Activity
From 04/29/2019 to 05/28/2019
05/28/2019
- 04:51 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Branch 3810b rebased to the trunk rev. 11311.
> Committed revision 11327
Your rebase is w... - 04:11 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Finished implementation and testing runtime support for all new attributes and methods of the @CLIENT-PRINCIPAL@ exce...
- 09:38 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Branch 3810b rebased to the trunk rev. 11311.
Committed revision 11327
05/27/2019
- 05:28 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added runtime support for the @CLIENT-PRINCIPAL@ new attributes. SEAL() method updated to use these attributes.
Br... - 12:52 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- In multiple runs of the regression testing, the following tests consistently fail:...
- 01:33 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- 3751a was merged to trunk rev 11311 and was archived. This commit includes mostly changes related to #3751 and other...
- 08:48 AM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg, a quick question: shouldn't the extent property have a no-arg getter? Currently w...
05/24/2019
- 05:20 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg, a quick question: shouldn't the extent property have a no-arg getter? Currently we emit only an indexed getter.
- 02:13 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Another OO-related issue: OO properties when they act as OUTPUT arguments for 4GL statements, like @IMPORT@ or @RUN P...
- 04:48 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > What is the new name? @clientPrincipal.p@? Rename it to i.e.... - 04:40 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What is the new name? @clientPrincipal.p@? Rename it to i.e. @clientp.p@ and make sure t... - 04:33 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Is your program named @client_... - 04:27 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Is your program named @client_principal.p@? If so, please r... - 04:21 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Is your program named @client_principal.p@? If so, please rename the program to somethi... - 04:13 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> It seems that we have a problem with the conversion of the @CREATE CLIENT-PRINCIPAL@ state... - 04:12 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- It seems that we have a problem with the conversion of the @CREATE CLIENT-PRINCIPAL@ statement. The following snippe...
- 02:35 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Marian, thank you for the notes.
I believe that at the external interface for RAW and MEMPTR, we do implement as... - 06:59 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I probably don't know the details here but in 4GL there is a difference between memptr and raw v... - 05:03 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > No, I mean that it is intentional that we are ignoring the @len@ in t... - 09:31 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- > Are 4GL system error messages translated, too? (we have been assuming YES, that CURRENT-LANGUAGE will select differ...
05/23/2019
- 03:37 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> No, I mean that it is intentional that we are ignoring the @len@ in the @memptr.writeByteRange()@... - 03:07 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > The len parameter was added because of the ArrayIndexBoundException was thrown in some cases which runs OK with 4GL...
- 02:39 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3810b Revision 11318
>
> 1. In @AuditPolicyManager@, @SecurityOps@, @S... - 01:55 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- I've just noticed that albeit 4GL validation of the value of the @SECURITY-POLICY:SYMMETRIC-ENCRYPTION-ALGORITHM@ is ...
- 11:47 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Code Review Task Branch 3810b Revision 11318
1. In @AuditPolicyManager@, @SecurityOps@, @SecurityPolicyManager@, @... - 11:19 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- TODO: We need to check the FWD runtime for references like this: @a_string.getBytes(Charset.forName("ISO-8859-1"))@ (...
05/22/2019
- 01:21 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- As we finished with cryptography may be it makes sense to merge 3810b and do the rest in the 3810c?
- 01:04 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Well done!
- 12:47 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Well, the @AUDIT-POLICY:ENCRYPT-AUDIT-MAC-KEY@ algorithm is indeed *very* simple.
1. Using a long string of identica... - 10:58 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > The P2J tail is different from one generated by 4GL. This affects 24- and 32-bytes keys with MD... - 10:30 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > The P2J tail is different from one generated by 4GL. This affects 24- and 32-bytes keys with MD5 and SHA-1. I do no...
- 10:26 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > > I've added the tail generation for the GENERATE-PBE-KEY. The tail is generated using the first 8 bytes of the PBK...
- 10:14 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > I've added the tail generation for the GENERATE-PBE-KEY. The tail is generated using the first 8 bytes of the PBKDF...
