Activity
From 07/21/2013 to 08/19/2013
08/19/2013
- 05:07 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> From my investigation it's enough to comment-out the line 399 from SortCriterion:
> [...]
... - 02:23 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The queries that used these indexes were probably unused on PSQL... - 02:09 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The queries that used these indexes were probably unused on PSQL.
How did you come to this... - 12:00 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- I have put to test my changes and here is the diff for it (ddl only):...
08/17/2013
- 04:47 PM Bug #2163: Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- OK, now I get it. I don't normally run non-database test cases (at least not without a data model present from some e...
- 04:23 PM Bug #2163: Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- Fixed the typo in my description above: off -> on.
- 04:14 PM Bug #2163: Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> When starting P2J server with converted code without data model (and no DMO index on the class... - 10:35 AM Bug #2163: Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- When starting P2J server with converted code without data model (and no DMO index on the classpath) and server persis...
- 10:13 AM Bug #2163 (New): Server fails to start when missing DMO index
- 04:22 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- Even so, you've identified a problem which has confused a number of people over the years. It's appropriate to open t...
- 04:16 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- Eric, you are right. I created the issue under false assumption that primes.p, which I used for testing, has no DB de...
- 04:01 PM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- The converted @primes.p@ sample program actually does have a persistence dependency; it uses a temp-table, which is w...
- 11:31 AM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- In regard to the NullPointerException - because persistence is off BufferManager is not listed in the context's (Tran...
- 11:19 AM Bug #2164: Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
- When server persistence disabled (directory.xml:persistence/active == FALSE) an attempt to start a converted Progress...
- 11:07 AM Bug #2164 (Closed): Server fails to start a Progress app when persistence disabled
08/16/2013
- 12:20 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- I checked how this attribute is used in the project. There is only one use, and it is the widget version of the attri...
- 11:33 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- But according to documentation, integer CURRENT-ITERATION attribute is used only for using buffers related with ProD...
- 09:59 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- ProDataSet support is out of scope for the current project.
- 09:56 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Is @currentIteration@ attribute planned for @ProDataSet.FILL()@ support? In this case seems Buffer should refer to p...
- 06:57 AM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- CREATE DATABASE statement (not supported now) will be one more place for creating metadata tables.
08/15/2013
- 06:12 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I suggest to include the following methods to MetaSchema API...
- 02:21 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Please summarize what methods are left to be implemented in order to complete this task. If any of them require metad...
- 02:14 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Please review those attributes in this task which require metadata support in order to implement. This includes any s...
08/14/2013
- 03:09 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- From my investigation it's enough to comment-out the line 399 from SortCriterion:...
- 02:19 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- OK, great. So, please just determine where things are going wrong with the @id@ column direction. I prefer to keep th...
- 02:07 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- I see no evidence that P2J fails in this case. Both H2 and PSQL dialects generate correctly java source and mixed ind...
- 12:54 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Sorry, what I meant was: please test a multi-column, mixed direction index that is already unique in Progress. In thi...
- 12:21 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Already tested, it seemed a little strange so I simplified the sample to the above form.
Back to your answer: it is ... - 11:56 AM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Interesting finding, good work.
The @id@ column is a special-purpose addition to some indexes, specific to our imp... - 11:30 AM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- I have found a possible issue.
When creating an index (balance-desc on customer) the conversion will generate someth... - 02:57 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Update vmn_upd20130814a.zip is attached.
1) lockTable implemented
2) delete all corrected with lockTable
3) sor... - 06:02 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- There is only problem with primary recognition. I tested and just remembered why I did not trust primary flag in runt...
08/13/2013
- 04:50 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Yes, good approach.
- 04:49 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- I understood. I will implement and test with simple fields having names equal to java names and insert TODO in corres...
- 04:46 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Hibernate does not know anything about the Progress legacy names. It only maps the Java object (DMO/property) names t...
- 04:44 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Yes.
- 04:43 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Do you mean a facility where you specify a Progress legacy table and field name, and it provides the Java DMO's prope...
- 04:31 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- I even think such or similar method exists in Hibernate
- 04:23 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Yes. What about field name to java name map? It seems it should be simple, or I do not see some problems?
- 04:21 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- @IndexSelectionWorker@ works within the context of the pattern engine and relies upon the set up work done by @index_...
- 04:00 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- In principle, calcIndexSelection() does not work in runtime only because of problem with method @indexes()@, requirin...
- 03:42 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- I think for @delete all@ only needed:
1) method repeating the logic of calcIndexSelection() including all private... - 03:21 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- For the moment, these resources are available at conversion time only, but we are adding support for index selection ...
