Activity
From 03/06/2013 to 04/04/2013
04/04/2013
- 05:59 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> I have attached update vmn_upd20130401a.zip/vmn_upd20130401b.zip
> It contains @FETCH-SELE... - 04:46 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- You described how to implement runtime behavior similar to 4GL in each concrete case. But my question was actually no...
- 03:18 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > I still don't understand how ErrorManager will recognize what mode (silent or not) should be used. From examples I ...
- 02:38 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> # add the new @ErrorManager.displayOrLogError@ API now, so you can use it for error mess...
04/03/2013
- 01:16 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- The Text.setTemporaryCaseSensitive (actually the entire class) is extracted from the character.java class. I don't th...
- 08:23 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * Please re-read the JavaDoc for @Text.setTemporaryCaseSensitive@. I'm not sure it was meant... - 07:17 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > Again, the testcase does not help us in determining the ... - 06:13 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Again, the testcase does not help us in determining the NO-ERROR behavior, as a runtime ...
04/02/2013
- 12:48 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > > *class Date, line 1435* - note 70
> Should I fix it directly in CVS without sending special update and regressio... - 12:19 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please edit each case and add the value of the ERROR:NUM-MESSAGES attribute (you can add ...
04/01/2013
- 05:58 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Code review 20130328a:
>
> * Why have you commented out the re-throwing of the @reason@ T... - 04:41 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130401a.zip/vmn_upd20130401b.zip
It contains @FETCH-SELECTED-ROW()@ conversion, usin... - 11:46 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Please edit each case and add the value of the ERROR:NUM-MESSAGES attribute (you can add it in the same MESSAGE line ...
03/31/2013
- 05:36 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Duding testing I have found out that @FETCH-SELECTED-ROW()@ conversion requires @BrowseWidg... - 05:35 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Code review 20130328a:
* Why have you commented out the re-throwing of the @reason@ Throwable in @BlockManager.pro...
03/30/2013
- 06:45 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
*class <Not found in code>*
Example:...- 06:42 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class <Not found in code>*
Example:... - 06:40 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class <Not found in code>*
Example:... - 06:37 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class ControlFlowOps, line 3519*
Example:... - 05:57 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Moved to #2106, note 2
*class <Not found in code>*
Example:... - 05:43 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Moved to #2106, note 1
*class <Not found in code>*
Example:... - 05:29 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- this note should be ignored according note 85
*class HandleOps, line 67*
Example:... - 05:24 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class handle, line 254*
Example:... - 05:18 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Moved from #2080, notes 3,4
*class BrowseWidget, line 751*
Example:... - 04:59 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class NumberType, line 3189*
Example:... - 04:55 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class ControlFlowOps, line 3577*
Example:... - 04:36 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class ControlFlowOps, line 2991*
Example:...
03/29/2013
- 05:32 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class Date, line 1435*
Example:... - 04:48 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- In regard to the use of an .odt document for reporting information about the errors, I prefer that you put the inform...
- 01:44 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have found also that @SESSION:TIMEZONE@ is not supported (but mentioned in code).
Example is ... - 12:43 PM Bug #2093 (Closed): VALEXP support in P2J
- 12:42 PM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- At this moment, with the exception of the cases where the expression from the string condition is not valid, I don't ...
- 10:36 AM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- Is there anything left to do on this issue or can it be closed?
- 10:26 AM Bug #2095 (Closed): FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- 09:43 AM Bug #2097 (Closed): FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- The fix has addressed the original problem and does not appear to have regressed anything else in the customer's serv...
- 09:19 AM Bug #2094 (Closed): OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
03/28/2013
- 06:59 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130328a.zip/vmn_upd20130328b.zip as replacement of vmn_upd20130326a.zip/ vmn_upd20130...
- 06:23 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric, sorry for so dangerous RecordBuffer.java. I think it was wrong bazaar merge with latest bzr revision. I do not ...
- 05:10 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Document with tests is updated
- 03:56 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Regarding vmn_upd20130326a.zip: there are hundreds of unnecessary/unwanted format changes in RecordBuffer, which mak...
- 01:07 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Duding testing I have found out that @FETCH-SELECTED-ROW()@ conversion requires @BrowseWidget.fetchSelectedRow()@ wit...
03/27/2013
- 06:22 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached some first test cases. Is such format would be ok?
Please notice that I found also some cases that ... - 03:17 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- The update has passed conversion regression testing and is committed to bzr rev. 10333.