05/21/2019
- 01:27 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Well, it seems that @ENCRYPT-AUDIT-MAC-KEY@ is something *very* simple. A quote from https://community.progress.com/c...
- 11:30 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Do we need to provide binary compatibility for the @AUDIT-POLICY:ENCRYPT-AUDIT-MAC-KEY@ (see note #96)? Or it is suff...
- 08:41 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- I've added the tail generation for the @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@. The tail is generated using the first 8 bytes of the PBKDF...
- 07:40 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> At this point we are trying to finish this work permanently instead of deferring it until later. ... - 07:33 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > Maybe it makes sense to discuss it with our customers?
At this point we are trying to finish this work permanent... - 07:31 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- So far I cannot understand what @AUDIT-POLICY:ENCRYPT-AUDIT-MAC-KEY@ actually does. What I see is that it returns a h...
- 05:38 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- As I see on the Internet people do discuss the problem of decrypting data encrypted by 4GL using other programming la...
- 05:09 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> On the one hand, I can see the value in generating a more cryptographically correct key instead o... - 04:58 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > Does it makes sense to try supporting binary compatibility for such "corner cases"?
On the one hand, I can see t... - 01:56 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> The situation with @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@ looks a little bit strange. Formally it "Generates a ...
05/20/2019
- 06:09 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The situation with @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@ looks a little bit strange. Formally it "Generates a password-based encryption ...
- 04:17 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added runtime support for @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@ and @GENERATE-PBE-SALT@. Branch 3810b rev.113361.
Added @uast/securit... - 03:42 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- If we want to generate a 24-byte key using MD5 the 4GL @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@ generated 24 bytes where the first 16 bytes...
- 02:52 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Well, I will run these tests but at this moment they add nothing to my test. In addition, my test generates a detaile...
- 02:37 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm not referencing the @testcases/uast/security/@. This is a different "Testcases Project":/pro... - 02:21 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Igor: Have you tried running the testcases mentioned in #3810-42? Th... - 02:18 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- I've implemented runtime support for @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@. In most cases, the results of running converted test are bin...
- 02:10 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Igor: Have you tried running the testcases mentioned in #3810-42? This is different from the @te... - 01:55 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor: Have you tried running the testcases mentioned in #3810-42? This is different from the @testcases/uast/@ direc...
- 01:47 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The 4GL code fragment...
- 11:03 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Contrary to what I wrote in note #75, the length of the key generated by @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@ depends on the value of t...
- 08:06 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Marian Edu wrote:
> It turns out the handling of IV is implemented based on the cipher key length, if provided IV ra... - 08:00 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please test a case where the encrypt and decrypt are done in separate programs. These separate p... - 07:31 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Maybe it is the right time to add a full implementation of @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@/@GENERATE-PBE... - 07:28 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> It appears that 4GL ignores the "length" of @RAW@ when uses it as IV and, instead of paddin... - 07:17 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > It appears that 4GL ignores the "length" of @RAW@ when uses it as IV and, instead of padding just uses what it find...
- 05:54 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@ always generates 16 bytes using first 8 bytes of salt (if provided), presumably padding salt with ...
- 04:24 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Maybe it is the right time to add a full implementation of @GENERATE-PBE-KEY@/@GENERATE-PBE-SALT@/@MESSAGE-DIGEST@ as...
- 02:36 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Rebased 3751a from trunk rev 11310 - new rev 11328.
- 02:22 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * dataset dereference, h-ds::bufname (Ovidiu, this will be part of #3908).
OK, I will... - 02:16 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- 3751a rev 11326 contains my latest changes. The @p2j/oo@ classes contains many Java sources for 4GL converted skelet...
05/19/2019
- 05:13 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Branch 3810b updated. Rev. 11315. The @uast/security/crypto.p@ test updated as well, revision 1854.
- 04:31 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- It appears that 4GL ignores the "length" of @RAW@ when uses it as IV and, instead of padding just uses what it finds ...
05/18/2019
- 03:23 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Indeed, if the cipher requires IV but it is not provided, 4GL uses "all zeroes" IV. Thanks again to Constantin for a ...
