Project

General

Profile

Activity

From 07/30/2025 to 08/28/2025

08/28/2025

06:35 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
Committed finest level logging for window open/close and mouse click events as rev *16135* / 10451a.
Next, I’ll re... Paula Păstrăguș

08/27/2025

06:02 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
Paula, I like the idea. Two suggestions.
1. I think it would be even better to extend this to all widgets. I.e. p... Hynek Cihlar

08/26/2025

06:17 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
It worked! It is now able to execute the file fine. Radu Apetrii
06:04 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
OK, comment out the code in FWD .java file to just use @p_relname@ to be what @SEARCH@ returns from PROPATH and see w... Constantin Asofiei
06:03 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
After that loop, the code does this... Radu Apetrii
05:55 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
I'm thinking to just remove this code in FWD's .java converted file. What is @cLongestProPath@ used for, after this ... Constantin Asofiei
05:53 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
In relname, it first does @FILE-INFO:FILE-NAME = filename@, where filename is @test.r@. This triggers the initial se... Radu Apetrii
05:46 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
What is relname 4GL code doing that it needs to look for the .r file on disk, and not rely just on SEARCH function to... Constantin Asofiei
05:28 AM Bug #10476: Webspeed request for .r file fails
Executing a file coming from a webspeed request involves a couple of additional steps rather than the classic method ... Radu Apetrii
05:11 AM Bug #10476 (New): Webspeed request for .r file fails
Radu Apetrii

08/20/2025

09:58 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
Let's use FINER or FINEST instead of INFO. Greg Shah
09:39 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
I’ve attached a patch that adds structured logging for key GUI events, specifically when windows are opened/closed an... Paula Păstrăguș
07:45 AM Feature #10451 (WIP): GUI interaction event logging
Paula Păstrăguș
07:45 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
In that case, we can stick with the existing logger levels defined in @directory.xml@, no need to introduce any new v... Paula Păstrăguș

08/19/2025

10:36 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
A common log file is useful because then all logging has context about what was happening. To make that work, we wou... Greg Shah
08:50 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
Hynek, I’d value your feedback on this and your approval. Thank you! Paula Păstrăguș
08:35 AM Feature #10451: GUI interaction event logging
This task is meant to add logging for key GUI actions so we can reconstruct user flows and reproduce "one-off" issues... Paula Păstrăguș
08:24 AM Feature #10451 (Test): GUI interaction event logging
Paula Păstrăguș

08/15/2025

02:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I finished the Keikai changes for Jetty 12. I tested them with isolated test cases and they pa... Tomasz Domin

08/14/2025

05:03 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> due to an unexpected exception during server start with 9687c.
See #9625-97.
 Hynek Cihlar
04:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I finished the Keikai changes for Jetty 12. I tested them with isolated test cases and they passed. I haven't tested ... Hynek Cihlar
07:11 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
I don't understand this @try@ block:... Șerban Bursuc
04:00 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
It seems that the similar issue was discussed in some task but I did not find where it was. Sergey Ivanovskiy
03:51 AM Support #10389 (WIP): Ending Web application does not free port
OK, please create the task branch 10389a. Sergey Ivanovskiy
03:09 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
Sergey, the patch above isn't fully correct, but the idea stands, if we are in a pause caused by @END-ERROR@ another ... Șerban Bursuc

08/13/2025

11:38 AM Support #10389 (Review): Ending Web application does not free port
Greg Shah
06:52 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
The ESC issue is fixed by this change:... Șerban Bursuc
06:30 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
-An easy example of a hanging application is #10087-19, this testcase on the web client hangs and there is no way to ... Șerban Bursuc
06:27 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> > Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lo... Șerban Bursuc
09:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> Please rebase 9687c from trunk 16111. There was another regression in incremental conversion fro... Tomasz Domin
08:38 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Please rebase 9687c from trunk 16111. There was another regression in incremental conversion from the 5586a changes,... Greg Shah

08/12/2025

03:27 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I've pushed 9687c revision 16135 to xfer. Greg Shah
03:25 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm going to push this to xfer.
Please do. Tomasz Domin
03:24 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I'm going to push this to xfer. Greg Shah
03:17 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Rebased *9687c* to *trunk* revision *16110*.
Tested features - all works:
* hotel_gui
** virtual desktop
** emb... Tomasz Domin
10:29 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lost message, same as holding ES... Sergey Ivanovskiy
08:10 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
Pressing ESC twice should not cause the websocket connection lost message, same as holding ESC. This bug can be fixed... Șerban Bursuc