- 02:20 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- A fix candidate is attached. Currently running it through conversion regression testing.
03/26/2013
- 05:22 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130326a.zip/ vmn_upd20130326b.zip
with current state of BUFFER-COPY() and BUFFER-COM... - 09:58 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I want to resolve this properly as part of this work. This includes any cases of ErrorManager.displayError() that sh...
- 03:23 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> ...but I wonder if we shouldn't treat the first @each person@ the same like @each w-person@... - 09:57 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- I understand. The algorithm is working in fact if you analyze the first clause that works.
And starting from here, I... - 09:31 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The reason why the where clause filtered to client-side is probably the @where_clause_prep2... - 04:44 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- The reason why the where clause filtered to client-side is probably the @where_clause_prep2.rules@. You can read in i...
- 02:53 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- I have isolated the #2068 note 272 regression like this:...
03/25/2013
- 04:31 PM Bug #2097 (Review): FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- The ecf_upd20130325e.zip update (finally) has passed conversion regression testing; there are some differences in th...
- 03:56 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Hopefully the final candidate; conversion regression testing it now.
- 01:39 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Another candidate, in conversion regression testing now.
- 09:49 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- While there are a number of expected differences, there are also still some regressions, though far fewer than the la...
- 05:37 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Fix candidate for regressions. Testing now.
- 04:53 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- This update regresses many files in Majic; cannot check it in.
- 03:59 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Missed a bit of cleanup in one of the files.
- 03:48 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- A fix candidate and test cases are attached. I am currently putting the fix through conversion regression testing. ...
- 03:58 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- OK, I forgot that the ERROR attribute is set for error conditions raised when the NO-ERROR clause is used (this expla...
- 03:30 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin,
I have removed @SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS = YES.@ and started from command line. But it did not affect ... - 05:42 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I do not understand which line of code generates the 9039 and 12860 messages. Please remove the @SESSION:SUPPRESS-WAR...
- 01:01 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- The current fix doesn't work for all cases, e.g.:
1. REPEAT PRESELECT.
2. DEFINE QUERY.
Note that FIELDS/EXCEP... - 11:42 PM Bug #2095 (Review): FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- The update has passed conversion regression testing and I have committed it to bzr rev. 10329.
- 10:43 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- The update looks good to me. I am running conversion regression testing on it now.
- 08:00 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Fixes the cases specified in note #2. Probably fixes all other cases too.
03/24/2013
- 05:33 PM Bug #2101 (Closed): multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not c...
- I've compared conversions of the customer's server project with and without this fix and it seems correct in all the ...
- 09:46 PM Bug #2101 (Review): multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not c...
- Update ecf_upd20130323a.zip has passed conversion regression testing and is committed to bzr rev. 10325.
- 08:23 PM Bug #2101: multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not converting...
- Although I'm not the assignee, in having to think through the problem for the above post, I took a quick look at the ...
- 05:27 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- BTW, location of the original problem is pmplan/gapptfn5.p.cache, line 700.
- 05:25 PM Bug #2094 (Review): OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- Passed conversion regression testing, committed to bzr revision 10328. I'll do a separate server folder conversion wi...
- 05:03 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- Change looks good to me. Please check in and distribute if/when it passes conversion regression testing.
- 04:04 PM Bug #2094 (WIP): OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- 03:47 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- Properly handles the @OUTER-JOIN@ and @LEFT OUTER-JOIN@ to convert the same.
- 03:37 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- This update adds support for the OUTER-JOIN clause for a record phrase. -The LEFT OUTER-JOIN will not emit anything.-...
- 10:09 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- The following:...
- 05:10 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- I'm working toward what I think the correct conversion would be:...
- 04:29 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin, I use ErrorManager.recordOrThrowError.
In my example above, 4GL meets errors 9039 and 12860 with differ... - 07:29 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- PS: about @SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS = YES.@. Note that in the 4GL editor, if you run a program which doesn't set the...
- 07:26 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > Another observation. Not all 4GL errors throw “exceptions”, some of them look like not critical errors or warnings,...
- 07:20 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Another observation. Not all 4GL errors throw “exceptions”, some of them look like not critical errors or warnings, e...
- 03:53 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > Conversion code should also support this option, returning value if ON-ERROR is set (current behaviour) and propaga...
- 03:51 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin: yes, it is just switch in behavior I was looking.
Conversion code should also support this option, retur... - 03:07 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric/Vadim: there is another way to supress the 4GL's errors, the @NO-ERROR@ clause. When trying to understand when a...
