Activity
From 07/25/2025 to 08/23/2025
08/20/2025
- 09:58 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Let's use FINER or FINEST instead of INFO.
- 09:39 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- I’ve attached a patch that adds structured logging for key GUI events, specifically when windows are opened/closed an...
- 07:45 AM Feature #10451 (WIP): GUI interaction event logging
- 07:45 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- In that case, we can stick with the existing logger levels defined in @directory.xml@, no need to introduce any new v...
08/19/2025
- 10:36 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- A common log file is useful because then all logging has context about what was happening. To make that work, we wou...
- 08:50 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- Hynek, I’d value your feedback on this and your approval. Thank you!
- 08:35 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
- This task is meant to add logging for key GUI actions so we can reconstruct user flows and reproduce "one-off" issues...
- 08:24 AM Feature #10451 (Test): GUI interaction event logging
08/15/2025
- 02:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I finished the Keikai changes for Jetty 12. I tested them with isolated test cases and they pa...
08/14/2025
- 05:03 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> due to an unexpected exception during server start with 9687c.
See #9625-97.
- 04:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I finished the Keikai changes for Jetty 12. I tested them with isolated test cases and they passed. I haven't tested ...
- 07:11 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- I don't understand this @try@ block:...
- 04:00 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- It seems that the similar issue was discussed in some task but I did not find where it was.
- 03:51 AM Support #10389 (WIP): Ending Web application does not free port
- OK, please create the task branch 10389a.
- 03:09 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Sergey, the patch above isn't fully correct, but the idea stands, if we are in a pause caused by @END-ERROR@ another ...
08/13/2025
- 11:38 AM Support #10389 (Review): Ending Web application does not free port
- 06:52 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- The ESC issue is fixed by this change:...
- 06:30 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- -An easy example of a hanging application is #10087-19, this testcase on the web client hangs and there is no way to ...
- 06:27 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> > Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lo... - 09:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please rebase 9687c from trunk 16111. There was another regression in incremental conversion fro... - 08:38 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Please rebase 9687c from trunk 16111. There was another regression in incremental conversion from the 5586a changes,...
08/12/2025
- 03:27 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've pushed 9687c revision 16135 to xfer.
- 03:25 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm going to push this to xfer.
Please do. - 03:24 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I'm going to push this to xfer.
- 03:17 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased *9687c* to *trunk* revision *16110*.
Tested features - all works:
* hotel_gui
** virtual desktop
** emb... - 10:29 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lost message, same as holding ES... - 08:10 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lost message, same as holding ESC. This bug can be fixed...
08/11/2025
- 11:24 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- OK, the pushed branch looks OK now. I've pushed it to xfer.
- 10:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > In meantime on customer's request I've rebased branch 9687c to trunk revision 16089.
>
> 968... - 10:36 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > In meantime on customer's request I've rebased branch 9687c to trunk revision 16089.
9687c seems to be based on ... - 10:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
>
> Also: Hynek, I think w... - 09:55 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I don't want to squash changes in every rebase. We did that once to deal with some conflicting changes in trunk. Le...
- 09:52 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
I can run regression tests, ... - 09:29 AM Feature #9687 (Internal Test): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
Also: Hynek, I think we need your help with th... - 06:43 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Retesting now.
>
> Pushed up 9687b to revision 16011 post review f...
08/08/2025
- 04:20 PM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Retesting now.
Pushed up 9687b to revision 16011 post review fixes.
Please review. - 03:38 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 9687b revisions 16009 and 16010.
>
> In @WebServer@, when the http config alrea... - 02:46 AM Feature #9687 (WIP): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Code review 9687b revisions 16009 and 16010.
In @WebServer@, when the http config already has a valid secure-reque... - 10:32 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- >but I need to wait for the websocket connection popup to appear and then press ESC again to close it.
I guess it is... - 10:11 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > But in your log there is this severe message
> > [...]
>
> ... - 09:15 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> But in your log there is this severe message
> [...]
That's an exception generated fr... - 09:13 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- But in your log there is this severe message...
- 08:59 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Șerban, please note that your directory.xml has a remote debug option...
- 08:10 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- Sure, all attached.
I just figured out now that if I wait for the "websocket connection lost" message and then pre... - 08:01 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- The video is not enough to make a guess what happens here. Please add directory.xml, test program to reproduce and logs.
- 06:46 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
- When making small testcases and ending the application with @ESC@ the port allocated to the web client spawner is not...
- 06:41 AM Support #10389 (WIP): Ending Web application does not free port
08/07/2025
- 01:12 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Oh, that is not true as @EmbeddedWebServer@ is part of a client. I'll... - 12:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek: Are you OK with the changes?
- 12:41 PM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Oh, that is not true as @EmbeddedWebServer@ i... - 07:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Oh, that is not true as @EmbeddedWebServer@ is part of a client. I'll... - 05:58 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Oh, that is not true as @EmbeddedWebServer@ is part of a client. I'll try to create config par...
08/06/2025
- 03:01 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Note the change does not affect @EmbeddedW... - 02:10 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Note the change does not affect @EmbeddedWebServer@ needed for web FW... - 11:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Note the change does not affect @EmbeddedWebServer@ needed for web FWD clients.
I'm not sur... - 10:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've implemented a workaround to Jetty 12 bug #9687-138.
The workaround disables *SNIHostCheck* for *SSL* connectio...
08/05/2025
- 06:29 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Ovidiu - I'd like you to review *9687c* revisions *16080-16083* a... - 03:44 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Ovidiu - I'd like you to review *9687c* revisions *16080-16083* as those are mainly related t... - 11:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've created task branch *9687c* which includes branch *9687a* and all changes from *9687b* squished to simplify reba...
08/01/2025
- 07:48 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Why is it an issue now when it wasn't before?
>
> The default behavio... - 06:49 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I guess when removed a standard keys would be in use, so SNI check does... - 06:06 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Why is it an issue now when it wasn't before?
>
> The default behavio...
07/31/2025
- 01:56 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Perhaps we should disable it by default and provide a configuration option to enable it.
Yes, ... - 01:40 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Perhaps we should disable it by default and provide a configuration option to enable it.
- 01:32 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Why is it an issue now when it wasn't before?
The default behavior changed in the new version ... - 08:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Why is it an issue now when it wasn't before?
Whatever we do, the solution is not to have a Jetty property file or... - 04:49 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Regarding disabling SNI check mentioned in #9674-88
I'd need to modify @SecureRequestCustomizer@ initialization to f...
07/29/2025
- 05:58 AM Bug #8060 (Test): Admin Console login fails every first time (AdminServerImpl.setTargetLive)
- The branch 8060a has been merged into the trunk revision 16074 and archived.
- 04:39 AM Bug #8060 (Merge Pending): Admin Console login fails every first time (AdminServerImpl.setTargetL...
- Please merge now.
Also available in: Atom