Activity
From 03/04/2021 to 04/02/2021
04/02/2021
- 08:41 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > openedge.web.webhandler
> openedge.web.webresponsewriter
What is needed to finish these? These have highest pr... - 08:18 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > There are a few things left on hold in .net package - mostly related to 'WEB-CONTEXT' system ha... - 08:13 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > There are a few things left on hold in .net package - mostly related to 'WEB-CONTEXT' system handle that is used fo...
04/01/2021
- 03:24 PM Feature #4396 (Closed): add LONGCHAR support to X-DOCUMENT:LOAD()
- 02:34 PM Feature #4396: add LONGCHAR support to X-DOCUMENT:LOAD()
- Sorry, clearing the assignee was not my intention.
- 02:33 PM Feature #4396 (WIP): add LONGCHAR support to X-DOCUMENT:LOAD()
- Yes, it is completed and can be closed.
- 09:14 AM Feature #4396: add LONGCHAR support to X-DOCUMENT:LOAD()
- Is this task complete as of 3821c rev 12222?
- 03:24 PM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- I've pushed 3821c rev 12240 to xfer.goldencode.com.
Marian: Let's go ahead with the #4384 merge so that you are on... - 02:30 PM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Done. Committed as revision 12237.
- 01:40 PM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- The changes are not in your branch yet.
Ovidiu: Please make the additional change for the default values and the... - 12:42 PM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Yes, the requested data is available in @TempTableSchema.Column@ starting from rev 12222. S... - 11:28 AM Bug #5202 (Test): Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- 10:39 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Yes, the requested data is available in @TempTableSchema.Column@ starting from rev 12222. Short description of the me...
- 09:14 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Is this task complete as of 3821c rev 12222?
- 03:18 PM Feature #4768 (WIP): finish copy-lob support
- Yes. It passed my testcases.
Then I used the xfer testcases for validation. Initially there were a lot of incorrec... - 09:14 AM Feature #4768: finish copy-lob support
- Is this task complete as of 3821c rev 12222?
- 11:29 AM Bug #5203 (Test): Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- 11:22 AM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this task complete as of 3821c rev 12222?
Yes. Now all temporary buffers register to their pa... - 09:14 AM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Is this task complete as of 3821c rev 12222?
03/23/2021
- 09:18 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > merged 4384i patch to 3821c rev 12172.
> >
> > Created branch ... - 09:05 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> merged 4384i patch to 3821c rev 12172.
>
> Created branch 4384j from 3821c rev 12172.... - 08:02 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- merged 4384i patch to 3821c rev 12172.
Created branch 4384j from 3821c rev 12172. - 07:46 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I've just pushed 3821c revision 12170 to xfer.
>
> Please pull it down and rebase 4384i from t... - 07:09 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've just pushed 3821c revision 12170 to xfer.
Please pull it down and rebase 4384i from that revision. Then post... - 06:57 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is 4384i in a good state for the changes to be merged back into 3821c? I know we have fixes in 3... - 06:51 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Is 4384i in a good state for the changes to be merged back into 3821c? I know we have fixes in 3821c that you may wa...
- 06:17 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- The patches from #4824-19 and #4824-12 are in 3821c rev 12170.
- 02:34 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, see the attached patch for the #4824-17 issue. Now the test passes.
OK, applie... - 02:27 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> BTW, please revert your changes made related to #4824-17.
You probably mean removing ... - 02:25 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, see the attached patch for the #4824-17 issue. Now the test passes.
>
I can't...
03/22/2021
- 06:22 PM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- BTW, please revert your changes made related to #4824-17.
- 06:11 PM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Marian, see the attached patch for the #4824-17 issue. Now the test passes.
I've also fixed some enum issues. - 02:27 PM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Marian Edu wrote:
> A test is in @oo/openedge/net/server_connection/client_socket_connection_parameters/test_propert... - 08:24 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, the patch fixes the example you posted, with @sslCiphers@, and I've checked othe... - 08:16 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, the patch fixes the example you posted, with @sslCiphers@, and I've checked othe... - 12:32 PM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Hi Ovidiu, just checking if this is something you will be handling or expect us to do it? :)
We... - 10:12 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Nice catch! Indeed, the @StaticTempTable@ does not initialize correctly those attributes. T... - 09:36 AM Feature #4761: I18N phase 3
- > The problem here is that FWD always keep the character/Strings internally in Java native UTF-16 (as a char array). ...
- 08:59 AM Feature #4761: I18N phase 3
- Although the CP conversion seems to work in FWD, it is actually incorrect. The appearance of being fine is because on...
