Activity
From 10/13/2015 to 11/11/2015
11/11/2015
- 02:17 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Developer tests were OK.
If normal regression testing goes well, please merge the changes to 2677a. - 12:00 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Sysmaint tests were OK.
- 11:19 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Common search and full search unit tests went OK with 2618a/10953. Running sysmaint and developer tests next...
- 08:29 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- There is no need to wait on testing. Get it done now and then merge into *2677a*. Do not merge to trunk.
11/10/2015
- 04:54 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- On second thought: Greg, would you prefer we hold off regression testing 2618a and 2692b until you've merged 2677a to...
- 04:49 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Code review 2618a/10953:
Changes look good. Due to the regression found in 10952, I separated my work for #2692 in... - 03:25 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- P2J branch 2692b, rev. 10956 (based on trunk revision 10951) contains the changes necessary to:
* parse schema valid...
11/06/2015
- 03:06 PM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- Eric, no need to apologise - I should have noticed this myself.
Thanks! - 02:27 PM Feature #2808 (Closed): allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceId...
- Paul, sorry, I should have seen this earlier; turns out this feature has been there all along, but it had long since ...
11/03/2015
- 09:30 AM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- Ok, thanks Eric.
- 09:27 AM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- I am in the middle of a fairly big, unrelated change. I can piggy-back this feature onto that change when it goes int...
- 08:00 AM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- The sooner this is done the higher it's value for us.
At the moment the postgres bug that the PK scan triggers is ...
11/02/2015
- 04:17 PM Feature #2808: allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceIdentityMan...
- Add an optional setting to the directory that would be read in @SequenceIdentityManager.setIdentityPool@, to disable ...
- 04:14 PM Feature #2808 (Closed): allow database scans for unused primary keys to be disabled in SequenceId...
10/31/2015
- 03:01 PM Bug #2807 (Test): LDBNAME can work with an unopen buffer
- 03:01 PM Bug #2807: LDBNAME can work with an unopen buffer
- A proposed fix is in 2677a/10996. It resolves the above test case, but has not been regression tested.
- 04:50 AM Bug #2807: LDBNAME can work with an unopen buffer
- The @ldbname@ function (and maybe others?) work in 4GL with an not-yet-opened buffer:...
- 04:47 AM Bug #2807 (Closed): LDBNAME can work with an unopen buffer
10/29/2015
- 04:36 PM Feature #2618 (Test): add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- 04:34 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Code review 2618a/10952:
Ovidiu, all looks good. To double-up on regression testing, I'm going to be making update... - 04:28 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Thanks, Guy.
- 12:15 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- I've updated the bzr repo on lincon01 with versions of adcdedi1.w and adcdedi2.w with the references to SKIP-DELETED-...
- 12:02 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Hi Ovidiu,
To be honest I didn't know about the existence of that attribute, nor what it did.
Looking at the code... - 11:19 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Guy,
From the initial list, the @SKIP-DELETED-RECORD@ is the only attribute that lacks support in p2j. I was not ... - 12:06 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Code review 2618a/10951:
This update looks good. Please clean up a few minor issues:
* either add a header entry ... - 04:28 PM Feature #2615 (New): implement CONNECT statement options -cache, -N and -1
- You are right. We created this task based on an older set of reports. It is not needed in the current code.
This... - 04:01 PM Feature #2615 (WIP): implement CONNECT statement options -cache, -N and -1
- I searched the project for CONNECT statements and I could not find any. I could find instead a call to DISCONNECT sta...
- 02:42 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- We already know SET, UPDATE, PROMPT-FOR, INSERT trigger schema-level validation. The following test results are inten...
10/28/2015
- 03:41 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Task branch 2618a created from main trunk revno 10950. It contains the implementation of UNDO attribute and fixes for...
10/23/2015
- 04:01 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- The implementation of UNDO attribute is done for dynamic temp-tables.
However, I discovered that the same attribute... - 08:28 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Further investigations I realized in the second half of my previous note I was wrong. Please ignore that part.
10/22/2015
- 03:17 PM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- I continued investigations on SKIP-DELETED-RECORD but without success. I checked the GUI sources and there are only t...
- 02:57 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Right now, we have the original, 4GL validation expression string for the table in the @_File@ metadata table (via th...
- 08:40 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- I might have misread something: @the record is not deleted, because the validation expression, normally applied at co...
- 08:37 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg/Eric: the doc for the buffer handle's @BUFFER-DELETE()@ method states this:
> The BUFFER-DELETE method correspo...
10/21/2015
- 06:42 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Ouch. You make a good point, which I should have considered in my previous answer. Sorry about that.
Since resou... - 05:23 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Our current strategy of parsing validation expressions at schema load time is faulty. I have long ignored validation ...
- 12:39 PM Feature #2616 (Closed): add some minor metadata support
- 12:28 PM Feature #2616 (WIP): add some minor metadata support
- 12:28 PM Feature #2616 (Closed): add some minor metadata support
10/20/2015
- 04:15 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- That suggests that we must emit a different instance in each business logic file that uses the @DELETE@ statement on ...
- 04:07 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Can they reference context that exists in the business logic code that is executing the @DELETE@?...
Also available in: Atom