Activity
From 04/30/2024 to 05/29/2024
05/29/2024
- 02:18 PM Bug #8799: ON ERROR UNDO, THROW problems leading to infinite loops
- > I do not think we have tests for default error handling for all blocks but we can maybe add those to somewhere if n...
- 04:16 AM Bug #8799: ON ERROR UNDO, THROW problems leading to infinite loops
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: Where are we with testcases for @ON ERROR UNDO, THROW@?
We have tests for error handling...
05/28/2024
- 02:15 PM Bug #8799: ON ERROR UNDO, THROW problems leading to infinite loops
- Marian: Where are we with testcases for @ON ERROR UNDO, THROW@?
Constantin: Do we have a standalone testcase to recr...
05/24/2024
- 01:47 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Greg Shah wrote:
>From my point of view yes. The inner blocks with on stop undo, ... does not respond to StopConditi...
05/23/2024
- 10:58 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- >> Is @STOP-AFTER@ essentially an @ON STOP UNDO, LEAVE@ but only matching a timeout and not other kinds of @STOP@?
>... - 10:33 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Greg Shah wrote:
> * 4GL syntax
> ** "time limit" value
> *** Test both literals and "complex" expressions (a vari... - 09:35 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- > > Here a StopCondition is triggered on @outerBlock1@, however because the nested @innerBlock1@ which has a @on stop...
- 09:34 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > I think there is some behavior related to blocking UI statements... - 09:26 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Eduard, Please do the following:
* In the testcase, add elapsed timers around each of the cases where you are expe... - 09:20 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think there is some behavior related to blocking UI statements (like UDPATE, or PAUSE): if th... - 09:16 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- > I think there is some behavior related to blocking UI statements (like UDPATE, or PAUSE): if these exist, then the ...
- 02:43 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- I think there is some behavior related to blocking UI statements (like UDPATE, or PAUSE): if these exist, then the ST...
- 02:39 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > That one works as expected for me (OE12.2), what you can do so it... - 02:33 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Marian Edu wrote:
> That one works as expected for me (OE12.2), what you can do so it doesn't look like it's mining ... - 02:28 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Here a StopCondition is triggered on @outerBlock1@, however because the nested @innerBlock1...
05/22/2024
- 06:04 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Committed on 4347a, revision 15205.
I understand from today's meeting that this commit add... - 02:48 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Committed on 4347a, revision 15205.
Created a suite of test cases.
Also find some scenarios which behaviours in 4... - 11:01 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Galya B wrote:
> May I get a confirmation that @webtests_from_logs/results@ are results from Progress?
Yes, this is... - 08:44 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- May I get a confirmation that @webtests_from_logs/results@ are results from Progress?
- 02:26 AM Bug #8799: ON ERROR UNDO, THROW problems leading to infinite loops
- There are cases when even if an ERROR condition is supposed to be morphed into a structured exception, and re-thrown ...
- 02:24 AM Bug #8799 (Test): ON ERROR UNDO, THROW problems leading to infinite loops
05/21/2024
- 10:38 AM Feature #6161: add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-PROPERTY language...
- Branch 6161a was merged to trunk rev 15229 and archived.
- 08:34 AM Feature #6161 (Merge Pending): add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-P...
- You can merge to trunk after 7417b.
- 08:04 AM Feature #6161: add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-PROPERTY language...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What testing do you propose?
DYNAMIC-PROPERTY is not being used in other projects than #8433. S... - 07:58 AM Feature #6161 (Internal Test): add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-P...
- What testing do you propose?
- 07:58 AM Feature #6161: add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-PROPERTY language...
- I think we just watch it in case it becomes a hotspot. One solution would be to group all the details of a property ...
- 07:30 AM Feature #6161: add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-PROPERTY language...
- I've moved the bulk getter/setter to be resolved only if no indexed setter/getter is resolved at all. I'm not sure w...
- 08:38 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- That explains it. I was looking at the 12.x docs.
- 07:47 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> According to https://docs.progress.com/bundle/openedge-startup-and-parameter-reference-1...
05/20/2024
- 12:51 PM Feature #6161: add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-PROPERTY language...
- Code Review Task Branch 6161a Revision 15222
The changes look good.
The only concern I have is about performa... - 07:34 AM Feature #6161 (Review): add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-PROPERTY...
- Created task branch 6161a from trunk rev 15222. rev 15223 fixed validation of the DYNAMIC-PROPERTY arguments for stat...
- 11:59 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Good.
Eduard: Create a new task for the @-catchStop@ behavior. Focus your implementation for this task on the tr... - 11:57 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, @-catchStop 1@ startup option is required for @progress.lang.stopafter@ to be thrown.
... - 11:40 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- > Greg, @-catchStop 1@ startup option is required for @progress.lang.stopafter@ to be thrown.
Are you saying tha... - 11:39 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- > I tried to run this code in Procedure Editor, but it does not work as expected.
Do not run any test code from in... - 09:12 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Marian Edu wrote:
> As Constantin said you have to move the @catch@ block out of the @stop-after@ one and also make ... - 08:51 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- As Constantin said you have to move the @catch@ block out of the @stop-after@ one and also make sure you remove the @...