- 08:13 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I don't normally see all this noise in the log at startup. Can you post your @directory.xml@...
03/19/2021
- 12:23 PM Support #5200: Database access issue
- I don't normally see all this noise in the log at startup. Can you post your @directory.xml@, please?
Is the size ... - 03:13 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is it possible that the working directory for the server has changed? If so, then the database f... - 07:29 AM Feature #5009 (Closed): add OS-USERID function as 4GL extension
- 05:16 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, the patch fixes the example you posted, with @sslCiphers@, and I've checked othe... - 03:47 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Marian, the patch fixes the example you posted, with @sslCiphers@, and I've checked other cases and it works. Maybe ...
- 03:31 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, please use the attached patch. I still need to reconvert some apps before decid...
03/18/2021
- 04:22 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Sorry for that but the dynamic proxy is the only way to accommodate the double interface ... - 04:02 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Ovidiu, for temp-table I can add the 'release' for default buffer buffer in @JsonExport@ but sin... - 09:15 AM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Ovidiu, for temp-table I can add the 'release' for default buffer buffer in @JsonExport@ but since this behavior is p...
- 03:03 PM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Nice catch! Indeed, the @StaticTempTable@ does not initialize correctly those attributes. They need to be added. Also...
- 03:25 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- OK, actually it does look like the temptable is implementing both @NamedSerializable@ and @XmlNode@ so the info shoul...
- 01:12 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian: I've updated this table (last changes were from #4384-413), but the only change seems to be related to @opene...
- 11:27 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Is it possible that the working directory for the server has changed? If so, then the database files would not be fo...
- 11:21 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Launching the FWD server from Eclipse may also make this problem worse. C... - 11:11 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Launching the FWD server from Eclipse may also make this problem worse. Consider starting the se... - 11:07 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Try to manually delete @deploy/db/*.h2.db@ before recreating/importing the database.
Well,... - 11:06 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Launching the FWD server from Eclipse may also make this problem worse. Consider starting the server separately.
- 10:59 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Try to manually delete @deploy/db/*.h2.db@ before recreating/importing the database.
Note that h2 DBM runs within ... - 03:29 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
>
> > Did a @deploy.all@ and that seems to be recreated the database, a... - 11:20 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Marian, please use the attached patch. I still need to reconvert some apps before deciding that's OK for 3821c.
- 09:42 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, please post the 4GL code snippet which doesn't convert properly. Thanks!
The ... - 09:39 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Marian, please post the 4GL code snippet which doesn't convert properly. Thanks!
- 09:25 AM Bug #4824: Conversion error for property with indeterminate extent
- Constantin, I have a conversion error when using one of the .NET classes @ClientSocketConnectionParameters@. There ar...
03/17/2021
- 12:38 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I've updated the tests in @oo/json/quirks/table_serialize.p@ and the behavior is rather confusin... - 06:55 AM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- I've updated the tests in @oo/json/quirks/table_serialize.p@ and the behavior is rather confusing :(
For a temp-ta... - 11:51 PM Feature #4768: finish copy-lob support
- Ovidiu, please note we still need to ensure that UNDO on a persistent table with a LOB field works correctly.
03/16/2021
- 07:15 PM Feature #4768: finish copy-lob support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * Check undo behavior (if any) with test cases.
> Actually the LOB fields are only allow... - 06:46 PM Feature #4768: finish copy-lob support
- > * Check undo behavior (if any) with test cases.
Actually the LOB fields are only allowed in @NO-UNDO@ tables, the ... - 04:43 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- I created the following test:...
- 03:42 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- This is a bit strange: suppose we have a record in buffer but, since the record was not validated, it may be invalid....
- 01:42 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The 'uncommitted' records are just one for each each buffer. For the... - 12:53 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I do not think the problem here is the transaction. It seems to me that this is only relate... - 12:22 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- I do not think the problem here is the transaction. It seems to me that this is only related to serialization methods...
- 07:38 AM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Eric/Ovidiu: the above looks like a temp-table flush issue.
- 05:52 AM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- There seems to be a difference in how 4GL is handling serialization/transaction scoping for temp-tables. First I thou...
- 05:52 AM Bug #5203 (Test): Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- 01:02 PM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The @xmlNodeName@ and @serializeName@ are members of this structure and they are used on ... - 11:51 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- The code in @Column@ constructor is as old as the class itself. What has changed recently is the data structure and t...
- 11:34 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Aren't these changes in a very recent revision of 3821c? I think they are not present in the latest 4384i. Perhaps ...
