Activity
From 10/28/2025 to 11/26/2025
11/26/2025
- 03:41 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've found an issue with one of customer application used for regression testing - as @velocity@ has been removed as ...
- 05:11 AM Feature #9687 (Test): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Branch 9687c has been merged into trunk as revision 16293
- 04:56 AM Feature #9687 (Merge Pending): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, you can merge 9687c to trunk now - you have the green light!
- 11:07 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> It may have been used in the base. I am afraid of having a decisive answer as I am not the ... - 09:33 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- > Note the fact that I removed the first parameter, String fname, because I couldn't find any usages for it. Please c...
- 08:39 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- Before starting the refactoring work, I'll like to lay out my plan and *receive feedback* in order to not waste time ...
11/25/2025
- 02:08 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg
What about merging 9687c ? I guess we do have green light from the customer(s), dont we ?. - 05:09 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- > Alex: Should we dedicate 10858a for getAttr and 10858b for setAttr, or merge both of them in 10858a?
I think it ... - 04:13 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- As of trunk rev. 16279, there are 699 places which need refactoring for @getAttr@ and 366 places for @setAttr@.
*A...
11/18/2025
- 12:56 PM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- I've spent some time migrating *gradle* to version supporting Java 21 - I started with version 8.14.3, which is curre...
11/17/2025
- 01:39 PM Feature #9685: move FWD to Java 21
- There is a problem with building FWD on clean system with Java 21 only - gradle 7.6.4 does not support Java 21 fully ...
11/14/2025
- 03:11 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > And the fact Java 8/11 will not be supported anymore in trunk.
We'll do a final check on customers early next we... - 01:29 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- @SPREADSHEET@ tests passed with 9687c.
- 01:03 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I am starting testing spreadheet widget now, it shouldn't take long.
- 12:53 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
>
> I think the only documentation is related with addiding *EE10* classes and handlers. AFAIR... - 12:48 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are we just needing the spreadsheet to be tested before we can merge?
And the fact Java 8/11 wil... - 09:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Are we just needing the spreadsheet to be tested before we can merge?
Tomasz: Is there any documentation needed fo... - 06:21 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- The difference is just for the error messages being reported. That is OK.
Greg, as web_apis work, then 9687c pass... - 05:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > > * Multi session app server (@MultiSessionAppserver@)
> > Isnt this setup by the customer req...
11/13/2025
- 06:53 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- This is an easy win. It is functionally the same and faster. There is good discussion of capturing/non-capturing la...
- 02:07 AM Bug #10858: Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- The idea was presented by Alex in the last statement from #9972-107. The general concept is to switch away from captu...
- 01:59 AM Bug #10858 (Test): Replace capturing with non-capturing lambdas in getters and setters
- 02:02 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > > * Multi session app server (@MultiSessionAppserver@)
> > Isnt this setup by the customer req...
11/12/2025
- 04:23 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > > * Multi session app server (@MultiSessionAppserver@)
> Isnt this setup by the customer requesting this change.
... - 04:02 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Constantin/Hynek: What other testing do we need?
>
> Here is the unso... - 08:55 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin/Hynek: What other testing do we need?
Here is the unsorted list of features, beside... - 08:18 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- While waiting for answer from Hynek/Constantin I am wondering if there are branches that modify Jetty 9 related handl...
11/10/2025
- 03:32 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Good, thanks.
- 03:31 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've asked for retesting apps in #10616-91
- 03:30 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin/Hynek: What other testing do we need?
- 11:46 AM Feature #9687 (Internal Test): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Well, I think you've fixed it in 9687c? I haven't run the test program in FWD.
Yes, ... - 09:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Only the last one:
> > > Error load... - 09:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Only the last one:
> > Error loading WSDL document WSDLExcept... - 08:46 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Only the last one:
> Error loading WSDL document WSDLException: faultCode=PARSER_ERROR: Prob... - 08:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've ran the test with the FWD server and:
> * first @CONNECT@ shows this in OpenEdge:
... - 06:11 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've ran the test with the FWD server and:
* first @CONNECT@ shows this in OpenEdge:...
11/04/2025
- 01:40 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, I need to try your example when connecting from OpenEdge to the FWD server. The ...
11/03/2025
- 05:23 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, I need to try your example when connecting from OpenEdge to the FWD server. The changes look good, I just nee...
10/31/2025
- 08:42 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- I don't have an issue with changing @fwd_create_pg_cluster.sh@. I'm saying we need other changes too, to deal with th...
10/30/2025
- 06:03 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There are some examples in old testcases @uast/web_services/wsdl_test*.p@ programs, but ... - 10:23 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > As Constantin noted, we also need to be able t... - 04:24 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > As Constantin noted, we also need to be able to configure this as part... - 08:58 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Greg Shah wrote:
> As Constantin noted, we also need to be able to configure this as part of the project json file, ... - 08:02 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- As Constantin noted, we also need to be able to configure this as part of the project json file, since it affects cfg...
10/29/2025
- 04:43 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Updated #10722-8... default is 100 connections
- 04:37 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- I am adding a @--max-connections VALUE@ option (defaults to 100) to the @fwd_create_pg_cluster.sh@ script. This scrip...
- 01:22 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- For MS SQL Server, the number of maximum connections can be obtained using:...
- 11:46 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> The container project's newer scripts that incorporate PG versions 14 to 17 strictly speakin... - 11:42 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- The container project's newer scripts that incorporate PG versions 14 to 17 strictly speaking do not allow you to con...
- 11:16 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> *Roger*: where do you configure max_connections in the docker postgresql image? What is... - 10:54 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- *Roger*: where do you configure max_connections in the docker postgresql image? What is the default value?
*Ovidi... - 05:52 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin - can you please review my changes to WebServiceImpl.java and LowLevelSocketImpl.ja...
Also available in: Atom