- 03:11 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> In 4GL, encrypt something without setting the IV and try decrypting it with a fully-zero... - 03:04 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've found another issue. JCR doesn't support AES w/o IV. On encryption, it generates rando... - 03:02 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- I've found another issue. JCR doesn't support AES w/o IV. On encryption, it generates random IV if not provided, and ...
05/17/2019
- 04:56 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The @SECURITY-POLICY:SYMMETRIC-ENCRYPTION-IV@ is a readable attribute. What is the value when th... - 04:52 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> A simple test shows that if the IV length for the encrypt and decrypt differs, 4GL dec... - 04:50 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Since the encryption in the short IV case can still be decrypted, we can assume that the padding is not random.
Th... - 04:45 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> This assumption is wrong - we use padding with zeroes and get a different result. In my tes... - 04:42 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> My assumption is that they would padded it with zeroes. Please test this in FWD and 4GL... - 04:38 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- It is possible to try to figure what exactly 4GL does with short IVs using "brute force attack". If the algorithm is ...
- 04:36 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > OK, so the algorithm requires 16 bytes IV. How does 4GL beh... - 04:32 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, so the algorithm requires 16 bytes IV. How does 4GL behave if you give a shorter IV... - 04:29 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > You mean the IV's length is set to i.e 8 instead of 16, or t... - 04:29 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The fixes committed to the branch 3810b rev. 11313.
- 04:28 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> You mean the IV's length is set to i.e 8 instead of 16, or that you set the length to 16... - 04:19 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> The only difference is the result of the encryption when the provided IV is shorter than re... - 04:18 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The converted test passed completely. The only difference is the result of the encryption when the provided IV is sho...
- 03:36 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Both problems mentioned in note #53 were the result of appending zero when converting @Text@ to @raw@ in the Security...
- 02:54 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- After fixing @BinaryData.setString()@ and @raw.writeByteRange@ the test is running.
I see some discrepancies at the ... - 02:05 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Go ahead as proposed. A @len == -1@ can mean copy to the end of the data.
OK, thank you. - 02:02 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Go ahead as proposed. A @len == -1@ can mean copy to the end of the data.
- 01:46 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- In addition. The additional @len@ parameter can be just ignored in @blob@ and @memptr@ which also implement @writeByt...
- 01:34 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- When running converted @security/crypto.p@ (attached) I've got @ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException@ in the converted frag...
- 09:49 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added quotes from the mail conversation with Marian:
On 5/17/19 8:31 AM, Marian Edu wrote:
> Hi Igor,
> you're r... - 03:38 PM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I'm implementing @SourceLob@ and @TargetLob@ c'tors which accept @Object@ to handle the POLY... - 03:04 PM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- I'm implementing @SourceLob@ and @TargetLob@ c'tors which accept @Object@ to handle the POLY case.
- 10:40 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- >> But your point is well taken that an extent can be passed at runtime, so do we need the signature to be Object for...
- 10:38 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Sorry, @b@ is a memptr, not a field.
Please post the full test case. - 10:22 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Well, a POLY can always be an extent value (Java array)... that is another whole can of warms t... - 10:18 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- > Well, a POLY can always be an extent value (Java array)... that is another whole can of warms to worry about.
It... - 09:59 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> All @POLY@ cases will be BDT, right? There is no other possibility for a field (@::@ or @BUFFER-... - 09:55 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > @b@ is @blob@ and @tt1.f1@ is char.
>
> So @b@ is a field?... - 09:54 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- All @POLY@ cases will be BDT, right? There is no other possibility for a field (@::@ or @BUFFER-FIELD:BUFFER-VALUE()...
- 09:52 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> @b@ is @blob@ and @tt1.f1@ is char.
So @b@ is a field? How is it defined? - 09:46 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I did not actually add the casting in my recent work; this was there already with the old AP... - 09:41 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > The case is @copy-lob b to h:buffer-field(tt1.f1):buffer-valu... - 09:41 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- I did not actually add the casting in my recent work; this was there already with the old API. What is the preferred ...