- 02:02 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Yes, I also think so. Return value has no sense if 4gl propagates its "exceptions". I only thought that maybe this pr...
- 09:26 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- This indicates that the idiom of:...
- 10:11 PM Bug #2084 (Closed): Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- 10:10 PM Feature #2000 (Closed): add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- 09:49 PM Feature #2092 (Closed): add server-side database support for several builtin functions
03/23/2013
- 06:54 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- This update has passed conversion regression testing (CA 0323d used deleteRecord for the "quick_delete" loops, instea...
- 12:58 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- ca_upd20130323d.zip update looks good to me. If it passes conversion regression testing (expect some changes to Maji...
- 12:52 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Replaces ca_upd2013023a.zip, and has the changes from note 105.
- 12:33 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- You are not missing anything, this is the first time I touch embedded sqls, so that's why the questions. Now I have a...
- 12:30 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- This refers to:...
- 12:23 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- For embedded SQL, I was referring to this rule in convert/database_access:...
- 12:19 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Let's use:...
- 11:38 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Eric: the ca_upd20130323a.zip has regressions. I see that the Buffer.delete API is used by other cases, like DELETE s...
- 10:23 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- This update changes the API for BUFFER-DELETE to deleteRecord, because else will collide with the resource's delete()...
- 06:53 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Also I have noticed the difference in behavior of 4GL and converted code.
I am comparing a lot of tests in the form... - 06:50 PM Bug #2101: multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not converting...
- This issue was first reported in note 192 of #2068.
The following converts badly:... - 06:34 PM Bug #2101 (Closed): multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not c...
03/22/2013
- 05:38 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- > I still think the include/exclude call should directly follow the associated addComponent call. I think it is easie...
- 05:31 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- I guess there's one more option; chain the call, as in:...
- 05:04 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- So if the full list of options is:
1. Add the list of fields to query c'tor / addComponent
2. include(String ...) -... - 04:34 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> For a multi-table query the buffer should be specified, but as an option we can have quali... - 04:28 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- For a multi-table query the buffer should be specified, but as an option we can have qualified field names:...
- 03:32 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- OK, but please emit this method immediately after the associated @addComponent@ call.
> ... - 03:07 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Unless someone has objections, for multi-component queries, I'll make include/exclude methods of the parent query:
<... - 11:42 AM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- > Removes FIELDS/EXCEPT nodes.
Thanks, I'm starting server folder conversion, hope nothing new will appear. - 11:36 AM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Removes FIELDS/EXCEPT nodes.
- 10:38 AM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- OK
- 10:14 AM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Stanislav: if it doesn't take you long to build some rules which just drop/hide the FIELDS/EXCEPT nodes (so they will...
- 02:32 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Costin Savin wrote:
> Well theoreticaly it is already there because both Buffer and TempTable extend it, but probabl... - 02:32 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Well theoreticaly it is already there because both Buffer and TempTable extend it, but probably it's good to see it i...
- 02:12 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Costin, regarding cs_upd20130322b.zip - you forgot to add the new interface to HandleCommon. Please put it right afte...
- 01:43 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Commited as revision number 10317
- 01:07 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- cs_upd20130322b.zip has passed conversion regression testing. Please check it in and distribute.
- 10:54 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- cs_upd20130322b.zip looks good. I am putting it through conversion regression testing.
It does look like we still... - 08:21 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Added proposed update for missing addFieldToIndex methods. Moved the defaultBufferHandle() method form the Buffer int...
- 05:06 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- This class evolved a little. The @defaultBufferHandle()@ (implementation of @DEFAULT-BUFFER-HANDLE@) was at the begin...
- 04:35 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- > ADMData was my mistake (should have not added it, as I don't see the ADM-DATA attribute defined for the temp-table ...
- 02:15 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have noticed from testing in 4GL that error message...
- 10:46 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- CA 0322c.zip was committed to bzr revision 10315 and CA 0322e.zip to 10316.
- 10:40 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Both updates look good, please check them in.
- 09:30 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Both 0322c.zip and 0322e.zip have passed conversion regression testing.
- 07:42 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Adds missing @queryRows(integer)@ API.
- 06:49 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Solved note 151 by always expanding array vars passed to the REPOSITION-TO-ROWID method. This avoids adding an @query...
- 06:06 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- I'm working on note 151.
- 05:23 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- See note 202 from #2068, which documents a server failure. Note that the @REPOSITION-TO-ROWID@ can accept mixed exten...
