Activity
From 05/25/2025 to 06/23/2025
06/24/2025
- 08:55 PM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Roger
> > In file @container_java_21.diff@ please find changes to ...
06/23/2025
- 11:56 AM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Roger
> In file @container_java_21.diff@ please find changes to @container@ project to suppor... - 09:52 AM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- Roger
In file @container_java_21.diff@ please find changes to @container@ project to support Java 21.
The patch is ... - 02:51 AM Bug #10174 (Internal Test): Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- I'm OK with the change.
06/20/2025
- 04:54 AM Bug #10174 (Review): Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- Commited revision *15990* in task branch *10174a*:
- fix for *RETURN* statement in OO void method.
06/19/2025
- 03:15 AM Bug #10174 (WIP): Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- Created task branch *10174a*
06/18/2025
- 12:06 PM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- I've created task branch @9685a@ which is based on @trunk@ revision @15988@ and was already tested with @hotel_gui@ a...
- 07:20 AM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > move JNI and native dependencies into the jar (Linux) - 1d and 1d+ win... - 06:55 AM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > move JNI and native dependencies into the jar (Linux) - 1d and 1d+ windows testing
>
> Is th... - 06:46 AM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- Is there any reason we can't do the performance testing first?
- 06:45 AM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- > move JNI and native dependencies into the jar (Linux) - 1d and 1d+ windows testing
Is this related to the FFM re... - 06:26 AM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- FWD builds under Java 21, I've build @hotel_gui@ and made a quick test - it works.
Assuming that bringing support ... - 09:45 AM Bug #10174: Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor, is this about the @FINALLY@ block? You can test this without OO.
Yes, I have... - 09:39 AM Bug #10174: Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- Teodor, is this about the @FINALLY@ block? You can test this without OO.
- 09:36 AM Bug #10174: Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- On OpenEdge, when using a true non-OO true internal procedure, the @RETURN@ statement will write the @RETURN-VALUE@ a...
- 08:27 AM Bug #10174: Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- I was told (many years ago) by someone at Progress, that they implemented OO methods in this way:
* If the method ... - 08:19 AM Bug #10174: Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- I have done some more investigation of this strange behavior.
* It is normal on 4GL to change the return of a proced... - 06:25 AM Bug #10174: Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- We have this testcase, which on OE pass and on FWD fail:
* TestNestedReturn.cls... - 06:21 AM Bug #10174 (Test): Method/Procedure call overwrites procedure return value
- 08:03 AM Feature #7080 (Test): expose all admin APIs via REST
- Branch 7080a was merged to trunk revision 15989 and archived.
- 07:28 AM Feature #7080 (Merge Pending): expose all admin APIs via REST
- Managed to run Hotel GUI in web and it works. Please merge 7080a now.
- 01:13 AM Bug #10071 (Test): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- 01:13 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Branch 10071b was merged to trunk rev 15988 and archived.
06/17/2025
- 09:16 AM Bug #10071 (Merge Pending): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Go ahead and merge now.
- 08:11 AM Bug #10136 (Test): SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- Branch 10136a was merged to trunk rev 15987 and archived.
- 07:54 AM Bug #10136 (Merge Pending): SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- Please merge 10136a now.
06/16/2025
- 05:37 AM Bug #10071 (Review): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Committed revision *15985* on task branch *10071b*:
- Regression from *10071a*: fixed error handling on processInbou... - 05:34 AM Bug #10071 (WIP): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Created task branch *10071b*.
- 03:29 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- I found another issue, after changing the type of exception from RuntimeException to InvocationTargetException. The i...
06/13/2025
- 04:31 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I do not know which project has @/web@ to test with.
I did a @/chui@ test with hotel. It did not end well. I got a... - 03:24 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> That's good news.
>
> In parallel I did test it with both smoke-test/harness and GUI na... - 02:49 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- That's good news.
In parallel I did test it with both smoke-test/harness and GUI navigation in the multi-tenant e... - 02:04 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, I've retested web_apis with 7080a and these:
* Admin Console
* REST ADMIN
* SOAP/REST with and without lo... - 02:24 PM Bug #10136: SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I don't object to your idea, but I'm also OK with always having the @tmp{random-digits}@ segregat... - 02:09 PM Bug #10136: SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- I don't object to your idea, but I'm also OK with always having the @tmp{random-digits}@ segregation. If a customer ...
- 01:28 PM Bug #10136: SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- Teodor: please post your findings about what Greg mentioned.
Greg: my points about the temp dir are this:
* for G... - 05:17 AM Bug #10071 (Test): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Branch 10071a was merged to trunk rev 15983 and archived.
- 03:46 AM Bug #10071 (Merge Pending): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Please merge after 9447a.
06/12/2025
- 08:27 AM Bug #10136: SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- > The same applies when you specify the path with -T startup parameter.
If you pass a non-existing directory name ... - 04:03 AM Bug #10136: SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- The @fwd{random-digits}@ folder is used to isolate Web clients (like GUI or ChUI), which on the original env, were ru...
- 01:47 AM Bug #10136: SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- On OE Developer Studio, the default value for SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY is @C:\Progress\OE116_64WRK\@, which is already ...
- 05:15 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Lorian, Stefanel, Andreea told that there are no issues.