- 09:39 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The case is @copy-lob b to h:buffer-field(tt1.f1):buffer-value.@
What are the data ty... - 09:38 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- > And if is something other than LargeObject, runtime will fail badly.
True. It is my understanding that only CL... - 09:34 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- The case is @copy-lob b to h:buffer-field(tt1.f1):buffer-value.@
BTW, casting to LargeObject is not safe in the lo... - 09:32 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- What is the test case? I tested with several forms of POLY. For example:...
- 07:37 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- There is a case where the source or target in a COPY-LOB is POLY - in this case, we have a SourceLob(BaseDataType) at...
- 01:52 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> @USING path.to.empty.folder.*@ is valid in 4GL - but Java compiler complains that the pa... - 01:48 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- @USING path.to.empty.folder.*@ is valid in 4GL - but Java compiler complains that the package is empty, as there are ...
05/16/2019
- 04:15 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg, in the @oo.json@ classes, do you have any other changes? Because some of them look... - 01:49 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg, in the @oo.json@ classes, do you have any other changes? Because some of them look that aren't implemented at a...
- 10:37 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > You force @raw-iv1@ to read @iv-len@ bytes but you have only the @"iv"@ text - and PUT-STRING will read past the @"...
- 10:31 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- OK, the random bytes are originated by this:...
- 10:25 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor, you have a flow in your test:...
- 10:13 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > This sounds as if the current encryption/decryption just uses the current value of @SECURITY-POLICY:SYMMETRIC-ENCRY...
- 10:09 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- > There is a strange behavior regarding IV. If the SECURITY-POLICY:SYMMETRIC-ENCRYPTION-IV attribute value was change...
- 09:56 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Some 4GL testcases are being written to explore and demonstrate the features in this task. The testcases can be foun...
- 08:40 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- After thorough testing I've found the following:
1. In an OFB and CFB modes, and WITH RC4 ABL doesn't use padding, a... - 09:21 AM Feature #3812: additions to SESSION system-handle
- Status update for 4GL testcases development:
> Subject: Feature #3812 - additions to SESSION system-handle
> Date...
05/15/2019
- 06:15 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- And something else to add: @@Override@ annotations are emitted for any method which has the @override@ option - this ...
- 06:13 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I suspect the solution is something like this:
>
> 1. We need to process the builtin class ske... - 09:44 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- > One other issue related to method overloading and overload suffix: when deriving from a builtin class (or even when...
- 04:18 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added full runtime support for @ENCRYPT@/@DECRYPT@ based on @SECURITY-POLICY@.
Branch 3810b rev.11311.
05/14/2019
- 07:00 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The previous way of keeping class definition dictionaries for each propath is completely... - 06:56 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- The previous way of keeping class definition dictionaries for each propath is completely wrong, as it allows a @Class...
- 04:26 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We have noting so far, so we will need it implemented here. As far as in-memory that is OK, but ... - 04:19 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Another question.
> Do we already have an implementation (stub) for the "ABL session domai... - 04:17 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that now it is time to provide "real" implementations of the @ENC... - 04:17 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Another question.
Do we already have an implementation (stub) for the "ABL session domain registry" or it should be ... - 04:11 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Do I understand correctly that now it is time to provide "real" implementations of the @ENCRYPT@ and @DECRYPT@ functi...
- 03:31 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added runtime support for @SECURITY-POLICY@ attributes.
Committed to the branch 3810b rev. 11310.
Synopsys:
If t...
05/13/2019
- 03:29 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- One other issue related to method overloading and overload suffix: when deriving from a builtin class (or even when y...
- 09:23 AM Feature #3854: update appserver support with PASOE features
- > From Marian:
>
> There is a bit of difference in how session managed/unmanaged modes works for the application se...
05/11/2019
- 01:27 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- 3751a was rebased from trunk rev 11308 - new rev 11312
- 07:15 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Created task branch 3810b from trunk rev.11308
- 07:13 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The branch 3810a was merged into the trunk rev. 11308 and archived.
- 07:01 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Rebased to the trunk rev. 11307. The new revision is 11318
- 06:39 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Don'r forget to rebase.