- 10:24 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- ca_upd20130322g.zip committed to bzr revision 10214.
- 09:15 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- The code looks fine. If it passes testing, check it in and distribute it.
- 09:11 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- Fixes a regression in the TABLE-HANDLE parameter conversion, introduced by 10293.
- 08:55 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- OK, I'll look at it.
- 08:15 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- It has been regressed since revision 10279.
Correct output is:... - 07:38 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- Stanislav: did this convert properly after you added TABLE-HANDLE parameter support?...
- 08:18 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Go ahead and check this in immediately (and distribute it). It has no effect on conversion and it is already being r...
- 07:07 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Removed the extra ' character from p2jpl.ddr at line 699
03/21/2013
- 03:54 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- From the TEMP-TABLE attributes the following are not implemented in any interface:
AFTER-TABLE, BEFORE-TABLE, DATA... - 01:54 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Eric/Costin: there is one more thing we should do - identify all attributes which are already defined by interfaces (...
- 01:49 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- > So, Costin: please remove Buffer and ADMData from the TempTable interface and post here what method stubs are still...
- 01:42 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- So, Costin: please remove Buffer and ADMData from the TempTable interface and post here what method stubs are still ...
- 01:39 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Why is TempTable interface extending Buffer, ADMData and UniqueID interfaces?
Good qu... - 01:38 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- ADMData was my mistake (should have not added it, as I don't see the ADM-DATA attribute defined for the temp-table re...
- 01:31 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Eric/Ovidiu/Costin: the interfaces extended by TempTable don't look OK. In the docs, the temp-table resource can acce...
- 01:30 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Costin Savin wrote:
> > That's strange, all the TempTable methods should be implemented in TempTableBuilder, AFAIK. ... - 01:25 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- > That's strange, all the TempTable methods should be implemented in TempTableBuilder, AFAIK. I don't know why they a...
- 12:55 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Vadim, your 20130321a update has passed conversion regression testing. Please check it in (and the test case) and di...
- 11:50 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > That's strange, all the TempTable methods should be implemented in TempTableBuilder, AFAI... - 11:36 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Code review 20130321a:
Looks good, I'm putting it through conversion regression test now. - 10:59 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Update vmn_upd20130321a.zip (vmn_upd20130321b.zip - conversion test) is replacement of vmn_upd20130320a.zip (vmn_upd2...
- 09:17 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- > That's strange, all the TempTable methods should be implemented in TempTableBuilder, AFAIK. I don't know why they ...
- 06:55 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- > Please post your test case.
I used the pers-addr table from p2j_test and created a temp table like pers-addr and... - 02:20 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Do I need to ensure that there are no duplicates in the converted list (e.g. if we are con... - 02:01 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- It is possible to reference an element of an extent field. The progress documentation says that "If field is an array...
- 11:21 AM Bug #2095 (WIP): FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- 09:51 AM Feature #2000 (Review): add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
03/20/2013
- 06:05 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Code review 20130320a:
All looks good except QueryWrapper: the new @numBuffers@ method implementation should dele... - 05:38 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Update vmn_upd20130320a.zip (vmn_upd20130320b.zip - conversion test) contains correction of NUM-BUFFERS()(KW_NUM_BUFF...
- 02:07 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Costin Savin wrote:
> Tested this case, The result is a runtime error message: @"Third argument to ADD-INDEX-FIELD m... - 02:05 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- > Write a test case and see what happens if you pass in something other than "asc" or "desc" as the last parameter. D...
- 01:07 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Costin Savin wrote:
> there are only these methods defined in the TempTable interface:
> public logical addFieldTo... - 12:37 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- For:...
- 02:38 PM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Update cs_upd20130320a1.zip has passed conversion regression testing and is committed to bzr rev. 10301.
- 01:29 PM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Code review 20130320a:
This one is mostly correct, except for the following:
* @Functions.minimum(Date var1, Date... - 11:55 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Added proposed update, for the testcase it seems you can't define a field as rowid in 4gl so I modified that part.
W... - 05:35 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Costin: the test you've uploaded doesn't work with the repository p2j_test.df schema definition. When modifying the p...
03/19/2013
- 04:29 PM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Code review 20130319a:
* common-progress.rules: changes look good, but see comment below about max/min.
* where-... - 02:29 PM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Re-arranged the code , solved the reviewed problems and merged with latest updates.
