FWD » Core Development » Base Language

08/14/2015

02:52 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

My testing of this update (i.e., branch rev. 10922) has gone well. I'm comfortable with you merging these changes int... Eric Faulhaber

02:07 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Branch 2638 rev 10923 passed runtime testing.
Rebased branch 2638 from trunk rev 10921 (new branch rev 10924). Constantin Asofiei

08/13/2015

06:08 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Eric: conversion passed, all changes are OK and expected.
Compilation fails because of hand-written java functions... Constantin Asofiei

04:59 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

I've added a small fix to rev 10922 - Added @BlockManager.markPendingDynCall@ to @ControlFlowOps.initializeExternalPr... Constantin Asofiei

04:53 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Code review 2638a/10921:
Changes look good. I'll report results of use with server after overnight conversion and ... Eric Faulhaber

04:50 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> To be more specific:
> - if there is only generated code, @resolveClosestMethod@ will n... Eric Faulhaber

04:48 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > I've committed to rev 10921 the fix - it was pretty simple in... Constantin Asofiei

04:42 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've committed to rev 10921 the fix - it was pretty simple in the end, just bypass @Proc... Eric Faulhaber

04:37 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Created task branch 2638a.
I've committed to rev 10921 the fix - it was pretty simple in the end, just bypass @Pro... Constantin Asofiei

04:28 PM Bug #2638: improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Greg,
On another thought, this is need only for user-defined function calls; so adding new parameters to the exi... Constantin Asofiei

04:27 PM Bug #2638 (Closed): improve performance of user-def function calls converted to java method calls

Constantin Asofiei

12:18 PM Bug #2637: batch client needs to detect if the client process has output redirected and change er...

I don't think the @OutputManager.activateBatch(false);@ calls throughout @ThinClient@ and @Window@ are properly balan... Constantin Asofiei

11:06 AM Bug #2637: batch client needs to detect if the client process has output redirected and change er...

When a _progres executible launches, it can detect if its standard output is redirected. In batch mode, this changes... Greg Shah

11:04 AM Bug #2637 (New): batch client needs to detect if the client process has output redirected and cha...

Greg Shah

08/06/2015

11:47 PM Bug #2592 (Closed): improve support for implicit type conversions

Eric Faulhaber

07/28/2015

08:03 AM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

The 2592a/10900 was merged to trunk as revision 10901 and the notification email was sent to team. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

07/24/2015

12:27 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

The 2592a/10900 passed the regression testing. The harness results were saved as /opt/secure/clients/timco/majic_test... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

07/23/2015

06:04 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Code review 2592a/10900.
The changes look good. Please regression test and merge into trunk as soon as possible. Eric Faulhaber

04:17 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

I did a quick test and the warning is gone with the small change. I committed the update on 2592 as revno 10900. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:21 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Greg,
I will add the requested notes in javadocs.
Eric,
2592a it is, I mistyped.
Thanks. I am replacing the @H... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:10 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The BDT has the @equals()@ method overridden so two different java objects (an @integer@ an... Eric Faulhaber

03:08 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

> I used a Map having BaseDataType as keys. This is a very bad option! We should never use BDT for keying/fast looku... Greg Shah

02:41 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Eric,
I found out why the server log is filled with @Two AbstractOutputParameterAssigner configured with same wrap... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

07/21/2015

03:26 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

The 2582 branch advanced to revno 10916 after it was rebased with trunk revno 10897. There were no conflicts.
Then i... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:26 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Please go ahead and rebase. If there are no conflicts as expected, go ahead and merge into the trunk. Eric Faulhaber

01:43 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Code review 2592/10915:
>
> The items from the previous code review appear to have been a... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:10 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Code review 2592/10915:
The items from the previous code review appear to have been addressed.
Ovidiu, what is ... Eric Faulhaber

07/20/2015

10:08 AM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

> Using the BaseDataType could be a solution, but we need to store somewhere the compatibility matrix. I guess this w... Greg Shah

07/17/2015

04:00 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, about revision 10912:
> * SourceNameMapper.getParameter:941 - you should check ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:22 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Greg Shah wrote:
> Aren't all implicit cases using the BaseDataType constructor?
At this point, no. The @ControlF... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:07 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Aren't all implicit cases using the BaseDataType constructor? Greg Shah

01:57 PM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

I was going further and investigating some other failed tests from #1868. I noticed that in P2J some query was failin... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

06:05 AM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Ovidiu, about revision 10912:
* SourceNameMapper.getParameter:941 - you should check for @param >= ie.getParameterLi... Constantin Asofiei

05:36 AM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

Paul Eames wrote:
> I see this is marked as blocking #1868.
>
> Can you give me a couple of examples of where we ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

05:06 AM Bug #2592: improve support for implicit type conversions

I see this is marked as blocking #1868.
Can you give me a couple of examples of where we are relying on this impli... Paul E