- 06:38 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Hi Constantin. I will merge 3810a now.
- 06:21 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- I've ran these and I think all are false-negatives - as they pass, except some with DB or other state dependencies.
...
05/10/2019
- 05:38 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Try running some of these tests individually; there is a @run_single.sh@ and @majic_single.xml@ in @majic_baseline/@ ...
- 10:49 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The results of regression testing (2 runs)"
1. All @gso_ctrlc_tests@ passed in both runs.
2. All @gso_ctrlc_3way_te... - 05:09 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Branch @3753a@ was merged to trunk as revno @11307@ then it was archived.
- 05:00 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You can merge to trunk.
OK. Starting the merge process. - 04:58 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- You can merge to trunk.
- 04:43 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Testing completed. No regression has been found. The results: @3753a_11332_32748a0_20190510_evl.zip@.
So far the b... - 02:17 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- One main round of the runtime testing passed, started another one to exclude false failing tests. The @CTRL-C@ part i...
- 08:11 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Task branch @3753a@ has been updated for review to revisions @11332@.
Fixed the regression in @character.java@ and... - 03:22 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- I'm OK with the change, except that the manipulation of the type and text needs to use @saveAndReplaceTypeAndText()@ ...
- 02:51 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> This is a valid class definition: @class "Imo.Windows.Support.LookupSupport"@. The clas... - 02:32 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- This is a valid class definition: @class "Imo.Windows.Support.LookupSupport"@. The class name will be considered wit...
05/09/2019
- 07:35 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Conversion passed, source are identical except one added new call to @setNoMap()@ which is OK considering @NO-MAP@ op...
- 04:56 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- > If the conversion will be OK can we include the changes for @4010@ and @4066@ into @3753a@ branch to speed up the f...
- 03:25 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg,
The conversion testing is in progress.
If the conversion will be OK can we include the changes for @4010@... - 12:51 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- I'm OK with changes. Minor fixing.
Task branch @3753a@ has been updated for review to revisions @11331@.
This i... - 09:08 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Revision 11330 fixes a bug in my management of the caching flag.
- 06:47 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Code Review Task Branch 3753a Revision 11328
The changes are a good step.
I have reworked the code to make @S... - 05:45 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- There is an issue which has been in the back of my head and bugging me for a while: we solve method name collisions (...
- 01:07 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Code Review Task Branch 3751a Revision 11308
I'm good with the changes. There is quite a bit there!
The @Class... - 03:31 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Regression testing started.
- 03:21 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Everything looks good. Please run ChUI regression testing (both conversion and runtime).
- 02:55 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- means that the converted code won't compile because there are no stubs.
Fixed
> 2. @AuditControlManager@ and @Aud... - 02:20 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Ovidiu: Please apply your patch from #4073 to 3810a.
Committed as revision 11316 in branch 3810a.
- 01:51 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- OK.
Ovidiu: Please apply your patch from #4073 to 3810a.
Igor: After your code review resolutions (and Ovidiu... - 01:40 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Also, considering #4073 issue: as HandleCommon was extended with new interfaces, the run... - 01:39 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Once the code review items are resolved, I think it makes sense to merge this branch into 3751a (... - 01:23 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Once the code review items are resolved, I think it makes sense to merge this branch into 3751a (and then dead-archiv...
- 01:21 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Code Review Task Branch 3810a Revision 11314
Good update.
1. The gaps marking for the new items should have run...
05/08/2019
- 05:57 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Created task branch 3751a from trunk rev 11306.
Rev 11307 contains a batch of OO and some misc fixes. Any file wit... - 05:45 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- > Greg, is there a reason why @fixups/stream_references.rules@ wouldn't be ran by @annotations_prep.rules@? The code ...
- 05:18 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg, is there a reason why @fixups/stream_references.rules@ wouldn't be ran by @annotations_prep.rules@? The code I ...
- 04:17 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Your approach makes sense, though the "feature" does not make any sense. It is like an implicit ... - 04:12 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Your approach makes sense, though the "feature" does not make any sense. It is like an implicit static version of a ...