Testcase used to check convers... - 01:29 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Costin Savin wrote:
> Added merged update.
> Are there any other functions that need to be added? I saw DATETIME an... - 01:11 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For this, I think we should add a @P2JQuery.tableCount@ API which returns @integer@ and ... - 07:30 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Eric,
> * num-buffers [KW_NUM_BUFF] (seems buggy) (I think this should map to P2JQuery.getTableCount, which already ... - 07:57 AM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- The AST is slightly different with last revision from bzr:...
- 07:20 AM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- Please check the failed case in the previous note with the latest #1620 fix, if you haven't done already so.
- 07:09 AM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- Everything seems to work smooth, validation is only generated in @schema-validation@:...
- 04:03 AM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- Ovidiu: with the #1620 changes, I can't see any more schema VALEXP problems in the logs (I think P2J was too aggressi...
03/18/2013
- 03:39 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Update vmn_upd20130318a.zip (vmn_upd20130318b.zip - tests) contains runtime support for BUFFER-COMPARE and some prepa...
- 11:36 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- This issue stems from note 127 in #2068.
The following code:... - 11:16 AM Bug #2097 (Closed): FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- 08:23 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Added merged update.
Are there any other functions that need to be added? I saw DATETIME and DATETIME-TZ which fit t... - 06:34 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- After some tests it seems that min and max can be applied also to character and date variables, not only numeric valu...
- 04:31 AM Feature #2092 (Review): add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- 04:31 AM Feature #2092 (WIP): add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- 12:12 AM Bug #2059 (Closed): CAN-FIND clause for a perm table in the RECORD_PHRASE of a temp table, with a...
03/17/2013
- 03:42 PM Bug #2077 (Closed): fix converted table and field name collisions
- 03:32 PM Bug #2084 (Review): Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- 03:31 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- The net effect of the cs_upd20130314a.zip update is that the correct Java output is produced, but the change still le...
03/16/2013
- 10:24 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Added proposed update,
For ROWID I didn't knew how a ROWID data type it's represented in the database so I assumed ...
03/15/2013
- 05:13 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin's advice has gotten you past the immediate handle problem, but please re-read note 9. The runtime impleme...
- 05:11 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Yes, it works, thank you
- 04:53 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim, I don't think the runtime for the CREATE BUFFER statement is implemented. Try this instead:...
- 04:41 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- It seems, ...
- 12:09 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- update [vmn_upd20130314a.zip]
Refs #2080, checked in as bzr revision 10291.
Corrected runtime for BUFFER-COPY (KW_B... - 11:52 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > Constantin: can you just pick up common-progress.rules from bzr and merge your quoter changes in?
OK, I'll wait f... - 11:49 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim: the 20130314a update looks good. Please go ahead and commit it to bzr.
Constantin: can you just pick up ... - 11:39 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Vadim, have you done the changes at notes #29? If yes, please upload just the common-pro... - 11:37 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim, have you done the changes at notes #29? If yes, please upload just the common-progress.rules file. If not, I c...
- 11:08 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Yes, the pairs parameter is in use.
- 11:00 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- What about pairs in RecordBuffer.compare()? Should it be supported?
- 10:39 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> I am implementing now RecordBuffer.compare(Buffer buffer, character mode, character except,... - 08:46 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I am implementing now RecordBuffer.compare(Buffer buffer, character mode, character except, character pairs) similar...
- 01:27 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- BTW, since multi-table queries also implement P2JQuery indirectly, they should throw UnsupportedOperationException fo...
- 01:20 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- The runtime API will look like:...
- 12:41 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- The use cases we must support:...
- 12:16 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Paraphrased from #2068:
Looks like P2J doesn't like the FIELDS clause, because with it, the fields get emitted as ... - 12:12 PM Bug #2095 (Closed): FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- 12:30 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Eric: I've put this through conversion regression testing (which has passed) plus server folder conversion, and I don...
- 12:11 PM Bug #2094 (Closed): OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- 12:06 PM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- This issue is dedicated to note 80 from Issue #2068.
> There is this validation expression for the @dvofrsts.dvofr... - 11:57 AM Bug #2093 (Closed): VALEXP support in P2J
- 02:06 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- The following builtin functions are used within where clauses in queries and thus need to be supported as database se...
- 01:14 AM Feature #2092 (Closed): add server-side database support for several builtin functions
03/14/2013
- 05:44 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- What methods are priority for now?
- 05:43 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Attached update vmn_upd20130314a.zip (vmn_upd20130314b.zip - tests).