08/11/2025

11:24 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
OK, the pushed branch looks OK now. I've pushed it to xfer. Greg Shah
10:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> > In meantime on customer's request I've rebased branch 9687c to trunk revision 16089.
>
> 968... Tomasz Domin
10:36 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
> In meantime on customer's request I've rebased branch 9687c to trunk revision 16089.
9687c seems to be based on ... Greg Shah
10:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
>
> Also: Hynek, I think w... Hynek Cihlar
09:55 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I don't want to squash changes in every rebase. We did that once to deal with some conflicting changes in trunk. Le... Greg Shah
09:52 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
I can run regression tests, ... Tomasz Domin
09:29 AM Feature #9687 (Internal Test): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
What testing is needed before we make this available to a customer?
Also: Hynek, I think we need your help with th... Greg Shah
06:43 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Retesting now.
>
> Pushed up 9687b to revision 16011 post review f... Hynek Cihlar

08/08/2025

04:20 PM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Retesting now.
Pushed up 9687b to revision 16011 post review fixes.
Please review. Tomasz Domin
03:38 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 9687b revisions 16009 and 16010.
>
> In @WebServer@, when the http config alrea... Tomasz Domin
02:46 AM Feature #9687 (WIP): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Code review 9687b revisions 16009 and 16010.
In @WebServer@, when the http config already has a valid secure-reque... Hynek Cihlar
10:32 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
>but I need to wait for the websocket connection popup to appear and then press ESC again to close it.
I guess it is... Sergey Ivanovskiy
10:11 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > But in your log there is this severe message
> > [...]
>
> ... Sergey Ivanovskiy
09:15 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> But in your log there is this severe message
> [...]
That's an exception generated fr... Șerban Bursuc
09:13 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
But in your log there is this severe message... Sergey Ivanovskiy
08:59 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
Șerban, please note that your directory.xml has a remote debug option... Sergey Ivanovskiy
08:10 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
Sure, all attached.
I just figured out now that if I wait for the "websocket connection lost" message and then pre... Șerban Bursuc
08:01 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
The video is not enough to make a guess what happens here. Please add directory.xml, test program to reproduce and logs. Sergey Ivanovskiy
06:46 AM Support #10389: Ending Web application does not free port
When making small testcases and ending the application with @ESC@ the port allocated to the web client spawner is not... Șerban Bursuc
06:41 AM Support #10389 (WIP): Ending Web application does not free port
Șerban Bursuc

08/07/2025

01:12 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Oh, that is not true as @EmbeddedWebServer@ is part of a client. I'll... Tomasz Domin
12:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek: Are you OK with the changes? Greg Shah
12:41 PM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Oh, that is not true as @EmbeddedWebServer@ i... Tomasz Domin
07:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Oh, that is not true as @EmbeddedWebServer@ is part of a client. I'll... Greg Shah
05:58 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Oh, that is not true as @EmbeddedWebServer@ is part of a client. I'll try to create config par... Tomasz Domin

08/06/2025

03:01 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Note the change does not affect @EmbeddedW... Tomasz Domin
02:10 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Note the change does not affect @EmbeddedWebServer@ needed for web FW... Tomasz Domin
11:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Note the change does not affect @EmbeddedWebServer@ needed for web FWD clients.
I'm not sur... Hynek Cihlar
10:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I've implemented a workaround to Jetty 12 bug #9687-138.
The workaround disables *SNIHostCheck* for *SSL* connectio... Tomasz Domin

08/05/2025

06:29 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Ovidiu - I'd like you to review *9687c* revisions *16080-16083* a... Tomasz Domin
03:44 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Ovidiu - I'd like you to review *9687c* revisions *16080-16083* as those are mainly related t... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
11:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
I've created task branch *9687c* which includes branch *9687a* and all changes from *9687b* squished to simplify reba... Tomasz Domin

08/01/2025

07:48 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Why is it an issue now when it wasn't before?
>
> The default behavio... Tomasz Domin
06:49 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I guess when removed a standard keys would be in use, so SNI check does... Tomasz Domin
06:06 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Why is it an issue now when it wasn't before?
>
> The default behavio... Tomasz Domin

07/31/2025

01:56 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> Perhaps we should disable it by default and provide a configuration option to enable it.
Yes, ... Hynek Cihlar
01:40 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Perhaps we should disable it by default and provide a configuration option to enable it. Greg Shah
01:32 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Greg Shah wrote:
> Why is it an issue now when it wasn't before?
The default behavior changed in the new version ... Hynek Cihlar
08:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Why is it an issue now when it wasn't before?
Whatever we do, the solution is not to have a Jetty property file or... Greg Shah
04:49 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
Regarding disabling SNI check mentioned in #9674-88
I'd need to modify @SecureRequestCustomizer@ initialization to f... Tomasz Domin
 

Also available in: Atom