- 04:09 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Do you have an example to help me understand what you mean?
This class:... - 04:02 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- > We need to 'hard-link' it to the proper method definition... and this can only be done by analysing the full table ...
- 03:59 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- > @DEF STREAM rpt.@ in a 4GL class can be used from both static and instance methods - and the static usage will have...
- 03:54 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > So, as TABLE parameters allow collisions, and target resolution is done via the temp-table stru... - 03:51 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- > So, as TABLE parameters allow collisions, and target resolution is done via the temp-table structure, in case of co...
- 05:20 AM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- @DEF STREAM rpt.@ in a 4GL class can be used from both static and instance methods - and the static usage will have a...
05/07/2019
- 12:06 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added conversion support for:...
- 08:31 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Just to be clear on this one, what is already tested and what do we need to test further on it? ...
05/06/2019
- 06:45 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Did you mean to implement helper methods in Stream class, correct?
>
> Yes.
Done. Task br... - 05:54 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- > Did you mean to implement helper methods in Stream class, correct?
Yes. - 05:49 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I prefer to go with the workers as I documented them. The primary reason is that the logic of wh... - 05:40 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- I prefer to go with the workers as I documented them. The primary reason is that the logic of whether or not we are ...
- 05:19 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> The first call to either one of @setConvertSource()@ or @setConvertTarget()@ will always fin... - 04:47 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > 11. In @Stream.setConvertSource(String)@, why is @convert@ set @true@... - 04:11 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added conversion support for...
- 01:39 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added conversion support for...
- 01:57 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Just to be clear on this one, what is already tested and what do we need to test further on it? Just the CLOB/BLOB (b...
05/05/2019
- 12:34 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > We need to know how code page conversion approach if we change CPINTERNAL or CPSTREAM several t... - 09:09 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- > We need to know how code page conversion approach if we change CPINTERNAL or CPSTREAM several time between I/O oper...
05/04/2019
- 10:44 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- 1. Fixed @handle@
2. Added/updated gaps data
3. -
4. Added file header and javadoc to @CommonSecurityPolicy@ and ... - 10:22 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Task branch @3753a@ has been updated for review to revisions @11327@.
Completed code review notes resolution. To c... - 08:26 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Task branch @3753a@ has been updated for review to revisions @11326@.
The notes resolved except point @1@(not yet ...
05/03/2019
- 04:31 PM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Code Review Task Branch 3810a Revision 11309
The first pass is good. Some items:
1. In @handle.java@, you chan... - 10:48 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Added conversion support for...
- 10:43 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Thank you, Constantin! It works.
- 10:32 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> No, don't add 28 methods - just make sure the conversion rules always wrap a string lite... - 10:30 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- No, don't add 28 methods - just make sure the conversion rules always wrap a string literal into a @new character(lit...
- 10:26 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Do we still add multiple signatures for methods with character argument(s) or there is another solution? For example ...
- 04:09 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- So, as TABLE parameters allow collisions, and target resolution is done via the temp-table structure, in case of coll...
- 01:31 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I would prefer if the converted name would match the extent value. So @m1(input x as int extent ... - 10:36 AM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- > a @m1(input x extent)@ and @m1(input x extent 5)@ will have as Java methods @m1_1(int[] x)@ and @m1_2(int[] x)@
... - 10:01 AM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Some notes related to #3751-493, solving the collisions in Java signatures. This is solved by ensuring that a 4GL me...
- 03:32 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 12. @Stream@ is used on both the server and the client. I think the direct usage of @Environment... - 03:19 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 13. The @Stream.convert@ member is modified multiple times, during construction, possibly when th... - 02:21 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 11. In @Stream.setConvertSource(String)@, why is @convert@ set @true@ when @targetCp == null@? I... - 11:28 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- > I think it is not the case. I thought about this possibility and the code:
Sorry, I mis-read the code.