- 02:35 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Is it impossible to use IndexSelectionWorker (and P2OLookup) in runtime?
- 10:09 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- This is not exactly what I was looking for; a missing WHERE clause does not mean you will have a missing order by cla...
- 03:33 PM Feature #1666: add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Reviewed the previous notes and investigate the Hibernate code:
- schema and p2o files support mixed indexes
- wi... - 10:29 PM Feature #1666 (WIP): add support for mixed-direction indexes
- Ovidiu, I am reassigning this issue to you.
Looking back at your last update, the underscore prefixes on the chara... - 12:50 PM Feature #2044 (Closed): implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- 12:49 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- vmn_upd20130731a.zip update passed regression testing and was committed to bzr rev 30372.
- 12:49 PM Feature #2046 (Closed): runtime support for DELETE statement with a validation expression
- 11:04 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Constantin, Ovidiu, is there any difference between @TempTable.uniqueId()@ and @UniqueID.g... - 10:21 PM Feature #1660 (Closed): add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
08/12/2013
- 04:46 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- I checked ...
- 02:43 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Still working on field name mapping.
Why do you plan to take the first index instead of the primary index? Please ... - 02:12 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Is field name to java name mapping available in runtime now? I need it to retrieve correct sort clause for deleteAll ...
- 02:32 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- Checked in bzr as rev 10375 and distributed by mail.
LE: I forgot to mention that I re-run the conversion test since... - 12:47 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- 20130812b update looks good. Please check it in.
- 12:31 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- There were some nodes duplicated in the @/src/aero/timco/majic/dmo/dmo_index.xml@. After investigations I had to chan...
- 01:51 PM Feature #1582 (Closed): add conversion and runtime support for sequences
- 01:48 PM Feature #1911 (Closed): add runtime support for sequences
- I am closing this issue, but please open a separate issue (bug) for the remaining, negative increment problem (note 2...
- 01:34 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Final update, that passed the runtime test (notes 37-39), was committed in bzr as rev 10374 and distributed by mail.
- 12:35 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Correction: I went back through my email and found that these tests are intermittently failing due to a non-P2J prob...
- 12:30 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Since this is a merged code base which is different from your last run, please run regression testing one more time (...
- 11:47 AM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- The regression test went flawlessly for the main part (ignoring the usual 'Unexpected EOF in actual at page # 1.' fro...
- 12:51 PM Feature #1602 (Closed): support BigDecimal in PLJAVA indexOf() implementation
- I can't determine that there is anything left to do here. Closing this issue accordingly.
- 09:29 AM Feature #2161: Changing UNDO attribute of dynamic table
- UNDO attribute can be changed (and takes effect!) after a table has been prepared. I'll leave this "feature" for futu...
- 09:26 AM Feature #2161 (New): Changing UNDO attribute of dynamic table
- 08:23 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- In regard to note 89, please create a separate task for this (and include the testcase). Make sure to make the new t...
08/11/2013
- 05:27 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- UNDO attribute can be changed (and takes effect!) after a table has been prepared. I'll leave this "feature" for futu...
- 12:05 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- My mistake, will correct.
- 11:37 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Hmm.......
- 11:10 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- I've found that @CLEAR()@ resets @UNDO@ attribute to @true@, unless the call was performed on an unprepared table wit...
08/09/2013
- 07:26 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Constantin, Ovidiu, is there any difference between @TempTable.uniqueId()@ and @UniqueID.getUniqueID()@?
- 01:34 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- > I have not reviewed the code yet (will do that later today). Is there anything left to do on this task (considering...
- 01:25 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- I have not reviewed the code yet (will do that later today). Is there anything left to do on this task (considering s...
- 03:18 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Indeed, there were some issues at conversion time:
> - join of a buffer with a table
> ... - 02:37 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- Indeed, there were some issues at conversion time:
- join of a buffer with a table
- join of a buffer with the sa... - 02:45 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- I removed the TODO comment that eclipse inserted automatically.
Regarding the desc sequences, I believe they are n... - 11:15 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric, thanks, I have no questions so far.
08/08/2013
- 06:14 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Do we still keep FOR-EACH loop based RecordBuffer.deleteAll implementation?
Yes, it is the... - 06:11 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- I've been thinking about this most of the afternoon here, and actually, after some discussions with Greg, I'm leaning...
- 05:18 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric, could you describe your idea about using table pinned lock for bulk delete in some more detail? I still not goo...
