Activity
From 07/11/2013 to 08/09/2013
08/09/2013
- 07:26 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Constantin, Ovidiu, is there any difference between @TempTable.uniqueId()@ and @UniqueID.getUniqueID()@?
- 01:34 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- > I have not reviewed the code yet (will do that later today). Is there anything left to do on this task (considering...
- 01:25 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- I have not reviewed the code yet (will do that later today). Is there anything left to do on this task (considering s...
- 03:18 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Indeed, there were some issues at conversion time:
> - join of a buffer with a table
> ... - 02:37 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- Indeed, there were some issues at conversion time:
- join of a buffer with a table
- join of a buffer with the sa... - 02:45 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- I removed the TODO comment that eclipse inserted automatically.
Regarding the desc sequences, I believe they are n... - 11:15 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric, thanks, I have no questions so far.
08/08/2013
- 06:14 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Do we still keep FOR-EACH loop based RecordBuffer.deleteAll implementation?
Yes, it is the... - 06:11 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- I've been thinking about this most of the afternoon here, and actually, after some discussions with Greg, I'm leaning...
- 05:18 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric, could you describe your idea about using table pinned lock for bulk delete in some more detail? I still not goo...
- 04:21 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- OK, but if you remove the conditional test, please be sure to add comments so we don't lose information. This condit...
- 03:59 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Condition on the line RecordBuffer, line 7747...
- 10:53 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I think the desired effect can be achieved with changes to @RecordLockContext@ and @RecordBu... - 04:09 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- In regard to note 26 and note 30, this is a known flaw in our processing for the MESSAGE statement. We don't need to...
- 03:37 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- Code review 20130808a:
This update looks OK, but it is in a very sensitive area of the conversion, and it is hard ... - 01:21 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- The first version of the update attached.
I used the disjunction between of-join foreign-key phrase and any existing ... - 06:42 AM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- My first approach here was to analyze the AST tree to see why the @OF@ node does not get encoded as needed.
I used ... - 08:52 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Unless there are significant downsides, I think we should implement chaining of both classloaders as our default appr...
- 08:34 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- When distributing update I forgot to mention that if someone wants to use dynamic temp tables, @InMemoryClassLoader@ ...
- 08:22 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- This update adds basic support for dynamic tables.
08/07/2013
- 05:59 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > Do you plan to support Alternate Buffer Pool (since 10.2B)?
> N... - 03:31 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > In case of separate TableIdentifier class we will need to use @i... - 03:21 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> In case of separate TableIdentifier class we will need to use @instanceof TableIdentifier@ ... - 03:16 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> It seems it might be best to leave the @LockManager@ interface and @InMemoryLockManager@ cla... - 02:59 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- It seems it might be best to leave the @LockManager@ interface and @InMemoryLockManager@ class alone after all.
Gi...
08/06/2013
- 09:07 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Code review 20130801a:
Looks good. There is a TODO comment in the PostgreSQLSequenceHandler c'tor. Is there some...
08/05/2013
- 07:43 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Good point. Please see the class @RecordLockContext@, which already deals with this issue (it is a bit more complicat...
- 10:30 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Several records could be locked from one context and require SHARE-LOCK for the same table.
I suggest to add one m... - 02:27 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- On Friday, the runtime test failed with an abend in gso_ctrlc_3way, failure in step 11, and about 10 other issues in ...
08/04/2013
- 02:23 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- These names will available via an API. The code will look something like this:...
- 02:00 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Eric, please note that in order to authentically implement @CREATE-LIKE@ and @ADD-LIKE-FIELD@ I need to have original...
08/02/2013
- 12:39 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I think it is ok to commit.
- 10:27 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Regression 20130802_053132 completed. There are 4 FAILED and 3 FAILED_DEPENDENCY tests in ts_tests....
- 05:00 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Yes, that's a good point. The @update@ parameter will need to be passed through from the @lock@ method.
08/01/2013
- 05:43 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Is the any sense in adding also @boolean update@ parameter like for @lock@ method?
- 03:54 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Regression 20130801_101909 completed. There are 6 FAILED tests in ts_tests....
- 10:11 AM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Near final update. Issues from Eric's review were fixed. The PSQL issues were eliminated.
I am putting this update t...