- 11:23 AM Bug #5202 (WIP): Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- We do not use the @Table@ annotation directly, because that is the static hardcoded value. Instead, the values of its...
- 03:49 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Eric/Ovidiu: please comment what's the proper way of resolving the xmlNodeName, serializeName for a temp-table.
- 03:44 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- While the @Table@ annotation has both the @xmlNodeName@ and @serializeName@ info, that is not available in @TempTable...
- 03:43 AM Bug #5202 (Test): Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- 03:05 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian: can you take a look at this part:
> > plus some formatting of the string read...
03/15/2021
- 04:46 PM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Greg Shah wrote:
> OK, defer the work. Please create a task for it.
Added #5201.
Marian: can you take a look at... - 04:45 PM Bug #5201: fix issues related to the error messages reported for invalid date/datetime/datetime-t...
- From #5120-7:
> ... rev 1010 of the xfer testcases project contains a set of tests of how literals are parsed as d... - 04:43 PM Bug #5201 (New): fix issues related to the error messages reported for invalid date/datetime/date...
- 10:42 AM Support #5200 (Closed): Database access issue
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Did a @deploy.all@ and that seems to be recreated the database, all good now... hmm, maybe one... - 10:25 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Is @CUSTOMER@ a persistent table or a temp-table?
>
> If persistent, what is the size of ... - 10:16 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Is @CUSTOMER@ a persistent table or a temp-table?
>
> If persistent, what is the size of ... - 10:06 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Is @CUSTOMER@ a persistent table or a temp-table?
If persistent, what is the size of your database file (@deploy/d... - 09:37 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- I'm having issues with accessing the 'fwd' database in one test, the database seems to be setup to use H2 and I don't...
- 09:36 AM Support #5200 (Closed): Database access issue
- 09:21 AM Support #5199 (Closed): decimal - get value
- 08:43 AM Support #5199: decimal - get value
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There is the @decimal.toBigDecimal()@ if you want to get the @BigDecimal@ instance.
T... - 07:29 AM Support #5199: decimal - get value
- There is the @decimal.toBigDecimal()@ if you want to get the @BigDecimal@ instance.
- 03:28 AM Support #5199: decimal - get value
- Trying to get the JSON serialization as close as possible to the 4GL one I see for decimal data type the conversion i...
- 03:28 AM Support #5199 (Closed): decimal - get value
03/12/2021
- 09:33 AM Bug #5194: Stream handle - type missing, not deletable
- As a side note when serializing JSON data to a stream the 4GL does not close the stream, however the data is being fl...
- 03:57 AM Bug #5194: Stream handle - type missing, not deletable
- There are some issues with a stream handle, first it does not support @type@ property - trying to access it eventuall...
- 03:57 AM Bug #5194 (New): Stream handle - type missing, not deletable
03/11/2021
- 10:10 AM Bug #5192 (Hold): OO Quirk - Json Number with exponent
- 10:08 AM Bug #5192: OO Quirk - Json Number with exponent
- > we can implement it right in FWD and let all those numeric get methods parse the actual number instead of throwing ...
- 08:55 AM Bug #5192: OO Quirk - Json Number with exponent
- Although numbers with exponents are supported to some extent in 4GL implementation those are not really parsed, one c...
- 08:45 AM Bug #5192 (Hold): OO Quirk - Json Number with exponent
03/10/2021
- 04:28 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- The testcases are very good, thank you. The behavior is indeed just like tables/table-handles except for the interes...
- 02:25 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I have a set of testcases in our old/crappy testcase repo. I will check them in to the new/hotn... - 07:44 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, you mean a @return new progress.lang.object()@ will work in 4GL but will not wor... - 06:23 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian, you mean a @return new progress.lang.object()@ will work in 4GL but will not work in FWD? If yes, then this i...
- 05:51 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Each object var definition should be declared outside the top-lev... - 02:14 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > @o:foo()@ produces a compile error when called from @Extension@ because @o@ is @Base@ and @foo(...
03/09/2021
- 01:41 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > is there a way to resolve an instance from its ID, an equivalent for handle function?
>
> Ma...
03/08/2021
- 01:35 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Another reason it is not often seen is the use of @super@ in the child class as the reference to call overridden pare...
- 01:31 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Interesting. I had not run across that restriction before. I guess the package visibility rules limit the cases whe...
- 12:57 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I just find it surprising that the 4GL does not allow child classes to access protected methods i... - 12:47 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- > @o:foo()@ produces a compile error when called from @Extension@ because @o@ is @Base@ and @foo()@ is protected.
