Activity
From 10/23/2025 to 11/21/2025
11/21/2025
- 06:24 PM Feature #8138: ABLUnit configuration using environment variables
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: I think you should take it from here.
Got it! - 06:20 PM Feature #8138: ABLUnit configuration using environment variables
- My suggestion was in #8138-7.
- 06:02 PM Feature #8138: ABLUnit configuration using environment variables
- Is this task active?
- 03:48 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Not good thing about it that this approach requires storing all function parameters values no ... - 03:46 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Yes, but block manager does not process parameters, they are pa... - 07:45 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > But it may be needed to make conversion changes or a new AspectJ rules.
Conversion changes, if really needed, ar... - 07:12 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > And how would the 4GL code look like, which would produce these... - 07:09 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> And how would the 4GL code look like, which would produce these logs?... - 06:10 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- And how would the 4GL code look like, which would produce these logs?
Note that every call (beside some exceptions... - 04:35 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, if you need line numbers, look into how @p2j.oo.lang.ProError.callStack@ is calc... - 03:38 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Tomasz, if you need line numbers, look into how @p2j.oo.lang.ProError.callStack@ is calculated (from the Java stacktr...
- 02:33 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg, Constantin
I have a question on a preferred way legacy logging should be implemented, which requires finding a...
11/19/2025
- 03:35 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Is there a standard way of resolving (as a reverse lookup) of current procedure name, line and ... - 11:52 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I didnt find anything related to reverse lookup of a line number.
>
> We don't have this at ... - 10:51 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > Is there a standard way of resolving (as a reverse lookup) of current procedure name, line and method ?
> I've fou... - 05:10 AM Feature #3853 (WIP): implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg
Is there a standard way of resolving (as a reverse lookup) of current procedure name, line and method ?
I've f... - 08:54 AM Bug #10567 (Test): same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- 08:53 AM Bug #10567: same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- ChUI regression testing passed, but I have forgot that I had included this into #10729 testing process.
Branch *10... - 08:43 AM Bug #10567 (Merge Pending): same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- Feel free to skip ChUI regression tests and pair this branch testing with another task that requires ChUI regression ...
- 08:41 AM Bug #10567: same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- All regression tests were done, but not for ChUI regression tests.
I am starting the tests right now and I think tom... - 08:40 AM Bug #10567: same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- Teodor, is 10567a ready for trunk?
11/17/2025
- 09:31 AM Feature #6506: implement CGI WebSpeed support and the standard web-disp.p dispatch functionality
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> I see that *6065a* is based on trunk/15757, but I've been testing with trunk/16277. I'll swit... - 07:33 AM Feature #6506: implement CGI WebSpeed support and the standard web-disp.p dispatch functionality
- I see that *6065a* is based on trunk/15757, but I've been testing with trunk/16277. I'll switch the branch and check ...
- 07:31 AM Feature #6506: implement CGI WebSpeed support and the standard web-disp.p dispatch functionality
- The issue with the .w file not being included seems to be related to convertSourceNameToAstNames():...
- 07:12 AM Feature #6506: implement CGI WebSpeed support and the standard web-disp.p dispatch functionality
- If an @.htm@ or @.html@ file is changed, then we must run the embedded 4GL preprocessor on that file. Running the E4...
- 07:10 AM Feature #6506: implement CGI WebSpeed support and the standard web-disp.p dispatch functionality
- After ./abl/goldencodewebspeed_htm.w is generated and incremental conversion is started, it will also be picked up if...
11/14/2025
- 09:08 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Paul Bodale wrote:
> I checked out the branch locally just to be sure. The only thing I understand from #10391-32 is... - 09:01 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- I checked out the branch locally just to be sure. The only thing I understand from #10391-32 is that the branch was m...
- 09:00 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Paul Bodale wrote:
> I don't think I created a @10800a@ branch. Didn't know about it until now
OK, never mind. I ... - 08:46 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Paul Bodale wrote:
> I don't think I created a @10800a@ branch. Didn't know about it until now... - 08:45 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- I don't think I created a @10800a@ branch. Didn't know about it until now
- 08:39 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Paul,
I have a question for branch repos on @devsrv01@.
Did you create @10800a@ branch? What was the purpose?
... - 05:01 AM Bug #10597 (Test): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- Branch 10597a was merged into trunk as rev. 16275 and archived.
- 04:49 AM Bug #10597 (Merge Pending): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- Please merge 10597a to trunk now.
- 03:25 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- Can this be merged to trunk?
11/13/2025
- 08:02 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- > The main explanation I think is because the invokedynamic JVM instruction relies on the JVM implementation, where t...
11/10/2025
- 11:35 AM Bug #10841: model table name is used in error messages for a 'like' temp-table definition
- So the rule I think is this, for the unique validation 'already exists with' message:
* for temp-tables, no field na... - 11:01 AM Bug #10841: model table name is used in error messages for a 'like' temp-table definition
- For a temp-table defined as:...
- 10:53 AM Bug #10841 (Closed): model table name is used in error messages for a 'like' temp-table definition
11/07/2025
- 12:37 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > In order to pass one of tests I had to make FILE-INFO:FILE-SIZE to reread file size.
> Was it static on purpose (...
11/06/2025
- 03:43 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg
In order to pass one of tests I had to make FILE-INFO:FILE-SIZE to reread file size.
Was it static on purpos... - 01:28 PM Bug #10831 (Review): Incorrect handling of UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error> causes IllegalStateExceptio...
- Please review.
- 01:27 PM Bug #10831 (WIP): Incorrect handling of UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error> causes IllegalStateException t...
- Task branch 10831a was created and the fix was committed. With r16262 the double rollback is gone and the exception i...
