FWD » Core Development » Runtime Infrastructure

05/02/2025

08:53 PM Feature #9002: Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when updating it

Ovidiu, I think something is missing. Either I did something wrong when checking out the branch, either there are som... Radu Apetrii

04/30/2025

07:59 PM Feature #9002 (Review): Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when...

Committed revision 15880 to 9002a.
Now the complex operations on landlord database are performed in transactions.
... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:13 PM Feature #9002: Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when updating it

The initial commit contains only the _"connection resiliency"_ part of the task: now the tenant manager will try to r... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:29 PM Feature #8863 (WIP): Add tenantName logic related to sec_authentication_domain in FWD

In the meet today, I affirmed that the first and last bullet are already implemented, just need to be tested/confirme... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04/29/2025

07:54 PM Feature #9002 (WIP): Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when up...

Created 9002a. Committed revision 15879. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04/24/2025

03:13 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu, did you do @./gradlew all@ ? The GWT part for FWD Admin Console does not get build for normal 'jar'.
I've ... Constantin Asofiei

04/23/2025

05:12 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

The change was not omitted. I had to roll it back because the @cpath@ will be added inside @WebServiceAuth.authorize(... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Review of 7080a rev 15860:
* this change from the patch in #9687 was omitted; the authorization ACLs work with the f... Constantin Asofiei

02:09 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Yes, 7080a. The changes were committed as r15860.
Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:27 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu, do you have a branch for this? Constantin Asofiei

04/22/2025

04:46 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

I've pushed 9687b revision 15895 to xfer. Greg Shah

03:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing?
I've reb... Tomasz Domin

08:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing?
I am reb... Tomasz Domin

08:37 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing? Greg Shah

06:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Cleaned up duplicate API libs as described in #9674-28
Pushed up to revision 9687b/15878. Tomasz Domin

04/15/2025

04:06 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Please create a branch and put the changes there. Thanks. Constantin Asofiei

04/14/2025

05:22 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin,
Is there a branch for the changes you proposed for fixing the context issues reported in #9687 which we... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09:17 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * One issue I see is that the implemented methods are @doHandl... Constantin Asofiei

08:56 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, please see attached patch - test all REST-admin requests, and admin handler. It... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

06:35 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Ovidiu, please see attached patch - test all REST-admin requests, and admin handler. It should work.
The point is... Constantin Asofiei

03:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Yes, that was my problem also.
> The problem now is that the @AdminRestHandler@ will att... Tomasz Domin

04/12/2025

03:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > That issue is caused by adding @DefaultHandler@ in sequence to Admini... Tomasz Domin

04/11/2025

06:04 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Yes, that was my problem also.
Initially, I did not write code like... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:01 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

I may be completely wrong, but in Jetty, if you have multiple handlers for a path, aren't all of them called, in orde... Constantin Asofiei

12:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Ovidiu, did you try using admin app after the change ?
> Now its possible to access embedded... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:26 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> That issue is caused by adding @DefaultHandler@ in sequence to Administration Console applicat... Hynek Cihlar

09:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Rebased @9687b@ to @trunk/15850@.
Migrated Ovidiu's changes, but still have issue as described in #9687-98
I guess ... Tomasz Domin

05:30 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is n... Tomasz Domin

04/10/2025

12:05 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, some new issues.
>
> Navigating to the root path gives a page with 404 error and li... Tomasz Domin

09:25 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz: When you get the chance, please update [[p2j:JVM Requirements]] to add Java 11 and Java 17. Later, when we r... Greg Shah

08:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> What has to be fixed before we can provide this as an early release to a customer? That customer... Tomasz Domin

07:58 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

What has to be fixed before we can provide this as an early release to a customer? That customer needs to make Jetty... Greg Shah

07:29 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, some new issues.
I am on it. Tomasz Domin

07:28 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
... Tomasz Domin

07:05 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz, some new issues.
Navigating to the root path gives a page with 404 error and list of contexts (admin and _... Hynek Cihlar

11:33 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Brett,
Your request is probably correct. Both _sec-auth tables were stuck as R/O. It an issue caused by a failed mer... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:45 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

When trying to add a domain I am getting this
{
"success": false,
"errors": [
"com.goldencode.p... Brett Rexius

04/09/2025

06:46 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

It is working now, I just needed to change it to the logical db name, not the physical. Thanks! Brett Rexius

06:43 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

I think this is strange.
The (GET - I assume) for @https://localhost:7443/admin/security/domains/shared@ will try to... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

06:15 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

When trying to list the domains I am getting this response
{
"errors": [
"Error initializing persist... Brett Rexius

12:31 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Brett Rexius wrote:
> Do you have Postman examples for /admin/security/domains?
Sure. See attached. The admin sub... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:51 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Do you have Postman examples for /admin/security/domains? Brett Rexius

05:59 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is not possible to get @/gui@ or... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09:08 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't recall what was the reason. What compilation issues do you get?
> I get it w... Hynek Cihlar

07:21 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following cha... Tomasz Domin

07:14 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
... Hynek Cihlar

07:02 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
I am not sure why - pro... Tomasz Domin