07/31/2013
- 05:29 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Correction: @lockTable(LockType lockType)@ should actually be @lockTable(String table, LockType lockType)@, where @ta...
- 05:04 PM Feature #1602: support BigDecimal in PLJAVA indexOf() implementation
- I have no idea. I'm sure I was just going off our estimate spreadsheet, based on some feedback you provided originally.
- 05:01 PM Feature #1602: support BigDecimal in PLJAVA indexOf() implementation
- Greg: I just looked into the Functions class and found we have the following method:...
- 01:36 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Update vmn_upd20130731a.zip replaces update vmn_upd20130729a.zip with fixed comments in note 22.
Updated to revision... - 12:32 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > I have tested DELETE with validation when record is locked. In t... - 08:38 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> I have tested DELETE with validation when record is locked. In this case 4GL simply ignores... - 08:21 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Code review 20130729a:
Code looks fine. However, I would suggest, instead of changing @handle@ and @ControlFlowOps... - 07:27 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Do you plan to support Alternate Buffer Pool (since 10.2B)?
Not to my knowledge. There are... - 07:12 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Please go ahead and fix the conversion defect. AFAIK, all the information we have regarding rules about buffers is in...
07/30/2013
- 05:37 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- @DEFAULT-BUFFER-HANDLE@ will take some more time if I'm going to implement it completely, specifically it is converte...
- 02:58 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Be careful with your conclusions here. This result can be heavily affected by the 4GL caching/flushing behavior AND ...
- 02:47 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I have tested DELETE with validation when record is locked. In this case 4GL simply ignores this record.
One user... - 05:12 AM Feature #2137 (WIP): runtime support for FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options
- See #2095 for cases which require support.
07/29/2013
- 04:21 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Do you plan to support Alternate Buffer Pool (since 10.2B)?
- 03:36 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130729a.zip/vmn_upd20130729b.zip
1) Added a boolean asMsg parameter to recordOrThr... - 11:58 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I don't see the value in making changes to builtErrorText(). If I understand correctly, we just need to bypass the c...
- 11:48 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Before I can answer, I have one more question. In both cases (NO-ERROR and without NO-ERROR), wha... - 09:33 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Before I can answer, I have one more question. In both cases (NO-ERROR and without NO-ERROR), what is returned from ...
- 11:59 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Yes, please commit and distribute.
- 11:12 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Eric, may I commit this update?
07/26/2013
- 03:41 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- What about adding one more parameter to buildErrorText and recordOrThrowError:
boolean withNumber
and do not pr... - 10:52 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- *Non-Error case*...
- 07:21 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- 2 things:
1. Are you sure that failing a validation in the 4GL is considered an "ERROR" in the 4GL sense? What do... - 06:17 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Please propose a change which adjusts for these minor differences with minimal or (if possib... - 08:22 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Oh, I believed you, I just found it interesting how inconsistent Progress is.
- 05:38 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Regression 20130725_172005 completed in time you pointed. There are less errors: 3 FAILED tests in ts_tests.
1. tc...
07/25/2013
- 06:17 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I have attached screenshots
- 05:57 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Interesting. I have not previously seen a Progress-style error which does not have the leading asterisks and trailing...
- 05:27 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I have tested both in P2J and 4GL and also with NO-ERROR and some other examples like ...
07/24/2013
- 05:52 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- For now, that is the best way. Later on, we will start to move our utility classes into separate jars, but let's kee...
- 03:49 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- I guess we have the same files in both projects.
Greg: can you think of a better way? - 02:00 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Eric, @com.goldencode.compile.*@ classes are from the harness project. They are now required for P2J project too. How...
- 12:38 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- > What is the TODO comment in DMOIndex.classes()
Dynamic table classes are not returned by this function. Since this... - 04:51 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Code review 20130717a/b/c:
Nice work. A very interesting update.
* What is the TODO comment in @DMOIndex.class... - 05:20 PM Feature #2046 (WIP): runtime support for DELETE statement with a validation expression
- 03:01 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- IIRC, some of the "job clock" tests are sensitive to the time of day they are run, so these may be false negatives (o...
- 02:48 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Regression 20130724_051719 completed. There are 8 FAILED and FAILED_DEPENDENCY tests in ts_tests:
1. tc_job_002 FA...
07/23/2013
- 05:38 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Then I think your suggested approach makes sense.