- 04:21 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- OK, but if you remove the conditional test, please be sure to add comments so we don't lose information. This condit...
- 03:59 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Condition on the line RecordBuffer, line 7747...
- 10:53 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I think the desired effect can be achieved with changes to @RecordLockContext@ and @RecordBu... - 04:09 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- In regard to note 26 and note 30, this is a known flaw in our processing for the MESSAGE statement. We don't need to...
- 03:37 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- Code review 20130808a:
This update looks OK, but it is in a very sensitive area of the conversion, and it is hard ... - 01:21 PM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- The first version of the update attached.
I used the disjunction between of-join foreign-key phrase and any existing ... - 06:42 AM Feature #1660: add conversion and runtime support for OF keyword use in a CAN-FIND
- My first approach here was to analyze the AST tree to see why the @OF@ node does not get encoded as needed.
I used ... - 08:52 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Unless there are significant downsides, I think we should implement chaining of both classloaders as our default appr...
- 08:34 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- When distributing update I forgot to mention that if someone wants to use dynamic temp tables, @InMemoryClassLoader@ ...
- 08:22 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- This update adds basic support for dynamic tables.
08/07/2013
- 05:59 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > Do you plan to support Alternate Buffer Pool (since 10.2B)?
> N... - 03:31 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > In case of separate TableIdentifier class we will need to use @i... - 03:21 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> In case of separate TableIdentifier class we will need to use @instanceof TableIdentifier@ ... - 03:16 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> It seems it might be best to leave the @LockManager@ interface and @InMemoryLockManager@ cla... - 02:59 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- It seems it might be best to leave the @LockManager@ interface and @InMemoryLockManager@ class alone after all.
Gi...
08/06/2013
- 09:07 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Code review 20130801a:
Looks good. There is a TODO comment in the PostgreSQLSequenceHandler c'tor. Is there some...
08/05/2013
- 07:43 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Good point. Please see the class @RecordLockContext@, which already deals with this issue (it is a bit more complicat...
- 10:30 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Several records could be locked from one context and require SHARE-LOCK for the same table.
I suggest to add one m... - 02:27 PM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- On Friday, the runtime test failed with an abend in gso_ctrlc_3way, failure in step 11, and about 10 other issues in ...
08/04/2013
- 02:23 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- These names will available via an API. The code will look something like this:...
- 02:00 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Eric, please note that in order to authentically implement @CREATE-LIKE@ and @ADD-LIKE-FIELD@ I need to have original...
08/02/2013
- 12:39 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I think it is ok to commit.
- 10:27 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Regression 20130802_053132 completed. There are 4 FAILED and 3 FAILED_DEPENDENCY tests in ts_tests....
- 05:00 AM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Yes, that's a good point. The @update@ parameter will need to be passed through from the @lock@ method.
08/01/2013
- 05:43 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Is the any sense in adding also @boolean update@ parameter like for @lock@ method?
- 03:54 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Regression 20130801_101909 completed. There are 6 FAILED tests in ts_tests....
- 10:11 AM Feature #1911: add runtime support for sequences
- Near final update. Issues from Eric's review were fixed. The PSQL issues were eliminated.
I am putting this update t...
07/31/2013
- 05:29 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- Correction: @lockTable(LockType lockType)@ should actually be @lockTable(String table, LockType lockType)@, where @ta...
- 05:04 PM Feature #1602: support BigDecimal in PLJAVA indexOf() implementation
- I have no idea. I'm sure I was just going off our estimate spreadsheet, based on some feedback you provided originally.
- 05:01 PM Feature #1602: support BigDecimal in PLJAVA indexOf() implementation
- Greg: I just looked into the Functions class and found we have the following method:...
- 01:36 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Update vmn_upd20130731a.zip replaces update vmn_upd20130729a.zip with fixed comments in note 22.
Updated to revision... - 12:32 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > I have tested DELETE with validation when record is locked. In t... - 08:38 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> I have tested DELETE with validation when record is locked. In this case 4GL simply ignores... - 08:21 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Code review 20130729a:
Code looks fine. However, I would suggest, instead of changing @handle@ and @ControlFlowOps... - 07:27 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Do you plan to support Alternate Buffer Pool (since 10.2B)?
Not to my knowledge. There are... - 07:12 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Please go ahead and fix the conversion defect. AFAIK, all the information we have regarding rules about buffers is in...
07/30/2013
- 05:37 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- @DEFAULT-BUFFER-HANDLE@ will take some more time if I'm going to implement it completely, specifically it is converte...
