: add JMX instrumentation to monitor the appserver agents
- We can close this, right?
- 12:23 PM Feature #6377 (WIP): provide tooling (and UI in the admin interface) to manage appserver agents (...
- It is a fair point that we have something rudimentary. It is not a proper replacement for a REST API.
- 10:52 AM Feature #6377: provide tooling (and UI in the admin interface) to manage appserver agents (start/...
- #7074-6.
- 10:49 AM Feature #6377: provide tooling (and UI in the admin interface) to manage appserver agents (start/...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think we need to reopen this task to get the REST API implemented. The admin console UI is use... - 10:46 AM Feature #6377: provide tooling (and UI in the admin interface) to manage appserver agents (start/...
- I think we need to reopen this task to get the REST API implemented. The admin console UI is useful but it will not ...
Also available in: Atom