- 08:26 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Greg, @-catchStop 1@ startup option is required for @progress.lang.stopafter@ to be thrown. Do we want to implement ...
- 05:24 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- ...
05/16/2024
- 09:48 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I thought that in #6407-71, this was changed to a @List@ approach which has proper FIFO ordering.... - 09:31 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You can include it in 8667a.
The fix was merged to trunk as rev. 15216. - 08:30 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- You can include it in 8667a.
- 02:08 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- The comparison in the condition is solid... if it wasn't for @extProg.ooname = ooname.isEmpty() ? null : ooname;@. @o...
05/15/2024
- 10:38 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- > Greg, why would #6667-995 fail with this test (@(!resolvedProgram.pname.equals(pname) || !ooname.equals(resolvedPro...
- 08:43 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Greg, why would #6667-995 fail with this test (@(!resolvedProgram.pname.equals(pname) || !ooname.equals(resolvedProgr...
- 08:30 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- > Interesting. Most of the discussion in this task is about how map resolvement should work and it's implemented acco...
- 03:00 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- And let me state again, if there is a discrepancy in the content of the maps of two jars in the classpath, this is a ...
- 02:44 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- I think we should actually be happy to have found this discrepancy in the scripts. Every time such malfunction appear...
- 02:40 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In #6667-995, Tomasz found that the server failed to start after picking up trunk rev 15180. The...
05/14/2024
- 09:34 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Code Review (Part 2) Task Branch 4347a Revision 15204
7. Should we (can we?) name the @Timer@ thread to make it cl... - 09:21 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Code Review Task Branch 4347a Revision 15204
1. Please explain why @Control.blockInterrupt()@ adds a remote call a... - 08:29 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- I'm reviewing the code now. After reviewing the 4GL docs, I do have some questions. I also added Marian to coordina...
- 06:20 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ah, you are right, there is a single thread where the tasks are posted. So there is no ... - 03:12 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Review for 4347a rev 15204:
> > * what happens if there are n... - 02:49 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Review for 4347a rev 15204:
> * what happens if there are nested blocks with @STOP-AFTE... - 02:16 AM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Review for 4347a rev 15204:
* we need a @SessionListener@ to clean up the @StopAfterTimer.stopAfterTimerOuts@ map. ...
05/13/2024
- 03:04 PM Feature #4347: add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Greg or Constantin: please review.
- 09:56 AM Feature #4347 (Review): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
- Committed on 4347a, revision 15204.
- 03:03 PM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- In #6667-995, Tomasz found that the server failed to start after picking up trunk rev 15180. The issue turned out to...
- 05:10 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I'm looking back at the responses (in webtests_from_logs folder) and it does look like the asser... - 05:02 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Galya B wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > Gayla
> It's Galya.
Galya :)
I'm looking back at the responses (in we... - 04:50 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Gayla
It's Galya. - 04:49 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Galya B wrote:
> @com.goldencode.p2j.util.decimal@ has:
>
> [...]
>
> But testcases test @pipe_decimal_decimal... - 04:48 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Marian, do you have any idea why this test executed as batch in 4GL gives th... - 03:58 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Greg, how is this going to work? I have more questions than the number of failing tests (quite a few and all over the...
- 03:26 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- @com.goldencode.p2j.util.decimal@ has:...
05/07/2024
- 03:09 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> This gets tricky if you pass an extent field via @::@. But yes, this would need to get ...
05/03/2024
- 07:40 AM Feature #6424: fill gaps in Java Open Client replacement (appserver client support)
- Galya B wrote:
> There are some failing tests. Is it the deployment or it's fine?
The failing tests are known failu... - 07:28 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Marian Edu wrote:
> We have tests for `ParameterList` that are failing for extent parameters used as output/input-ou...
05/02/2024
- 02:53 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- We have tests for `ParameterList` that are failing for extent parameters used as output/input-output. As it is now th...
04/30/2024
- 09:12 AM Feature #6424 (WIP): fill gaps in Java Open Client replacement (appserver client support)
- There is one point in @AppServerConnectionPool@ that is bothering me. It's used only by @LegacyJavaAppserverClient@ a...
- 08:19 AM Feature #6424: fill gaps in Java Open Client replacement (appserver client support)
- I think we're doing a partial review of the Java client in #8456 and #8661. At least I'm getting familiar with the cl...
- 08:49 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Galya B wrote:
> Marian, do you have any idea why this test executed as batch in 4GL gives the following result:
> ... - 08:24 AM Feature #6417: cleanup some known items in appserver support
- Marian, do you have any idea why this test executed as batch in 4GL gives the following result:...
- 08:45 AM Feature #6407 (Test): name_map.xml improvements
- 6407a was merged to trunk as rev. 15180 and archived.
Support for reading mappings from multiple name_map.xml file... - 08:27 AM Feature #6407 (Merge Pending): name_map.xml improvements
- 6407a can be merged after 8486a.
- 08:12 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Are there any reasons why this can't be merged to trunk?
No, it can be merged. - 08:12 AM Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin: Are there any reasons why this can't be merged to trunk?
- 03:17 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Constantin, I'm trying to rerun all tests for method invoke and parameter list but those fails to convert now because...
Also available in: Atom