I have asked Serban to check if he ran with this branch. I ... - 05:07 AM Bug #10071 (Internal Test): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Committed revision *15954* on task branch *10071a*.
> - replaced RuntimeException with Invoc...
06/11/2025
- 10:56 AM Bug #10136: SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- We only should implement the change if that is how OE works.
- 09:47 AM Bug #10136 (Review): SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- Created task branch *10136a*.
Committed revision *15981* on task branch *10136a*:
- SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY getter: ... - 09:08 AM Bug #10136: SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
- When using Startup Parameters, SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY directory is not created.
- 09:06 AM Bug #10136 (Test): SESSION:TEMP-DIRECTORY missing directory
06/10/2025
- 12:16 PM Bug #9740 (Closed): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- 11:57 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- We have a clean compile and updated p2j.dll. With this in place, we are no longer receiving thread dumps for each re...
- 03:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Rebased *9687b* to *trunk/15972*
> There were only minor merge conflicts.
>
> Pushed up to...
06/09/2025
- 08:54 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- What additional testing is needed for 7080a? The admin console is broken in trunk until this is merged, right?
- 06:59 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased *9687b* to *trunk/15972*
There were only minor merge conflicts.
Pushed up to revision *9687b/16001*.
T...
06/05/2025
- 04:19 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Committed revision *15954* on task branch *10071a*.
- replaced RuntimeException with InvocationTargetException (remo... - 03:34 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- ReflectASM throws RuntimeException with the cause from which the invoked method throws.
Java Reflection Invoke metho... - 03:29 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- I don't think you need to use the @catch@ block, @Utils.invoke@ already throws it?...
06/04/2025
- 03:50 PM Feature #9685 (WIP): move FWD to Java 21
- 01:51 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Does @Utils.invoke@ need to make @method.setAccessible(true)@? The test is declaring a @...
06/03/2025
- 03:20 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Does @Utils.invoke@ need to make @method.setAccessible(true)@? The test is declaring a @PROCEDURE proc0 PRIVATE@. and...
- 02:53 AM Bug #10071 (Review): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- 02:52 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Committed revision @15952@ on task branch @10071a@.
This change includes only the replacement of ReflectASM with Jav...
05/30/2025
- 08:28 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- If the stack trace matches the one in #10068, then first step is to bypass this (so @Method.invoke@ is used if Reflec...
- 08:27 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Create a .p with 100s procedure/functions and each with 10s of args. After that use @... - 07:26 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Created branch *10071a*. I am currently searching for a simple test case.
Create a .p with 1... - 07:25 AM Bug #10071 (WIP): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- Created branch *10071a*. I am currently searching for a simple test case.
- 04:56 AM Bug #10071: Method code too large - ReflectASM
- When the bytecode is too large, we get @Method code too large!@.
To address this, we need to:
- Investigate if we c... - 04:55 AM Bug #10071 (Closed): Method code too large - ReflectASM
- When the bytecode is too large, we get @Method code too large!@.
To address this, we need to:
- Investigate if we c...
05/29/2025
- 08:05 AM Feature #9002 (Closed): Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when...
- Thanks, Brian!
- 07:55 AM Feature #9002: Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when updating it
- Infor testing now that all three RedMine issues are in place with the directory.xml removal of breakAfterAcquireFailu...
05/28/2025
- 11:09 AM Feature #9851 (Test): hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Branch 9851b was merged into trunk as rev. 15948 and archived.
* Changed @Version.getFWDVersionUnformatted()@ to r... - 10:36 AM Feature #9851 (Merge Pending): hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Code Review Task Branch 9851b Revision 15946
No objections. This should be quite safe.
You can merge 9851b to ... - 10:33 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I do want to reiterate that many cases where the FWD version becomes "unknown" are resolved ... - 10:25 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- I do want to reiterate that many cases where the FWD version becomes "unknown" are resolved by *7133a*, since it can ...
- 09:45 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- *Greg*, I believe I’ve found an issue where the FWD version cannot be detected, either in standard Java code or in na...
- 08:11 AM Feature #9851 (Test): hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Branch 9851a was merged into trunk as rev. 15945 and archived.
* Hard code the FWD_VERSION in the native code at c... - 07:39 AM Feature #9851 (Merge Pending): hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- You can merge to trunk now.
- 07:14 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- The testing passed.
@9851a@ can be added to the merge queue. - 07:14 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Hi, I think this was not a clean build (@Compiling 452 source files@ suggests this). Please do a clean (or manually ...
- 07:10 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- While testing and researching yesterday, I discovered that our job to build Windows Native is encountering a compile ...
- 03:34 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Thanks for the update. The good news is that the root cause (crash) is resolved when using an up-to-date version of t...
05/27/2025
- 03:35 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- I pulled the latest code and updated the files in the deploy directory with the p2j and fwd files Lorian posted. Afte...
- 02:23 PM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- The changes should be fairly safe. Please check Hotel GUI and Hotel ChUI and something with batch processes. If the...
- 01:14 PM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 9851a Revision 15934
>
> The change is good. Have you tested the buil... - 01:02 PM Feature #9851 (Internal Test): hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Code Review Task Branch 9851a Revision 15934
The change is good. Have you tested the build process and the result...
Also available in: Atom