> The ... - 08:59 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- The original 4GL ordering for @GET-CODEPAGES()@:
!code_pages_order.jpg! - 08:37 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 5. In @I18nOps.getCodePages()@, the returned string will always end in a @,@. Is that how the 4G... - 01:16 PM Feature #3854: update appserver support with PASOE features
- From Marian:
> Other than that the rest of the day was for setting up one PASOE instance for each and start deploy...
05/02/2019
- 04:17 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Code Review 3753a Revision 11325
This is a really good update. Some feedback:
1. The change in @DirectoryServe... - 10:19 AM Feature #4064: large-raw data type
- In subclassing from @MEMPTR@, we might want to use a name like @SERVER-MEMPTR@. Or we can add an @ON-SERVER@ option ...
- 10:15 AM Feature #4064: large-raw data type
- > Do you expect for the 4GL programs to be re-written using the large-raw data-type? Because I would use hints at con...
- 09:43 AM Feature #4064: large-raw data type
- Do you expect for the 4GL programs to be re-written using the @large-raw@ data-type? Because I would use hints at co...
- 09:45 AM Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: To what extent do we need to look at additional optimizations in @ControlFlowOps@ and...
05/01/2019
- 07:59 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- +4GL tests additional wishes+
It will be good to also have the 4GL testcases that leverage the following Progress ... - 06:56 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- +4GL tests requirement+
More test related area to investigate:
* @LC()@/@CAPS()@ functions for different code pag... - 05:34 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- > As far as I understand the only work left for now in this task is to create the list of the specifications for 4GL ...
- 05:01 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Task branch @3753a@ has been updated for review to revisions @11325@.
This is the improvement for mapping Java cod... - 04:29 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- +4GL tests requirement+
Another point of the interest for @4GL@ testing is the behavior of the @CHR()@ function in... - 01:41 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- +4GL tests requirement+
The following option's dependency need to be tested in 4GL environment from @CURRENT-LANGU... - 11:39 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- We are arranging for someone to write 4GL testcases to do a deep/comprehensive look at the I18N features.
> What s... - 11:04 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Continue working with next part of the task - translation manager replacement.
>
> Actually,... - 10:08 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- > Continue working with next part of the task - translation manager replacement.
Actually, we are going to defer t... - 10:48 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Task branch @3753a@ has been updated for review to revisions @11324@.
The update fixes the bug in @Stream@ while c... - 04:49 PM Feature #4065: server-side processing of client platform dependencies
- Proper processing of "Client Platform Dependencies":/projects/p2j/wiki/Client_Platform_Delegate requires these featur...
- 04:38 PM Feature #4065 (Closed): server-side processing of client platform dependencies
- 04:37 PM Feature #4064: large-raw data type
- In the 4GL, the @RAW@ type stores binary data up to 31000 bytes in size. For larger binary data, a @MEMPTR@ must be ...
- 04:29 PM Feature #4064 (New): large-raw data type
- 01:29 PM Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- From Eric in #3992-163:
> @SourceNameMapper.removePkg()@ is called hundreds of thousands of times in some use case... - 01:27 PM Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- From Eric (see #3992-162):
> ProcedureManager.hasReferent is showing as a minor bottleneck in some use cases, due ... - 01:20 PM Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- From Eric (see #3992-159):
> We could save a little bit of time by streamlining HandleOps.getLegacyAnnotation. Thi... - 01:02 PM Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- Constantin: To what extent do we need to look at additional optimizations in @ControlFlowOps@ and @ProcedureManager@?...
- 01:00 PM Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- @ErrorManager@ should be moved to a @TransactionHelper@ design. For example, @ErrorManager.isPendingError()@ is very...
- 01:11 PM Support #4061: base language performance work
- This is a gathering place (master index) of proposed performance work for the base language:
* #4032 block/transac... - 01:04 PM Support #4061 (New): base language performance work
- 06:32 AM Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin.
Sorry, I forgot to set watch for this task and overlooked your question.
I will try to implement conver...
04/30/2019
- 09:19 PM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Task branch @3753a@ has been updated for review to revisions @11322@, @11323@.
The update adds session context are...
04/29/2019
- 08:43 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Task branch @3753a@ has been rebased with trunk @11306@, new revision is @11321@.
Also available in: Atom