TRPL

04/11/2025

08:30 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

The idea here is that the language features match the parser structure, not the individual tokens. Greg Shah

08:29 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Octavian Adrian Gavril wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Also, we don't need to track @protected@ lexer rules since the... Greg Shah

08:10 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Greg Shah wrote:
> Also, we don't need to track @protected@ lexer rules since they don't actually generate tokens us... Octavian Adrian Gavril

07:57 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Also, we don't need to track @protected@ lexer rules since they don't actually generate tokens used by the parser. I... Greg Shah

07:55 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

> I assumed that if logging occurs within the @try@ block and no exception is thrown by @match()@ up to that point, w... Greg Shah

06:41 AM Feature #1745 (WIP): review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Greg Shah wrote:
> On the other hand, @CAST@ looks wrong (there should be around 2100) and @LT@ seems wrong.
I co... Octavian Adrian Gavril

04/10/2025

12:09 PM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

I've done some quick checking of the results. Most of the numbers look pretty reasonable, even the ones that are ver... Greg Shah

09:58 AM Bug #9835: The same rules files are loaded and compiled multiple times

Yes, you can use 1745a. Greg Shah

09:33 AM Bug #9835: The same rules files are loaded and compiled multiple times

I've started implementing a mechanism to prevent loading the same @.rules@ file multiple times. While analyzing @Conf... Octavian Adrian Gavril

02:21 AM Bug #9835 (WIP): The same rules files are loaded and compiled multiple times

Octavian Adrian Gavril

04/09/2025

09:52 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

The table in #1745-44 was incomplete due to an issue while attempting to reformat the data into multiple tables. Apol... Octavian Adrian Gavril

04/07/2025

09:05 AM Feature #1745 (Review): review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained ...

Greg Shah wrote:
> I think we will need a custom driver that loads everything (all rule set files) and forces all co... Octavian Adrian Gavril

04/03/2025

08:41 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

I think we will need a custom driver that loads everything (all rule set files) and forces all content to parse and a... Greg Shah

07:21 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

I'm starting a new approach similar to @Expression.main()@ to compile expression rules. Octavian Adrian Gavril

06:33 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

I tried different ways to compile expressions without any @ast@, but without success. I used @AstSymbolResolver.getRe... Octavian Adrian Gavril

04/02/2025

09:18 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

After some investigation, I believe the only way the TRPL expression can be compiled is by processing it together wit... Octavian Adrian Gavril

04/01/2025

08:11 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Greg Shah wrote:
> Please try to confirm all of your numbers using other matching techniques (even something like gr... Octavian Adrian Gavril

07:19 AM Feature #1745 (WIP): review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Octavian Adrian Gavril

05:56 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Please try to confirm all of your numbers using other matching techniques (even something like grep). Many of the nu... Greg Shah

04:51 AM Feature #1745 (Review): review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained ...

Instrumented @expression.g@, both rules and tokens, into *1745a/15796*. Now, the results look like this:
|_.Featur... Octavian Adrian Gavril

03/31/2025

09:25 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, what do you think about the numbers above? Also, what should I continue tracking with?
>... Octavian Adrian Gavril

09:24 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

> Greg, what do you think about the numbers above? Also, what should I continue tracking with?
Please instrument @... Greg Shah

04:32 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Octavian Adrian Gavril wrote:
> I reviewed @ConfigLoader.java@ along with [[p2j:Writing_TRPL_Rule-Sets]] and these a... Octavian Adrian Gavril

03:08 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

I've added the elements mentioned in [[p2j:Writing_TRPL_Expressions#Features|Features]] to be tracked. I've also incl... Octavian Adrian Gavril

03/26/2025

03:05 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Greg, as you suggested in the last call, I created a new task about that performance gap described in #1745-27. Octavian Adrian Gavril

03:00 AM Bug #9835: The same rules files are loaded and compiled multiple times

During a tags count in TRPL, it was found that many @.rules@ files are loaded and compiled multiple times. This sugge... Octavian Adrian Gavril

02:54 AM Bug #9835 (WIP): The same rules files are loaded and compiled multiple times

Octavian Adrian Gavril

03/24/2025

11:00 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

I've added some changes to avoid multiple uploads of the same @.rules@ file. The numbers seem accurate, so I hope I'v... Octavian Adrian Gavril

09:50 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

I added another class (@TRPLFeatureTracker@) to search for all @.xml@ files and process them with the @processTrees@ ... Octavian Adrian Gavril

03/20/2025

02:02 PM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

> I committed the initial implementation of TRPL feature tracking system
These are interesting results. Some feed... Greg Shah

01:49 PM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

> Updated the [[p2j:Writing_TRPL_Expressions#Features|Expression Features]] documentation. I added an introduction to... Greg Shah

11:00 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

I committed the initial implementation of TRPL feature tracking system into task branch *1745a/15792*. I added a clas... Octavian Adrian Gavril

07:46 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Please, let me know if improvements are needed. Octavian Adrian Gavril

07:44 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Updated the [[p2j:Writing_TRPL_Expressions#Features|Expression Features]] documentation. I added an introduction to t... Octavian Adrian Gavril

03/19/2025

01:21 PM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Greg Shah wrote:
> > Still looking for the *Automatic Null Checking* implementation to expand its documentation.
> ... Eric Faulhaber

01:04 PM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Octavian Adrian Gavril wrote:
> Eric, is *Automatic Null Checking* related to code sections similar to this?
>
> ... Eric Faulhaber

10:26 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Yes, that works. Greg Shah

10:16 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Is it OK if I start with the items mentioned in the table in [[p2j:Writing_TRPL_Rule-Sets#Pipeline-and-Ruleset-Profil... Octavian Adrian Gavril

08:27 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0

Question from Octavian:
> Should I configure ConfigLoader and Compiler to track each .rules file/.xml file/rule-se... Greg Shah

03/14/2025

05:44 AM Feature #9770: Change annotation key type from plain string to Enum

Ovidiu, I will be honest, I don't know. I just created a patch that prints the keys in a file, and that's it, I didn'... Radu Apetrii

03/13/2025

01:11 PM Feature #9770: Change annotation key type from plain string to Enum

Radu,
I had peeked at the list you compiled. I am puzzled by something: why are there customer-specific values saved... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

07:20 AM Feature #9770: Change annotation key type from plain string to Enum

Remove the customer-specific stuff (you can leave behind description of what was removed) and post it in #9721. Greg Shah

07:16 AM Feature #9770: Change annotation key type from plain string to Enum

Greg Shah wrote:
> We need to post that somewhere else, it has customer table names in it. Also, this is better don... Radu Apetrii

06:41 AM Feature #9770: Change annotation key type from plain string to Enum

We need to post that somewhere else, it has customer table names in it. Also, this is better done in a FWD sub-proje... Greg Shah

05:04 AM Feature #9770: Change annotation key type from plain string to Enum

Here's a list of all annotations that were identified in at least one customer application. They are already sorted i... Radu Apetrii