Activity
From 11/12/2015 to 12/11/2015
12/02/2015
- 09:03 AM Feature #2618 (Closed): add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- 08:35 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- The update was merged into task branch 2677a as revision 11046. 2677a is already in trunk.
I believe we can close th...
12/01/2015
- 06:16 PM Bug #2896: Close dynamically defined query when an underlying buffer is closed
- The discussion has started in #2819.
Last letter from Eric:
My understanding of your work so far is that you've f... - 06:13 PM Bug #2896 (New): Close dynamically defined query when an underlying buffer is closed
- 10:19 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Can we close this?
All the work with the code is done and merged to trunk. I just left this open... - 08:17 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Can we close this?
- 08:17 AM Feature #2618: add some buffer/query/temp-table attributes
- Can we close this?
11/25/2015
- 05:18 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Runtime main and ctrl-c regression testing passed. Server unit testing (full search, common search, system maintenanc...
- 10:49 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- > This is actually a useful side effect, as it provides a record of invalid validation expressions which have managed...
- 10:39 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- I'm going to call conversion regression testing passed. There are some differences in some frames' widget method name...
- 07:18 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Please provide a status update on your conversion and runtime regression testing.
Also, please write up a summary ... - 07:17 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Code Review Task branch 2692b Revision 10964
The changes are good. - 07:16 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Eric rebased task branch 2692b from P2J trunk revision 10952. The latest revision is now 10964.
11/24/2015
- 06:56 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Please rebase to trunk 10952.
11/23/2015
- 03:29 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- > > 3. I'm surprised that in @record_spec@, you did not exclude the fields in @except_list@.
> This was a bit compli... - 01:58 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 3. I'm surprised that in @record_spec@, you did not exclude the fields in @except_list@.
This wa... - 01:56 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 2. Please check if the @VALMSG@ can be an complex expression instead of a literal. In business l... - 01:17 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Any database field or lvalue can be inserted instead of the temp-table fields. The point is that these statements ar...
- 01:10 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- ...
- 01:09 PM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 6. The @set_or_update_or_prompt_for_stm@ case supports a non-record case where explicit fields ar...
11/22/2015
- 10:08 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- I've committed branch 2692b rev 10962 with some minor comment and formatting cleanups.
- 10:07 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Code Review Task Branch 2692b Revision 10961
This is really good work. It is very close to complete.
1. The @f...
11/19/2015
- 02:46 PM Bug #2514 (Closed): incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
- Sorry, I just came across this issue and realized I never reviewed this update separately. However, it seems this fix...
- 02:24 PM Bug #2456 (Closed): BUFFER-HANDLE attribute doesn't always work
- Just re-tested this -- I'm not sure in which revision it was fixed, but it works now.
11/18/2015
- 11:12 AM Feature #2692: table-level VALEXP/VALMSG support
- Improved support for ENABLE ALL is now in 2692b/10961. This is a release candidate which I am testing currently.
Also available in: Atom