Activity
From 09/25/2025 to 10/24/2025
10/16/2025
- 08:23 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- @max_connection@ is per-cluster, so all databases in that cluster (including multi-tenant) will use this value. So, ...
- 07:57 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- When deploying to production, there is configuration which needs to be adjusted depending on the customer's load. Th...
- 07:36 AM Bug #10733 (New): evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in pr...
10/08/2025
- 10:02 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I mean the basepath - if that is /ws and the request URI is /wsa, then it will match. I... - 05:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I mean the basepath - if that is /ws and the request URI is /wsa, then it will match. I think basepath needs to be s...
- 05:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, beside the @requestUri.startsWith(instance.getBasePath())@ check mentioned by Hy... - 04:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, beside the @requestUri.startsWith(instance.getBasePath())@ check mentioned by Hynek, I think we are OK.
- 04:53 AM Feature #10685: Move name_map.xml to the cvt folder
- The purpose of this task is to move the name_map.xml to the conversion folder, this is a breaking change which will r...
- 04:52 AM Feature #10685 (Closed): Move name_map.xml to the cvt folder
10/07/2025
- 09:29 AM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- 09:29 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've just checked and the current trunk introduces a feature that may require a bit more work before merging - revis...
- 05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I agree that @StandardServer@ should not be aware of activated handlers. However, the handlers... - 04:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > The solution for the potential context conflict isn't well structured...
10/06/2025
- 09:46 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 9687c.
Thank you
> Please fix the added javadoc of @SoapServiceFilterHandler.h... - 05:25 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Instead of a filter, did you consider distinct context handlers? I.e. to have a context handle... - 05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek - please review revision 16214
Code review 9687c.
Please fix the added javadoc of ...
10/03/2025
- 05:36 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> There is a bit unexpected (I didnt presume its possible to map Soap handler to root of the ser... - 02:41 AM Feature #9687 (WIP): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- There is a bit unexpected (I didnt presume its possible to map Soap handler to root of the server) consequence of mig...
- 04:43 AM Bug #10574 (New): contextlocal cross-dependencies
- Branch 10574a was merged to trunk rev 16207 and archived.
What's left is to improve/refactor the ContextLocal feat... - 03:07 AM Bug #10574 (Merge Pending): contextlocal cross-dependencies
- I'll merge after 10483a.
10/02/2025
- 01:33 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've committed changes #10616-57, it is need to handle special case when SOAP services are pla... - 03:07 AM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've committed changes #10616-57, it is need to handle special case when SOAP services are places in a root context (...
09/29/2025
- 10:08 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> We dont. Our customers do.
> See: [[p2j:Jetty_12]]
I see. Still, they should be deduplicated. - 09:42 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > Tomasz, why do we need @CurrentRequestFilt... - 04:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > The changes needed to make Spreadsheet backend compatible with Jetty ... - 04:01 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz, why do we need @CurrentRequestFilterEE10@ and @WebAuthFilterE... - 02:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> The changes needed to make Spreadsheet backend compatible with Jetty 12 are checked in to 9687... - 01:06 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, why do we need @CurrentRequestFilterEE10@ and @WebAuthFilterEE10@? The implementations...
09/28/2025
- 05:44 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, why do we need @CurrentRequestFilterEE10@ and @WebAuthFilterEE10@? The implementations duplicate @CurrentRequ...
- 05:41 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- The changes needed to make Spreadsheet backend compatible with Jetty 12 are checked in to 9687c. Tomasz, please review.
09/27/2025
- 03:03 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased *9687c* to *trunk* revision *16184*.
Tested features - all works correctly (after applying a patch from #1...
09/26/2025
- 10:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > > I finished th... - 09:58 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > I finished the Keikai changes for Jetty 12...
09/25/2025
- 09:11 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I finished the Keikai changes for Jetty 12. I tested them with isolat... - 07:05 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- +Roger
- 04:17 AM Bug #10609: FWD compilation issues on Windows
- Small correction, the @-ljvm@ linker error is not fixed by adding @/bin/server@ to path, it's fixed by moving @jvm.li...
Also available in: Atom