... - 10:02 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- These tests have OO 4GL code usage. You must checkout the "skeletons":/projects/p2j/wiki/Object_Oriented_Classes_and...
- 08:41 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Vladimir is making changes to the date parsing in #4880. Are the ... - 07:21 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > if this is an issue in FWD is not because the ID's are incremental or random but with the fact that the actual (int...
- 06:52 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 12088
> The changes are OK for me.
> Ovidiu: If you are ... - 05:35 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> This is a real issue. The embedded mode web client includes a kind of javascript appserver f...
03/07/2021
- 11:35 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- OK, defer the work. Please create a task for it.
- 10:57 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir is making changes to the date parsing in #4880. Are the issues overlapping?
I think #4... - 10:51 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Vladimir is making changes to the date parsing in #4880. Are the issues overlapping?
Are the tests broken because... - 10:23 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- There are some differences in the error messages/codes reported by FWD in case of invalid literals, but the functiona...
- 10:17 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- What is left to do on this task?
- 10:34 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- See attached for the tests I used.
@o:foo()@ produces a compile error when called from @Extension@ because @o@ is ... - 10:07 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- As part of the changes for #4350, I'm switching the @exactMethodLookup()@ to use @candidates()@ for making a list of ...
- 09:13 AM Bug #5035 (Test): Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
03/06/2021
- 01:29 PM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Is there anything else to do here?
No.
- 10:41 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 12088
The changes are OK for me.
Ovidiu: If you are OK with the persiste... - 07:29 AM Bug #5035 (WIP): Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- The changes are in 3821c rev 12088.
Ovidiu: please review. - 10:17 AM Bug #4749: Conversion error for object indeterminate extent output parameter
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 12087
The changes are good. - 08:01 AM Bug #4749: Conversion error for object indeterminate extent output parameter
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please add javadoc to @ArrayAssigner.register(BaseDataType[] array)@ and @ArrayAssigner.registerD...
03/05/2021
- 04:05 PM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > I haven't touched com-handle field, I assume this is also mapped as Long in 4GL, but its weird to test in FWD. And ...
- 03:13 PM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- I've switched both handle and object fields to Long and incremental value. There are two more issues to check, unkn...
- 11:41 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > anyone can walk through session first object/handle and use next-sibling to get access to everything
Yes, this i... - 11:07 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- I find this illusion of security kinda funny, random or incremental is exactly the same in a single threaded environm...
- 10:33 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I understand it is more secure but does it break any existing 4GL behavior?
Only in cases of w... - 09:59 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > The major reason why the resource ID for the persistent procedures/handles/etc needs to be random is because you ca...
- 09:43 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This seems reasonable. Do I understand correctly that the internal representation will never be ... - 08:42 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > I have the changes to move the object ID to a long, incrementing value. This will be used by the toString and temp-...
- 05:18 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- I have the changes to move the object ID to a long, incrementing value. This will be used by the toString and temp-t...
- 07:36 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, the signature for @JsonArray:read@ as documented at https://docs.progress.com/bu... - 06:30 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I have a fix for the @jsonarray:read(handle)@ case - the conversion rules will emit the TableParameter for builtin OO...
- 05:39 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, the signature for @JsonArray:read@ as documented at https://docs.progress.com/bundle/openedge-abl-reference-1...
- 04:31 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > @bzr merge@ is not working. Please unbind your skeleton project,... - 04:16 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> @bzr merge@ is not working. Please unbind your skeleton project, bind to the xfer proje... - 04:03 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- @bzr merge@ is not working. Please unbind your skeleton project, bind to the xfer project, run @bzr update@ and afte...
- 03:58 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, please use the skeleton checkout from xfer, @/opt/fwd/skeleton@ to create the pa... - 03:34 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, please use the skeleton checkout from xfer, @/opt/fwd/skeleton@ to create the patch. That is at revision 99.
- 02:04 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, you've made some changes to JsonConstruct and the read(TableParameter) method is... - 07:22 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- > I have a set of testcases in our old/crappy testcase repo. I will check them in to the new/hotness testcases repo. ...
03/04/2021
- 04:30 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, you've made some changes to JsonConstruct and the read(TableParameter) method is now gone.
This code no lo... - 02:14 PM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- The changes are in 3821c rev 12081.
Also, rev 1010 of the xfer testcases project contains a set of tests of how li... - 10:30 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > If you want I can go ahead and fill in the tests unless this is already ...
Also available in: Atom