- 03:53 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Default buffer for dynamic tables can be used anywhere, i.e. within and outside of @TEMP-TABLE-PREPARE()@ call scope.
- 02:37 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Eric, I was working on @DEFAULT-BUFFER-HANDLE@ - handle to default buffer which can be use... - 02:21 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> ...
> I think we should use "field1", "field2" as Hibernate names and parse queries passe... - 01:54 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Eric, I was working on @DEFAULT-BUFFER-HANDLE@ - handle to default buffer which can be used anywhere in the program a...
- 03:25 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Code review 20130723a/b:
Code looks good. Please regression test and check it in if successful. - 03:05 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130723a.zip/vmn_upd20130723b.zip with deleteAll based on "converted-style" FOR-EACH l...
- 02:48 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> This is file you sent me separately. Bzr version does not contain 023 ECF 20130618
Yes, ...
07/22/2013
- 10:18 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- > Good. But hibernate-core-4.1.8.jar is file I received from Stas, I am not sure if he will commit (or already commit...
- 10:05 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * Please put the Hibernate jar in a separate update and put it under the @lib@ directory ins... - 09:34 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * This version of database_general.rules is the same as the one currently checked into bzr. ...
07/21/2013
- 06:02 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Code review 20130719a:
* This version of database_general.rules is the same as the one currently checked into bzr....
07/19/2013
- 03:01 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Savepoint based reversible actually could work for other operations, not only for @deleteAll@. I have attached update...
07/18/2013
- 06:17 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- I was mistaken, temporary table was created by DefaultDirtyShareManager for track changes
- 01:09 AM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Code review 20130712a:
Generally looks good; nice work. Some comments below.
* Please add a WARNING to schema co... - 12:23 AM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> +Note 26 continued+.
> ...
Greg: I need your input here.
Ovidiu: since this is an erro...
07/17/2013
- 06:11 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Savepoint seems more promising and common approach. I have attached very draft @deleteAll@ support based on Savepoin...
- 01:05 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- +Note 26 continued+.
From my quick tests, it seems that @message@ is more permissive about errors occurred while eva... - 09:34 AM Feature #1655: add conversion and runtime support for certain dynamic database attributes and met...
- All metadata from the _field, _file, _index, _index_field, _user, and _lock tables are being stored in an embedded H2...
- 09:12 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- About field name validation for dynamic tables.
1. Basically you can create a field with any name, and this field ca... - 08:52 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Update - part 3 (Hibernate changes).
- 04:07 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Update - part 2.
07/16/2013
- 02:30 PM Feature #1655: add conversion and runtime support for certain dynamic database attributes and met...
- Did some research regarding these methods, focusing on @bufferField()@.
My first thought were to 'capture' the mis... - 11:14 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Update for review. Allows potentially manipulate DMOs using P2J framework. I'll post remaining parts and make comment...
- 10:24 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- The other option is to look at savepoints sooner rather than later, since this is probably the most correct/supported...
07/15/2013
- 06:33 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Interesting idea.
Please detail your proposed design for bulk delete "undo"-ability (to use the Progress term) for... - 05:24 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Reversible operations for temporary tables are based on multiplex ID value and records are not actually deleted from ...
- 02:19 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- I discovered something strange with sequences.
If you define a sequence with negative increment Progress will automa...
07/12/2013
- 06:25 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- OK, this complicates the implementation.
Based on your findings so far, I think the way we need to handle this is to... - 01:49 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Example undo for DELETE FROM for subtransaction. It works: record exists after bulk delete and undo ...
- 02:15 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- This update package contains a first stage of runtime implementation. Main points:
- fixed name issues (4GL-legacy ... - 11:59 AM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- I am having the following issue....
07/11/2013
- 04:58 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Good question. I'm sure a DELETE FROM style bulk delete would be rolled back at a full transaction scope, but we nee...
- 04:52 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Are there sense of reversible bulk delete for persistent tables?
- 03:09 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Additionally to note 29.
> I have tested @DELETE FOR@ with @WHERE@ clause. I understand i... - 02:01 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- OK, please check in and distribute this update.
- 01:58 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Regression 20130711_075408 completed with the following results.
Only 2 tests failed: tc_job_002 as expected and ...
Also available in: Atom