This update is replacement vmn_upd20130312a.z... - 03:12 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- for note 22:
> Constantin: you didn't already do this, right?
No, I have not changed the @Buffer.findXXXX@ APIs
for ... - 03:46 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Went back and searched for another solution, since the last one started from the wrong premise that can-find BUFFER_S...
- 03:35 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Costin, please provide a detailed update of what you have found/done on this today.
03/13/2013
- 06:06 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Will be ast processing with rules also required with wrapping String to character?
Const... - 04:49 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> With your next update, please replace the predicate data type of @String@ in all the @Buff... - 03:23 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > One question: why not just implement @AbstractQuery.queryReposi... - 03:18 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Low priority: related to my last note, we are using the wrong data type for the NO-LOBS parameter in our bufferCopy/...
- 03:16 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> One question: why not just implement @AbstractQuery.queryReposition(NumberType n)@ as
> [.... - 02:07 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- The current project never uses the NO-LOBS parameter of BUFFER-COPY and BUFFER-COMPARE, so the variants of @BufferImp...
- 01:46 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Code review 20130312a:
Update looks fine.
Good catch on the @queryReposition@ method. One question: why not j... - 11:10 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I suspect that much of the use we will see of this feature will involve expressions resolving to character values (si...
- 05:40 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- The FIND-FIRST/LAST/UNIQUE methods can receive a character for the first parameter. Currently, the Buffer.find* imple...
- 03:13 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Tried to replicate the test which failed on update cs_upd20130312a.zip (-where- before I moved the logic from post-ru...
- 11:09 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- The testcase from note 11 passed, there was another file from conversion regression tests that failed (with the remap...
- 10:53 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- I haven't looked at this issue in detail nor tried to reproduce the problem yet, but the last update you sent looks w...
- 08:11 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- There seems to be a problem with some buffers being used in different db schemas,
after the change it seems the buff... - 05:25 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- There are changes in two files with this update, I think they are expected, but Costin is checking them now.
- 02:14 AM Bug #2090 (Closed): correct sorting of DMO properties during schema conversion
03/12/2013
- 05:20 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Current status of methods from ref 1947
Implemented:
GET-CURRENT (KW_GET_CUR)
FIND-LAST (KW_FIND_LST)
FIND-FIRST ... - 05:19 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Attached update vmn_upd20130312a.zip.
Corrected runtime for BUFFER-COPY (KW_BUF_COPY) and BUFFER-COMPARE (KW_BUF_CO... - 04:40 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Yes, I handed my changes off to Constantin a few days ago, based on an older version, to integrate with some other ch...
- 04:26 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric, I corrected BufferImpl.bufferCompare according #12, but noticed that you replaced function body with ... Unsupp...
- 06:22 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Tests
uast/find-with-locks.p
uast/get-with-locks.p
committed revision 991.
- 05:01 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- vmn_upd20130311c.zip checked in as bzr revision 10278.
- 08:58 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Update vmn_upd20130311c.zip has passed conversion regression testing. Please commit it to bzr and distribute. Note ...
- 03:37 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- This fix looks good to me. I have merged it with the latest bzr revision, re-run conversion regression testing with ...
- 01:36 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- I see you found another solution.
I also found one simple and straightforward solution by refining the condition f... - 12:19 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- Ovidiu, I was having many similar issues with client-side query substitution parameters and CAN-FIND while fixing #20...
- 02:33 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Added proposed update
It seems the problem is in some situation the remap scope is deleted before we get into the <p... - 11:28 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- It seems there are still some weird cases where it fails. Working on reproducing and fixing it
- 04:54 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- I'm sorry about that, it seems I forgot to save after doing the clean-up, and created the archive with some unwanted ...
- 09:54 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Code review 20130311a:
* Do you have a test case that illustrates the problem described by Constantin in notes 5 a... - 01:17 PM Bug #2059: CAN-FIND clause for a perm table in the RECORD_PHRASE of a temp table, with a FOR EACH...
- Update has passed conversion regression testing and is committed to bzr rev. 10280.
- 12:14 PM Bug #2059: CAN-FIND clause for a perm table in the RECORD_PHRASE of a temp table, with a FOR EACH...
- Fix candidate is attached. I am conversion regression testing this now.
- 10:15 PM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- Code looks good, AFAICT, but without test cases and being able to look at the ASTs, the changes were hard to follow, ...