- 02:58 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Be careful with your conclusions here. This result can be heavily affected by the 4GL caching/flushing behavior AND ...
- 02:47 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I have tested DELETE with validation when record is locked. In this case 4GL simply ignores this record.
One user... - 05:12 AM Feature #2137 (WIP): runtime support for FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options
- See #2095 for cases which require support.
07/29/2013
- 04:21 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Do you plan to support Alternate Buffer Pool (since 10.2B)?
- 03:36 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130729a.zip/vmn_upd20130729b.zip
1) Added a boolean asMsg parameter to recordOrThr... - 11:58 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I don't see the value in making changes to builtErrorText(). If I understand correctly, we just need to bypass the c...
- 11:48 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Before I can answer, I have one more question. In both cases (NO-ERROR and without NO-ERROR), wha... - 09:33 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Before I can answer, I have one more question. In both cases (NO-ERROR and without NO-ERROR), what is returned from ...
- 11:59 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Yes, please commit and distribute.
- 11:12 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Eric, may I commit this update?
07/26/2013
- 03:41 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- What about adding one more parameter to buildErrorText and recordOrThrowError:
boolean withNumber
and do not pr... - 10:52 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- *Non-Error case*...
- 07:21 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- 2 things:
1. Are you sure that failing a validation in the 4GL is considered an "ERROR" in the 4GL sense? What do... - 06:17 AM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Please propose a change which adjusts for these minor differences with minimal or (if possib... - 08:22 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Oh, I believed you, I just found it interesting how inconsistent Progress is.
- 05:38 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Regression 20130725_172005 completed in time you pointed. There are less errors: 3 FAILED tests in ts_tests.
1. tc...
07/25/2013
- 06:17 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I have attached screenshots
- 05:57 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- Interesting. I have not previously seen a Progress-style error which does not have the leading asterisks and trailing...
- 05:27 PM Feature #2044: implement support for a DELETE statement with a validation expression
- I have tested both in P2J and 4GL and also with NO-ERROR and some other examples like ...
07/24/2013
- 05:52 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- For now, that is the best way. Later on, we will start to move our utility classes into separate jars, but let's kee...
- 03:49 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- I guess we have the same files in both projects.
Greg: can you think of a better way? - 02:00 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Eric, @com.goldencode.compile.*@ classes are from the harness project. They are now required for P2J project too. How...
- 12:38 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- > What is the TODO comment in DMOIndex.classes()
Dynamic table classes are not returned by this function. Since this... - 04:51 AM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Code review 20130717a/b/c:
Nice work. A very interesting update.
* What is the TODO comment in @DMOIndex.class... - 05:20 PM Feature #2046 (WIP): runtime support for DELETE statement with a validation expression
- 03:01 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- IIRC, some of the "job clock" tests are sensitive to the time of day they are run, so these may be false negatives (o...
- 02:48 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Regression 20130724_051719 completed. There are 8 FAILED and FAILED_DEPENDENCY tests in ts_tests:
1. tc_job_002 FA...
07/23/2013
- 05:38 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Then I think your suggested approach makes sense.
- 03:53 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Default buffer for dynamic tables can be used anywhere, i.e. within and outside of @TEMP-TABLE-PREPARE()@ call scope.
- 02:37 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Eric, I was working on @DEFAULT-BUFFER-HANDLE@ - handle to default buffer which can be use... - 02:21 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> ...
> I think we should use "field1", "field2" as Hibernate names and parse queries passe... - 01:54 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- Eric, I was working on @DEFAULT-BUFFER-HANDLE@ - handle to default buffer which can be used anywhere in the program a...
- 03:25 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Code review 20130723a/b:
Code looks good. Please regression test and check it in if successful. - 03:05 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130723a.zip/vmn_upd20130723b.zip with deleteAll based on "converted-style" FOR-EACH l...
- 02:48 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> This is file you sent me separately. Bzr version does not contain 023 ECF 20130618
Yes, ...
07/22/2013
- 10:18 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- > Good. But hibernate-core-4.1.8.jar is file I received from Stas, I am not sure if he will commit (or already commit...
- 10:05 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * Please put the Hibernate jar in a separate update and put it under the @lib@ directory ins... - 09:34 AM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * This version of database_general.rules is the same as the one currently checked into bzr. ...
07/21/2013
- 06:02 PM Feature #1588: add conversion and runtime support for embedded SQL
- Code review 20130719a:
* This version of database_general.rules is the same as the one currently checked into bzr....
Also available in: Atom