- 01:14 PM Bug #10831: Incorrect handling of UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error> causes IllegalStateException to be t...
- As noted in the title, there is a flaw in handling of statements @UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error>@ if this occurs in a @CA...
- 12:53 PM Bug #10831 (Closed): Incorrect handling of UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error> causes IllegalStateExceptio...
- 08:26 AM Bug #10567 (Internal Test): same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- I am OK with the changes in 10567a. they are cleaner than my attempt in #10818 in fact :)
- 07:54 AM Bug #9906 (Closed): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- 06:25 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: Please post the commit message here and we can close the task.
The branch 9906b was ... - 04:06 AM Bug #9906 (Merge Pending): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- 04:06 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Vladimir: Please post the commit message here and we can close the task.
- 03:51 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- > There is no active 9906b branch to review.
I approved merge in #7143-1731 after reviewing in #7143. I wasn't awa... - 03:38 AM Bug #9906 (Review): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- 02:53 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- There is no active 9906b branch to review.
11/05/2025
- 04:27 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Another OE 11.7 difference:
You can set @LOG-MANAGER:LOGGING-LEVEL@ only to a value greater than it was already set,... - 02:14 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It means that any version specific code should be protected. If there is existing code that work... - 02:40 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Hynek, please review. Could 9906b rev. 16259. be merged into the trunk?
11/04/2025
- 03:07 PM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> This change introduced a regression due to overly restrictive access to date methods (s... - 02:12 PM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- This change introduced a regression due to overly restrictive access to date methods (see #7143-1728).
I created 990...
11/03/2025
- 03:54 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg
While working on ABLUnit tests for LOG-MANAGER I had a major problem with resetting LOG-MANAGER state to defaul...
10/30/2025
- 09:49 AM Bug #10391 (Test): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Branch *10391b* was merged into trunk as rev. *16254* and archived.
- 09:39 AM Bug #10391 (Merge Pending): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Please merge 10391b to trunk now.
- 09:37 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > Serban, can you confirm that 10391b is fixing the OG issue in the... - 09:34 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Serban, can you confirm that 10391b is fixing the OG issue in the customer application?
... - 09:22 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Serban, can you confirm that 10391b is fixing the OG issue in the customer application?
- 04:27 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- > Alexandru: we need this in trunk if we are making a release today.
I will be doing a delivery today. Please focu... - 03:48 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Alexandru: we need this in trunk if we are making a release today.
- 04:45 AM Feature #10467: Make READ-JSON dataset handle method able to read json files not containing the n...
- I tested with both trunk and 9457c again today and no.
10/29/2025
- 03:29 PM Feature #10467: Make READ-JSON dataset handle method able to read json files not containing the n...
- Paul: is this fixed already by other tasks?
- 05:11 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Rebased *10352a* to trunk revision *16250*.
- 05:01 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Teodor: please rebase 10352a.
10/28/2025
- 10:07 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please add history entries.
Sorry for that. Committed rev *16252* on branch *10391b*.... - 09:57 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- +Eugenie
Paul: Please update [[regression:Open Regressions in FWD v4]] to add a entry for this issue. - 09:55 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Please add history entries.
- 09:53 AM Bug #10391 (Review): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Created task branch *10391b* and committed rev. *16251* that fixes the regression found in #7143-1723
10/27/2025
- 10:06 AM Bug #10391 (WIP): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Paul - please work on a standalone testcase for #7143-1723 and lets discuss it.
10/24/2025
- 08:06 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- That is a fair point, Ovidiu. I've been thinking about a similar solution. As you note, we would not want to change...
10/23/2025
- 04:41 PM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Delia Mitric wrote:
> Sure, here is an example:
> [...]
This is very interesting. It shows how OE will use the mem... - 07:50 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Don't we already handle this conversion in the @Stream@ and subclasses?
As I've noticed, the... - 12:56 PM Bug #9906 (Closed): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- 12:37 PM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Please merge 9906a to trunk.
Merged as rev. 16241 - 11:11 AM Bug #9906 (Merge Pending): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Please merge 9906a to trunk.
- 10:01 AM Feature #9955 (Test): Implement ClientPrincipal:TENANT-ID and ClientPrincipal:TENANT-NAME
- Branch 9955a was merged to trunk rev. 16239 and archived.
- 08:00 AM Feature #9955 (Merge Pending): Implement ClientPrincipal:TENANT-ID and ClientPrincipal:TENANT-NAME
- This can be merged after 10542a.
- 08:48 AM Bug #10558 (Test): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- Branch 10558a was merged to trunk rev. 16234 and archived.
- 07:58 AM Bug #10558 (Merge Pending): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABL...
- 07:58 AM Bug #10558: READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- This can be merged after 10519a.
- 08:42 AM Bug #10519 (Test): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Branch 10519a was merged to trunk rev. 16233 and archived.
- 07:57 AM Bug #10519 (Merge Pending): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- This can be merged after 10509a.
- 08:37 AM Bug #10509 (Test): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- Branch *10509a* was merged to trunk rev. *16232* and archived.
- 07:57 AM Bug #10509 (Merge Pending): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- This can be merged after 10455a.
- 08:24 AM Bug #10336 (Test): Issue on object deletion: java.lang.IllegalStateException
- Branch 10336b was merged to trunk rev. 16230 and archived.
- 07:56 AM Bug #10336 (Merge Pending): Issue on object deletion: java.lang.IllegalStateException
- This can be merged after 10391a.
- 08:20 AM Bug #10391 (Test): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Branch *10391a* was merged into trunk as rev. *16229* and archived.
- 07:52 AM Bug #10391 (Merge Pending): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Paul, please merge 10391a now.
Also available in: Atom