03/11/2013
- 06:30 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Code review 20130311c:
The merge looks fine. The implementation of @BufferImpl.bufferCompare@ doesn't look right. ... - 05:00 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Attached update
vmn_upd20130311c.zip
vmn_upd20130311d.zip (corresponding test cases)
is next replacement of vm... - 04:26 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- P2JQuery,
** 040 CA 20130311 Added bufferHandle(integer).
It seems wrong number - 03:08 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Code review 20130311a:
The changes all look good.
I noticed on this second review that even the no-arg versions... - 10:01 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Attached update
vmn_upd20130311a.zip
vmn_upd20130311b.zip (corresponding test cases)
is replacement of vmn_upd2013... - 06:20 PM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- Regression conversion completed without errors.
- 03:42 PM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- > Is this merged up to the latest bzr revision?
Yes, it is merged. - 02:59 PM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- Is this merged up to the latest bzr revision?
If so, please do run conversion regression testing. Eric will do a ... - 02:32 PM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- Update for TABLE-HANDLE FOR case. Should I regression-test it?
- 03:32 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- The @<action>sibref.setHidden(true)</action>@ from @where_clause_post.rules@ at line 438 from my previous update seem...
- 11:24 AM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- After some more tests, it seems like this update does not fix the issue, in fact it is too restrictive, it will cut m...
- 06:07 AM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- With help from Constantin, the missing @setHidden@ is now in place.
- 01:46 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Added proposed update which checks if the javaname is marked for remap but not as a generated increment name.
- 11:05 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Added missing API bufferHandle(integer). Committed to bzr revision -10276- 10277.
03/10/2013
- 03:29 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Update ecf_upd20130308a.zip has passed conversion regression testing and is committed as bzr rev. 10274.
03/09/2013
- 09:11 AM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- I couldn't get my mind of client_taint and I took a quick look where is used. In where_clause_post.rules, at line 413...
03/08/2013
- 04:40 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Fix candidate attached. I'll push this through conversion regression testing.
Vadim: please take note of this up... - 03:56 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Eric, we've hit this on another occasion (? literal). For now, just handle both cases. The parser changes related to ...
- 03:43 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Interesting...outside of the message statement, the NO_LOCK_LITERAL is the child of an intermediate EXPRESSION node, ...
- 03:24 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- The update doesn't handle this case:...
- 01:59 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Sorry, I should have been more explicit. The failures are caused by the fact that, when you have a table named @prodc...
- 01:53 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Conversion regression testing has failed, as the tests above have passed because the jav... - 06:53 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Conversion regression testing has failed, as the tests above have passed because the javaname in these cases is the s...
- 04:51 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- The changes looks good, also solves other compile errors where wrong buf name was used, in cases like:...
- 04:01 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Added proposed update,
In previous comment I didn't understood exactly the process so I assumed there's an addition... - 12:20 PM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- About the state of work: I changed the parser so TABLE-HANDLE FOR is recognized as a variable reference rather than a...
- 12:19 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- At this moment, I use the following simplified testcase:...
- 12:09 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- I'm getting closer. Here what I found:
The extra node (@f1 [FUNC_LOGICAL]@) should be made hidden so it will not b... - 09:09 AM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- In my previous note there the and operator from where clause contains a reference to a buffer other than the one that...
- 10:35 AM Feature #2086 (Closed): add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined u...
- 10:34 AM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- Committed to bzr 10266.
- 09:58 AM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- OK, this change looks fine. Commit and distribute it.
- 09:48 AM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- The update has passed conversion regression testing. There is one additional change in MAJIC, from a @DEFINE TEMP-TAB...
- 08:37 AM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- Sorry, when you say "VALIDATE clause", I thought you are referring to the option for a TEMP-TABLE (not for a specific...
- 07:27 AM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- New version of the update, which solves the VALIDATE when used with @DEFINE TEMP-TABLE tt1 LIKE source VALIDATE@. Als...
- 03:09 AM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- This fix removes the extent annotation from the source field reference in the VALEXP. What is still needed to do:
# ... - 01:41 AM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- Greg, the VALIDATE clause is used in the server project with a field definition. See file pmcon/cjcotdo0.w. There are...
03/07/2013
- 06:12 PM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- VALIDATE is NOT used in the server project (in a TEMP-TABLE or WORK-TABLE definition). Only NO-UNDO and RCODE-INFORM...
- 05:41 PM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- MAJIC has finished conversion and there are changes, expected: validation clauses are dropped for temp-table fields d...