04:34 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is n... Tomasz Domin

12:22 PM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time

Greg Shah wrote:
> > Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but... Lorian Sandu

11:14 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time

> Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but did not find anythi... Greg Shah

09:59 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time

Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but did not find anything.
Lorian Sandu

09:48 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time

> > In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it into code like @Version.java@.
> >
> Hmm, ok. Should this version be... Greg Shah

09:33 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time

Greg Shah wrote:
> > How could we get the version at build time?
>
> In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it in... Lorian Sandu

09:17 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time

> How could we get the version at build time?
In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it into code like @Version.ja... Greg Shah

08:06 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time

Greg Shah wrote:
>
> The idea here:
>
> * At build time, we should create a static string literal in the native... Lorian Sandu

04/08/2025

07:29 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is not possible to get @/gui@ or... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Let me know if you need additional help.
Thank you, it worked.
I've found related issue -... Tomasz Domin

01:16 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

We can't recreate the problem here. The only theory we have is that the @p2j.dll@ is not updated with a later versio... Greg Shah

12:45 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Where does this Redmine stand? It's in 'Test' status, but Kevin can still recreate this. Amy Gakopoulos

04/07/2025

01:26 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I would think so.
>
> See @httpConfig.addCustomizer(new SecureRequestCustomizer());@ in @Ge... Tomasz Domin

11:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
> >
... Hynek Cihlar

11:05 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
>
> For development (where I ... Tomasz Domin

10:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
For development (where I don't care about certificat... Hynek Cihlar

09:17 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Rebased to trunk/15842.
Resolved minor conflicts.
Pushed up 9687b/15866. Tomasz Domin

10:04 AM Bug #9804 (Test): improve the OpenClient remote calls

Constantin Asofiei

10:03 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Branch 9804a was merged to trunk rev 15845 and archived. Constantin Asofiei

10:01 AM Bug #9804 (Merge Pending): improve the OpenClient remote calls

I've redone tests, I'm merging to trunk and 7156c/e now. Constantin Asofiei

08:23 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, please see 9804a rev 15849 - this address the review.
>
> I've added timeout f... Galya B

08:18 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Galya, please see 9804a rev 15849 - this address the review.
I've added timeout for the remote-side request.
Fo... Constantin Asofiei

07:04 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Galya B wrote:
> Aren't the workers supposed to be reused by the SoapHandler and RestHandler? I mean @worker.getHelp... Constantin Asofiei

06:59 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > * What about synchronizing @LegacyServiceWorker.getHelper@ and @RemoteLegacyServiceWor... Galya B

06:41 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Galya B wrote:
> Review of 9804a r15848:
> * Remove pasoe references in @RemoteLegacyServiceWorker@ and there seems... Constantin Asofiei

06:08 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Review of 9804a r15848:
* Remove pasoe references in @RemoteLegacyServiceWorker@ and there seems to be one reference... Galya B

05:21 AM Bug #9804 (Review): improve the OpenClient remote calls

Rebased 9804a from trunk rev 15842 - new rev 15848.
Galya: please do a final review. Constantin Asofiei

03:32 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Testing went well over the weekend. I only emailed Constantin this morning and forgot to update the task. Dănuț Filimon

05:33 AM Bug #9878: Java client process hangs when -verbose:class is part of jvmargs

I can replicate this in Java 11, 17, 21.
When -verbose:class is part of the client's java argumens the Java client... Hynek Cihlar

05:25 AM Bug #9878 (New): Java client process hangs when -verbose:class is part of jvmargs

Hynek Cihlar

04/04/2025

12:08 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I see common code like this:
> [...]
> Please add a worker method.
Thank you. I've ... Tomasz Domin

08:46 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

I see common code like this:... Constantin Asofiei

08:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

I've removed dependency on @commons-httpclient@ which seems not to be in use since #6692 and migrated *NoHostVerify* ... Tomasz Domin

03:19 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek
> Note that 9687a is a development branch and 9687b is a branch constantly re-based to ... Hynek Cihlar

09:19 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests

Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Galya B wrote:
> > > Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with o... Greg Shah

08:52 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests

Greg Shah wrote:
> +Testcases Needed+
> * [[p2j:Appserver Tests]]
> ** see #1608, #2124, #3854, #6424, #6488, #641... Marian Edu

08:23 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests

Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml ... Galya B

08:14 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests

Galya B wrote:
> Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml that is derived from t... Greg Shah

07:59 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests

Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml that is derived from the template? Galya B

07:50 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests

Galya B wrote:
> Where is the startup guide on how to write tests, add them to testcases and run them in Harness?
... Greg Shah

07:39 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests

Where is the startup guide on how to write tests, add them to testcases and run them in Harness? Galya B

04/03/2025

06:04 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Ovidiu - do you have any testing tools/scripts/configuration/curl for testing API with 9687b ?... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04:34 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, 8976a was merged to trunk, this includes changes to the REST Admin handlers. Pl... Tomasz Domin

08:53 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > As for the formatting according to the formatting standards the imports sh... Hynek Cihlar

07:21 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Galya B wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I wonder if I'd rather use something similar @super.sendError@ in there to... Tomasz Domin