- 04:55 PM Feature #2086: add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined using LIKE...
- The server project exposed a problem with the temp-table fields defined using the LIKE clause, when the target field ...
- 04:43 PM Feature #2086 (Closed): add support for the VALIDATE clause, for the temp-table's fiels defined u...
- 03:12 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Code review 20130307a:
* There is no implementation for @QueryWrapper.getNext(LockType)@. The other @getXXX(LockT... - 11:10 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Does P2J have common module responsible for 4GL errors processing? (I found actually ErrorM... - 11:01 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Attached update vmn_upd20130307a.zip. Added runtime support for queryClose, queryForward, queryReposition, queryRepos...
- 05:11 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Does P2J have common module responsible for 4GL errors processing? (I found actually ErrorManager.recordOrThrowError(...
- 02:10 PM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- The problem seems to be happening in the annotation phase in the following way:
The BUFFER_SCOPE with a bufname" va... - 07:46 AM Bug #2084: Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- Example:...
- 07:44 AM Bug #2084 (Closed): Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- 09:57 AM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- I did some patch (removing the extra expression from where node after generating the anonymous inner class needed by ...
- 05:33 AM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- Another can-find leak:...
- 08:48 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- > When will the solution be ready for review?
Hopefully will finish it today. - 08:46 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- When will the solution be ready for review?
- 04:44 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- About @DEF PARAMETER TABLE-HANDLE FOR th@ where @th@ is a regular variable:
1. OUTPUT case will produce compile-ti...
03/06/2013
- 05:13 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Please implement all the methods you can, which do not require dynamic database support. For example, FIND-FIRST wit...
- 02:02 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The parameter is in fact an echo of the content of the client-side WhereExpression: @f1(cus... - 01:59 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- Here are the converted code for two cases (which attempt to call two new constructors), with and without another join...
- 01:50 PM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- I tried to simplify the sample. Suppose we have a simple function:...
- 01:25 PM Bug #2083 (Closed): client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- 01:37 PM Feature #1947 (Closed): add conversion support for database methods
- Vadim committed this update to bzr as revision number 10256.
- 11:21 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- I made a minor change to the database_general.rules header. Please check in and distribute the attached version of y...
- 10:58 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- I have attached one more variant of the same update, but merged manually
- 10:29 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Code review 20130306a:
Other than the literal.rules merge issue noted above (which I do think was my mistake), eve... - 09:35 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- I will merge everything manually and resubmit
- 09:25 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- As I see, update from Eric was not merged with revision you pointed. Maybe I am wrong with time calculation?
- 09:21 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Update #134 from Eric was attached at 2013-03-05 11:38PM, so I supposed that it was merged with revision 10245 that w...
- 08:54 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Vadim, literals.rules is not merged with 10245 (evl_upd20130305a.zip). I'll let Eric review the rest of the update.
- 08:49 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Attached update
vmn_upd20130306a.zip / vmn_upd20130306a_test_cases.zip (start/final revisions 10245/10253)
The follow... - 12:42 PM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- Committed to bzr revision 10257.
- 11:54 AM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- Check it in and distribute it.
- 11:40 AM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- Update has passed conversion regression testing - no changes in generated code.
- 10:46 AM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- This solves the collision cases for good. Also, I've added support for buffer names collision check. I'm putting this...
- 09:12 AM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- Yes, the fix is pretty simple. I'll provide an update today.
- 09:00 AM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- If this is easy enough to fix, please go ahead and put the fix in. That way we don't have to remember there is a pro...
- 07:38 AM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- Ovidiu, sorry I hijacked this from you last night. Anyway, this case I don't think is encountered in the server proje...
- 07:26 AM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- By chance I prepared a sample test-case for this issue which at this moment is not converted correctly by p2j:...
- 01:50 AM Bug #2077: fix converted table and field name collisions
- Committed to bzr revision 10246.
- 07:14 AM Feature #1967: rework DMO class/interface hierarchy
- 0306b.zip was committed to bzr revision 10253.
- 04:46 AM Feature #1967: rework DMO class/interface hierarchy
- ca_upd20130306b.zip has passed conversion regression testing (no changes in generated sources).
- 02:25 AM Feature #1967: rework DMO class/interface hierarchy
- Attached update fixes the problem for my 0305d.zip. It brackets the deleteAll with a block only if it's parent is not...
- 03:03 AM Feature #1953: add conversion support for CREATE BUFFER statement
- Committed revision 10248.
Also available in: Atom